Helens International Holdings Company Limited
Helens International Holdings Company Limited 9869.HK Peers
See (9869.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9869.HK | HK$1.39 | +3.73% | 1.8B | -19.86 | -HK$0.07 | +21.31% |
| 9987.HK | HK$363.40 | +3.41% | 135.7B | 19.37 | HK$18.76 | +8.04% |
| 6862.HK | HK$15.08 | +1.21% | 81.7B | 15.87 | HK$0.95 | +5.95% |
| 1405.HK | HK$101.10 | -3.35% | 13.4B | 223.26 | HK$0.46 | N/A |
| 0999.HK | HK$10.78 | +1.32% | 12.7B | 17.67 | HK$0.61 | N/A |
| 9658.HK | HK$15.64 | +1.43% | 9.8B | 27.93 | HK$0.56 | N/A |
| 0341.HK | HK$7.08 | +2.31% | 4.1B | 17.48 | HK$0.41 | +8.05% |
| 9922.HK | HK$2.85 | +1.79% | 4B | 71.25 | HK$0.04 | +0.70% |
| 2150.HK | HK$1.68 | +33.33% | 2.9B | -2.85 | -HK$0.59 | N/A |
| 2217.HK | HK$1.57 | +1.29% | 2.1B | 26.17 | HK$0.06 | +4.62% |
Stock Comparison
9869.HK vs 9987.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 9987.HK has a market cap of 135.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 9987.HK trades at HK$363.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 9987.HK's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 9987.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 9987.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 6862.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 6862.HK has a market cap of 81.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 6862.HK trades at HK$15.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 6862.HK's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 6862.HK's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 6862.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 1405.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1405.HK has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 1405.HK trades at HK$101.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 1405.HK's P/E ratio is 223.26. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 1405.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 1405.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 0999.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0999.HK has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 0999.HK trades at HK$10.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 0999.HK's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0999.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 0999.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 9658.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 9658.HK has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 9658.HK trades at HK$15.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 9658.HK's P/E ratio is 27.93. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 9658.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 9658.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 0341.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0341.HK has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 0341.HK trades at HK$7.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 0341.HK's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0341.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 0341.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 9922.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 9922.HK has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 9922.HK trades at HK$2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 9922.HK's P/E ratio is 71.25. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 9922.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 9922.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 2150.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 2150.HK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 2150.HK trades at HK$1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 2150.HK's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 2150.HK's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is less volatile compared to 2150.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 2217.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 2217.HK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 2217.HK trades at HK$1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 2217.HK's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 2217.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 2217.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 1488.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1488.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 1488.HK trades at HK$1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 1488.HK's P/E ratio is -5.88. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 1488.HK's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 1488.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 0538.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0538.HK has a market cap of 916.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 0538.HK trades at HK$0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 0538.HK's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0538.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 0538.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 6811.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 6811.HK has a market cap of 878.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 6811.HK trades at HK$0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 6811.HK's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 6811.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 6811.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 0520.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0520.HK has a market cap of 833.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 0520.HK trades at HK$0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 0520.HK's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0520.HK's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 0520.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 8371.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 8371.HK has a market cap of 738.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 8371.HK trades at HK$1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 8371.HK's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 8371.HK's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 8371.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 0052.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0052.HK has a market cap of 710M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 0052.HK trades at HK$5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 0052.HK's P/E ratio is 23.83. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0052.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 0052.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 0156.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0156.HK has a market cap of 661.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 0156.HK trades at HK$0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 0156.HK's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0156.HK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 0156.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 0226.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0226.HK has a market cap of 305.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 0226.HK trades at HK$0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 0226.HK's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0226.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 0226.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 0573.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0573.HK has a market cap of 304.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 0573.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 0573.HK's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0573.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 0573.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 1978.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1978.HK has a market cap of 296M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 1978.HK trades at HK$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 1978.HK's P/E ratio is -9.25. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 1978.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 1978.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 1314.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1314.HK has a market cap of 265.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 1314.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 1314.HK's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 1314.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 1314.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 8300.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 8300.HK has a market cap of 200.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 8300.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 8300.HK's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 8300.HK's ROE of +2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is less volatile compared to 8300.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 0126.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0126.HK has a market cap of 187M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 0126.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 0126.HK's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0126.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 0126.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 1181.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1181.HK has a market cap of 184M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 1181.HK trades at HK$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 1181.HK's P/E ratio is -8.55. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 1181.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is less volatile compared to 1181.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 8213.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 8213.HK has a market cap of 183.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 8213.HK trades at HK$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 8213.HK's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 8213.