Nac Co., Ltd.
Nac Co., Ltd. (9788.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (9788.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9788.T | ¥536.00 | +0.75% | 22.4B | 14.86 | ¥36.06 | +4.10% |
| 1812.T | ¥6,184.00 | -1.25% | 2.9T | 17.29 | ¥357.65 | +1.86% |
| 1801.T | ¥17,340.00 | -0.40% | 2.8T | 21.23 | ¥816.76 | +1.56% |
| 1802.T | ¥3,870.00 | +0.70% | 2.7T | 16.22 | ¥238.65 | +2.09% |
| 1803.T | ¥3,114.00 | -0.10% | 2.1T | 21.12 | ¥147.43 | +1.27% |
| 1944.T | ¥7,526.00 | +0.56% | 1.5T | 24.95 | ¥301.61 | +1.40% |
| 1942.T | ¥6,112.00 | -0.21% | 1.2T | 24.22 | ¥252.35 | +1.65% |
| 1959.T | ¥9,571.00 | +0.47% | 677B | 22.08 | ¥433.39 | +1.72% |
| 1721.T | ¥5,353.00 | +1.50% | 620.3B | 19.82 | ¥270.02 | +2.24% |
| 5076.T | ¥2,287.00 | -1.72% | 577.7B | 13.89 | ¥164.70 | +2.62% |
Stock Comparison
9788.T vs 1812.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1812.T has a market cap of 2.9T. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1812.T trades at ¥6,184.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1812.T's P/E ratio is 17.29. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1812.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1812.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1812.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1801.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1801.T has a market cap of 2.8T. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1801.T trades at ¥17,340.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1801.T's P/E ratio is 21.23. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1801.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1801.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1801.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1802.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1802.T has a market cap of 2.7T. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1802.T trades at ¥3,870.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1802.T's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1802.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1802.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1802.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1803.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1803.T has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1803.T trades at ¥3,114.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1803.T's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1803.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1803.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1803.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1944.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1944.T has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1944.T trades at ¥7,526.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1944.T's P/E ratio is 24.95. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1944.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1944.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1944.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1942.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1942.T has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1942.T trades at ¥6,112.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1942.T's P/E ratio is 24.22. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1942.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1942.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1942.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1959.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1959.T has a market cap of 677B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1959.T trades at ¥9,571.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1959.T's P/E ratio is 22.08. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1959.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1959.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1959.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1721.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1721.T has a market cap of 620.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1721.T trades at ¥5,353.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1721.T's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1721.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1721.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1721.T's competition here
9788.T vs 5076.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 5076.T has a market cap of 577.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 5076.T trades at ¥2,287.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 5076.T's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 5076.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 5076.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 5076.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1951.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1951.T has a market cap of 554.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1951.T trades at ¥2,709.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1951.T's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1951.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1951.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1951.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1963.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1963.T has a market cap of 506.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1963.T trades at ¥2,094.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1963.T's P/E ratio is -329.25. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1963.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1963.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1963.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1893.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1893.T has a market cap of 495.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1893.T trades at ¥1,815.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1893.T's P/E ratio is 25.70. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1893.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1893.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1893.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1860.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1860.T has a market cap of 454.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1860.T trades at ¥1,512.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1860.T's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1860.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1860.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1860.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1980.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1980.T has a market cap of 391.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1980.T trades at ¥3,025.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1980.T's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1980.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1980.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1980.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1961.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1961.T has a market cap of 341.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1961.T trades at ¥6,710.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1961.T's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1961.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1961.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1961.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1949.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1949.T has a market cap of 341.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1949.T trades at ¥9,700.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1949.T's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1949.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is more volatile compared to 1949.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1949.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1417.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1417.T has a market cap of 322.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1417.T trades at ¥3,639.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1417.T's P/E ratio is 16.12. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1417.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1417.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1417.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1719.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1719.T has a market cap of 302.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1719.T trades at ¥1,927.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1719.T's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1719.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1719.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1719.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1414.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1414.T has a market cap of 284.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1414.T trades at ¥1,401.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1414.T's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1414.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1414.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1414.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1861.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1861.T has a market cap of 284.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1861.T trades at ¥1,654.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1861.T's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1861.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1861.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1861.T's competition here
9788.T vs 6366.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 6366.T has a market cap of 278.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 6366.T trades at ¥1,076.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 6366.T's P/E ratio is 36.66. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6366.T's ROE of +1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 6366.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 6366.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1885.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1885.T has a market cap of 257.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1885.T trades at ¥3,335.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1885.T's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1885.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1885.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1885.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1941.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1941.T has a market cap of 250.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1941.T trades at ¥4,620.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1941.T's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1941.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1941.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1941.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1820.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1820.T has a market cap of 238.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1820.T trades at ¥6,036.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1820.T's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1820.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1820.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1820.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1833.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1833.T has a market cap of 235.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1833.T trades at ¥6,570.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1833.T's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1833.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1833.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1833.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1946.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1946.T has a market cap of 188B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1946.T trades at ¥2,025.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1946.T's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1946.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1946.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1946.T's competition here
9788.T vs 6055.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 6055.T has a market cap of 185.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 6055.T trades at ¥1,802.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 6055.T's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6055.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 6055.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 6055.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1835.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1835.T has a market cap of 183.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1835.T trades at ¥5,330.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1835.T's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1835.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1835.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1835.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1934.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1934.T has a market cap of 182.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1934.T trades at ¥2,655.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1934.T's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1934.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1934.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1934.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1926.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1926.T has a market cap of 173.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1926.T trades at ¥4,060.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1926.T's P/E ratio is 16.31. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1926.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1926.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1926.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1952.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1952.T has a market cap of 169.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1952.T trades at ¥3,735.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1952.T's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1952.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1952.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1952.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1890.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1890.T has a market cap of 163.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1890.T trades at ¥1,742.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1890.T's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1890.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is more volatile compared to 1890.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1890.T's competition here
9788.T vs 6330.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 6330.T has a market cap of 160B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 6330.T trades at ¥2,731.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 6330.T's P/E ratio is -58.00. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6330.T's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 6330.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 6330.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1720.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1720.T has a market cap of 154.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1720.T trades at ¥1,460.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1720.T's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1720.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1720.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1720.T's competition here
9788.T vs 9716.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 9716.T has a market cap of 148.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 9716.T trades at ¥1,333.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 9716.T's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 9716.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 9716.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 9716.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1965.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1965.T has a market cap of 135.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1965.T trades at ¥6,630.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1965.T's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1965.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1965.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1965.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1871.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1871.T has a market cap of 134B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1871.T trades at ¥2,863.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1871.T's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1871.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1871.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1871.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1762.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1762.T has a market cap of 127.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1762.T trades at ¥3,655.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1762.T's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1762.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1762.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1762.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1982.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1982.T has a market cap of 126.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1982.T trades at ¥5,860.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1982.T's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1982.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1982.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1982.T's competition here
9788.T vs 5911.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 5911.T has a market cap of 118.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 5911.T trades at ¥3,005.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 5911.T's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 5911.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is more volatile compared to 5911.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 5911.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1879.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1879.T has a market cap of 116.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1879.T trades at ¥1,995.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1879.T's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1879.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1879.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1879.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1884.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1884.T has a market cap of 110.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1884.T trades at ¥2,512.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1884.T's P/E ratio is 17.49. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1884.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is more volatile compared to 1884.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1884.T's competition here
9788.T vs 9161.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 9161.T has a market cap of 97.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 9161.T trades at ¥6,480.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 9161.T's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 9161.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is more volatile compared to 9161.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 9161.T's competition here
9788.T vs 9663.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 9663.T has a market cap of 93.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 9663.T trades at ¥5,970.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 9663.T's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 9663.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is more volatile compared to 9663.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 9663.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1870.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1870.T has a market cap of 93.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1870.T trades at ¥2,164.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1870.T's P/E ratio is 8.94. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1870.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is more volatile compared to 1870.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1870.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1939.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1939.T has a market cap of 92.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1939.T trades at ¥1,959.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1939.T's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1939.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1939.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1939.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1976.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1976.T has a market cap of 84.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1976.T trades at ¥1,838.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1976.T's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1976.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1976.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1976.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1882.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1882.T has a market cap of 82.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1882.T trades at ¥1,786.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1882.T's P/E ratio is 20.70. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1882.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is more volatile compared to 1882.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1882.T's competition here
9788.T vs 6226.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 6226.T has a market cap of 82.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 6226.T trades at ¥4,675.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 6226.T's P/E ratio is 24.42. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6226.T's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 6226.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 6226.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1852.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1852.T has a market cap of 82.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1852.T trades at ¥1,021.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1852.T's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1852.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is more volatile compared to 1852.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1852.T's competition here
9788.T vs 3443.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 3443.T has a market cap of 82.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 3443.T trades at ¥4,720.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 3443.T's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 3443.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 3443.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 3443.T's competition here
9788.T vs 9621.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 9621.T has a market cap of 82.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 9621.T trades at ¥2,990.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 9621.T's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 9621.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 9621.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 9621.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1921.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1921.T has a market cap of 75B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1921.T trades at ¥2,033.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1921.T's P/E ratio is 31.50. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1921.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1921.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1921.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1822.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1822.T has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1822.T trades at ¥834.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1822.T's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1822.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is more volatile compared to 1822.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1822.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1799.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1799.T has a market cap of 72B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1799.T trades at ¥4,070.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1799.T's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1799.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1799.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1799.T's competition here
9788.T vs 9755.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 9755.T has a market cap of 66.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 9755.T trades at ¥2,938.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 9755.T's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 9755.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is more volatile compared to 9755.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 9755.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1775.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1775.T has a market cap of 64.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1775.T trades at ¥7,160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1775.T's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1775.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1775.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1775.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1899.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1899.T has a market cap of 62.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1899.T trades at ¥7,590.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1899.T's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1899.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1899.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1899.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1815.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1815.T has a market cap of 61.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1815.T trades at ¥4,430.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1815.T's P/E ratio is 18.24. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1815.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1815.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1815.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1811.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1811.T has a market cap of 60.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1811.T trades at ¥8,450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1811.T's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1811.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1811.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1811.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1945.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1945.T has a market cap of 59B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1945.T trades at ¥1,781.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1945.T's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1945.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1945.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1945.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1948.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1948.T has a market cap of 57.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1948.T trades at ¥6,590.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1948.T's P/E ratio is 19.96. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1948.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1948.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1948.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1898.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1898.T has a market cap of 57.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1898.T trades at ¥1,570.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1898.T's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1898.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is more volatile compared to 1898.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1898.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1954.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1954.T has a market cap of 56.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1954.T trades at ¥3,740.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1954.T's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1954.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1954.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1954.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1888.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1888.T has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1888.T trades at ¥4,335.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1888.T's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1888.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is more volatile compared to 1888.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1888.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1929.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1929.T has a market cap of 52.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1929.T trades at ¥1,264.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1929.T's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1929.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1929.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1929.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1967.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1967.T has a market cap of 52.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1967.T trades at ¥2,340.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1967.T's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1967.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1967.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1967.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1827.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1827.T has a market cap of 50.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1827.T trades at ¥1,474.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1827.T's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1827.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1827.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1827.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1813.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1813.T has a market cap of 50.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1813.T trades at ¥3,330.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1813.T's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1813.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1813.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1813.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1786.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1786.T has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1786.T trades at ¥391.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1786.T's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1786.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is more volatile compared to 1786.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1786.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1810.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1810.T has a market cap of 49.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1810.T trades at ¥1,732.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1810.T's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1810.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1810.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1810.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1887.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1887.T has a market cap of 49.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1887.T trades at ¥619.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1887.T's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1887.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1887.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1887.T's competition here
9788.T vs 3431.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 3431.T has a market cap of 47B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 3431.T trades at ¥1,774.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 3431.T's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 3431.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is more volatile compared to 3431.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 3431.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1793.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1793.T has a market cap of 46.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1793.T trades at ¥1,840.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1793.T's P/E ratio is 37.10. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1793.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1793.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1793.T's competition here
