Saint Marc Holdings Co., Ltd. (3395.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (3395.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3395.T | ¥2,439.00 | +0.00% | 52.1B | 19.41 | ¥125.31 | +2.14% |
| 7550.T | ¥8,156.00 | +0.93% | 1.2T | 28.77 | ¥275.56 | +0.95% |
| 3563.T | ¥9,989.00 | +2.13% | 1.1T | 39.73 | ¥251.37 | +0.35% |
| 2702.T | ¥7,480.00 | +0.13% | 997.2B | 29.44 | ¥254.73 | +0.75% |
| 3197.T | ¥2,772.50 | +0.91% | 626B | 37.33 | ¥73.75 | +0.80% |
| 3397.T | ¥3,753.00 | -3.89% | 335.9B | 72.86 | ¥52.44 | +0.29% |
| 3387.T | ¥713.00 | -0.56% | 300.2B | 64.29 | ¥11.09 | +0.63% |
| 3350.T | ¥260.00 | +16.07% | 297.2B | -1.06 | -¥218.02 | N/A |
| 7581.T | ¥5,390.00 | +0.19% | 262.3B | 21.69 | ¥246.17 | +0.56% |
| 9861.T | ¥3,161.00 | +0.22% | 203.3B | 43.58 | ¥72.08 | +0.70% |
Stock Comparison
3395.T vs 7550.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 7550.T has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 7550.T trades at ¥8,156.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 7550.T's P/E ratio is 28.77. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7550.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 7550.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 7550.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3563.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3563.T has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3563.T trades at ¥9,989.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3563.T's P/E ratio is 39.73. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3563.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 3563.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3563.T's competition here
3395.T vs 2702.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 2702.T has a market cap of 997.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 2702.T trades at ¥7,480.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 2702.T's P/E ratio is 29.44. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2702.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 2702.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 2702.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3197.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3197.T has a market cap of 626B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3197.T trades at ¥2,772.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3197.T's P/E ratio is 37.33. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3197.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 3197.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3197.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3397.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3397.T has a market cap of 335.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3397.T trades at ¥3,753.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3397.T's P/E ratio is 72.86. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3397.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 3397.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3397.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3387.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3387.T has a market cap of 300.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3387.T trades at ¥713.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3387.T's P/E ratio is 64.29. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3387.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 3387.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3387.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3350.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3350.T has a market cap of 297.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3350.T trades at ¥260.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3350.T's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3350.T's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 3350.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3350.T's competition here
3395.T vs 7581.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 7581.T has a market cap of 262.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 7581.T trades at ¥5,390.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 7581.T's P/E ratio is 21.69. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7581.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 7581.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 7581.T's competition here
3395.T vs 9861.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 9861.T has a market cap of 203.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 9861.T trades at ¥3,161.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 9861.T's P/E ratio is 43.58. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9861.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 9861.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 9861.T's competition here
3395.T vs 7616.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 7616.T has a market cap of 195.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 7616.T trades at ¥1,834.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 7616.T's P/E ratio is 117.02. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7616.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T and 7616.T have similar daily volatility (1.31).Check 7616.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3097.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3097.T has a market cap of 181.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3097.T trades at ¥4,765.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3097.T's P/E ratio is 26.01. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3097.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 3097.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3097.T's competition here
3395.T vs 9873.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 9873.T has a market cap of 145B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 9873.T trades at ¥6,490.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 9873.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9873.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 9873.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 9873.T's competition here
3395.T vs 9936.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 9936.T has a market cap of 144.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 9936.T trades at ¥2,799.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 9936.T's P/E ratio is 19.51. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9936.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 9936.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 9936.T's competition here
3395.T vs 7630.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 7630.T has a market cap of 143.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 7630.T trades at ¥902.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 7630.T's P/E ratio is 56.00. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7630.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 7630.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 7630.T's competition here
3395.T vs 7412.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 7412.T has a market cap of 131.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 7412.T trades at ¥681.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 7412.T's P/E ratio is -86.97. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7412.T's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 7412.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 7412.T's competition here
3395.T vs 2695.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 2695.T has a market cap of 130.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 2695.T trades at ¥1,570.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 2695.T's P/E ratio is 36.13. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2695.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 2695.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 2695.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3543.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3543.T has a market cap of 124.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3543.T trades at ¥2,733.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3543.T's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3543.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 3543.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3543.T's competition here
3395.T vs 8179.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 8179.T has a market cap of 121.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 8179.T trades at ¥1,241.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 8179.T's P/E ratio is 21.51. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8179.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 8179.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 8179.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3087.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3087.T has a market cap of 112.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3087.T trades at ¥2,687.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3087.T's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3087.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 3087.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3087.T's competition here
3395.T vs 8153.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 8153.T has a market cap of 112.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 8153.T trades at ¥3,640.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 8153.T's P/E ratio is 24.49. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8153.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 8153.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 8153.T's competition here
3395.T vs 9945.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 9945.T has a market cap of 101.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 9945.T trades at ¥2,634.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 9945.T's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9945.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 9945.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 9945.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3085.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3085.T has a market cap of 97.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3085.T trades at ¥3,065.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3085.T's P/E ratio is 33.15. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3085.T's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 3085.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3085.T's competition here
3395.T vs 9887.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 9887.T has a market cap of 96.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 9887.T trades at ¥4,705.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 9887.T's P/E ratio is 23.84. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9887.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 9887.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 9887.T's competition here
