Loading...

Tianqi Lithium Corporation

9696.HKHKSE
Basic Materials
Industrial Materials
HK$29.25
HK$0.30(1.04%)

Tianqi Lithium Corporation 9696.HK Peers

See (9696.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.

Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry

Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.

SymbolPriceChange %Market CapP/E RatioEPSDividend Yield
9696.HKHK$29.25+1.04%58.3B-5.03-HK$5.81N/A
3993.HKHK$8.33+4.39%212.4B10.68HK$0.78+3.34%
3939.HKHK$31.50+0.48%34.1B43.75HK$0.72+0.88%
2245.HKHK$10.72+4.89%17.1B8.58HK$1.25+3.54%
1029.HKHK$0.62-3.13%7.9B-31.00-HK$0.02N/A
1205.HKHK$0.39-2.53%3B5.43HK$0.07+6.75%
3833.HKHK$1.06+1.92%2.3B11.78HK$0.09N/A
0769.HKHK$0.70+0.00%2B-17.50-HK$0.04N/A
0521.HKHK$0.13+0.00%1.5B4.47HK$0.03N/A
1091.HKHK$0.28-11.29%1.2B-1.38-HK$0.21N/A
Showing 1 to 10 of 26 results
1

Stock Comparison

Select a stock to compare (requires JavaScript). Showing default comparison.

9696.HK vs 3993.HK Comparison

9696.HK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 9696.HK stands at 58.3B. In comparison, 3993.HK has a market cap of 212.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9696.HK is priced at HK$29.25, while 3993.HK trades at HK$8.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

9696.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.03, whereas 3993.HK's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, 9696.HK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to 3993.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 9696.HK is less volatile compared to 3993.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9696.HK.

Stock Price Comparison

Loading...

Frequently Asked Questions

;