Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See 9696.HK's competitors and their performance on the HKSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for 9696.HK and its HKSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9696.HK | HK$22.68 | -4.30% | 38.5B | 7.45 | HK$3.16 | N/A |
| 0148.HK | HK$45.00 | -7.64% | 55.3B | 12.42 | HK$3.97 | +4.46% |
| 9607.HK | HK$37.84 | -0.32% | 23.5B | 33.93 | HK$1.13 | N/A |
| 2768.HK | HK$31.40 | -6.16% | 20.9B | 14.86 | HK$2.23 | +1.73% |
| 0189.HK | HK$9.33 | -5.85% | 17B | 8.13 | HK$1.21 | +3.06% |
| 6616.HK | HK$8.66 | -7.28% | 11.7B | -17.83 | -HK$0.53 | N/A |
| 0336.HK | HK$3.21 | -1.23% | 10.7B | -24.67 | -HK$0.14 | +3.24% |
| 0546.HK | HK$3.96 | -4.81% | 10.2B | 8.99 | HK$0.45 | +4.58% |
| 3788.HK | HK$2.86 | -7.59% | 7.5B | 286.45 | HK$0.01 | N/A |
| 9893.HK | HK$1.39 | +0.00% | 4.9B | 21.99 | HK$0.06 | +2.01% |
Stock Comparison
Kingboard Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0148.HK)
9696.HK vs 0148.HK Comparison October 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, 0148.HK has a market cap of 55.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$22.68 on the HKSE, while 0148.HK trades at HK$45.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.45, whereas 0148.HK's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0148.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is less volatile compared to 0148.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 0148.HK's competition here
Red Avenue New Materials Group Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 9607.HK)
9696.HK vs 9607.HK Comparison October 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, 9607.HK has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$22.68 on the HKSE, while 9607.HK trades at HK$37.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.45, whereas 9607.HK's P/E ratio is 33.93. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 9607.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 9607.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 9607.HK's competition here
Qingdao Gon Technology Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2768.HK)
9696.HK vs 2768.HK Comparison October 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, 2768.HK has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$22.68 on the HKSE, while 2768.HK trades at HK$31.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.45, whereas 2768.HK's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 2768.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is less volatile compared to 2768.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 2768.HK's competition here
Dongyue Group Limited (HKSE: 0189.HK)
9696.HK vs 0189.HK Comparison October 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, 0189.HK has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$22.68 on the HKSE, while 0189.HK trades at HK$9.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.45, whereas 0189.HK's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0189.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is less volatile compared to 0189.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 0189.HK's competition here
Global New Material International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 6616.HK)
9696.HK vs 6616.HK Comparison October 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, 6616.HK has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$22.68 on the HKSE, while 6616.HK trades at HK$8.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.45, whereas 6616.HK's P/E ratio is -17.83. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 6616.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is less volatile compared to 6616.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 6616.HK's competition here
Huabao International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0336.HK)
9696.HK vs 0336.HK Comparison October 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, 0336.HK has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$22.68 on the HKSE, while 0336.HK trades at HK$3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.45, whereas 0336.HK's P/E ratio is -24.67. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0336.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 0336.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 0336.HK's competition here
Fufeng Group Limited (HKSE: 0546.HK)
9696.HK vs 0546.HK Comparison October 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, 0546.HK has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$22.68 on the HKSE, while 0546.HK trades at HK$3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.45, whereas 0546.HK's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0546.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 0546.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 0546.HK's competition here
Hanking Gold International Limited (HKSE: 3788.HK)
9696.HK vs 3788.HK Comparison October 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, 3788.HK has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$22.68 on the HKSE, while 3788.HK trades at HK$2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.45, whereas 3788.HK's P/E ratio is 286.45. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3788.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is less volatile compared to 3788.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 3788.HK's competition here
Pizu Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 9893.HK)
9696.HK vs 9893.HK Comparison October 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, 9893.HK has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$22.68 on the HKSE, while 9893.HK trades at HK$1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.45, whereas 9893.HK's P/E ratio is 21.99. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 9893.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 9893.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 9893.HK's competition here
Ximei Resources Holding Limited (HKSE: 9936.HK)
9696.HK vs 9936.HK Comparison October 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, 9936.HK has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$22.68 on the HKSE, while 9936.HK trades at HK$8.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.45, whereas 9936.HK's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 9936.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is less volatile compared to 9936.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 9936.HK's competition here
SANVO Fine Chemicals Group Limited (HKSE: 0301.HK)
9696.HK vs 0301.HK Comparison October 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, 0301.HK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$22.68 on the HKSE, while 0301.HK trades at HK$7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.45, whereas 0301.HK's P/E ratio is -202.20. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0301.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 0301.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 0301.HK's competition here
China Boton Group Company Limited (HKSE: 3318.HK)
9696.HK vs 3318.HK Comparison October 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, 3318.HK has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$22.68 on the HKSE, while 3318.HK trades at HK$3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.45, whereas 3318.HK's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3318.HK's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 3318.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 3318.HK's competition here
Pizu Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8053.HK)
9696.HK vs 8053.HK Comparison October 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, 8053.HK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$22.68 on the HKSE, while 8053.HK trades at HK$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.45, whereas 8053.HK's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 8053.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is less volatile compared to 8053.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 8053.HK's competition here
GHW International (HKSE: 9933.HK)
9696.HK vs 9933.HK Comparison October 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, 9933.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$22.68 on the HKSE, while 9933.HK trades at HK$1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.45, whereas 9933.HK's P/E ratio is 39.19. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 9933.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 9933.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 9933.HK's competition here
Yip's Chemical Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0408.HK)
9696.HK vs 0408.HK Comparison October 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, 0408.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$22.68 on the HKSE, while 0408.HK trades at HK$2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.45, whereas 0408.HK's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0408.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 0408.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 0408.HK's competition here
Befar Group (HKSE: 6745.HK)
