Nikken Kogaku Co., Ltd.

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 5233.T has a market cap of 434.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 5233.T trades at ¥3,920.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 5233.T's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5233.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5233.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5233.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 5352.T has a market cap of 137.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 5352.T trades at ¥4,095.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 5352.T's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5352.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5352.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5352.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 5232.T has a market cap of 128.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 5232.T trades at ¥3,937.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 5232.T's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5232.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5232.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5232.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 4044.T has a market cap of 84.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 4044.T trades at ¥3,395.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 4044.T's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 4044.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 4044.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 4044.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 5011.T has a market cap of 80.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 5011.T trades at ¥2,773.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 5011.T's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5011.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5011.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5011.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 5290.T has a market cap of 75.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 5290.T trades at ¥3,075.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 5290.T's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5290.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5290.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5290.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 5288.T has a market cap of 47.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 5288.T trades at ¥1,217.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 5288.T's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5288.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5288.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5288.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 5357.T has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 5357.T trades at ¥1,725.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 5357.T's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5357.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5357.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5357.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 7463.T has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 7463.T trades at ¥907.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 7463.T's P/E ratio is 5.37. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7463.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 7463.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 7463.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 8007.T has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 8007.T trades at ¥1,720.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 8007.T's P/E ratio is 19.07. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8007.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 8007.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 8007.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 1429.T has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 1429.T trades at ¥896.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 1429.T's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1429.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 1429.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 1429.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 1904.T has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 1904.T trades at ¥4,245.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 1904.T's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1904.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 1904.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 1904.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 5363.T has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 5363.T trades at ¥539.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 5363.T's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5363.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5363.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5363.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 5285.T has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 5285.T trades at ¥2,098.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 5285.T's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5285.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5285.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5285.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 5269.T has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 5269.T trades at ¥313.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 5269.T's P/E ratio is -82.90. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5269.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is less volatile compared to 5269.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5269.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 3157.T has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 3157.T trades at ¥1,190.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 3157.T's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3157.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 3157.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 3157.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 1981.T has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 1981.T trades at ¥1,513.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 1981.T's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1981.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is less volatile compared to 1981.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 1981.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 5284.T has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 5284.T trades at ¥2,312.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 5284.T's P/E ratio is 5.95. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5284.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5284.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5284.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 5388.T has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 5388.T trades at ¥1,085.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 5388.T's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5388.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5388.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5388.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 5356.T has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 5356.T trades at ¥1,160.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 5356.T's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5356.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5356.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5356.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 7879.T has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 7879.T trades at ¥702.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 7879.T's P/E ratio is -3.31. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7879.T's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 7879.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 7879.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 5268.T has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 5268.T trades at ¥732.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 5268.T's P/E ratio is 23.64. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5268.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5268.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5268.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 5282.T has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 5282.T trades at ¥309.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 5282.T's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5282.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5282.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5282.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 6230.T has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 6230.T trades at ¥2,050.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 6230.T's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 6230.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 6230.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 6230.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 8104.T has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 8104.T trades at ¥571.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 8104.T's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8104.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 8104.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 8104.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 5935.T has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 5935.T trades at ¥2,070.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 5935.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5935.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5935.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5935.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 7461.T has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 7461.T trades at ¥503.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 7461.T's P/E ratio is 6.39. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7461.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 7461.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 7461.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 7434.T has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 7434.T trades at ¥1,786.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 7434.T's P/E ratio is 9.24. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7434.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 7434.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 7434.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 7635.T has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 7635.T trades at ¥1,259.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 7635.T's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7635.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 7635.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 7635.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 3426.T has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 3426.T trades at ¥1,438.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 3426.T's P/E ratio is 17.57. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3426.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 3426.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 3426.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 5283.T has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 5283.T trades at ¥3,260.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 5283.T's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5283.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5283.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5283.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 7953.T has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 7953.T trades at ¥395.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 7953.T's P/E ratio is 29.99. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7953.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 7953.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 7953.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 5900.T has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 5900.T trades at ¥855.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 5900.T's P/E ratio is 18.89. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5900.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is less volatile compared to 5900.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5900.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 1994.T has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 1994.T trades at ¥499.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 1994.T's P/E ratio is 61.12. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1994.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 1994.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 1994.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 5277.T has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 5277.T trades at ¥452.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 5277.T's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5277.T's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5277.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5277.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 5997.T has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 5997.T trades at ¥665.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 5997.T's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5997.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is less volatile compared to 5997.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5997.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 5386.T has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 5386.T trades at ¥408.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 5386.T's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5386.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5386.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5386.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 5928.T has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 5928.T trades at ¥285.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 5928.T's P/E ratio is 106.74. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5928.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5928.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5928.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 5287.T has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 5287.T trades at ¥903.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 5287.T's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5287.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is less volatile compared to 5287.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5287.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 7896.T has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 7896.T trades at ¥515.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 7896.T's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7896.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 7896.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 7896.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 6173.T has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 6173.T trades at ¥296.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 6173.T's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 6173.T's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is less volatile compared to 6173.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 6173.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 9812.T has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 9812.T trades at ¥323.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 9812.T's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9812.T's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 9812.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 9812.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 5380.T has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 5380.T trades at ¥1,634.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 5380.T's P/E ratio is -63.57. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5380.T's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5380.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5380.T's competition here

9767.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9767.T stands at 2.9B. In comparison, 5610.T has a market cap of 14.5K. Regarding current trading prices, 9767.T is priced at ¥1,597.00, while 5610.T trades at ¥1,612.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9767.T currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas 5610.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 9767.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5610.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 9767.T is more volatile compared to 5610.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9767.T.Check 5610.T's competition here