Toho Co., Ltd.
Toho Co., Ltd. (9602.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (9602.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9602.T | ¥1,705.50 | +3.33% | 1.4T | 28.05 | ¥59.42 | +6.30% |
| 4816.T | ¥2,643.00 | +2.76% | 530.2B | 21.78 | ¥119.14 | +1.26% |
| 9605.T | ¥6,000.00 | +3.09% | 368.7B | 18.27 | ¥323.01 | +0.51% |
| 5032.T | ¥3,005.00 | +5.36% | 176.6B | 12.18 | ¥238.06 | +2.33% |
| 9601.T | ¥12,210.00 | +4.00% | 162.2B | 39.26 | ¥300.54 | +0.20% |
| 2329.T | ¥618.00 | +0.65% | 84.5B | 8.95 | ¥68.58 | +3.96% |
| 7860.T | ¥1,205.00 | +1.95% | 50.7B | 119.32 | ¥9.99 | +3.77% |
| 6879.T | ¥791.00 | +0.00% | 35B | -0.00 | -¥285,983,008.00 | N/A |
| 4301.T | ¥2,029.00 | +0.59% | 32.8B | 6.98 | ¥290.04 | +1.78% |
| 3791.T | ¥1,303.00 | +3.58% | 25B | 39.43 | ¥31.32 | +1.21% |
Stock Comparison
9602.T vs 4816.T Comparison April 2026
9602.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9602.T stands at 1.4T. In comparison, 4816.T has a market cap of 530.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9602.T is priced at ¥1,705.50, while 4816.T trades at ¥2,643.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9602.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas 4816.T's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, 9602.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 4816.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 9602.T is more volatile compared to 4816.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9602.T.Check 4816.T's competition here
9602.T vs 9605.T Comparison April 2026
9602.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9602.T stands at 1.4T. In comparison, 9605.T has a market cap of 368.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9602.T is priced at ¥1,705.50, while 9605.T trades at ¥6,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9602.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas 9605.T's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, 9602.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 9605.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9602.T is more volatile compared to 9605.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9602.T.Check 9605.T's competition here
9602.T vs 5032.T Comparison April 2026
9602.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9602.T stands at 1.4T. In comparison, 5032.T has a market cap of 176.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 9602.T is priced at ¥1,705.50, while 5032.T trades at ¥3,005.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9602.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas 5032.T's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, 9602.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 5032.T's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, 9602.T is less volatile compared to 5032.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9602.T.Check 5032.T's competition here
9602.T vs 9601.T Comparison April 2026
9602.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9602.T stands at 1.4T. In comparison, 9601.T has a market cap of 162.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9602.T is priced at ¥1,705.50, while 9601.T trades at ¥12,210.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9602.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas 9601.T's P/E ratio is 39.26. In terms of profitability, 9602.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 9601.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9602.T is less volatile compared to 9601.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9602.T.Check 9601.T's competition here
9602.T vs 2329.T Comparison April 2026
9602.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9602.T stands at 1.4T. In comparison, 2329.T has a market cap of 84.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9602.T is priced at ¥1,705.50, while 2329.T trades at ¥618.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9602.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas 2329.T's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, 9602.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2329.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 9602.T is more volatile compared to 2329.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9602.T.Check 2329.T's competition here
9602.T vs 7860.T Comparison April 2026
9602.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9602.T stands at 1.4T. In comparison, 7860.T has a market cap of 50.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9602.T is priced at ¥1,705.50, while 7860.T trades at ¥1,205.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9602.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas 7860.T's P/E ratio is 119.32. In terms of profitability, 9602.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 7860.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9602.T is more volatile compared to 7860.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9602.T.Check 7860.T's competition here
9602.T vs 6879.T Comparison April 2026
9602.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9602.T stands at 1.4T. In comparison, 6879.T has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, 9602.T is priced at ¥1,705.50, while 6879.T trades at ¥791.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9602.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas 6879.T's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, 9602.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6879.T's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 9602.T is more volatile compared to 6879.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9602.T.Check 6879.T's competition here
9602.T vs 4301.T Comparison April 2026
9602.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9602.T stands at 1.4T. In comparison, 4301.T has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9602.T is priced at ¥1,705.50, while 4301.T trades at ¥2,029.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9602.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas 4301.T's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, 9602.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 4301.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 9602.T is more volatile compared to 4301.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9602.T.Check 4301.T's competition here
9602.T vs 3791.T Comparison April 2026
9602.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9602.T stands at 1.4T. In comparison, 3791.T has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, 9602.T is priced at ¥1,705.50, while 3791.T trades at ¥1,303.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9602.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas 3791.T's P/E ratio is 39.43. In terms of profitability, 9602.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3791.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9602.T is less volatile compared to 3791.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9602.T.Check 3791.T's competition here
9602.T vs 9408.T Comparison April 2026
9602.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9602.T stands at 1.4T. In comparison, 9408.T has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9602.T is priced at ¥1,705.50, while 9408.T trades at ¥2,743.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9602.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas 9408.T's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, 9602.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 9408.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 9602.T is more volatile compared to 9408.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9602.T.Check 9408.T's competition here
9602.T vs 4347.T Comparison April 2026
