Aegon N.V. PERP CAP SECS

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, BRK-A has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while BRK-A trades at $726,286.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas BRK-A's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to BRK-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is less volatile compared to BRK-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check BRK-A's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, BRK-B has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while BRK-B trades at $483.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas BRK-B's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to BRK-B's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is less volatile compared to BRK-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check BRK-B's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, AIG-PA has a market cap of 112.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while AIG-PA trades at $62.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas AIG-PA's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to AIG-PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is less volatile compared to AIG-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check AIG-PA's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, AEH has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while AEH trades at $25.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas AEH's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to AEH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AED is less volatile compared to AEH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check AEH's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, AEB has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while AEB trades at $25.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas AEB's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to AEB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AED is more volatile compared to AEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check AEB's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, AIG has a market cap of 46.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while AIG trades at $79.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas AIG's P/E ratio is 19.54. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to AIG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is less volatile compared to AIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check AIG's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, SLF has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while SLF trades at $62.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas SLF's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to SLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is less volatile compared to SLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check SLF's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, HIG has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while HIG trades at $121.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas HIG's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to HIG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is less volatile compared to HIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check HIG's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, HIG-PG has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while HIG-PG trades at $25.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas HIG-PG's P/E ratio is 3.42. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to HIG-PG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is more volatile compared to HIG-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check HIG-PG's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, ACGL has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while ACGL trades at $87.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas ACGL's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to ACGL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is less volatile compared to ACGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check ACGL's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, ACGLO has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while ACGLO trades at $20.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas ACGLO's P/E ratio is 4.39. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to ACGLO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is less volatile compared to ACGLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check ACGLO's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, ATH has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while ATH trades at $83.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas ATH's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to ATH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is less volatile compared to ATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check ATH's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, PFG has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while PFG trades at $80.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas PFG's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to PFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is less volatile compared to PFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check PFG's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, BNT has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while BNT trades at $67.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas BNT's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to BNT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is less volatile compared to BNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check BNT's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, EQH has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while EQH trades at $52.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas EQH's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to EQH's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is less volatile compared to EQH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check EQH's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, ACGLP has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while ACGLP trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas ACGLP's P/E ratio is 5.03. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to ACGLP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is more volatile compared to ACGLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check ACGLP's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, UNMA has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while UNMA trades at $23.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas UNMA's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to UNMA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is less volatile compared to UNMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check UNMA's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, AEG has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while AEG trades at $7.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas AEG's P/E ratio is 16.93. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to AEG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is less volatile compared to AEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check AEG's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, AIZN has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while AIZN trades at $19.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas AIZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to AIZN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is less volatile compared to AIZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check AIZN's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, ORI has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while ORI trades at $36.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas ORI's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to ORI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is less volatile compared to ORI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check ORI's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, ACGLN has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while ACGLN trades at $16.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas ACGLN's P/E ratio is 3.61. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to ACGLN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is more volatile compared to ACGLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check ACGLN's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, EQH-PA has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while EQH-PA trades at $20.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas EQH-PA's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to EQH-PA's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is less volatile compared to EQH-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check EQH-PA's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, ATH-PE has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while ATH-PE trades at $26.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas ATH-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to ATH-PE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is less volatile compared to ATH-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check ATH-PE's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, ESGRP has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while ESGRP trades at $20.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas ESGRP's P/E ratio is -13.72. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to ESGRP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is less volatile compared to ESGRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check ESGRP's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, ATH-PC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while ATH-PC trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas ATH-PC's P/E ratio is 3.14. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to ATH-PC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is more volatile compared to ATH-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check ATH-PC's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, EQH-PC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while EQH-PC trades at $16.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas EQH-PC's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to EQH-PC's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is less volatile compared to EQH-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check EQH-PC's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, ESGR has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while ESGR trades at $337.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas ESGR's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to ESGR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is more volatile compared to ESGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check ESGR's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, ATH-PA has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while ATH-PA trades at $24.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas ATH-PA's P/E ratio is 3.11. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to ATH-PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is less volatile compared to ATH-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check ATH-PA's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, ESGRO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while ESGRO trades at $19.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas ESGRO's P/E ratio is -12.87. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to ESGRO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is less volatile compared to ESGRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check ESGRO's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, ATH-PB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while ATH-PB trades at $19.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas ATH-PB's P/E ratio is 2.49. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to ATH-PB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is less volatile compared to ATH-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check ATH-PB's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, CNO-PA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while CNO-PA trades at $18.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas CNO-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to CNO-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is more volatile compared to CNO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check CNO-PA's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, ATH-PD has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while ATH-PD trades at $16.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas ATH-PD's P/E ratio is 2.12. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to ATH-PD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is less volatile compared to ATH-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check ATH-PD's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, GSHD has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while GSHD trades at $85.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas GSHD's P/E ratio is 76.86. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to GSHD's ROE of -1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is less volatile compared to GSHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check GSHD's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, RZC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while RZC trades at $25.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas RZC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to RZC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is less volatile compared to RZC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check RZC's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, FIHL has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while FIHL trades at $15.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas FIHL's P/E ratio is -173.33. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to FIHL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is less volatile compared to FIHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check FIHL's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, IGIC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while IGIC trades at $23.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas IGIC's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to IGIC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is less volatile compared to IGIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check IGIC's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, ARGD has a market cap of 737.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while ARGD trades at $21.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas ARGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to ARGD's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is more volatile compared to ARGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check ARGD's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, YB has a market cap of 208.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while YB trades at $26.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas YB's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to YB's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is less volatile compared to YB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check YB's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, WDH has a market cap of 74.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while WDH trades at $1.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas WDH's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to WDH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is less volatile compared to WDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check WDH's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, FGF has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while FGF trades at $20.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas FGF's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to FGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is less volatile compared to FGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check FGF's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, FGFPP has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while FGFPP trades at $17.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas FGFPP's P/E ratio is -6.73. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to FGFPP's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is less volatile compared to FGFPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check FGFPP's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, ANAT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while ANAT trades at $188.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas ANAT's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to ANAT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is less volatile compared to ANAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check ANAT's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, WTREP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while WTREP trades at $25.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas WTREP's P/E ratio is 1.35. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to WTREP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is more volatile compared to WTREP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check WTREP's competition here

AED plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AED stands at 52.2B. In comparison, IGICW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AED is priced at $25.52, while IGICW trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AED currently has a P/E ratio of 19.26, whereas IGICW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AED's ROE is N/A, compared to IGICW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AED is less volatile compared to IGICW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AED.Check IGICW's competition here