SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See 1414.T's competitors and their performance on the JPX and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for 1414.T and its JPX peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1414.T | ¥1,316.00 | +2.73% | 265.8B | 17.65 | ¥74.80 | +3.45% |
| 1812.T | ¥5,431.00 | -2.67% | 2.6T | 14.70 | ¥384.71 | +2.58% |
| 1802.T | ¥3,238.00 | -1.40% | 2.3T | 13.18 | ¥252.81 | +2.64% |
| 1801.T | ¥13,370.00 | -2.23% | 2.3T | 13.49 | ¥1,025.50 | +2.24% |
| 1803.T | ¥2,440.00 | -0.69% | 1.7T | 13.37 | ¥188.73 | +2.85% |
| 1944.T | ¥7,594.00 | +1.61% | 1.5T | 22.24 | ¥350.53 | +1.67% |
| 1942.T | ¥5,861.00 | -1.89% | 1.2T | 19.52 | ¥311.78 | +2.04% |
| 5076.T | ¥2,687.50 | -3.69% | 715.6B | 9.50 | ¥298.19 | +4.24% |
| 1959.T | ¥8,856.00 | -0.15% | 643.8B | 16.07 | ¥566.25 | +2.42% |
| 1721.T | ¥5,245.00 | -0.46% | 617.1B | 17.16 | ¥311.60 | +2.43% |
Stock Comparison
Kajima Corporation (JPX: 1812.T)
1414.T vs 1812.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1812.T has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1812.T trades at ¥5,431.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1812.T's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1812.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1812.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1812.T's competition here
Obayashi Corporation (JPX: 1802.T)
1414.T vs 1802.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1802.T has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1802.T trades at ¥3,238.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1802.T's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1802.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1802.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1802.T's competition here
Taisei Corporation (JPX: 1801.T)
1414.T vs 1801.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1801.T has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1801.T trades at ¥13,370.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1801.T's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1801.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1801.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1801.T's competition here
Shimizu Corporation (JPX: 1803.T)
1414.T vs 1803.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1803.T has a market cap of 1.7T. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1803.T trades at ¥2,440.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1803.T's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1803.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1803.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1803.T's competition here
Kinden Corporation (JPX: 1944.T)
1414.T vs 1944.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1944.T has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1944.T trades at ¥7,594.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1944.T's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1944.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1944.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1944.T's competition here
Kandenko Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1942.T)
1414.T vs 1942.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1942.T has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1942.T trades at ¥5,861.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1942.T's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1942.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1942.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1942.T's competition here
INFRONEER Holdings Inc. (JPX: 5076.T)
1414.T vs 5076.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 5076.T has a market cap of 715.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 5076.T trades at ¥2,687.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 5076.T's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 5076.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 5076.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 5076.T's competition here
Kraftia Corporation (JPX: 1959.T)
1414.T vs 1959.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1959.T has a market cap of 643.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1959.T trades at ¥8,856.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1959.T's P/E ratio is 16.07. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1959.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1959.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1959.T's competition here
COMSYS Holdings Corporation (JPX: 1721.T)
1414.T vs 1721.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1721.T has a market cap of 617.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1721.T trades at ¥5,245.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1721.T's P/E ratio is 17.16. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1721.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1721.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1721.T's competition here
JGC Holdings Corporation (JPX: 1963.T)
1414.T vs 1963.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1963.T has a market cap of 573.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1963.T trades at ¥2,283.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1963.T's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1963.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1963.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1963.T's competition here
EXEO Group, Inc. (JPX: 1951.T)
1414.T vs 1951.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1951.T has a market cap of 552B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1951.T trades at ¥2,643.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1951.T's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1951.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1951.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1951.T's competition here
Toda Corporation (JPX: 1860.T)
1414.T vs 1860.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1860.T has a market cap of 457.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1860.T trades at ¥1,519.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1860.T's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1860.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1860.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1860.T's competition here
Penta-Ocean Construction Co., Ltd. (JPX: 1893.T)
1414.T vs 1893.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1893.T has a market cap of 432.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1893.T trades at ¥1,514.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1893.T's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1893.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1893.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1893.T's competition here
Sanki Engineering Co., Ltd. (JPX: 1961.T)
1414.T vs 1961.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1961.T has a market cap of 377.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1961.T trades at ¥2,340.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1961.T's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1961.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1961.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1961.T's competition here
Sumitomo Densetsu Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1949.T)
1414.T vs 1949.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1949.T has a market cap of 341.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1949.T trades at ¥9,700.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1949.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1949.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is more volatile compared to 1949.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1949.T's competition here
Dai-Dan Co., Ltd. (JPX: 1980.T)