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 8213.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 2108.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 2108.HK has a market cap of 160.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 2108.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 2108.HK's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 2108.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 2108.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 0703.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0703.HK has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 0703.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 0703.HK's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0703.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 0703.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 1869.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1869.HK has a market cap of 98.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 1869.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 1869.HK's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 1869.HK's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 1869.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 1843.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1843.HK has a market cap of 90.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 1843.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 1843.HK's P/E ratio is 86.52. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 1843.HK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 1843.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 8527.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 8527.HK has a market cap of 85.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 8527.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 8527.HK's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 8527.HK's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 8527.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 8519.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 8519.HK has a market cap of 80.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 8519.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 8519.HK's P/E ratio is -13.90. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 8519.HK's ROE of -6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 8519.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 1443.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1443.HK has a market cap of 80.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 1443.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 1443.HK's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 1443.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is less volatile compared to 1443.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 8428.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 8428.HK has a market cap of 76.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 8428.HK trades at HK$0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 8428.HK's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 8428.HK's ROE of -7.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is less volatile compared to 8428.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 3666.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 3666.HK has a market cap of 74.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 3666.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 3666.HK's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 3666.HK's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is less volatile compared to 3666.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 8495.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 8495.HK has a market cap of 68.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 8495.HK trades at HK$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 8495.HK's P/E ratio is -10.98. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 8495.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is less volatile compared to 8495.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 8120.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 8120.HK has a market cap of 62.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 8120.HK trades at HK$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 8120.HK's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 8120.HK's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is less volatile compared to 8120.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 8232.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 8232.HK has a market cap of 60.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 8232.HK trades at HK$1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 8232.HK's P/E ratio is -7.27. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 8232.HK's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 8232.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 1703.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1703.HK has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 1703.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 1703.HK's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 1703.HK's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 1703.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 0657.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0657.HK has a market cap of 46.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 0657.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 0657.HK's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0657.HK's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is less volatile compared to 0657.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 8412.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 8412.HK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 8412.HK trades at HK$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 8412.HK's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 8412.HK's ROE of -6.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 8412.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 8447.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 8447.HK has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 8447.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 8447.HK's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 8447.HK's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 8447.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 8056.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 8056.HK has a market cap of 28.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 8056.HK trades at HK$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 8056.HK's P/E ratio is -12.75. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 8056.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 8056.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 8432.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 8432.HK has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 8432.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 8432.HK's P/E ratio is 47.14. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 8432.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 8432.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 8096.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 8096.HK has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 8096.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 8096.HK's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 8096.HK's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 8096.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 8367.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 8367.HK has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 8367.HK trades at HK$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 8367.HK's P/E ratio is 1.66. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 8367.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 8367.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 8510.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 8510.HK has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 8510.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 8510.HK's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 8510.HK's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 8510.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 8493.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 8493.HK has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 8493.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 8493.HK's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 8493.HK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 8493.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 1007.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1007.HK has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 1007.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 1007.HK's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 1007.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 1007.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 8475.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 8475.HK has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 8475.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 8475.HK's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 8475.HK's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is less volatile compared to 8475.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.
9869.HK vs 0047.HK Comparison
9869.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9869.HK stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0047.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 9869.HK is priced at HK$1.39, while 0047.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9869.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas 0047.HK's P/E ratio is 6.61. In terms of profitability, 9869.HK's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0047.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 9869.HK is more volatile compared to 0047.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9869.HK.