9696.HK vs 6745.HK Comparison October 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, 6745.HK has a market cap of 961.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$22.68 on the HKSE, while 6745.HK trades at HK$2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.45, whereas 6745.HK's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 6745.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 6745.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 6745.HK's competition here
Jiangsu Lopal Tech Group Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2465.HK)
9696.HK vs 2465.HK Comparison October 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, 2465.HK has a market cap of 922.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$22.68 on the HKSE, while 2465.HK trades at HK$6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.45, whereas 2465.HK's P/E ratio is 39.13. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 2465.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is less volatile compared to 2465.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 2465.HK's competition here
Wuhan Youji Holdings Ltd. (HKSE: 2881.HK)
9696.HK vs 2881.HK Comparison October 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, 2881.HK has a market cap of 905M. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$22.68 on the HKSE, while 2881.HK trades at HK$9.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.45, whereas 2881.HK's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 2881.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 2881.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 2881.HK's competition here
Tsaker New Energy Tech Co., Limited (HKSE: 1986.HK)
9696.HK vs 1986.HK Comparison October 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, 1986.HK has a market cap of 871.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$22.68 on the HKSE, while 1986.HK trades at HK$0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.45, whereas 1986.HK's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1986.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is less volatile compared to 1986.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 1986.HK's competition here
Infinity Development Holdings Company Limited (HKSE: 0640.HK)
9696.HK vs 0640.HK Comparison October 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, 0640.HK has a market cap of 684.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$22.68 on the HKSE, while 0640.HK trades at HK$2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.45, whereas 0640.HK's P/E ratio is 5.63. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0640.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 0640.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 0640.HK's competition here
Henan Jinyuan Hydrogenated Chemicals Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2502.HK)
9696.HK vs 2502.HK Comparison October 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, 2502.HK has a market cap of 468.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$22.68 on the HKSE, while 2502.HK trades at HK$0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.45, whereas 2502.HK's P/E ratio is -9.80. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 2502.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is less volatile compared to 2502.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 2502.HK's competition here
Newtrend Group Holding Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2573.HK)
9696.HK vs 2573.HK Comparison October 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, 2573.HK has a market cap of 429.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$22.68 on the HKSE, while 2573.HK trades at HK$4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.45, whereas 2573.HK's P/E ratio is -4.98. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 2573.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 2573.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 2573.HK's competition here
Jiangsu Innovative Ecological New Materials Limited (HKSE: 2116.HK)
9696.HK vs 2116.HK Comparison October 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, 2116.HK has a market cap of 364.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$22.68 on the HKSE, while 2116.HK trades at HK$0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.45, whereas 2116.HK's P/E ratio is 24.76. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 2116.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 2116.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 2116.HK's competition here
CNT Group Limited (HKSE: 0701.HK)
9696.HK vs 0701.HK Comparison October 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, 0701.HK has a market cap of 201.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$22.68 on the HKSE, while 0701.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.45, whereas 0701.HK's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0701.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 0701.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 0701.HK's competition here
China Treasures New Materials Group Ltd. (HKSE: 2439.HK)
9696.HK vs 2439.HK Comparison October 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, 2439.HK has a market cap of 200M. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$22.68 on the HKSE, while 2439.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.45, whereas 2439.HK's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 2439.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is less volatile compared to 2439.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 2439.HK's competition here
CPM Group Limited (HKSE: 1932.HK)
9696.HK vs 1932.HK Comparison October 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, 1932.HK has a market cap of 162M. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$22.68 on the HKSE, while 1932.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.45, whereas 1932.HK's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1932.HK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 1932.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 1932.HK's competition here
Changmao Biochemical Engineering Company Limited (HKSE: 0954.HK)
9696.HK vs 0954.HK Comparison October 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, 0954.HK has a market cap of 119.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$22.68 on the HKSE, while 0954.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.45, whereas 0954.HK's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0954.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is less volatile compared to 0954.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 0954.HK's competition here
Ngai Hing Hong Company Limited (HKSE: 1047.HK)
9696.HK vs 1047.HK Comparison October 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, 1047.HK has a market cap of 114.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$22.68 on the HKSE, while 1047.HK trades at HK$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.45, whereas 1047.HK's P/E ratio is -17.79. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1047.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 1047.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 1047.HK's competition here
Diwang Industrial Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1950.HK)
9696.HK vs 1950.HK Comparison October 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, 1950.HK has a market cap of 71.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$22.68 on the HKSE, while 1950.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.45, whereas 1950.HK's P/E ratio is 2.82. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1950.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is less volatile compared to 1950.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 1950.HK's competition here
Pan Asia Data Holdings Inc. (HKSE: 1561.HK)
9696.HK vs 1561.HK Comparison October 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, 1561.HK has a market cap of 67.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$22.68 on the HKSE, while 1561.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.45, whereas 1561.HK's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 1561.HK's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is less volatile compared to 1561.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 1561.HK's competition here
China Huajun Group Limited (HKSE: 0377.HK)
9696.HK vs 0377.HK Comparison October 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, 0377.HK has a market cap of 43.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$22.68 on the HKSE, while 0377.HK trades at HK$0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.45, whereas 0377.HK's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0377.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is less volatile compared to 0377.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 0377.HK's competition here
Bao Shen Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8151.HK)
9696.HK vs 8151.HK Comparison October 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 38.5B. In comparison, 8151.HK has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$22.68 on the HKSE, while 8151.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 7.45, whereas 8151.HK's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 8151.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 8151.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 8151.HK's competition here