Shokubun Co., Ltd.
Shokubun Co., Ltd. (9969.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (9969.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9969.T | ¥242.00 | +0.00% | 3.7B | 49.19 | ¥4.92 | +0.83% |
| 7550.T | ¥8,876.00 | -6.07% | 1.4T | 38.57 | ¥230.12 | +0.79% |
| 2702.T | ¥8,470.00 | -1.28% | 1.1T | 33.24 | ¥254.83 | +0.53% |
| 3563.T | ¥9,394.00 | -2.49% | 1.1T | 46.90 | ¥200.28 | +0.37% |
| 3197.T | ¥3,301.00 | -3.03% | 751B | 44.89 | ¥73.53 | +0.58% |
| 3397.T | ¥4,366.00 | -2.98% | 383.6B | 82.92 | ¥52.65 | +0.25% |
| 3387.T | ¥767.00 | -2.91% | 322.9B | 57.63 | ¥13.31 | +0.55% |
| 7581.T | ¥5,820.00 | -13.65% | 285.9B | 25.70 | ¥226.46 | +0.52% |
| 3350.T | ¥307.00 | -3.15% | 222.3B | -2.34 | -¥131.33 | N/A |
| 9861.T | ¥3,356.00 | -2.27% | 217.2B | 51.17 | ¥65.59 | +0.66% |
Stock Comparison
9969.T vs 7550.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 7550.T has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 7550.T trades at ¥8,876.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 7550.T's P/E ratio is 38.57. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7550.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 7550.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 7550.T's competition here
9969.T vs 2702.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 2702.T has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 2702.T trades at ¥8,470.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 2702.T's P/E ratio is 33.24. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2702.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 2702.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 2702.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3563.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3563.T has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3563.T trades at ¥9,394.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3563.T's P/E ratio is 46.90. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3563.T's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 3563.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3563.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3197.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3197.T has a market cap of 751B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3197.T trades at ¥3,301.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3197.T's P/E ratio is 44.89. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3197.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 3197.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3197.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3397.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3397.T has a market cap of 383.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3397.T trades at ¥4,366.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3397.T's P/E ratio is 82.92. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3397.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 3397.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3397.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3387.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3387.T has a market cap of 322.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3387.T trades at ¥767.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3387.T's P/E ratio is 57.63. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3387.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 3387.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3387.T's competition here
9969.T vs 7581.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 7581.T has a market cap of 285.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 7581.T trades at ¥5,820.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 7581.T's P/E ratio is 25.70. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7581.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 7581.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 7581.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3350.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3350.T has a market cap of 222.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3350.T trades at ¥307.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3350.T's P/E ratio is -2.34. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3350.T's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 3350.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3350.T's competition here
9969.T vs 9861.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9861.T has a market cap of 217.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 9861.T trades at ¥3,356.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 9861.T's P/E ratio is 51.17. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9861.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 9861.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 9861.T's competition here
9969.T vs 7616.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 7616.T has a market cap of 206.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 7616.T trades at ¥1,944.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 7616.T's P/E ratio is 149.58. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7616.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 7616.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 7616.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3097.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3097.T has a market cap of 179.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3097.T trades at ¥4,650.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3097.T's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3097.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 3097.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3097.T's competition here
9969.T vs 9936.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9936.T has a market cap of 160.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 9936.T trades at ¥3,070.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 9936.T's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9936.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 9936.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 9936.T's competition here
9969.T vs 8179.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 8179.T has a market cap of 146.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 8179.T trades at ¥1,489.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 8179.T's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 8179.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 8179.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 8179.T's competition here
9969.T vs 9873.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9873.T has a market cap of 145B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 9873.T trades at ¥6,490.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 9873.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9873.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is more volatile compared to 9873.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 9873.T's competition here
9969.T vs 7630.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 7630.T has a market cap of 142.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 7630.T trades at ¥892.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 7630.T's P/E ratio is 55.44. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7630.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 7630.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 7630.T's competition here
9969.T vs 2695.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 2695.T has a market cap of 141.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 2695.T trades at ¥3,555.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 2695.T's P/E ratio is 39.14. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2695.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 2695.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 2695.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3543.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3543.T has a market cap of 138.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3543.T trades at ¥3,045.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3543.T's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3543.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 3543.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3543.T's competition here
9969.T vs 8153.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 8153.T has a market cap of 135B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 8153.T trades at ¥4,375.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 8153.T's P/E ratio is 32.15. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 8153.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 8153.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 8153.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3087.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3087.T has a market cap of 127.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3087.T trades at ¥3,035.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3087.T's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3087.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 3087.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3087.T's competition here
9969.T vs 7412.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 7412.T has a market cap of 125.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 7412.T trades at ¥650.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 7412.T's P/E ratio is 183.10. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7412.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 7412.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 7412.T's competition here
9969.T vs 9887.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9887.T has a market cap of 110.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 9887.T trades at ¥5,810.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 9887.T's P/E ratio is 41.04. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9887.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 9887.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 9887.T's competition here
9969.T vs 7611.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 7611.T has a market cap of 108.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 7611.T trades at ¥3,010.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 7611.T's P/E ratio is 23.74. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7611.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 7611.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 7611.T's competition here
9969.T vs 9945.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9945.T has a market cap of 101.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 9945.T trades at ¥2,634.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 9945.T's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9945.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is more volatile compared to 9945.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 9945.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3085.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3085.T has a market cap of 97.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3085.T trades at ¥3,065.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3085.T's P/E ratio is 33.15. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3085.T's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 3085.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3085.T's competition here
9969.T vs 9279.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9279.T has a market cap of 97B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 9279.T trades at ¥4,840.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 9279.T's P/E ratio is 44.35. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9279.T's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 9279.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 9279.T's competition here
9969.T vs 2157.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 2157.T has a market cap of 90.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 2157.T trades at ¥1,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 2157.T's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2157.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 2157.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 2157.T's competition here
9969.T vs 7421.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 7421.T has a market cap of 79B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 7421.T trades at ¥1,601.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 7421.T's P/E ratio is 61.08. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7421.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 7421.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 7421.T's competition here
9969.T vs 8160.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 8160.T has a market cap of 71.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 8160.T trades at ¥2,547.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 8160.T's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 8160.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 8160.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 8160.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3091.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3091.T has a market cap of 66.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3091.T trades at ¥4,490.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3091.T's P/E ratio is 33.96. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3091.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 3091.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3091.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3395.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3395.T has a market cap of 62.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3395.T trades at ¥2,933.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3395.T's P/E ratio is 32.53. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3395.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 3395.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3395.T's competition here
9969.T vs 8200.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 8200.T has a market cap of 60.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 8200.T trades at ¥2,324.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 8200.T's P/E ratio is 52.15. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 8200.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 8200.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 8200.T's competition here
9969.T vs 2752.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 2752.T has a market cap of 56.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 2752.T trades at ¥1,106.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 2752.T's P/E ratio is 621.35. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2752.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 2752.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 2752.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3198.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3198.T has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3198.T trades at ¥2,440.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3198.T's P/E ratio is 42.33. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3198.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 3198.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3198.T's competition here
9969.T vs 9900.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9900.T has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 9900.T trades at ¥1,836.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 9900.T's P/E ratio is 35.58. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9900.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 9900.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 9900.T's competition here
9969.T vs 2705.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 2705.T has a market cap of 51.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 2705.T trades at ¥7,110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 2705.T's P/E ratio is 47.23. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2705.T's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 2705.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 2705.T's competition here
9969.T vs 8163.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 8163.T has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 8163.T trades at ¥1,235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 8163.T's P/E ratio is 68.76. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 8163.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 8163.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 8163.T's competition here
9969.T vs 9828.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9828.T has a market cap of 50.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 9828.T trades at ¥2,856.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 9828.T's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9828.T's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 9828.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 9828.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3561.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3561.T has a market cap of 44.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3561.T trades at ¥1,468.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3561.T's P/E ratio is 22.19. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3561.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 3561.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3561.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3196.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3196.T has a market cap of 43B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3196.T trades at ¥2,021.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3196.T's P/E ratio is 106.26. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3196.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 3196.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3196.T's competition here
9969.T vs 7522.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 7522.T has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 7522.T trades at ¥1,019.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 7522.T's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7522.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 7522.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 7522.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3193.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3193.T has a market cap of 40.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3193.T trades at ¥3,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3193.T's P/E ratio is 19.97. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3193.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 3193.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3193.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3221.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3221.T has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3221.T trades at ¥3,520.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3221.T's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3221.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 3221.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3221.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3399.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3399.T has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3399.T trades at ¥3,660.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3399.T's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3399.T's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 3399.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3399.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3073.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3073.T has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3073.T trades at ¥1,690.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3073.T's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3073.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is more volatile compared to 3073.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3073.T's competition here
9969.T vs 7678.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 7678.T has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 7678.T trades at ¥5,720.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 7678.T's P/E ratio is 89.60. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7678.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 7678.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 7678.T's competition here
9969.T vs 2753.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 2753.T has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 2753.T trades at ¥1,445.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 2753.T's P/E ratio is 23.39. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2753.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 2753.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 2753.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3178.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3178.T has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3178.T trades at ¥1,217.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3178.T's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3178.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 3178.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3178.T's competition here
9969.T vs 9979.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9979.T has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 9979.T trades at ¥1,105.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 9979.T's P/E ratio is 19.79. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9979.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 9979.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 9979.T's competition here
9969.T vs 2882.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 2882.T has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 2882.T trades at ¥2,022.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 2882.T's P/E ratio is 77.12. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2882.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is more volatile compared to 2882.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 2882.T's competition here
9969.T vs 9850.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9850.T has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 9850.T trades at ¥981.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 9850.T's P/E ratio is 65.57. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9850.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 9850.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 9850.T's competition here
9969.T vs 7554.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 7554.T has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 7554.T trades at ¥1,141.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 7554.T's P/E ratio is 24.74. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7554.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 7554.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 7554.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3075.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3075.T has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3075.T trades at ¥1,608.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3075.T's P/E ratio is 29.05. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3075.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is more volatile compared to 3075.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3075.T's competition here
9969.T vs 7621.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 7621.T has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 7621.T trades at ¥3,360.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 7621.T's P/E ratio is -101.66. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7621.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 7621.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 7621.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3068.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3068.T has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3068.T trades at ¥2,999.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3068.T's P/E ratio is -49.29. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3068.T's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is more volatile compared to 3068.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3068.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3547.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3547.T has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3547.T trades at ¥1,970.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3547.T's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3547.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 3547.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3547.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3133.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3133.T has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3133.T trades at ¥310.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3133.T's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3133.T's ROE of -2.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 3133.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3133.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3329.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3329.T has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3329.T trades at ¥2,164.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3329.T's P/E ratio is 24.26. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3329.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is more volatile compared to 3329.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3329.T's competition here
9969.T vs 7562.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 7562.T has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 7562.T trades at ¥3,715.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 7562.T's P/E ratio is 46.08. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7562.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is more volatile compared to 7562.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 7562.T's competition here
9969.T vs 2694.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 2694.T has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 2694.T trades at ¥70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 2694.T's P/E ratio is -22.65. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2694.T's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 2694.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 2694.T's competition here
9969.T vs 9701.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9701.T has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 9701.T trades at ¥4,700.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 9701.T's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9701.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is more volatile compared to 9701.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 9701.T's competition here
9969.T vs 7561.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 7561.T has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 7561.T trades at ¥685.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 7561.T's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7561.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 7561.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 7561.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3030.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3030.T has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3030.T trades at ¥974.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3030.T's P/E ratio is 25.13. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3030.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 3030.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3030.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3418.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3418.T has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3418.T trades at ¥1,110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3418.T's P/E ratio is 26.55. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3418.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is more volatile compared to 3418.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3418.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3175.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3175.T has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3175.T trades at ¥915.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3175.T's P/E ratio is 28.59. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3175.T's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 3175.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3175.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3053.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3053.T has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3053.T trades at ¥185.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3053.T's P/E ratio is -97.88. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3053.T's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 3053.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3053.T's competition here
9969.T vs 8207.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 8207.T has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 8207.T trades at ¥287.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 8207.T's P/E ratio is 989.66. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 8207.T's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is more volatile compared to 8207.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 8207.T's competition here
9969.T vs 2764.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 2764.T has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 2764.T trades at ¥157.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 2764.T's P/E ratio is -63.82. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2764.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 2764.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 2764.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3082.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3082.T has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3082.T trades at ¥961.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3082.T's P/E ratio is 39.86. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3082.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 3082.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3082.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3063.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3063.T has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3063.T trades at ¥817.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3063.T's P/E ratio is -104.88. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3063.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 3063.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3063.T's competition here
9969.T vs 9950.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9950.T has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 9950.T trades at ¥3,380.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 9950.T's P/E ratio is 98.71. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9950.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is more volatile compared to 9950.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 9950.T's competition here
9969.T vs 2798.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 2798.T has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 2798.T trades at ¥2,958.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 2798.T's P/E ratio is 32.30. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2798.T's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 2798.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 2798.T's competition here
9969.T vs 6082.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 6082.T has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 6082.T trades at ¥995.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 6082.T's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 6082.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is more volatile compared to 6082.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 6082.T's competition here
9969.T vs 7682.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 7682.T has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 7682.T trades at ¥4,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 7682.T's P/E ratio is 107.78. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7682.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is more volatile compared to 7682.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 7682.T's competition here
9969.T vs 5891.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 5891.T has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 5891.T trades at ¥1,485.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 5891.T's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 5891.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 5891.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 5891.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3069.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3069.T has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3069.T trades at ¥169.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3069.T's P/E ratio is 34.85. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3069.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 3069.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3069.T's competition here
9969.T vs 7604.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 7604.T has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 7604.T trades at ¥918.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 7604.T's P/E ratio is -19.35. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7604.T's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is more volatile compared to 7604.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 7604.T's competition here
9969.T vs 9973.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9973.T has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 9973.T trades at ¥27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 9973.T's P/E ratio is -10.63. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9973.T's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 9973.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 9973.T's competition here
9969.T vs 7674.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 7674.T has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 7674.T trades at ¥2,582.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 7674.T's P/E ratio is -8.93. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7674.T's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 7674.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 7674.T's competition here
9969.T vs 9853.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9853.T has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 9853.T trades at ¥920.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 9853.T's P/E ratio is 234.69. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 9853.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is more volatile compared to 9853.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 9853.T's competition here
9969.T vs 7918.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 7918.T has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 7918.T trades at ¥111.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 7918.T's P/E ratio is -25.34. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7918.T's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 7918.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 7918.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3065.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3065.T has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3065.T trades at ¥1,616.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3065.T's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3065.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is more volatile compared to 3065.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3065.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3557.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3557.T has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3557.T trades at ¥969.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3557.T's P/E ratio is 172.73. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3557.T's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is more volatile compared to 3557.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3557.T's competition here
9969.T vs 7625.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 7625.T has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 7625.T trades at ¥460.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 7625.T's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7625.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 7625.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 7625.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3317.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3317.T has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3317.T trades at ¥1,558.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3317.T's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3317.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is more volatile compared to 3317.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3317.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3077.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3077.T has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3077.T trades at ¥770.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3077.T's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3077.T's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 3077.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3077.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3067.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3067.T has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3067.T trades at ¥452.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3067.T's P/E ratio is 53.18. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3067.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is more volatile compared to 3067.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3067.T's competition here
9969.T vs 2762.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 2762.T has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 2762.T trades at ¥100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 2762.T's P/E ratio is -4.27. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2762.T's ROE of -1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 2762.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 2762.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3224.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3224.T has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3224.T trades at ¥767.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3224.T's P/E ratio is -56.11. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3224.T's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is more volatile compared to 3224.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3224.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3358.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3358.T has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3358.T trades at ¥102.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3358.T's P/E ratio is 425.00. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3358.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 3358.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3358.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3372.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3372.T has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3372.T trades at ¥222.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3372.T's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3372.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 3372.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3372.T's competition here
9969.T vs 138A.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 138A.T has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 138A.T trades at ¥2,990.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 138A.T's P/E ratio is 28.99. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 138A.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 138A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 138A.T's competition here
9969.T vs 2789.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 2789.T has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 2789.T trades at ¥467.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 2789.T's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 2789.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 2789.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 2789.T's competition here
9969.T vs 8181.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 8181.T has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 8181.T trades at ¥1,014.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 8181.T's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 8181.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is more volatile compared to 8181.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 8181.T's competition here
9969.T vs 7524.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 7524.T has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 7524.T trades at ¥167.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 7524.T's P/E ratio is 58.39. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7524.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 7524.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 7524.T's competition here
9969.T vs 7585.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 7585.T has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 7585.T trades at ¥416.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 7585.T's P/E ratio is -7.52. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 7585.T's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is more volatile compared to 7585.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 7585.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3370.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3370.T has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3370.T trades at ¥436.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3370.T's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3370.T's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 3370.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3370.T's competition here
9969.T vs 3223.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3223.T has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 3223.T trades at ¥943.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 3223.T's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 3223.T's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is less volatile compared to 3223.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 3223.T's competition here
9969.T vs 8209.T Comparison April 2026
9969.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9969.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 8209.T has a market cap of 884.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 9969.T is priced at ¥242.00, while 8209.T trades at ¥310.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9969.T currently has a P/E ratio of 49.19, whereas 8209.T's P/E ratio is -8.29. In terms of profitability, 9969.T's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 8209.T's ROE of +1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, 9969.T is more volatile compared to 8209.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9969.T.Check 8209.T's competition here