AbraSilver Resource Corp.
AbraSilver Resource Corp. ABBRF Peers
See (ABBRF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABBRF | $4.16 | -2.78% | 543M | -37.73 | -$0.11 | N/A |
| AUXIF | $0.01 | +0.00% | 50.8B | 0.10 | $0.06 | N/A |
| FNLPF | $19.70 | -0.66% | 14.5B | 103.68 | $0.19 | +3.77% |
| ANGPY | $9.11 | -0.22% | 14.4B | 36.52 | $0.25 | +7.08% |
| IMPUF | $10.95 | +2.57% | 9.8B | -10.23 | -$1.07 | N/A |
| IMPUY | $10.71 | +0.66% | 9.6B | -10.00 | -$1.07 | N/A |
| OICT | $10.05 | +0.10% | 5.5B | -34.30 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| NMPNF | $11.00 | +0.00% | 4.2B | 5.83 | $1.89 | N/A |
| JINFF | $9.05 | +2.84% | 3.6B | 20.57 | $0.44 | +0.88% |
| GMINF | $13.21 | +2.13% | 3B | 25.45 | $0.52 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ABBRF vs AUXIF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, AUXIF has a market cap of 50.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while AUXIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas AUXIF's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to AUXIF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to AUXIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs FNLPF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, FNLPF has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while FNLPF trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas FNLPF's P/E ratio is 103.68. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to FNLPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to FNLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs ANGPY Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, ANGPY has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while ANGPY trades at $9.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas ANGPY's P/E ratio is 36.52. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ANGPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to ANGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs IMPUF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, IMPUF has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while IMPUF trades at $10.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas IMPUF's P/E ratio is -10.23. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to IMPUF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to IMPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs IMPUY Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, IMPUY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while IMPUY trades at $10.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas IMPUY's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to IMPUY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to IMPUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs OICT Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, OICT has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while OICT trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas OICT's P/E ratio is -34.30. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to OICT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to OICT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs NMPNF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, NMPNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while NMPNF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas NMPNF's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to NMPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to NMPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs JINFF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, JINFF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while JINFF trades at $9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas JINFF's P/E ratio is 20.57. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to JINFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to JINFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs GMINF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, GMINF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while GMINF trades at $13.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas GMINF's P/E ratio is 25.45. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to GMINF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to GMINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs POYYF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, POYYF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while POYYF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas POYYF's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to POYYF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to POYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs ZMPLF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, ZMPLF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while ZMPLF trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas ZMPLF's P/E ratio is 48.35. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ZMPLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to ZMPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs AUCOY Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, AUCOY has a market cap of 899.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while AUCOY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas AUCOY's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to AUCOY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to AUCOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs GLGDF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, GLGDF has a market cap of 539.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while GLGDF trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas GLGDF's P/E ratio is 165.00. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to GLGDF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to GLGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs TPRFF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, TPRFF has a market cap of 332M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while TPRFF trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas TPRFF's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to TPRFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to TPRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs GOTRF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, GOTRF has a market cap of 284.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while GOTRF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas GOTRF's P/E ratio is -8.75. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to GOTRF's ROE of -3.92%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to GOTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs SAPLF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, SAPLF has a market cap of 278.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while SAPLF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas SAPLF's P/E ratio is 26.75. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SAPLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to SAPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs BRVMF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, BRVMF has a market cap of 268.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while BRVMF trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas BRVMF's P/E ratio is -89.47. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to BRVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to BRVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs TIHRF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, TIHRF has a market cap of 245M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while TIHRF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas TIHRF's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to TIHRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to TIHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs SLVTF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, SLVTF has a market cap of 196.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while SLVTF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas SLVTF's P/E ratio is -47.80. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SLVTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to SLVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs PLLHF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, PLLHF has a market cap of 189.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while PLLHF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas PLLHF's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to PLLHF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to PLLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs BOCOF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, BOCOF has a market cap of 169.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while BOCOF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas BOCOF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to BOCOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to BOCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs IAUFF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, IAUFF has a market cap of 150.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while IAUFF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas IAUFF's P/E ratio is 10.45. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to IAUFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to IAUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs BKRRF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, BKRRF has a market cap of 137.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while BKRRF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas BKRRF's P/E ratio is -7.27. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to BKRRF's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to BKRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs SDRC Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, SDRC has a market cap of 121.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while SDRC trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas SDRC's P/E ratio is -324.04. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SDRC's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to SDRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs CTNXF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, CTNXF has a market cap of 105.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while CTNXF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas CTNXF's P/E ratio is -17.88. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to CTNXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to CTNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs HEGLF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, HEGLF has a market cap of 104.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while HEGLF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas HEGLF's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to HEGLF's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to HEGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs XANAF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, XANAF has a market cap of 103.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while XANAF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas XANAF's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to XANAF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to XANAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs ARRKF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, ARRKF has a market cap of 92.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while ARRKF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas ARRKF's P/E ratio is -25.93. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ARRKF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to ARRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs CHPGF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, CHPGF has a market cap of 87M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while CHPGF trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas CHPGF's P/E ratio is -45.27. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to CHPGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to CHPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs OCGSF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, OCGSF has a market cap of 84.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while OCGSF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas OCGSF's P/E ratio is -7.46. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to OCGSF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to OCGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs PAASF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, PAASF has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while PAASF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas PAASF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to PAASF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to PAASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs LUCRF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, LUCRF has a market cap of 80.