1414.T vs 1980.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1980.T has a market cap of 340B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1980.T trades at ¥2,567.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1980.T's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1980.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1980.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1980.T's competition here
MIRAIT ONE Corporation (JPX: 1417.T)
1414.T vs 1417.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1417.T has a market cap of 325.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1417.T trades at ¥3,587.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1417.T's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1417.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1417.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1417.T's competition here
Hazama Ando Corporation (JPX: 1719.T)
1414.T vs 1719.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1719.T has a market cap of 288.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1719.T trades at ¥1,826.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1719.T's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1719.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is more volatile compared to 1719.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1719.T's competition here
Chudenko Corporation (JPX: 1941.T)
1414.T vs 1941.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1941.T has a market cap of 273.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1941.T trades at ¥5,030.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1941.T's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1941.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1941.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1941.T's competition here
Kumagai Gumi Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1861.T)
1414.T vs 1861.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1861.T has a market cap of 249.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1861.T trades at ¥1,438.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1861.T's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1861.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1861.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1861.T's competition here
JAPAN MATERIAL Co., Ltd. (JPX: 6055.T)
1414.T vs 6055.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 6055.T has a market cap of 236.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 6055.T trades at ¥2,126.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 6055.T's P/E ratio is 22.31. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6055.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 6055.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 6055.T's competition here
Nishimatsu Construction Co., Ltd. (JPX: 1820.T)
1414.T vs 1820.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1820.T has a market cap of 214.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1820.T trades at ¥5,349.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1820.T's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1820.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1820.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1820.T's competition here
Okumura Corporation (JPX: 1833.T)
1414.T vs 1833.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1833.T has a market cap of 209.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1833.T trades at ¥5,830.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1833.T's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1833.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1833.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1833.T's competition here
Toenec Corporation (JPX: 1946.T)
1414.T vs 1946.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1946.T has a market cap of 200.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1946.T trades at ¥2,039.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1946.T's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1946.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1946.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1946.T's competition here
Chiyoda Corporation (JPX: 6366.T)
1414.T vs 6366.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 6366.T has a market cap of 188.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 6366.T trades at ¥701.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 6366.T's P/E ratio is 2.28. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6366.T's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 6366.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 6366.T's competition here
Yurtec Corporation (JPX: 1934.T)
1414.T vs 1934.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1934.T has a market cap of 163.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1934.T trades at ¥2,363.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1934.T's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1934.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1934.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1934.T's competition here
Toyo Construction Co., Ltd. (JPX: 1890.T)
1414.T vs 1890.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1890.T has a market cap of 163.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1890.T trades at ¥1,742.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1890.T's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1890.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is more volatile compared to 1890.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1890.T's competition here
TOA Corporation (JPX: 1885.T)
1414.T vs 1885.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1885.T has a market cap of 161.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1885.T trades at ¥2,031.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1885.T's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1885.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1885.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1885.T's competition here
Raito Kogyo Co., Ltd. (JPX: 1926.T)
1414.T vs 1926.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1926.T has a market cap of 160.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1926.T trades at ¥3,845.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1926.T's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1926.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1926.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1926.T's competition here
Shin Nippon Air Technologies Co., Ltd. (JPX: 1952.T)
1414.T vs 1952.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1952.T has a market cap of 156.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1952.T trades at ¥3,315.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1952.T's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1952.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1952.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1952.T's competition here
Taihei Dengyo Kaisha, Ltd. (JPX: 1968.T)
1414.T vs 1968.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1968.T has a market cap of 156.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1968.T trades at ¥2,386.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1968.T's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1968.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1968.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1968.T's competition here
Totetsu Kogyo Co., Ltd. (JPX: 1835.T)
1414.T vs 1835.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1835.T has a market cap of 146.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1835.T trades at ¥4,185.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1835.T's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1835.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1835.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1835.T's competition here
RAIZNEXT Corporation (JPX: 6379.T)
1414.T vs 6379.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 6379.T has a market cap of 143.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 6379.T trades at ¥2,605.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 6379.T's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6379.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 6379.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 6379.T's competition here
Takamatsu Construction Group Co., Ltd. (JPX: 1762.T)
1414.T vs 1762.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1762.T has a market cap of 133.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1762.T trades at ¥3,825.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1762.T's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1762.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1762.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1762.T's competition here
Techno Ryowa Ltd. (JPX: 1965.T)
1414.T vs 1965.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1965.T has a market cap of 130.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1965.T trades at ¥6,050.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1965.T's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1965.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1965.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1965.T's competition here
Hibiya Engineering, Ltd. (JPX: 1982.T)
1414.T vs 1982.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1982.T has a market cap of 126.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1982.T trades at ¥2,820.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1982.T's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1982.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1982.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1982.T's competition here
Tokyu Construction Co., Ltd. (JPX: 1720.T)
1414.T vs 1720.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1720.T has a market cap of 126.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1720.T trades at ¥1,163.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1720.T's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1720.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1720.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1720.T's competition here
Shinnihon Corporation (JPX: 1879.T)
1414.T vs 1879.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1879.T has a market cap of 124.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1879.T trades at ¥2,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1879.T's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1879.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1879.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1879.T's competition here
Toyo Engineering Corporation (JPX: 6330.T)
1414.T vs 6330.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 6330.T has a market cap of 122.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 6330.T trades at ¥2,025.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 6330.T's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6330.T's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 6330.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 6330.T's competition here
Yokogawa Bridge Holdings Corp. (JPX: 5911.T)
1414.T vs 5911.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 5911.T has a market cap of 118.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 5911.T trades at ¥2,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 5911.T's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 5911.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 5911.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 5911.T's competition here
THE NIPPON ROAD Co., Ltd. (JPX: 1884.T)
1414.T vs 1884.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1884.T has a market cap of 110.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1884.T trades at ¥2,512.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1884.T's P/E ratio is 17.49. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1884.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is more volatile compared to 1884.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1884.T's competition here
PS Construction Co., Ltd. (JPX: 1871.T)
1414.T vs 1871.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1871.T has a market cap of 107.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1871.T trades at ¥2,229.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1871.T's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1871.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1871.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1871.T's competition here
Asahi Kogyosha Co., Ltd. (JPX: 1975.T)
1414.T vs 1975.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1975.T has a market cap of 105.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1975.T trades at ¥3,910.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1975.T's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1975.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1975.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1975.T's competition here
The Kodensha Co., Ltd. (JPX: 1948.T)
1414.T vs 1948.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1948.T has a market cap of 99.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1948.T trades at ¥11,400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1948.T's P/E ratio is 35.15. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1948.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is more volatile compared to 1948.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1948.T's competition here
Integrated Design & Engineering Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 9161.T)
1414.T vs 9161.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 9161.T has a market cap of 97.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 9161.T trades at ¥6,480.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 9161.T's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 9161.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is more volatile compared to 9161.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 9161.T's competition here
Yondenko Corporation (JPX: 1939.T)
1414.T vs 1939.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1939.T has a market cap of 95.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1939.T trades at ¥1,985.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1939.T's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1939.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1939.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1939.T's competition here
MEISEI INDUSTRIAL Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1976.T)
1414.T vs 1976.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1976.T has a market cap of 91.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1976.T trades at ¥1,963.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1976.T's P/E ratio is 17.05. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1976.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1976.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1976.T's competition here
Moriya Transportation Engineering and Manufacturing Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 6226.T)
1414.T vs 6226.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 6226.T has a market cap of 90.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 6226.T trades at ¥2,428.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 6226.T's P/E ratio is 21.84. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 6226.T's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 6226.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 6226.T's competition here
Yahagi Construction Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1870.T)
1414.T vs 1870.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1870.T has a market cap of 83.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1870.T trades at ¥1,928.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1870.T's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1870.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1870.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1870.T's competition here
NAGAWA Co., Ltd. (JPX: 9663.T)
1414.T vs 9663.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 9663.T has a market cap of 80.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 9663.T trades at ¥5,140.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 9663.T's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 9663.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 9663.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 9663.T's competition here
CTI Engineering Co., Ltd. (JPX: 9621.T)
1414.T vs 9621.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 9621.T has a market cap of 80.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 9621.T trades at ¥2,912.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 9621.T's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 9621.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 9621.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 9621.T's competition here
Toa Road Corporation (JPX: 1882.T)
1414.T vs 1882.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1882.T has a market cap of 75.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1882.T trades at ¥1,620.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1882.T's P/E ratio is 22.02. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1882.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1882.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1882.T's competition here
Asanuma Corporation (JPX: 1852.T)
1414.T vs 1852.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1852.T has a market cap of 71.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1852.T trades at ¥872.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1852.T's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1852.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1852.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1852.T's competition here
Kawada Technologies, Inc. (JPX: 3443.T)
1414.T vs 3443.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 3443.T has a market cap of 68.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 3443.T trades at ¥1,271.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 3443.T's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 3443.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 3443.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 3443.T's competition here
Tanseisha Co., Ltd. (JPX: 9743.T)
1414.T vs 9743.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 9743.T has a market cap of 68B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 9743.T trades at ¥1,446.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 9743.T's P/E ratio is 15.01. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 9743.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 9743.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 9743.T's competition here
Tokyo Energy & Systems Inc. (JPX: 1945.T)
1414.T vs 1945.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1945.T has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1945.T trades at ¥1,946.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1945.T's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1945.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1945.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1945.T's competition here
Daiho Corporation (JPX: 1822.T)
1414.T vs 1822.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1822.T has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1822.T trades at ¥785.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1822.T's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1822.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1822.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1822.T's competition here
Fukuda Corporation (JPX: 1899.T)
1414.T vs 1899.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1899.T has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1899.T trades at ¥3,870.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1899.T's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1899.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1899.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1899.T's competition here
OYO Corporation (JPX: 9755.T)
1414.T vs 9755.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 9755.T has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 9755.T trades at ¥2,803.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 9755.T's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 9755.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 9755.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 9755.T's competition here
Fuji Furukawa Engineering & Construction Co.Ltd. (JPX: 1775.T)
1414.T vs 1775.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1775.T has a market cap of 64.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1775.T trades at ¥7,160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1775.T's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1775.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1775.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1775.T's competition here
Tekken Corporation (JPX: 1815.T)
1414.T vs 1815.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1815.T has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1815.T trades at ¥4,405.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1815.T's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1815.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1815.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1815.T's competition here
Nichireki Co., Ltd. (JPX: 5011.T)
1414.T vs 5011.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 5011.T has a market cap of 62.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 5011.T trades at ¥2,203.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 5011.T's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 5011.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 5011.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 5011.T's competition here
Nippon Rietec Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1938.T)
1414.T vs 1938.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1938.T has a market cap of 62.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1938.T trades at ¥2,441.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1938.T's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1938.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1938.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1938.T's competition here
Daiichi Kensetsu Corporation (JPX: 1799.T)
1414.T vs 1799.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1799.T has a market cap of 61.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1799.T trades at ¥3,375.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1799.T's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1799.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1799.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1799.T's competition here
The Zenitaka Corporation (JPX: 1811.T)
1414.T vs 1811.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1811.T has a market cap of 58.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1811.T trades at ¥8,110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1811.T's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1811.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is more volatile compared to 1811.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1811.T's competition here
Tomoe Corporation (JPX: 1921.T)
1414.T vs 1921.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1921.T has a market cap of 58.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1921.T trades at ¥1,727.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1921.T's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1921.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1921.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1921.T's competition here
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. (JPX: 1954.T)
1414.T vs 1954.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1954.T has a market cap of 56.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1954.T trades at ¥3,740.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1954.T's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1954.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1954.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1954.T's competition here
Seikitokyu Kogyo Co., Ltd. (JPX: 1898.T)
1414.T vs 1898.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1898.T has a market cap of 54.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1898.T trades at ¥1,489.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1898.T's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1898.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is more volatile compared to 1898.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1898.T's competition here
Ohmoto Gumi Co., Ltd. (JPX: 1793.T)
1414.T vs 1793.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1793.T has a market cap of 52B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1793.T trades at ¥2,015.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1793.T's P/E ratio is 28.67. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1793.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is more volatile compared to 1793.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1793.T's competition here
Nittoc Construction Co., Ltd. (JPX: 1929.T)
1414.T vs 1929.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1929.T has a market cap of 48.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1929.T trades at ¥1,137.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1929.T's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1929.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1929.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1929.T's competition here
Oriental Shiraishi Corporation (JPX: 1786.T)
1414.T vs 1786.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1786.T has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1786.T trades at ¥365.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1786.T's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1786.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1786.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1786.T's competition here
Nakano Corporation (JPX: 1827.T)
1414.T vs 1827.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1827.T has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1827.T trades at ¥1,280.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1827.T's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1827.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1827.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1827.T's competition here
Yamato Corporation (JPX: 1967.T)
1414.T vs 1967.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1967.T has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1967.T trades at ¥1,996.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1967.T's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1967.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1967.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1967.T's competition here
Wakachiku Construction Co., Ltd. (JPX: 1888.T)
1414.T vs 1888.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1888.T has a market cap of 45.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1888.T trades at ¥3,510.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1888.T's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1888.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1888.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1888.T's competition here
Hokuriku Electrical Construction Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1930.T)
1414.T vs 1930.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1930.T has a market cap of 45B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1930.T trades at ¥1,612.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1930.T's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1930.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1930.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1930.T's competition here
Miyaji Engineering Group,Inc. (JPX: 3431.T)
1414.T vs 3431.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 3431.T has a market cap of 41.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 3431.T trades at ¥1,563.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 3431.T's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 3431.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 3431.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 3431.T's competition here
Okabe Co., Ltd. (JPX: 5959.T)
1414.T vs 5959.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 5959.T has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 5959.T trades at ¥920.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 5959.T's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 5959.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 5959.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 5959.T's competition here
JDC Corporation (JPX: 1887.T)
1414.T vs 1887.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1887.T has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1887.T trades at ¥512.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1887.T's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1887.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1887.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1887.T's competition here
Matsui Construction Co., Ltd. (JPX: 1810.T)
1414.T vs 1810.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1810.T has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1810.T trades at ¥1,445.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1810.T's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1810.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1810.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1810.T's competition here
Fudo Tetra Corporation (JPX: 1813.T)
1414.T vs 1813.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1813.T has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1813.T trades at ¥2,661.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1813.T's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1813.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1813.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1813.T's competition here
Ichiken Co., Ltd. (JPX: 1847.T)
1414.T vs 1847.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1847.T has a market cap of 40.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1847.T trades at ¥2,711.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1847.T's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1847.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1847.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1847.T's competition here
Tobishima Holdings Inc. (JPX: 256A.T)
1414.T vs 256A.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 256A.T has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 256A.T trades at ¥2,063.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 256A.T's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 256A.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 256A.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 256A.T's competition here
CTS Co., Ltd. (JPX: 4345.T)
1414.T vs 4345.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 4345.T has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 4345.T trades at ¥883.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 4345.T's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 4345.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 4345.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 4345.T's competition here
Space Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 9622.T)
1414.T vs 9622.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 9622.T has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 9622.T trades at ¥1,448.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 9622.T's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 9622.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 9622.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 9622.T's competition here
E J Holdings Inc. (JPX: 2153.T)
1414.T vs 2153.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 2153.T has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 2153.T trades at ¥1,751.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 2153.T's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 2153.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 2153.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 2153.T's competition here
Yamaura Corporation (JPX: 1780.T)
1414.T vs 1780.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1780.T has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1780.T trades at ¥1,529.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1780.T's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1780.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1780.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1780.T's competition here
Tobishima Corporation (JPX: 1805.T)
1414.T vs 1805.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1805.T has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1805.T trades at ¥1,439.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1805.T's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1805.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1805.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1805.T's competition here
Kitano Construction Corp. (JPX: 1866.T)
1414.T vs 1866.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1866.T has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1866.T trades at ¥1,108.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1866.T's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1866.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1866.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1866.T's competition here
IDEA Consultants,Inc. (JPX: 9768.T)
1414.T vs 9768.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 9768.T has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 9768.T trades at ¥3,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 9768.T's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 9768.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 9768.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 9768.T's competition here
Sanko Metal Industrial Co., Ltd. (JPX: 1972.T)
1414.T vs 1972.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1972.T has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1972.T trades at ¥1,278.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1972.T's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1972.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1972.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1972.T's competition here
Tanabe Engineering Corporation (JPX: 1828.T)
1414.T vs 1828.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1828.T has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1828.T trades at ¥2,286.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1828.T's P/E ratio is 7.04. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1828.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1828.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1828.T's competition here
Br. Holdings Corporation (JPX: 1726.T)
1414.T vs 1726.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1726.T has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1726.T trades at ¥526.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1726.T's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1726.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is more volatile compared to 1726.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1726.T's competition here
Sanyo Engineering & Construction Inc. (JPX: 1960.T)
1414.T vs 1960.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1960.T has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1960.T trades at ¥1,450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1960.T's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1960.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1960.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1960.T's competition here
Nac Co., Ltd. (JPX: 9788.T)
1414.T vs 9788.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 9788.T has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 9788.T trades at ¥537.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 9788.T's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 9788.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is more volatile compared to 9788.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 9788.T's competition here
Fujita Engineering Co., Ltd. (JPX: 1770.T)
1414.T vs 1770.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1770.T has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1770.T trades at ¥2,216.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1770.T's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1770.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1770.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1770.T's competition here
Asia Air Survey Co., Ltd. (JPX: 9233.T)
1414.T vs 9233.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 9233.T has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 9233.T trades at ¥1,116.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 9233.T's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 9233.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is more volatile compared to 9233.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 9233.T's competition here
Sumiken Mitsui Road Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1776.T)
1414.T vs 1776.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1776.T has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1776.T trades at ¥1,996.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1776.T's P/E ratio is 46.95. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1776.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is more volatile compared to 1776.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1776.T's competition here
UEKI Corporation (JPX: 1867.T)
1414.T vs 1867.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 1867.T has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 1867.T trades at ¥2,760.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 1867.T's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1867.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is less volatile compared to 1867.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 1867.T's competition here
Ohba Co., Ltd. (JPX: 9765.T)
1414.T vs 9765.T Comparison July 2026
SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 1414.T) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 1414.T stands at 265.8B. In comparison, 9765.T has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 1414.T is priced at ¥1,316.00 on the JPX, while 9765.T trades at ¥1,133.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
1414.T currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas 9765.T's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, 1414.T's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 9765.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 1414.T is more volatile compared to 9765.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 1414.T.Check 9765.T's competition here