3395.T vs 7611.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 7611.T has a market cap of 94.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 7611.T trades at ¥2,602.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 7611.T's P/E ratio is 19.99. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7611.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 7611.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 7611.T's competition here
3395.T vs 9279.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 9279.T has a market cap of 83.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 9279.T trades at ¥4,130.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 9279.T's P/E ratio is 38.23. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9279.T's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 9279.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 9279.T's competition here
3395.T vs 2157.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 2157.T has a market cap of 80.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 2157.T trades at ¥960.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 2157.T's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2157.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 2157.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 2157.T's competition here
3395.T vs 7421.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 7421.T has a market cap of 71.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 7421.T trades at ¥1,423.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 7421.T's P/E ratio is -179.28. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7421.T's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 7421.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 7421.T's competition here
3395.T vs 8160.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 8160.T has a market cap of 65.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 8160.T trades at ¥2,329.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 8160.T's P/E ratio is 37.89. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8160.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 8160.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 8160.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3091.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3091.T has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3091.T trades at ¥4,445.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3091.T's P/E ratio is 32.96. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3091.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 3091.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3091.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3399.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3399.T has a market cap of 64.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3399.T trades at ¥3,325.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3399.T's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3399.T's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 3399.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3399.T's competition here
3395.T vs 2752.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 2752.T has a market cap of 60.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 2752.T trades at ¥1,175.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 2752.T's P/E ratio is 671.43. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2752.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 2752.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 2752.T's competition here
3395.T vs 2705.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 2705.T has a market cap of 55.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 2705.T trades at ¥7,590.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 2705.T's P/E ratio is 45.19. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2705.T's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 2705.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 2705.T's competition here
3395.T vs 8200.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 8200.T has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 8200.T trades at ¥2,113.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 8200.T's P/E ratio is 31.72. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8200.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 8200.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 8200.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3198.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3198.T has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3198.T trades at ¥2,272.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3198.T's P/E ratio is 47.99. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3198.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 3198.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3198.T's competition here
3395.T vs 9828.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 9828.T has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 9828.T trades at ¥2,840.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 9828.T's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9828.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 9828.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 9828.T's competition here
3395.T vs 8163.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 8163.T has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 8163.T trades at ¥1,191.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 8163.T's P/E ratio is 32.23. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8163.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 8163.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 8163.T's competition here
3395.T vs 9900.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 9900.T has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 9900.T trades at ¥1,618.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 9900.T's P/E ratio is 30.20. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9900.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 9900.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 9900.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3561.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3561.T has a market cap of 46B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3561.T trades at ¥1,519.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3561.T's P/E ratio is 25.14. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3561.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 3561.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3561.T's competition here
3395.T vs 7522.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 7522.T has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 7522.T trades at ¥930.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 7522.T's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7522.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 7522.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 7522.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3196.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3196.T has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3196.T trades at ¥1,620.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3196.T's P/E ratio is 84.79. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3196.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 3196.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3196.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3221.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3221.T has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3221.T trades at ¥3,235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3221.T's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3221.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 3221.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3221.T's competition here
3395.T vs 7678.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 7678.T has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 7678.T trades at ¥5,870.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 7678.T's P/E ratio is 98.12. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7678.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 7678.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 7678.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3193.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3193.T has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3193.T trades at ¥2,724.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3193.T's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3193.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 3193.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3193.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3073.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3073.T has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3073.T trades at ¥1,690.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3073.T's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3073.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 3073.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3073.T's competition here
3395.T vs 2753.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 2753.T has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 2753.T trades at ¥1,343.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 2753.T's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2753.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 2753.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 2753.T's competition here
3395.T vs 9979.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 9979.T has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 9979.T trades at ¥1,103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 9979.T's P/E ratio is 28.31. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9979.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 9979.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 9979.T's competition here
3395.T vs 2882.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 2882.T has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 2882.T trades at ¥2,001.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 2882.T's P/E ratio is 60.76. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2882.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 2882.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 2882.T's competition here
3395.T vs 9850.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 9850.T has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 9850.T trades at ¥945.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 9850.T's P/E ratio is 95.53. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9850.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 9850.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 9850.T's competition here
