AAP, Inc.
AAP, Inc. AAPJ Peers
See (AAPJ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAPJ | $0.00 | +0.00% | 178K | -0.01 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| ERIXF | $9.00 | N/A | 27.6B | 180.00 | $0.05 | +3.03% |
| NOKBF | $5.21 | N/A | 27.3B | 20.84 | $0.25 | +3.10% |
| ZTCOF | $2.86 | N/A | 20B | 11.92 | $0.24 | +6.35% |
| AACAY | $4.82 | N/A | 5.7B | 22.95 | $0.21 | +0.27% |
| AACAF | $4.75 | N/A | 5.6B | 22.62 | $0.21 | +0.98% |
| ETCMY | $1.01 | +2.02% | 1.9B | -1.74 | -$0.58 | N/A |
| HMNKF | $36.65 | N/A | 1.8B | 55.53 | $0.66 | N/A |
| VTKLY | $6.46 | N/A | 1.6B | 10.42 | $0.62 | +9.53% |
| VTKLF | $5.81 | N/A | 1.5B | 9.37 | $0.62 | +11.18% |
Stock Comparison
AAPJ vs ERIXF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, ERIXF has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while ERIXF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ERIXF's P/E ratio is 180.00. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ERIXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to ERIXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs NOKBF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, NOKBF has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while NOKBF trades at $5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NOKBF's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NOKBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to NOKBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs ZTCOF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, ZTCOF has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while ZTCOF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ZTCOF's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZTCOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to ZTCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs AACAY Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, AACAY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while AACAY trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AACAY's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AACAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to AACAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs AACAF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, AACAF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while AACAF trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AACAF's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AACAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to AACAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs ETCMY Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, ETCMY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while ETCMY trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ETCMY's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ETCMY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to ETCMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs HMNKF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, HMNKF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while HMNKF trades at $36.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HMNKF's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HMNKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ and HMNKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AAPJ vs VTKLY Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, VTKLY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while VTKLY trades at $6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VTKLY's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VTKLY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to VTKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs VTKLF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, VTKLF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while VTKLF trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VTKLF's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VTKLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to VTKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs FXCNF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, FXCNF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while FXCNF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FXCNF's P/E ratio is -41.67. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FXCNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to FXCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs YZOFF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, YZOFF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while YZOFF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas YZOFF's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to YZOFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to YZOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs HTCKF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, HTCKF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while HTCKF trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HTCKF's P/E ratio is -14.13. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HTCKF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ and HTCKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AAPJ vs ADVOF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, ADVOF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while ADVOF trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ADVOF's P/E ratio is -40.88. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ADVOF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to ADVOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs EUTLF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, EUTLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while EUTLF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EUTLF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EUTLF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to EUTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs FXCNY Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, FXCNY has a market cap of 877.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while FXCNY trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FXCNY's P/E ratio is -41.35. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FXCNY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to FXCNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs UBLXF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, UBLXF has a market cap of 823.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while UBLXF trades at $109.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas UBLXF's P/E ratio is -7.52. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to UBLXF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to UBLXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs COBJF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, COBJF has a market cap of 702.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while COBJF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas COBJF's P/E ratio is -7.59. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to COBJF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to COBJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs EVTZF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, EVTZF has a market cap of 642.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while EVTZF trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EVTZF's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EVTZF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to EVTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs OKIEF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, OKIEF has a market cap of 577.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while OKIEF trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OKIEF's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OKIEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to OKIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs EVSBY Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, EVSBY has a market cap of 554.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while EVSBY trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EVSBY's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EVSBY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to EVSBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs OKIEY Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, OKIEY has a market cap of 528.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while OKIEY trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OKIEY's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OKIEY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to OKIEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs SATOF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, SATOF has a market cap of 465.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while SATOF trades at $14.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SATOF's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SATOF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ and SATOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AAPJ vs FLTCF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, FLTCF has a market cap of 361.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while FLTCF trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FLTCF's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FLTCF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to FLTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs PAOTF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, PAOTF has a market cap of 279.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while PAOTF trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PAOTF's P/E ratio is -12.30. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PAOTF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to PAOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs VNWTF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, VNWTF has a market cap of 173.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while VNWTF trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VNWTF's P/E ratio is 64.82. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VNWTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to VNWTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs QTRHF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, QTRHF has a market cap of 120.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while QTRHF trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas QTRHF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QTRHF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to QTRHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs ATSKF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, ATSKF has a market cap of 93.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while ATSKF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ATSKF's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ATSKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to ATSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs NPNZF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, NPNZF has a market cap of 92.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while NPNZF trades at $8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NPNZF's P/E ratio is -11.23. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NPNZF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ and NPNZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AAPJ vs BEWFF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, BEWFF has a market cap of 48.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while BEWFF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BEWFF's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BEWFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ and BEWFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AAPJ vs ELSLF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, ELSLF has a market cap of 48.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while ELSLF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ELSLF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ELSLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ and ELSLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AAPJ vs ASROF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, ASROF has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while ASROF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ASROF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ASROF's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ and ASROF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AAPJ vs BYLTF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, BYLTF has a market cap of 30.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while BYLTF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BYLTF's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BYLTF's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to BYLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs WSTL Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, WSTL has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while WSTL trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WSTL's P/E ratio is -8.84. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WSTL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to WSTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs CYSNF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, CYSNF has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while CYSNF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CYSNF's P/E ratio is -68.00. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CYSNF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to CYSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs SIMTF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, SIMTF has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while SIMTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SIMTF's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SIMTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ and SIMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AAPJ vs ENAFF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, ENAFF has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while ENAFF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ENAFF's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ENAFF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to ENAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs MILOF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, MILOF has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while MILOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MILOF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MILOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ and MILOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AAPJ vs ATGN Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, ATGN has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while ATGN trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ATGN's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ATGN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to ATGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs KPIFF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, KPIFF has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while KPIFF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KPIFF's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KPIFF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to KPIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs CYCA Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, CYCA has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while CYCA trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CYCA's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CYCA's ROE of +5.72%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to CYCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs LTCCF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, LTCCF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while LTCCF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LTCCF's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LTCCF's ROE of +8.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ and LTCCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AAPJ vs VMNT Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, VMNT has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while VMNT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VMNT's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VMNT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to VMNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs MOYFF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, MOYFF has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while MOYFF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MOYFF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MOYFF's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to MOYFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs ISEYF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, ISEYF has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while ISEYF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ISEYF's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ISEYF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to ISEYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs STRH Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, STRH has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while STRH trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas STRH's P/E ratio is -6.65. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STRH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to STRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs HPNN Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, HPNN has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while HPNN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HPNN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HPNN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to HPNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs TTLTF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, TTLTF has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while TTLTF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TTLTF's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TTLTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to TTLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs WLAN Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, WLAN has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while WLAN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WLAN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WLAN's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to WLAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs NRRWF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, NRRWF has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while NRRWF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NRRWF's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NRRWF's ROE of -8.90%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to NRRWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs NVRVF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, NVRVF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while NVRVF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NVRVF's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NVRVF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ and NVRVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AAPJ vs LMGR Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, LMGR has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while LMGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LMGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LMGR's ROE of +93.87%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to LMGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs CNTFY Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, CNTFY has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while CNTFY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CNTFY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CNTFY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ and CNTFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AAPJ vs MFCO Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, MFCO has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while MFCO trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MFCO's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MFCO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to MFCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs TPTW Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, TPTW has a market cap of 735.7K. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while TPTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TPTW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TPTW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ and TPTW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AAPJ vs BDRL Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, BDRL has a market cap of 534.7K. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while BDRL trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BDRL's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BDRL's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to BDRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs ATCLF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, ATCLF has a market cap of 493.5K. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while ATCLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ATCLF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ATCLF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ and ATCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AAPJ vs MLRT Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, MLRT has a market cap of 478.6K. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while MLRT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MLRT's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MLRT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to MLRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs CRMK Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, CRMK has a market cap of 441.4K. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while CRMK trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CRMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CRMK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to CRMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs AXBSF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, AXBSF has a market cap of 425.9K. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while AXBSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AXBSF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AXBSF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to AXBSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs ELST Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, ELST has a market cap of 395.7K. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while ELST trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ELST's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ELST's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ and ELST have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AAPJ vs WGNR Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, WGNR has a market cap of 276.9K. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while WGNR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WGNR's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WGNR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ and WGNR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AAPJ vs BKSD Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, BKSD has a market cap of 273.9K. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while BKSD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BKSD's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BKSD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ and BKSD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AAPJ vs CAMPQ Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, CAMPQ has a market cap of 120.6K. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while CAMPQ trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CAMPQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CAMPQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to CAMPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs VCTY Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, VCTY has a market cap of 95.9K. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while VCTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VCTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VCTY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to VCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs ERFB Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, ERFB has a market cap of 84.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while ERFB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ERFB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ERFB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ and ERFB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AAPJ vs PDXP Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, PDXP has a market cap of 81.7K. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while PDXP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PDXP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PDXP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to PDXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs EZEN Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, EZEN has a market cap of 72.6K. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while EZEN trades at $3,300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EZEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EZEN's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. AAPJ has daily volatility of 0.00 and EZEN has daily volatility of N/A.
AAPJ vs PMOZ Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, PMOZ has a market cap of 68.2K. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while PMOZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PMOZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PMOZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ and PMOZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AAPJ vs CRLI Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, CRLI has a market cap of 60.5K. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while CRLI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CRLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CRLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ and CRLI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AAPJ vs ETCIA Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, ETCIA has a market cap of 55.2K. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while ETCIA trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ETCIA's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ETCIA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ and ETCIA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AAPJ vs IPTK Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, IPTK has a market cap of 28.7K. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while IPTK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IPTK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IPTK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to IPTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs FBCE Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, FBCE has a market cap of 10K. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while FBCE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FBCE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FBCE's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to FBCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs OTOW Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, OTOW has a market cap of 8.8K. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while OTOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OTOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OTOW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ and OTOW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AAPJ vs UTRK Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, UTRK has a market cap of 5.9K. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while UTRK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas UTRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to UTRK's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to UTRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs LTTC Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, LTTC has a market cap of 4.8K. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while LTTC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LTTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LTTC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to LTTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs JUMT Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, JUMT has a market cap of 4.6K. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while JUMT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas JUMT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JUMT's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to JUMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs AVSR Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, AVSR has a market cap of 4.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while AVSR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AVSR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AVSR's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ and AVSR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AAPJ vs MPEG Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, MPEG has a market cap of 3.8K. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while MPEG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MPEG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MPEG's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ and MPEG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AAPJ vs WIRX Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, WIRX has a market cap of 3.5K. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while WIRX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WIRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WIRX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to WIRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs CYBD Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, CYBD has a market cap of 3.4K. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while CYBD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CYBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CYBD's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ and CYBD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AAPJ vs VRCM Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, VRCM has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while VRCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VRCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VRCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to VRCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs IZNN Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, IZNN has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while IZNN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IZNN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IZNN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to IZNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs PRXM Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, PRXM has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while PRXM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PRXM's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PRXM's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ and PRXM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AAPJ vs RPDT Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, RPDT has a market cap of 2.2K. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while RPDT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RPDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RPDT's ROE of +3.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to RPDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs XCOMQ Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, XCOMQ has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while XCOMQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas XCOMQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to XCOMQ's ROE of +2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to XCOMQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs RITT Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, RITT has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while RITT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RITT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RITT's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to RITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs ZSTN Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, ZSTN has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while ZSTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ZSTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZSTN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to ZSTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs ABILF Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, ABILF has a market cap of 799. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while ABILF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ABILF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ABILF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ and ABILF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AAPJ vs GNRD Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, GNRD has a market cap of 353. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while GNRD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GNRD's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GNRD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ and GNRD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AAPJ vs ZTNO Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, ZTNO has a market cap of 301. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while ZTNO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ZTNO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZTNO's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to ZTNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs ORSX Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, ORSX has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while ORSX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ORSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ORSX's ROE of -2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to ORSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs TCCO Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, TCCO has a market cap of 185. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while TCCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TCCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TCCO's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ and TCCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AAPJ vs HDIH Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, HDIH has a market cap of 45. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while HDIH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HDIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HDIH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ and HDIH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AAPJ vs LMSC Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, LMSC has a market cap of 31. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while LMSC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LMSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LMSC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ and LMSC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AAPJ vs STCI Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, STCI has a market cap of 20. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while STCI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas STCI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STCI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ and STCI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AAPJ vs BETW Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, BETW has a market cap of 3. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while BETW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BETW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BETW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to BETW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs DGIV Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, DGIV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while DGIV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DGIV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ is less volatile compared to DGIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AAPJ.
AAPJ vs AXCP Comparison
AAPJ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AAPJ stands at 178K. In comparison, AXCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AAPJ is priced at $0.00, while AXCP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AAPJ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AXCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AAPJ's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AXCP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AAPJ and AXCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).