Faith, Inc. (4295.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (4295.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4295.T | ¥1,215.00 | -0.08% | 13.2B | -12.87 | -¥94.41 | +0.82% |
| 9602.T | ¥1,262.00 | -1.25% | 1T | 5.62 | ¥224.38 | +1.74% |
| 4816.T | ¥2,309.00 | +0.65% | 471.8B | 18.82 | ¥122.67 | +1.91% |
| 9605.T | ¥5,690.00 | +0.18% | 355.6B | 14.97 | ¥380.13 | +0.53% |
| 9601.T | ¥10,100.00 | -1.17% | 138.8B | 26.20 | ¥385.47 | +0.40% |
| 5032.T | ¥2,097.00 | +2.09% | 125.7B | 9.05 | ¥231.82 | +3.58% |
| 2329.T | ¥520.00 | +0.00% | 71.5B | 10.28 | ¥50.60 | +5.20% |
| 7860.T | ¥1,189.00 | +0.51% | 50.5B | 14.21 | ¥83.70 | +4.21% |
| 8142.T | ¥1,351.00 | +0.30% | 43.1B | 8.89 | ¥152.05 | +3.70% |
| 6879.T | ¥791.00 | +0.00% | 35B | -0.00 | -¥285,983,008.00 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
4295.T vs 9602.T Comparison June 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 9602.T has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 9602.T trades at ¥1,262.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 9602.T's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 9602.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 9602.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 9602.T's competition here
4295.T vs 4816.T Comparison June 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 4816.T has a market cap of 471.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 4816.T trades at ¥2,309.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 4816.T's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 4816.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 4816.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 4816.T's competition here
4295.T vs 9605.T Comparison June 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 9605.T has a market cap of 355.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 9605.T trades at ¥5,690.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 9605.T's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 9605.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 9605.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 9605.T's competition here
4295.T vs 9601.T Comparison June 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 9601.T has a market cap of 138.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 9601.T trades at ¥10,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 9601.T's P/E ratio is 26.20. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 9601.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 9601.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 9601.T's competition here
4295.T vs 5032.T Comparison June 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 5032.T has a market cap of 125.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 5032.T trades at ¥2,097.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 5032.T's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 5032.T's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 5032.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 5032.T's competition here
4295.T vs 2329.T Comparison June 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 2329.T has a market cap of 71.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 2329.T trades at ¥520.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 2329.T's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 2329.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 2329.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 2329.T's competition here
4295.T vs 7860.T Comparison June 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 7860.T has a market cap of 50.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 7860.T trades at ¥1,189.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 7860.T's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 7860.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 7860.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 7860.T's competition here
4295.T vs 8142.T Comparison June 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 8142.T has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 8142.T trades at ¥1,351.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 8142.T's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 8142.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 8142.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 8142.T's competition here
4295.T vs 6879.T Comparison June 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 6879.T has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 6879.T trades at ¥791.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 6879.T's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 6879.T's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is more volatile compared to 6879.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 6879.T's competition here
4295.T vs 4301.T Comparison June 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 4301.T has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 4301.T trades at ¥1,803.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 4301.T's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 4301.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 4301.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 4301.T's competition here
4295.T vs 3791.T Comparison June 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 3791.T has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 3791.T trades at ¥1,255.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 3791.T's P/E ratio is 22.54. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 3791.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 3791.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 3791.T's competition here
4295.T vs 9408.T Comparison June 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 9408.T has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 9408.T trades at ¥2,750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 9408.T's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 9408.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is more volatile compared to 9408.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 9408.T's competition here
4295.T vs 4712.T Comparison June 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 4712.T has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 4712.T trades at ¥805.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 4712.T's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 4712.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 4712.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 4712.T's competition here
4295.T vs 9249.T Comparison June 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 9249.T has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 9249.T trades at ¥1,581.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 9249.T's P/E ratio is 29.47. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 9249.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 9249.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 9249.T's competition here
4295.T vs 9636.T Comparison June 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 9636.T has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 9636.T trades at ¥4,210.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 9636.T's P/E ratio is 64.94. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 9636.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 9636.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 9636.T's competition here
4295.T vs 4347.T Comparison June 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 4347.T has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 4347.T trades at ¥1,620.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 4347.T's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 4347.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 4347.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 4347.T's competition here
4295.T vs 4308.T Comparison June 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 4308.T has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 4308.T trades at ¥354.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 4308.T's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 4308.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 4308.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 4308.T's competition here
4295.T vs 4772.T Comparison June 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 4772.T has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 4772.T trades at ¥68.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 4772.T's P/E ratio is 20.98. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 4772.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 4772.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 4772.T's competition here
4295.T vs 4317.T Comparison June 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 4317.T has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 4317.T trades at ¥473.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 4317.T's P/E ratio is 4.80. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 4317.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 4317.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 4317.T's competition here
4295.T vs 3929.T Comparison June 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 3929.T has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 3929.T trades at ¥271.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 3929.T's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 3929.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 3929.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 3929.T's competition here
4295.T vs 3686.T Comparison June 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 3686.T has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 3686.T trades at ¥72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 3686.T's P/E ratio is -6.29. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 3686.T's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 3686.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 3686.T's competition here
4295.T vs 4650.T Comparison June 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 4650.T has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 4650.T trades at ¥260.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 4650.T's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 4650.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 4650.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 4650.T's competition here
4295.T vs 5125.T Comparison June 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 5125.T has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 5125.T trades at ¥474.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 5125.T's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 5125.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 5125.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 5125.T's competition here