3395.T vs 7554.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 7554.T has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 7554.T trades at ¥1,086.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 7554.T's P/E ratio is 17.93. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7554.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 7554.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 7554.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3178.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3178.T has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3178.T trades at ¥1,063.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3178.T's P/E ratio is 40.55. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3178.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 3178.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3178.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3075.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3075.T has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3075.T trades at ¥1,613.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3075.T's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3075.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 3075.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3075.T's competition here
3395.T vs 7621.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 7621.T has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 7621.T trades at ¥3,305.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 7621.T's P/E ratio is 63.08. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7621.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 7621.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 7621.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3068.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3068.T has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3068.T trades at ¥2,861.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3068.T's P/E ratio is 76.10. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3068.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 3068.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3068.T's competition here
3395.T vs 7562.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 7562.T has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 7562.T trades at ¥3,715.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 7562.T's P/E ratio is 20.19. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7562.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 7562.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 7562.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3329.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3329.T has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3329.T trades at ¥2,072.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3329.T's P/E ratio is 22.19. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3329.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 3329.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3329.T's competition here
3395.T vs 2694.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 2694.T has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 2694.T trades at ¥69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 2694.T's P/E ratio is -39.33. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2694.T's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 2694.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 2694.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3063.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3063.T has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3063.T trades at ¥1,180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3063.T's P/E ratio is 53.43. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3063.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 3063.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3063.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3547.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3547.T has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3547.T trades at ¥1,534.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3547.T's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3547.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 3547.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3547.T's competition here
3395.T vs 9701.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 9701.T has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 9701.T trades at ¥4,225.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 9701.T's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9701.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 9701.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 9701.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3053.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3053.T has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3053.T trades at ¥202.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3053.T's P/E ratio is -106.91. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3053.T's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 3053.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3053.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3418.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3418.T has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3418.T trades at ¥1,103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3418.T's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3418.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 3418.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3418.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3175.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3175.T has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3175.T trades at ¥932.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3175.T's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3175.T's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 3175.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3175.T's competition here
3395.T vs 7561.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 7561.T has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 7561.T trades at ¥640.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 7561.T's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7561.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 7561.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 7561.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3030.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3030.T has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3030.T trades at ¥869.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3030.T's P/E ratio is 19.22. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3030.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 3030.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3030.T's competition here
3395.T vs 8207.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 8207.T has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 8207.T trades at ¥284.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 8207.T's P/E ratio is -24.40. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8207.T's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 8207.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 8207.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3082.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3082.T has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3082.T trades at ¥982.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3082.T's P/E ratio is 40.65. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3082.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 3082.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3082.T's competition here
3395.T vs 9950.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 9950.T has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 9950.T trades at ¥3,405.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 9950.T's P/E ratio is 166.91. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9950.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 9950.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 9950.T's competition here
3395.T vs 2798.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 2798.T has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 2798.T trades at ¥2,994.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 2798.T's P/E ratio is 48.09. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2798.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 2798.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 2798.T's competition here
3395.T vs 6082.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 6082.T has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 6082.T trades at ¥974.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 6082.T's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6082.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 6082.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 6082.T's competition here
3395.T vs 2764.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 2764.T has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 2764.T trades at ¥135.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 2764.T's P/E ratio is 41.80. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2764.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 2764.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 2764.T's competition here
3395.T vs 5891.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 5891.T has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 5891.T trades at ¥1,605.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 5891.T's P/E ratio is 30.66. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 5891.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 5891.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 5891.T's competition here
3395.T vs 7682.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 7682.T has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 7682.T trades at ¥4,070.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 7682.T's P/E ratio is 107.41. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7682.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 7682.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 7682.T's competition here