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while LUCRF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas LUCRF's P/E ratio is 1.77. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to LUCRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to LUCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs VLMGF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, VLMGF has a market cap of 80.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while VLMGF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas VLMGF's P/E ratio is -72.18. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to VLMGF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to VLMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs EMPYF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, EMPYF has a market cap of 77.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while EMPYF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas EMPYF's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to EMPYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to EMPYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs INMNF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, INMNF has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while INMNF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas INMNF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to INMNF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to INMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs SMDRF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, SMDRF has a market cap of 73.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while SMDRF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas SMDRF's P/E ratio is -32.28. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SMDRF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to SMDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs CAPTF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, CAPTF has a market cap of 65.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while CAPTF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas CAPTF's P/E ratio is -33.24. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to CAPTF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to CAPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs PDLMF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, PDLMF has a market cap of 65.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while PDLMF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas PDLMF's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to PDLMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to PDLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs SSVFF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, SSVFF has a market cap of 63.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while SSVFF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas SSVFF's P/E ratio is -19.34. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SSVFF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to SSVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs DNCVF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, DNCVF has a market cap of 63.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while DNCVF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas DNCVF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to DNCVF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to DNCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs ORVMF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, ORVMF has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while ORVMF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas ORVMF's P/E ratio is 42.06. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ORVMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to ORVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs DYNR Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, DYNR has a market cap of 46.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while DYNR trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas DYNR's P/E ratio is -12.23. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to DYNR's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to DYNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs PDIV Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, PDIV has a market cap of 46.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while PDIV trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas PDIV's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to PDIV's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to PDIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs BRGC Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, BRGC has a market cap of 44.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while BRGC trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas BRGC's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to BRGC's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to BRGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs ADYRF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, ADYRF has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while ADYRF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas ADYRF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ADYRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to ADYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs SSVRF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, SSVRF has a market cap of 42.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while SSVRF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas SSVRF's P/E ratio is -35.29. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SSVRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to SSVRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs TSORF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, TSORF has a market cap of 41.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while TSORF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas TSORF's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to TSORF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to TSORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs EQMEF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, EQMEF has a market cap of 41.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while EQMEF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas EQMEF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to EQMEF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to EQMEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs KDKCF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, KDKCF has a market cap of 40.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while KDKCF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas KDKCF's P/E ratio is -15.57. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to KDKCF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to KDKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs ELRFF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, ELRFF has a market cap of 39.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while ELRFF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas ELRFF's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ELRFF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to ELRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs WAMFF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, WAMFF has a market cap of 39.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while WAMFF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas WAMFF's P/E ratio is -11.75. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to WAMFF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to WAMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs ACKRF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, ACKRF has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while ACKRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas ACKRF's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ACKRF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to ACKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs TEUTF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, TEUTF has a market cap of 36M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while TEUTF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas TEUTF's P/E ratio is -15.69. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to TEUTF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to TEUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs HMRRF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, HMRRF has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while HMRRF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas HMRRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to HMRRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to HMRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs FCSUF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, FCSUF has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while FCSUF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas FCSUF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to FCSUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to FCSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs BBBXF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, BBBXF has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while BBBXF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas BBBXF's P/E ratio is -6.23. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to BBBXF's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to BBBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs SCTSF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, SCTSF has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while SCTSF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas SCTSF's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SCTSF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to SCTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs TBXXF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, TBXXF has a market cap of 33.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while TBXXF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas TBXXF's P/E ratio is -4.14. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to TBXXF's ROE of -4.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to TBXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs SMOFF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, SMOFF has a market cap of 32.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while SMOFF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas SMOFF's P/E ratio is -13.56. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SMOFF's ROE of +22.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to SMOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs OKPRF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, OKPRF has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while OKPRF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas OKPRF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to OKPRF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to OKPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs NAUFF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, NAUFF has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while NAUFF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas NAUFF's P/E ratio is -9.34. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to NAUFF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to NAUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs MMNGF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, MMNGF has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while MMNGF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas MMNGF's P/E ratio is -17.48. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to MMNGF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to MMNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs ATEPF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, ATEPF has a market cap of 30.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while ATEPF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas ATEPF's P/E ratio is -15.22. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ATEPF's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to ATEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs VIPRF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, VIPRF has a market cap of 30.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while VIPRF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas VIPRF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to VIPRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to VIPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs TLSMF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, TLSMF has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while TLSMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas TLSMF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to TLSMF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to TLSMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs ACRG Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, ACRG has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while ACRG trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas ACRG's P/E ratio is -11.11. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ACRG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to ACRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs AGMRF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, AGMRF has a market cap of 28.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while AGMRF trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas AGMRF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to AGMRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to AGMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs AGLDF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, AGLDF has a market cap of 28.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while AGLDF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas AGLDF's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to AGLDF's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to AGLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs VTXXF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, VTXXF has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while VTXXF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas VTXXF's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to VTXXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to VTXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs NHAWF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, NHAWF has a market cap of 28M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while NHAWF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas NHAWF's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to NHAWF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to NHAWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs DNRSF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, DNRSF has a market cap of 26.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while DNRSF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas DNRSF's P/E ratio is -2.66. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to DNRSF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to DNRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs WEXPF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, WEXPF has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while WEXPF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas WEXPF's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to WEXPF's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to WEXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs GLDRF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, GLDRF has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while GLDRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas GLDRF's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to GLDRF's ROE of -17.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to GLDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs SHGDF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, SHGDF has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while SHGDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas SHGDF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SHGDF's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to SHGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs GBRRF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, GBRRF has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while GBRRF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas GBRRF's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to GBRRF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to GBRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs GSMGF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, GSMGF has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while GSMGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas GSMGF's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to GSMGF's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to GSMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs SILS Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, SILS has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while SILS trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas SILS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SILS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to SILS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs MRZLF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, MRZLF has a market cap of 22.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while MRZLF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas MRZLF's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to MRZLF's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to MRZLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs LGCXF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, LGCXF has a market cap of 21.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while LGCXF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas LGCXF's P/E ratio is -7.64. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to LGCXF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to LGCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs PNTRF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, PNTRF has a market cap of 21.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while PNTRF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas PNTRF's P/E ratio is -37.97. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to PNTRF's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to PNTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs AUCUF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, AUCUF has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while AUCUF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas AUCUF's P/E ratio is -9.25. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to AUCUF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to AUCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs URVNF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, URVNF has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while URVNF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas URVNF's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to URVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to URVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs CTMCF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, CTMCF has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while CTMCF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas CTMCF's P/E ratio is -5.94. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to CTMCF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to CTMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs KGFMF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, KGFMF has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while KGFMF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas KGFMF's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to KGFMF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to KGFMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs RKHNF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, RKHNF has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while RKHNF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas RKHNF's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to RKHNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to RKHNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs PVGDF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, PVGDF has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while PVGDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas PVGDF's P/E ratio is -14.46. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to PVGDF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to PVGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs HGLD Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, HGLD has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while HGLD trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas HGLD's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to HGLD's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to HGLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs MERG Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, MERG has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while MERG trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas MERG's P/E ratio is -5.66. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to MERG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to MERG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs THMG Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, THMG has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while THMG trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas THMG's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to THMG's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to THMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs EMPPF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, EMPPF has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while EMPPF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas EMPPF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to EMPPF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to EMPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs SBMCF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, SBMCF has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while SBMCF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas SBMCF's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SBMCF's ROE of +8.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to SBMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs VOYRF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, VOYRF has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while VOYRF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas VOYRF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to VOYRF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to VOYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs CJIMF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, CJIMF has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while CJIMF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas CJIMF's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to CJIMF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to CJIMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs AUSVF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, AUSVF has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while AUSVF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas AUSVF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to AUSVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to AUSVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs SEKZF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, SEKZF has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while SEKZF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas SEKZF's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SEKZF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to SEKZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs FREDF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, FREDF has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while FREDF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas FREDF's P/E ratio is -5.77. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to FREDF's ROE of +10.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to FREDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs ASLRF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, ASLRF has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while ASLRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas ASLRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ASLRF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to ASLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs SUNPF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, SUNPF has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while SUNPF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas SUNPF's P/E ratio is -8.58. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SUNPF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is more volatile compared to SUNPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.
ABBRF vs PGLDF Comparison
ABBRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABBRF stands at 543M. In comparison, PGLDF has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ABBRF is priced at $4.16, while PGLDF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABBRF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.73, whereas PGLDF's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, ABBRF's ROE is -0.86%, compared to PGLDF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ABBRF is less volatile compared to PGLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABBRF.