Nikken Kogaku Co., Ltd.
Nikken Kogaku Co., Ltd. (9767.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (9767.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9767.T | ¥1,399.00 | -1.06% | 2.6B | 9.44 | ¥150.45 | +2.11% |
| 5233.T | ¥4,140.00 | +1.52% | 461.7B | 54.56 | ¥75.83 | +2.42% |
| 5232.T | ¥5,221.00 | +7.96% | 155.6B | 14.05 | ¥349.64 | +2.44% |
| 5352.T | ¥4,180.00 | -0.24% | 140.8B | 7.36 | ¥567.64 | +2.75% |
| 4044.T | ¥3,835.00 | -1.16% | 95.8B | 11.47 | ¥337.08 | +4.40% |
| 5288.T | ¥1,654.00 | -0.78% | 61.9B | 11.83 | ¥137.36 | +3.38% |
| 5011.T | ¥1,975.00 | -0.60% | 56.6B | 13.28 | ¥149.82 | +4.02% |
| 5290.T | ¥1,552.00 | -1.71% | 38.5B | 7.54 | ¥205.25 | +2.26% |
| 1904.T | ¥5,180.00 | +0.97% | 31.4B | 9.05 | ¥573.79 | +3.45% |
| 5357.T | ¥1,696.00 | +0.95% | 31.1B | 14.02 | ¥120.28 | +5.34% |
Stock Comparison
9767.T vs 5233.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 5233.T has a market cap of 461.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 5233.T trades at ¥4,140.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 5233.T's P/E ratio is 54.56. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5233.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5233.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5233.T's competition here
9767.T vs 5232.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 5232.T has a market cap of 155.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 5232.T trades at ¥5,221.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 5232.T's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5232.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is less volatile compared to 5232.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5232.T's competition here
9767.T vs 5352.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 5352.T has a market cap of 140.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 5352.T trades at ¥4,180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 5352.T's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5352.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5352.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5352.T's competition here
9767.T vs 4044.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 4044.T has a market cap of 95.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 4044.T trades at ¥3,835.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 4044.T's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 4044.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 4044.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 4044.T's competition here
9767.T vs 5288.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 5288.T has a market cap of 61.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 5288.T trades at ¥1,654.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 5288.T's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5288.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is less volatile compared to 5288.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5288.T's competition here
9767.T vs 5011.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 5011.T has a market cap of 56.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 5011.T trades at ¥1,975.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 5011.T's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5011.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5011.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5011.T's competition here
9767.T vs 5290.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 5290.T has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 5290.T trades at ¥1,552.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 5290.T's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5290.T's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is less volatile compared to 5290.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5290.T's competition here
9767.T vs 1904.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 1904.T has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 1904.T trades at ¥5,180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 1904.T's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1904.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 1904.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 1904.T's competition here
9767.T vs 5357.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 5357.T has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 5357.T trades at ¥1,696.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 5357.T's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5357.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5357.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5357.T's competition here
9767.T vs 7463.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 7463.T has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 7463.T trades at ¥916.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 7463.T's P/E ratio is 3.92. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7463.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 7463.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 7463.T's competition here
9767.T vs 5363.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 5363.T has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 5363.T trades at ¥656.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 5363.T's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5363.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is less volatile compared to 5363.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5363.T's competition here
9767.T vs 8007.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 8007.T has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 8007.T trades at ¥745.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 8007.T's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8007.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 8007.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 8007.T's competition here
9767.T vs 1429.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 1429.T has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 1429.T trades at ¥706.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 1429.T's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1429.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 1429.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 1429.T's competition here
9767.T vs 3157.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 3157.T has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 3157.T trades at ¥1,450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 3157.T's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3157.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is less volatile compared to 3157.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 3157.T's competition here
9767.T vs 5269.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 5269.T has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 5269.T trades at ¥325.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 5269.T's P/E ratio is 26.07. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5269.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5269.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5269.T's competition here
9767.T vs 5388.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 5388.T has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 5388.T trades at ¥1,235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 5388.T's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5388.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5388.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5388.T's competition here
9767.T vs 5284.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 5284.T has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 5284.T trades at ¥2,232.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 5284.T's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5284.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5284.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5284.T's competition here
9767.T vs 1981.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 1981.T has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 1981.T trades at ¥1,319.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 1981.T's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1981.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 1981.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 1981.T's competition here
9767.T vs 5356.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 5356.T has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 5356.T trades at ¥1,221.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 5356.T's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5356.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5356.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5356.T's competition here
9767.T vs 5268.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 5268.T has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 5268.T trades at ¥945.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 5268.T's P/E ratio is 57.60. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5268.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5268.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5268.T's competition here
9767.T vs 5285.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 5285.T has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 5285.T trades at ¥1,264.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 5285.T's P/E ratio is 5.74. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5285.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5285.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5285.T's competition here
9767.T vs 5282.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 5282.T has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 5282.T trades at ¥376.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 5282.T's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5282.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5282.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5282.T's competition here
9767.T vs 7879.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 7879.T has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 7879.T trades at ¥673.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 7879.T's P/E ratio is -12.73. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7879.T's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 7879.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 7879.T's competition here
9767.T vs 6230.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 6230.T has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 6230.T trades at ¥2,110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 6230.T's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 6230.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 6230.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 6230.T's competition here
9767.T vs 7635.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 7635.T has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 7635.T trades at ¥1,697.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 7635.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7635.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 7635.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 7635.T's competition here
9767.T vs 8104.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 8104.T has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 8104.T trades at ¥616.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 8104.T's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8104.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 8104.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 8104.T's competition here
9767.T vs 5935.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 5935.T has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 5935.T trades at ¥2,070.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 5935.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5935.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5935.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5935.T's competition here
9767.T vs 7434.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 7434.T has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 7434.T trades at ¥1,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 7434.T's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7434.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 7434.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 7434.T's competition here
9767.T vs 7461.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 7461.T has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 7461.T trades at ¥449.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 7461.T's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7461.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 7461.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 7461.T's competition here
9767.T vs 5283.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 5283.T has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 5283.T trades at ¥3,240.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 5283.T's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5283.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5283.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5283.T's competition here
9767.T vs 3426.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 3426.T has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 3426.T trades at ¥1,315.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 3426.T's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3426.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 3426.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 3426.T's competition here
9767.T vs 7953.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 7953.T has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 7953.T trades at ¥385.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 7953.T's P/E ratio is 56.17. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7953.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 7953.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 7953.T's competition here
9767.T vs 1994.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 1994.T has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 1994.T trades at ¥594.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 1994.T's P/E ratio is 24.52. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1994.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 1994.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 1994.T's competition here
9767.T vs 5900.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 5900.T has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 5900.T trades at ¥799.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 5900.T's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5900.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5900.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5900.T's competition here
9767.T vs 5997.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 5997.T has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 5997.T trades at ¥797.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 5997.T's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5997.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5997.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5997.T's competition here
9767.T vs 5277.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 5277.T has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 5277.T trades at ¥452.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 5277.T's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5277.T's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5277.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5277.T's competition here
9767.T vs 5271.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 5271.T has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 5271.T trades at ¥2,260.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 5271.T's P/E ratio is -13.30. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5271.T's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5271.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5271.T's competition here
9767.T vs 5928.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 5928.T has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 5928.T trades at ¥278.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 5928.T's P/E ratio is 34.89. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5928.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5928.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5928.T's competition here
9767.T vs 5386.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 5386.T has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 5386.T trades at ¥373.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 5386.T's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5386.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is less volatile compared to 5386.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5386.T's competition here
9767.T vs 5287.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 5287.T has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 5287.T trades at ¥886.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 5287.T's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5287.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is less volatile compared to 5287.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5287.T's competition here
9767.T vs 7896.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 7896.T has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 7896.T trades at ¥503.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 7896.T's P/E ratio is -17.55. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7896.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 7896.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 7896.T's competition here
9767.T vs 9812.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 9812.T has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 9812.T trades at ¥231.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 9812.T's P/E ratio is -14.07. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9812.T's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 9812.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 9812.T's competition here
9767.T vs 5380.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 5380.T has a market cap of 855.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 5380.T trades at ¥1,191.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 5380.T's P/E ratio is 95.65. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5380.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5380.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5380.T's competition here
9767.T vs 6173.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 6173.T has a market cap of 211.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 6173.T trades at ¥19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 6173.T's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 6173.T's ROE of +8.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is less volatile compared to 6173.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 6173.T's competition here
9767.T vs 5610.T Comparison May 2026
9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.6B. In comparison, 5610.T has a market cap of 14.5K. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,399.00, while 5610.T trades at ¥1,612.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 9.44, whereas 5610.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5610.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5610.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5610.T's competition here