3395.T vs 7604.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 7604.T has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 7604.T trades at ¥855.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 7604.T's P/E ratio is -18.09. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7604.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 7604.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 7604.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3069.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3069.T has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3069.T trades at ¥147.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3069.T's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3069.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 3069.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3069.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3133.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3133.T has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3133.T trades at ¥117.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3133.T's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3133.T's ROE of -3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 3133.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3133.T's competition here
3395.T vs 7674.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 7674.T has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 7674.T trades at ¥2,653.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 7674.T's P/E ratio is -6.90. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7674.T's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 7674.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 7674.T's competition here
3395.T vs 9973.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 9973.T has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 9973.T trades at ¥20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 9973.T's P/E ratio is -7.48. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9973.T's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 9973.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 9973.T's competition here
3395.T vs 9853.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 9853.T has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 9853.T trades at ¥902.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 9853.T's P/E ratio is 34.44. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9853.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 9853.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 9853.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3065.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3065.T has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3065.T trades at ¥1,616.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3065.T's P/E ratio is 138.98. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3065.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 3065.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3065.T's competition here
3395.T vs 7625.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 7625.T has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 7625.T trades at ¥467.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 7625.T's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7625.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 7625.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 7625.T's competition here
3395.T vs 7918.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 7918.T has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 7918.T trades at ¥105.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 7918.T's P/E ratio is -9.26. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7918.T's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 7918.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 7918.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3077.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3077.T has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3077.T trades at ¥697.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3077.T's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3077.T's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 3077.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3077.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3067.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3067.T has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3067.T trades at ¥452.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3067.T's P/E ratio is 51.54. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3067.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 3067.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3067.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3317.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3317.T has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3317.T trades at ¥1,370.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3317.T's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3317.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 3317.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3317.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3224.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3224.T has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3224.T trades at ¥705.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3224.T's P/E ratio is -20.02. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3224.T's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 3224.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3224.T's competition here
3395.T vs 2762.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 2762.T has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 2762.T trades at ¥93.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 2762.T's P/E ratio is -3.93. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2762.T's ROE of -2.52%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 2762.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 2762.T's competition here
3395.T vs 9969.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 9969.T has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 9969.T trades at ¥230.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 9969.T's P/E ratio is -108.57. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9969.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 9969.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 9969.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3358.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3358.T has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3358.T trades at ¥90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3358.T's P/E ratio is 49.16. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3358.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 3358.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3358.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3372.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3372.T has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3372.T trades at ¥219.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3372.T's P/E ratio is 24.39. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3372.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 3372.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3372.T's competition here
3395.T vs 138A.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 138A.T has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 138A.T trades at ¥2,870.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 138A.T's P/E ratio is 27.79. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 138A.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 138A.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 138A.T's competition here
3395.T vs 2789.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 2789.T has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 2789.T trades at ¥464.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 2789.T's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2789.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 2789.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 2789.T's competition here
3395.T vs 8181.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 8181.T has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 8181.T trades at ¥1,027.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 8181.T's P/E ratio is 4.19. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8181.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 8181.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 8181.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3557.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3557.T has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3557.T trades at ¥529.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3557.T's P/E ratio is -9.95. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3557.T's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 3557.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3557.T's competition here
3395.T vs 7524.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 7524.T has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 7524.T trades at ¥186.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 7524.T's P/E ratio is -26.09. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7524.T's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 7524.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 7524.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3370.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3370.T has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3370.T trades at ¥494.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3370.T's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3370.T's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is less volatile compared to 3370.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3370.T's competition here
3395.T vs 7585.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 7585.T has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 7585.T trades at ¥416.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 7585.T's P/E ratio is -7.52. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7585.T's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 7585.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 7585.T's competition here
3395.T vs 3223.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 3223.T has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 3223.T trades at ¥950.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 3223.T's P/E ratio is 26.76. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3223.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 3223.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 3223.T's competition here
3395.T vs 8209.T Comparison June 2026
3395.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3395.T stands at 52.1B. In comparison, 8209.T has a market cap of 889.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 3395.T is priced at ¥2,439.00, while 8209.T trades at ¥312.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3395.T currently has a P/E ratio of 19.41, whereas 8209.T's P/E ratio is -8.35. In terms of profitability, 3395.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8209.T's ROE of +1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, 3395.T is more volatile compared to 8209.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3395.T.Check 8209.T's competition here