Aluminum Corporation of China Limited

ACH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACH stands at N/A. In comparison, CHHQY has a market cap of 123.64B. Regarding current trading prices, ACH is priced at $9.04, while CHHQY trades at $13.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.78, whereas CHHQY's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, ACH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CHHQY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ACH is more volatile compared to CHHQY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACH.

ACH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACH stands at N/A. In comparison, CHHQF has a market cap of 15.54B. Regarding current trading prices, ACH is priced at $9.04, while CHHQF trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.78, whereas CHHQF's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, ACH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CHHQF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ACH is more volatile compared to CHHQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACH.

ACH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACH stands at N/A. In comparison, ALMMF has a market cap of 13.85B. Regarding current trading prices, ACH is priced at $9.04, while ALMMF trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.78, whereas ALMMF's P/E ratio is 4.91. In terms of profitability, ACH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALMMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ACH is less volatile compared to ALMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACH.

ACH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACH stands at N/A. In comparison, ACHHY has a market cap of 11.22B. Regarding current trading prices, ACH is priced at $9.04, while ACHHY trades at $10.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.78, whereas ACHHY's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, ACH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ACHHY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACH is less volatile compared to ACHHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACH.

ACH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACH stands at N/A. In comparison, NHYKF has a market cap of 11.09B. Regarding current trading prices, ACH is priced at $9.04, while NHYKF trades at $5.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.78, whereas NHYKF's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, ACH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NHYKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACH is less volatile compared to NHYKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACH.

ACH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACH stands at N/A. In comparison, NHYDY has a market cap of 10.88B. Regarding current trading prices, ACH is priced at $9.04, while NHYDY trades at $5.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.78, whereas NHYDY's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, ACH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NHYDY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACH is less volatile compared to NHYDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACH.

ACH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACH stands at N/A. In comparison, AWCMY has a market cap of 10.71B. Regarding current trading prices, ACH is priced at $9.04, while AWCMY trades at $3.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.78, whereas AWCMY's P/E ratio is -17.57. In terms of profitability, ACH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AWCMY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACH is less volatile compared to AWCMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACH.

ACH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACH stands at N/A. In comparison, AA has a market cap of 6.71B. Regarding current trading prices, ACH is priced at $9.04, while AA trades at $25.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.78, whereas AA's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, ACH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ACH is less volatile compared to AA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACH.

ACH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACH stands at N/A. In comparison, AWCMF has a market cap of 3.22B. Regarding current trading prices, ACH is priced at $9.04, while AWCMF trades at $1.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.78, whereas AWCMF's P/E ratio is -22.20. In terms of profitability, ACH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AWCMF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACH is more volatile compared to AWCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACH.

ACH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACH stands at N/A. In comparison, CSTM has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, ACH is priced at $9.04, while CSTM trades at $11.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.78, whereas CSTM's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, ACH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CSTM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACH is less volatile compared to CSTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACH.

ACH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACH stands at N/A. In comparison, CENX has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, ACH is priced at $9.04, while CENX trades at $15.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.78, whereas CENX's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, ACH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CENX's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ACH is less volatile compared to CENX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACH.

ACH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACH stands at N/A. In comparison, KALU has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, ACH is priced at $9.04, while KALU trades at $67.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.78, whereas KALU's P/E ratio is 22.12. In terms of profitability, ACH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KALU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACH is less volatile compared to KALU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACH.

ACH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACH stands at N/A. In comparison, EORBF has a market cap of 91.71M. Regarding current trading prices, ACH is priced at $9.04, while EORBF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.78, whereas EORBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EORBF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACH is less volatile compared to EORBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACH.

ACH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACH stands at N/A. In comparison, BXRDF has a market cap of 10.01M. Regarding current trading prices, ACH is priced at $9.04, while BXRDF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.78, whereas BXRDF's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, ACH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BXRDF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACH is more volatile compared to BXRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACH.

ACH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACH stands at N/A. In comparison, AFML has a market cap of 7656.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACH is priced at $9.04, while AFML trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.78, whereas AFML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AFML's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACH is more volatile compared to AFML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACH.

ACH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACH stands at N/A. In comparison, NORNQ has a market cap of 7019.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACH is priced at $9.04, while NORNQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.78, whereas NORNQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NORNQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACH is less volatile compared to NORNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACH.

ACH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACH stands at N/A. In comparison, MNSF has a market cap of 1889.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACH is priced at $9.04, while MNSF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.78, whereas MNSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MNSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACH is more volatile compared to MNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACH.

ACH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACH stands at N/A. In comparison, ORMTQ has a market cap of 1866.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACH is priced at $9.04, while ORMTQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.78, whereas ORMTQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ORMTQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACH is less volatile compared to ORMTQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACH.

ACH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACH stands at N/A. In comparison, CHZHF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ACH is priced at $9.04, while CHZHF trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.78, whereas CHZHF's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, ACH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CHZHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACH is more volatile compared to CHZHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACH.

ACH plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACH stands at N/A. In comparison, UNRIF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ACH is priced at $9.04, while UNRIF trades at $0.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.78, whereas UNRIF's P/E ratio is 4.33. In terms of profitability, ACH's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UNRIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACH is more volatile compared to UNRIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACH.