All American Pet Company, Inc.
All American Pet Company, Inc. (AAPT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AAPT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Shell Companies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAPT | $0.00 | +9900.00% | 17.3M | -0.01 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| QMIS | $0.25 | +0.00% | 30.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| GSHN | $22.70 | +2.71% | 9.3B | -2270.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| KATX | $1.05 | +0.00% | 1.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CCYC | $11.25 | +0.00% | 1.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ZSYC | $2.00 | +0.00% | 1B | -2.12 | -$0.95 | N/A |
| WPCBF | $0.00 | +100.00% | 700.3M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NOTR | $13.00 | +0.00% | 570.9M | -433.33 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| WCHS | $5.01 | +0.00% | 531.9M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FZRO | $2.00 | N/A | 346.2M | -0.00 | -$4,243,300.50 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AAPT vs QMIS Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, QMIS has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while QMIS trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas QMIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to QMIS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and QMIS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QMIS's competition here
AAPT vs GSHN Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, GSHN has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while GSHN trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GSHN's P/E ratio is -2270.00. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to GSHN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and GSHN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GSHN's competition here
AAPT vs KATX Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, KATX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while KATX trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KATX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to KATX's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to KATX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check KATX's competition here
AAPT vs CCYC Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, CCYC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while CCYC trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CCYC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CCYC's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and CCYC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CCYC's competition here
AAPT vs ZSYC Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, ZSYC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while ZSYC trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ZSYC's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ZSYC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to ZSYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check ZSYC's competition here
AAPT vs WPCBF Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, WPCBF has a market cap of 700.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while WPCBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WPCBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to WPCBF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and WPCBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WPCBF's competition here
AAPT vs NOTR Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, NOTR has a market cap of 570.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while NOTR trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NOTR's P/E ratio is -433.33. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to NOTR's ROE of -65.90%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to NOTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check NOTR's competition here
AAPT vs WCHS Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, WCHS has a market cap of 531.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while WCHS trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WCHS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to WCHS's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to WCHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check WCHS's competition here
AAPT vs FZRO Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, FZRO has a market cap of 346.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while FZRO trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FZRO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to FZRO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and FZRO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FZRO's competition here
AAPT vs RGLG Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, RGLG has a market cap of 342.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while RGLG trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RGLG's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to RGLG's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to RGLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check RGLG's competition here
AAPT vs CINV Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, CINV has a market cap of 338.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while CINV trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CINV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CINV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and CINV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CINV's competition here
AAPT vs DVTC Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, DVTC has a market cap of 272.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while DVTC trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DVTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to DVTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and DVTC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DVTC's competition here
AAPT vs AMRR Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, AMRR has a market cap of 250.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while AMRR trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AMRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to AMRR's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and AMRR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMRR's competition here
AAPT vs ADCV Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, ADCV has a market cap of 219.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while ADCV trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ADCV's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ADCV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and ADCV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADCV's competition here
AAPT vs KAST Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, KAST has a market cap of 164.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while KAST trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KAST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to KAST's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to KAST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check KAST's competition here
AAPT vs SCGX Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, SCGX has a market cap of 138M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while SCGX trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SCGX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SCGX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to SCGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check SCGX's competition here
AAPT vs TGLO Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, TGLO has a market cap of 120.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while TGLO trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TGLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to TGLO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to TGLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check TGLO's competition here
AAPT vs AWCA Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, AWCA has a market cap of 119.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while AWCA trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AWCA's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to AWCA's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and AWCA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AWCA's competition here
AAPT vs AOAO Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, AOAO has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while AOAO trades at $10.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AOAO's P/E ratio is -11.07. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to AOAO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to AOAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check AOAO's competition here
AAPT vs TRFE Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, TRFE has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while TRFE trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TRFE's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to TRFE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and TRFE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TRFE's competition here
AAPT vs NMTT Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, NMTT has a market cap of 90.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while NMTT trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NMTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to NMTT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and NMTT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NMTT's competition here
AAPT vs RMGCF Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, RMGCF has a market cap of 89.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while RMGCF trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RMGCF's P/E ratio is -14.41. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to RMGCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to RMGCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check RMGCF's competition here
AAPT vs WAYS Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, WAYS has a market cap of 86.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while WAYS trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WAYS's P/E ratio is -49.72. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to WAYS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and WAYS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WAYS's competition here
AAPT vs ATAQF Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, ATAQF has a market cap of 82.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while ATAQF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ATAQF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ATAQF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to ATAQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check ATAQF's competition here
AAPT vs WWHC Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, WWHC has a market cap of 80.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while WWHC trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WWHC's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to WWHC's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and WWHC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WWHC's competition here
AAPT vs XTPT Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, XTPT has a market cap of 79M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while XTPT trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas XTPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to XTPT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to XTPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check XTPT's competition here
AAPT vs CHAAW Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, CHAAW has a market cap of 77.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while CHAAW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CHAAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CHAAW's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and CHAAW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHAAW's competition here
AAPT vs CREEF Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, CREEF has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while CREEF trades at $10.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CREEF's P/E ratio is 36.47. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CREEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to CREEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check CREEF's competition here
AAPT vs CMCAF Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, CMCAF has a market cap of 67.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while CMCAF trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CMCAF's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CMCAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and CMCAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMCAF's competition here
AAPT vs GWIN Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, GWIN has a market cap of 66.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while GWIN trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GWIN's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to GWIN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and GWIN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GWIN's competition here
AAPT vs AASP Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, AASP has a market cap of 61.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while AASP trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AASP's P/E ratio is -21.72. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to AASP's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to AASP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check AASP's competition here
AAPT vs IDIG Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, IDIG has a market cap of 60.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while IDIG trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IDIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to IDIG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and IDIG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IDIG's competition here
AAPT vs CAHO Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, CAHO has a market cap of 59.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while CAHO trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CAHO's P/E ratio is -80.00. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CAHO's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to CAHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check CAHO's competition here
AAPT vs PTCP Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, PTCP has a market cap of 56.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while PTCP trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PTCP's P/E ratio is -27.78. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to PTCP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and PTCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTCP's competition here
AAPT vs ATMS Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, ATMS has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while ATMS trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ATMS's P/E ratio is -8.30. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ATMS's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and ATMS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATMS's competition here
AAPT vs GGAAF Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, GGAAF has a market cap of 50.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while GGAAF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GGAAF's P/E ratio is -133.33. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to GGAAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to GGAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check GGAAF's competition here
AAPT vs FCGD Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, FCGD has a market cap of 48.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while FCGD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FCGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to FCGD's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and FCGD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FCGD's competition here
AAPT vs JMTM Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, JMTM has a market cap of 48M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while JMTM trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas JMTM's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to JMTM's ROE of +4.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to JMTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check JMTM's competition here
AAPT vs KWAC Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, KWAC has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while KWAC trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KWAC's P/E ratio is -23.75. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to KWAC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and KWAC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KWAC's competition here
AAPT vs KWACW Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, KWACW has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while KWACW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KWACW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to KWACW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and KWACW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KWACW's competition here
AAPT vs USCTF Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, USCTF has a market cap of 44.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while USCTF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas USCTF's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to USCTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and USCTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check USCTF's competition here
AAPT vs ATMH Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, ATMH has a market cap of 42.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while ATMH trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ATMH's P/E ratio is -7.90. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ATMH's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to ATMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check ATMH's competition here
AAPT vs PMVCW Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, PMVCW has a market cap of 41.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while PMVCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PMVCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to PMVCW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and PMVCW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PMVCW's competition here
AAPT vs MDWK Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, MDWK has a market cap of 39.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while MDWK trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MDWK's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to MDWK's ROE of -1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and MDWK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MDWK's competition here
AAPT vs WBQNL Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, WBQNL has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while WBQNL trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WBQNL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to WBQNL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and WBQNL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WBQNL's competition here
AAPT vs CNXX Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, CNXX has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while CNXX trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CNXX's P/E ratio is -8.76. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CNXX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to CNXX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check CNXX's competition here
AAPT vs AVNI Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, AVNI has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while AVNI trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AVNI's P/E ratio is -31.10. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to AVNI's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and AVNI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AVNI's competition here
AAPT vs PSCO Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, PSCO has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while PSCO trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PSCO's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to PSCO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and PSCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PSCO's competition here
AAPT vs IVME Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, IVME has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while IVME trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IVME's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to IVME's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to IVME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check IVME's competition here
AAPT vs ACBD Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, ACBD has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while ACBD trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ACBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ACBD's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to ACBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check ACBD's competition here
AAPT vs NPFC Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, NPFC has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while NPFC trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NPFC's P/E ratio is -17.86. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to NPFC's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and NPFC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NPFC's competition here
AAPT vs CRSQ Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, CRSQ has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while CRSQ trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CRSQ's P/E ratio is -250.75. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CRSQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to CRSQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check CRSQ's competition here
AAPT vs CBBB Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, CBBB has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while CBBB trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CBBB's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CBBB's ROE of +10.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to CBBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check CBBB's competition here
AAPT vs EVTK Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, EVTK has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while EVTK trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EVTK's P/E ratio is -402.00. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to EVTK's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to EVTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check EVTK's competition here
AAPT vs GTVI Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, GTVI has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while GTVI trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GTVI's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to GTVI's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and GTVI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GTVI's competition here
AAPT vs ECGR Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, ECGR has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while ECGR trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ECGR's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ECGR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to ECGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check ECGR's competition here
AAPT vs USBL Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, USBL has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while USBL trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas USBL's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to USBL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to USBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check USBL's competition here
AAPT vs PCMC Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, PCMC has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while PCMC trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PCMC's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to PCMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and PCMC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PCMC's competition here
AAPT vs SLTN Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, SLTN has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while SLTN trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SLTN's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SLTN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and SLTN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SLTN's competition here
AAPT vs WRPT Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, WRPT has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while WRPT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WRPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to WRPT's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and WRPT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WRPT's competition here
AAPT vs TCRI Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, TCRI has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while TCRI trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TCRI's P/E ratio is -15.90. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to TCRI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to TCRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check TCRI's competition here
AAPT vs ELLH Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, ELLH has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while ELLH trades at $13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ELLH's P/E ratio is -4.04. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ELLH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to ELLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check ELLH's competition here
AAPT vs AZRH Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, AZRH has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while AZRH trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AZRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to AZRH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and AZRH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZRH's competition here
AAPT vs SIPN Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, SIPN has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while SIPN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SIPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SIPN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to SIPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check SIPN's competition here
AAPT vs STLY Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, STLY has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while STLY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas STLY's P/E ratio is -20.83. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to STLY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to STLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check STLY's competition here
AAPT vs NHICW Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, NHICW has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while NHICW trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NHICW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to NHICW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to NHICW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check NHICW's competition here
AAPT vs LWLW Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, LWLW has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while LWLW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LWLW's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to LWLW's ROE of -3.87%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and LWLW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LWLW's competition here
AAPT vs LNMG Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, LNMG has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while LNMG trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LNMG's P/E ratio is 1.56. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to LNMG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and LNMG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LNMG's competition here
AAPT vs GRNL Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, GRNL has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while GRNL trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GRNL's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to GRNL's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to GRNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check GRNL's competition here
AAPT vs BOREF Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, BOREF has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while BOREF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BOREF's P/E ratio is -17.22. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to BOREF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and BOREF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BOREF's competition here
AAPT vs ITRX Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, ITRX has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while ITRX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ITRX's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ITRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and ITRX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ITRX's competition here
AAPT vs XCPT Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, XCPT has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while XCPT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas XCPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to XCPT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and XCPT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XCPT's competition here
AAPT vs XITO Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, XITO has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while XITO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas XITO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to XITO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to XITO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check XITO's competition here
AAPT vs SSHT Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, SSHT has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while SSHT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SSHT's P/E ratio is -5.74. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SSHT's ROE of +1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to SSHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check SSHT's competition here
AAPT vs BDCM Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, BDCM has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while BDCM trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BDCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to BDCM's ROE of +20.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to BDCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check BDCM's competition here
AAPT vs NGRC Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, NGRC has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while NGRC trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NGRC's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to NGRC's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and NGRC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NGRC's competition here
AAPT vs CHYL Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, CHYL has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while CHYL trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CHYL's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CHYL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to CHYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check CHYL's competition here
AAPT vs ADHI Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, ADHI has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while ADHI trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ADHI's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ADHI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to ADHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check ADHI's competition here
AAPT vs SITS Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, SITS has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while SITS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SITS's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SITS's ROE of -3.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to SITS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check SITS's competition here
AAPT vs NRCD Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, NRCD has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while NRCD trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NRCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to NRCD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to NRCD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check NRCD's competition here
AAPT vs WHLT Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, WHLT has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while WHLT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WHLT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to WHLT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to WHLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check WHLT's competition here
AAPT vs GIPL Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, GIPL has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while GIPL trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GIPL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to GIPL's ROE of +3391.74%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and GIPL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GIPL's competition here
AAPT vs FUNR Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, FUNR has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while FUNR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FUNR's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to FUNR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to FUNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check FUNR's competition here
AAPT vs ASNB Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, ASNB has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while ASNB trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ASNB's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ASNB's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to ASNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check ASNB's competition here
AAPT vs MTRI Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, MTRI has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while MTRI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MTRI's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to MTRI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to MTRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check MTRI's competition here
AAPT vs AGSS Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, AGSS has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while AGSS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AGSS's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to AGSS's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to AGSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check AGSS's competition here
AAPT vs PLPL Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, PLPL has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while PLPL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PLPL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to PLPL's ROE of +17.88%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and PLPL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PLPL's competition here
AAPT vs NXMH Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, NXMH has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while NXMH trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NXMH's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to NXMH's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to NXMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check NXMH's competition here
AAPT vs FORW Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, FORW has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while FORW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FORW's P/E ratio is -7.30. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to FORW's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to FORW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check FORW's competition here
AAPT vs FWFW Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, FWFW has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while FWFW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FWFW's P/E ratio is 1.08. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to FWFW's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to FWFW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check FWFW's competition here
AAPT vs ETER Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, ETER has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while ETER trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ETER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ETER's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to ETER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check ETER's competition here
AAPT vs CDBT Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, CDBT has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while CDBT trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CDBT's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CDBT's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to CDBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check CDBT's competition here
AAPT vs HKBT Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, HKBT has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while HKBT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HKBT's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to HKBT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to HKBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check HKBT's competition here
AAPT vs XSVT Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, XSVT has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while XSVT trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas XSVT's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to XSVT's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and XSVT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XSVT's competition here
AAPT vs GDVM Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, GDVM has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while GDVM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GDVM's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to GDVM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to GDVM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check GDVM's competition here
AAPT vs HPIL Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, HPIL has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while HPIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HPIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to HPIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and HPIL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HPIL's competition here
AAPT vs LRGR Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, LRGR has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while LRGR trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LRGR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to LRGR's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and LRGR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LRGR's competition here
AAPT vs ENGA Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, ENGA has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while ENGA trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ENGA's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ENGA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT and ENGA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ENGA's competition here
AAPT vs INOQ Comparison August 2025
AAPT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPT stands at 17.3M. In comparison, INOQ has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPT is priced at $0.00, while INOQ trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas INOQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPT's ROE is +0.64%, compared to INOQ's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPT is less volatile compared to INOQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPT.Check INOQ's competition here