9788.T vs 6085.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 6085.T has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 6085.T trades at ¥4,060.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 6085.T's P/E ratio is -163.31. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6085.T's ROE of -3.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 6085.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 6085.T's competition here
9788.T vs 5959.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 5959.T has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 5959.T trades at ¥983.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 5959.T's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 5959.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is more volatile compared to 5959.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 5959.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1930.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1930.T has a market cap of 43.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1930.T trades at ¥1,580.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1930.T's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1930.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is more volatile compared to 1930.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1930.T's competition here
9788.T vs 256A.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 256A.T has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 256A.T trades at ¥2,225.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 256A.T's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 256A.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 256A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 256A.T's competition here
9788.T vs 9622.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 9622.T has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 9622.T trades at ¥1,550.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 9622.T's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 9622.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is more volatile compared to 9622.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 9622.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1866.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1866.T has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1866.T trades at ¥1,368.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1866.T's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1866.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1866.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1866.T's competition here
9788.T vs 2153.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 2153.T has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 2153.T trades at ¥1,780.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 2153.T's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2153.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is more volatile compared to 2153.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 2153.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1780.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1780.T has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1780.T trades at ¥1,623.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1780.T's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1780.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is more volatile compared to 1780.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1780.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1828.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1828.T has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1828.T trades at ¥2,754.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1828.T's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1828.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is more volatile compared to 1828.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1828.T's competition here
9788.T vs 9768.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 9768.T has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 9768.T trades at ¥3,975.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 9768.T's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 9768.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 9768.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 9768.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1805.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1805.T has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1805.T trades at ¥1,439.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1805.T's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1805.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is more volatile compared to 1805.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1805.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1726.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1726.T has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1726.T trades at ¥529.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1726.T's P/E ratio is 20.97. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1726.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is more volatile compared to 1726.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1726.T's competition here
9788.T vs 9233.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 9233.T has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 9233.T trades at ¥1,286.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 9233.T's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 9233.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 9233.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 9233.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1960.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1960.T has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1960.T trades at ¥1,447.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1960.T's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1960.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1960.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1960.T's competition here
9788.T vs 6540.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 6540.T has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 6540.T trades at ¥1,951.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 6540.T's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6540.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 6540.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 6540.T's competition here
9788.T vs 9163.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 9163.T has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 9163.T trades at ¥2,322.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 9163.T's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 9163.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is more volatile compared to 9163.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 9163.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1867.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1867.T has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1867.T trades at ¥3,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1867.T's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1867.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1867.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1867.T's competition here
9788.T vs 9765.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 9765.T has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 9765.T trades at ¥1,187.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 9765.T's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 9765.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 9765.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 9765.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1776.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1776.T has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1776.T trades at ¥1,996.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1776.T's P/E ratio is 68.03. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1776.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is more volatile compared to 1776.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1776.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1826.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1826.T has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1826.T trades at ¥1,221.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1826.T's P/E ratio is 24.91. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1826.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1826.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1826.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1716.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1716.T has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1716.T trades at ¥1,535.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1716.T's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1716.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1716.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1716.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1436.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1436.T has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1436.T trades at ¥4,190.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1436.T's P/E ratio is 51.03. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1436.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1436.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1436.T's competition here
9788.T vs 9612.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 9612.T has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 9612.T trades at ¥1,632.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 9612.T's P/E ratio is 40.38. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 9612.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 9612.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 9612.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1770.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1770.T has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1770.T trades at ¥1,733.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1770.T's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1770.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1770.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1770.T's competition here
9788.T vs 1798.T Comparison March 2026
9788.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9788.T stands at 22.4B. In comparison, 1798.T has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, 9788.T is priced at ¥536.00, while 1798.T trades at ¥6,870.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9788.T currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas 1798.T's P/E ratio is 5.47. In terms of profitability, 9788.T's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1798.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 9788.T is less volatile compared to 1798.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9788.T.Check 1798.T's competition here