Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See 9696.HK's competitors and their performance on the HKSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for 9696.HK and its HKSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9696.HK | HK$37.70 | +11.74% | 61.7B | 23.49 | HK$1.60 | N/A |
| 0148.HK | HK$46.80 | +2.81% | 52.5B | 11.79 | HK$3.97 | +4.70% |
| 2768.HK | HK$37.68 | +1.13% | 23.7B | 13.08 | HK$2.88 | +1.52% |
| 0189.HK | HK$13.52 | +9.65% | 23.4B | 11.20 | HK$1.21 | +2.22% |
| 0546.HK | HK$5.24 | +1.35% | 13.1B | 4.84 | HK$1.08 | +9.30% |
| 6616.HK | HK$9.70 | +1.20% | 12.1B | -28.04 | -HK$0.35 | N/A |
| 0336.HK | HK$3.16 | +0.48% | 10.2B | -22.87 | -HK$0.14 | +3.14% |
| 9936.HK | HK$14.40 | +5.34% | 6B | 38.90 | HK$0.37 | +0.91% |
| 9893.HK | HK$1.65 | +1.85% | 5.9B | 40.50 | HK$0.04 | +0.91% |
| 0301.HK | HK$6.68 | -3.82% | 3.1B | -148.28 | -HK$0.05 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Kingboard Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0148.HK)
9696.HK vs 0148.HK Comparison August 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 61.7B. In comparison, 0148.HK has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$37.70 on the HKSE, while 0148.HK trades at HK$46.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas 0148.HK's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0148.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 0148.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 0148.HK's competition here
Qingdao Gon Technology Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2768.HK)
9696.HK vs 2768.HK Comparison August 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 61.7B. In comparison, 2768.HK has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$37.70 on the HKSE, while 2768.HK trades at HK$37.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas 2768.HK's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2768.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 2768.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 2768.HK's competition here
Dongyue Group Limited (HKSE: 0189.HK)
9696.HK vs 0189.HK Comparison August 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 61.7B. In comparison, 0189.HK has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$37.70 on the HKSE, while 0189.HK trades at HK$13.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas 0189.HK's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0189.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 0189.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 0189.HK's competition here
Fufeng Group Limited (HKSE: 0546.HK)
9696.HK vs 0546.HK Comparison August 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 61.7B. In comparison, 0546.HK has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$37.70 on the HKSE, while 0546.HK trades at HK$5.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas 0546.HK's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0546.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 0546.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 0546.HK's competition here
Global New Material International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 6616.HK)
9696.HK vs 6616.HK Comparison August 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 61.7B. In comparison, 6616.HK has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$37.70 on the HKSE, while 6616.HK trades at HK$9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas 6616.HK's P/E ratio is -28.04. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6616.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 6616.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 6616.HK's competition here
Huabao International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0336.HK)
9696.HK vs 0336.HK Comparison August 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 61.7B. In comparison, 0336.HK has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$37.70 on the HKSE, while 0336.HK trades at HK$3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas 0336.HK's P/E ratio is -22.87. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0336.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 0336.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 0336.HK's competition here
Ximei Resources Holding Limited (HKSE: 9936.HK)
9696.HK vs 9936.HK Comparison August 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 61.7B. In comparison, 9936.HK has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$37.70 on the HKSE, while 9936.HK trades at HK$14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas 9936.HK's P/E ratio is 38.90. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 9936.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 9936.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 9936.HK's competition here
Pizu Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 9893.HK)
9696.HK vs 9893.HK Comparison August 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 61.7B. In comparison, 9893.HK has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$37.70 on the HKSE, while 9893.HK trades at HK$1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas 9893.HK's P/E ratio is 40.50. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 9893.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 9893.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 9893.HK's competition here
SANVO Fine Chemicals Group Limited (HKSE: 0301.HK)
9696.HK vs 0301.HK Comparison August 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 61.7B. In comparison, 0301.HK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$37.70 on the HKSE, while 0301.HK trades at HK$6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas 0301.HK's P/E ratio is -148.28. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0301.HK's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 0301.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 0301.HK's competition here
China Boton Group Company Limited (HKSE: 3318.HK)
9696.HK vs 3318.HK Comparison August 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 61.7B. In comparison, 3318.HK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$37.70 on the HKSE, while 3318.HK trades at HK$2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas 3318.HK's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 3318.HK's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 3318.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 3318.HK's competition here
Pizu Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8053.HK)
9696.HK vs 8053.HK Comparison August 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 61.7B. In comparison, 8053.HK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$37.70 on the HKSE, while 8053.HK trades at HK$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas 8053.HK's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8053.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 8053.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 8053.HK's competition here
GHW International (HKSE: 9933.HK)
9696.HK vs 9933.HK Comparison August 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 61.7B. In comparison, 9933.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$37.70 on the HKSE, while 9933.HK trades at HK$1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas 9933.HK's P/E ratio is 116.00. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 9933.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 9933.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 9933.HK's competition here
Yip's Chemical Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0408.HK)
9696.HK vs 0408.HK Comparison August 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 61.7B. In comparison, 0408.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$37.70 on the HKSE, while 0408.HK trades at HK$2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas 0408.HK's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0408.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 0408.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 0408.HK's competition here
Jiangsu Lopal Tech Group Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2465.HK)
9696.HK vs 2465.HK Comparison August 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 61.7B. In comparison, 2465.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$37.70 on the HKSE, while 2465.HK trades at HK$9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas 2465.HK's P/E ratio is 56.93. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2465.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 2465.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 2465.HK's competition here
Befar Group (HKSE: 6745.HK)
9696.HK vs 6745.HK Comparison August 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 61.7B. In comparison, 6745.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$37.70 on the HKSE, while 6745.HK trades at HK$3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas 6745.HK's P/E ratio is 24.94. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 6745.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 6745.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 6745.HK's competition here
Wuhan Youji Holdings Ltd. (HKSE: 2881.HK)
9696.HK vs 2881.HK Comparison August 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 61.7B. In comparison, 2881.HK has a market cap of 975M. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$37.70 on the HKSE, while 2881.HK trades at HK$10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas 2881.HK's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2881.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 2881.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 2881.HK's competition here
Tsaker New Energy Tech Co., Limited (HKSE: 1986.HK)
9696.HK vs 1986.HK Comparison August 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 61.7B. In comparison, 1986.HK has a market cap of 895.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$37.70 on the HKSE, while 1986.HK trades at HK$0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas 1986.HK's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1986.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 1986.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 1986.HK's competition here
Infinity Development Holdings Company Limited (HKSE: 0640.HK)
9696.HK vs 0640.HK Comparison August 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 61.7B. In comparison, 0640.HK has a market cap of 716.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$37.70 on the HKSE, while 0640.HK trades at HK$2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas 0640.HK's P/E ratio is 5.61. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0640.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 0640.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 0640.HK's competition here
Newtrend Group Holding Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2573.HK)
9696.HK vs 2573.HK Comparison August 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 61.7B. In comparison, 2573.HK has a market cap of 591.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$37.70 on the HKSE, while 2573.HK trades at HK$6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas 2573.HK's P/E ratio is 38.44. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2573.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 2573.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 2573.HK's competition here
Henan Jinyuan Hydrogenated Chemicals Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2502.HK)
9696.HK vs 2502.HK Comparison August 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 61.7B. In comparison, 2502.HK has a market cap of 582.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$37.70 on the HKSE, while 2502.HK trades at HK$0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas 2502.HK's P/E ratio is -12.20. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2502.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 2502.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 2502.HK's competition here
Jiangsu Innovative Ecological New Materials Limited (HKSE: 2116.HK)
9696.HK vs 2116.HK Comparison August 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 61.7B. In comparison, 2116.HK has a market cap of 350.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$37.70 on the HKSE, while 2116.HK trades at HK$0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas 2116.HK's P/E ratio is 19.14. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2116.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 2116.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 2116.HK's competition here
China Treasures New Materials Group Ltd. (HKSE: 2439.HK)
9696.HK vs 2439.HK Comparison August 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 61.7B. In comparison, 2439.HK has a market cap of 260M. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$37.70 on the HKSE, while 2439.HK trades at HK$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas 2439.HK's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 2439.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 2439.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 2439.HK's competition here
China Huajun Group Limited (HKSE: 0377.HK)
9696.HK vs 0377.HK Comparison August 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 61.7B. In comparison, 0377.HK has a market cap of 214.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$37.70 on the HKSE, while 0377.HK trades at HK$3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas 0377.HK's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0377.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 0377.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 0377.HK's competition here
CNT Group Limited (HKSE: 0701.HK)
9696.HK vs 0701.HK Comparison August 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 61.7B. In comparison, 0701.HK has a market cap of 175.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$37.70 on the HKSE, while 0701.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas 0701.HK's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0701.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 0701.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 0701.HK's competition here
CPM Group Limited (HKSE: 1932.HK)
9696.HK vs 1932.HK Comparison August 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 61.7B. In comparison, 1932.HK has a market cap of 136M. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$37.70 on the HKSE, while 1932.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas 1932.HK's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1932.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 1932.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 1932.HK's competition here
Changmao Biochemical Engineering Company Limited (HKSE: 0954.HK)
9696.HK vs 0954.HK Comparison August 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 61.7B. In comparison, 0954.HK has a market cap of 130.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$37.70 on the HKSE, while 0954.HK trades at HK$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas 0954.HK's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0954.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 0954.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 0954.HK's competition here
Ngai Hing Hong Company Limited (HKSE: 1047.HK)
9696.HK vs 1047.HK Comparison August 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 61.7B. In comparison, 1047.HK has a market cap of 129.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$37.70 on the HKSE, while 1047.HK trades at HK$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas 1047.HK's P/E ratio is -20.08. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1047.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 1047.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 1047.HK's competition here
Diwang Industrial Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1950.HK)
9696.HK vs 1950.HK Comparison August 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 61.7B. In comparison, 1950.HK has a market cap of 74.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$37.70 on the HKSE, while 1950.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas 1950.HK's P/E ratio is 2.96. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1950.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 1950.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 1950.HK's competition here
Pan Asia Data Holdings Inc. (HKSE: 1561.HK)
9696.HK vs 1561.HK Comparison August 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 61.7B. In comparison, 1561.HK has a market cap of 53.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$37.70 on the HKSE, while 1561.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas 1561.HK's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 1561.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 1561.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 1561.HK's competition here
Bao Shen Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8151.HK)
9696.HK vs 8151.HK Comparison August 2026
Tianqi Lithium Corporation (HKSE: 9696.HK) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 61.7B. In comparison, 8151.HK has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$37.70 on the HKSE, while 8151.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.49, whereas 8151.HK's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 8151.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is more volatile compared to 8151.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.Check 8151.HK's competition here