9602.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9602.T stands at 1.4T. In comparison, 4347.T has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9602.T is priced at ¥1,705.50, while 4347.T trades at ¥2,249.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9602.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas 4347.T's P/E ratio is 27.66. In terms of profitability, 9602.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 4347.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 9602.T is less volatile compared to 4347.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9602.T.Check 4347.T's competition here
9602.T vs 4712.T Comparison April 2026
9602.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9602.T stands at 1.4T. In comparison, 4712.T has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 9602.T is priced at ¥1,705.50, while 4712.T trades at ¥780.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9602.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas 4712.T's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, 9602.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 4712.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9602.T is less volatile compared to 4712.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9602.T.Check 4712.T's competition here
9602.T vs 9249.T Comparison April 2026
9602.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9602.T stands at 1.4T. In comparison, 9249.T has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9602.T is priced at ¥1,705.50, while 9249.T trades at ¥1,563.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9602.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas 9249.T's P/E ratio is 44.70. In terms of profitability, 9602.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 9249.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 9602.T is more volatile compared to 9249.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9602.T.Check 9249.T's competition here
9602.T vs 4295.T Comparison April 2026
9602.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9602.T stands at 1.4T. In comparison, 4295.T has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9602.T is priced at ¥1,705.50, while 4295.T trades at ¥1,215.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9602.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas 4295.T's P/E ratio is -12.87. In terms of profitability, 9602.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 4295.T's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 9602.T is more volatile compared to 4295.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9602.T.Check 4295.T's competition here
9602.T vs 9636.T Comparison April 2026
9602.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9602.T stands at 1.4T. In comparison, 9636.T has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9602.T is priced at ¥1,705.50, while 9636.T trades at ¥4,140.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9602.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas 9636.T's P/E ratio is 69.53. In terms of profitability, 9602.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 9636.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9602.T is more volatile compared to 9636.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9602.T.Check 9636.T's competition here
9602.T vs 4772.T Comparison April 2026
9602.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9602.T stands at 1.4T. In comparison, 4772.T has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 9602.T is priced at ¥1,705.50, while 4772.T trades at ¥89.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9602.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas 4772.T's P/E ratio is 27.16. In terms of profitability, 9602.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 4772.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 9602.T is more volatile compared to 4772.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9602.T.Check 4772.T's competition here
9602.T vs 4308.T Comparison April 2026
9602.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9602.T stands at 1.4T. In comparison, 4308.T has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9602.T is priced at ¥1,705.50, while 4308.T trades at ¥366.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9602.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas 4308.T's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, 9602.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 4308.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 9602.T is less volatile compared to 4308.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9602.T.Check 4308.T's competition here
9602.T vs 4317.T Comparison April 2026
9602.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9602.T stands at 1.4T. In comparison, 4317.T has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9602.T is priced at ¥1,705.50, while 4317.T trades at ¥596.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9602.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas 4317.T's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, 9602.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 4317.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 9602.T is more volatile compared to 4317.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9602.T.Check 4317.T's competition here
9602.T vs 3686.T Comparison April 2026
9602.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9602.T stands at 1.4T. In comparison, 3686.T has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 9602.T is priced at ¥1,705.50, while 3686.T trades at ¥108.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9602.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas 3686.T's P/E ratio is -9.88. In terms of profitability, 9602.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3686.T's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 9602.T is less volatile compared to 3686.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9602.T.Check 3686.T's competition here
9602.T vs 3929.T Comparison April 2026
9602.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9602.T stands at 1.4T. In comparison, 3929.T has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 9602.T is priced at ¥1,705.50, while 3929.T trades at ¥318.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9602.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas 3929.T's P/E ratio is 20.03. In terms of profitability, 9602.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3929.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 9602.T is less volatile compared to 3929.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9602.T.Check 3929.T's competition here
9602.T vs 5125.T Comparison April 2026
9602.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9602.T stands at 1.4T. In comparison, 5125.T has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 9602.T is priced at ¥1,705.50, while 5125.T trades at ¥637.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9602.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas 5125.T's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, 9602.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 5125.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 9602.T is more volatile compared to 5125.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9602.T.Check 5125.T's competition here
9602.T vs 4650.T Comparison April 2026
9602.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 9602.T stands at 1.4T. In comparison, 4650.T has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 9602.T is priced at ¥1,705.50, while 4650.T trades at ¥266.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
9602.T currently has a P/E ratio of 28.05, whereas 4650.T's P/E ratio is 47.14. In terms of profitability, 9602.T's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 4650.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 9602.T is more volatile compared to 4650.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 9602.T.Check 4650.T's competition here