1957 & Co. (Hospitality) Limited
1957 & Co. (Hospitality) Limited 8495.HK Peers
See (8495.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8495.HK | $0.18 | -6.25% | 69.12M | -11.04 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| 9987.HK | $343.80 | -1.21% | 128.35B | 18.43 | $18.65 | +0.58% |
| 6862.HK | $16.06 | -1.83% | 86.96B | 17.09 | $0.94 | +7.57% |
| 1405.HK | $96.85 | -1.68% | 12.67B | 215.22 | $0.45 | N/A |
| 0999.HK | $10.64 | +0.76% | 12.52B | 17.73 | $0.60 | N/A |
| 9658.HK | $17.44 | -3.11% | 11.34B | 56.26 | $0.31 | N/A |
| 0341.HK | $7.10 | +0.14% | 4.07B | 15.11 | $0.47 | +8.03% |
| 9922.HK | $2.42 | -0.41% | 3.38B | 60.50 | $0.04 | +6.20% |
| 9869.HK | $1.62 | +4.52% | 2.05B | -23.14 | -$0.07 | +19.83% |
| 2217.HK | $1.50 | N/A | 2.01B | 25.00 | $0.06 | +4.83% |
Stock Comparison
8495.HK vs 9987.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 9987.HK has a market cap of 128.35B. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 9987.HK trades at $343.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 9987.HK's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9987.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is more volatile compared to 9987.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 6862.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 6862.HK has a market cap of 86.96B. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 6862.HK trades at $16.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 6862.HK's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 6862.HK's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is more volatile compared to 6862.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 1405.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 1405.HK has a market cap of 12.67B. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 1405.HK trades at $96.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 1405.HK's P/E ratio is 215.22. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1405.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is more volatile compared to 1405.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 0999.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 0999.HK has a market cap of 12.52B. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 0999.HK trades at $10.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 0999.HK's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0999.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 0999.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 9658.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 9658.HK has a market cap of 11.34B. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 9658.HK trades at $17.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 9658.HK's P/E ratio is 56.26. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9658.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 9658.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 0341.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 0341.HK has a market cap of 4.07B. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 0341.HK trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 0341.HK's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0341.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is more volatile compared to 0341.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 9922.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 9922.HK has a market cap of 3.38B. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 9922.HK trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 9922.HK's P/E ratio is 60.50. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9922.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is more volatile compared to 9922.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 9869.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 9869.HK has a market cap of 2.05B. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 9869.HK trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 9869.HK's P/E ratio is -23.14. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9869.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 9869.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 2217.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 2217.HK has a market cap of 2.01B. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 2217.HK trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 2217.HK's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2217.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is more volatile compared to 2217.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 2150.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 2150.HK has a market cap of 1.87B. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 2150.HK trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 2150.HK's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2150.HK's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is more volatile compared to 2150.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 1488.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 1488.HK has a market cap of 1.66B. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 1488.HK trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 1488.HK's P/E ratio is -6.18. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1488.HK's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is more volatile compared to 1488.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 6811.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 6811.HK has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 6811.HK trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 6811.HK's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 6811.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is more volatile compared to 6811.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 0538.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 0538.HK has a market cap of 895.06M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 0538.HK trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 0538.HK's P/E ratio is -41.00. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0538.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is more volatile compared to 0538.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 0156.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 0156.HK has a market cap of 753.33M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 0156.HK trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 0156.HK's P/E ratio is -82.00. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0156.HK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is more volatile compared to 0156.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 0520.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 0520.HK has a market cap of 725.43M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 0520.HK trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 0520.HK's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0520.HK's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is more volatile compared to 0520.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 0052.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 0052.HK has a market cap of 659.42M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 0052.HK trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 0052.HK's P/E ratio is 22.13. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0052.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is more volatile compared to 0052.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 8371.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 8371.HK has a market cap of 590.39M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 8371.HK trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 8371.HK's P/E ratio is 6.74. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8371.HK's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is more volatile compared to 8371.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 1978.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 1978.HK has a market cap of 312.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 1978.HK trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 1978.HK's P/E ratio is -9.75. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1978.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 1978.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 0573.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 0573.HK has a market cap of 284.02M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 0573.HK trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 0573.HK's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0573.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 0573.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 1314.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 1314.HK has a market cap of 275.76M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 1314.HK trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 1314.HK's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1314.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is more volatile compared to 1314.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 0226.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 0226.HK has a market cap of 226.85M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 0226.HK trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 0226.HK's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0226.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is more volatile compared to 0226.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 8213.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 8213.HK has a market cap of 224.80M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 8213.HK trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 8213.HK's P/E ratio is -10.13. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8213.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 8213.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 0126.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 0126.HK has a market cap of 193.28M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 0126.HK trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 0126.HK's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0126.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is more volatile compared to 0126.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 1181.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 1181.HK has a market cap of 189.38M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 1181.HK trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 1181.HK's P/E ratio is -8.80. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1181.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is more volatile compared to 1181.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 2108.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 2108.HK has a market cap of 184.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 2108.HK trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 2108.HK's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2108.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is more volatile compared to 2108.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 1869.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 1869.HK has a market cap of 172.05M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 1869.HK trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 1869.HK's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1869.HK's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is more volatile compared to 1869.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 8300.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 8300.HK has a market cap of 166.53M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 8300.HK trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 8300.HK's P/E ratio is -6.30. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8300.HK's ROE of +2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is more volatile compared to 8300.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 8519.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 8519.HK has a market cap of 110.76M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 8519.HK trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 8519.HK's P/E ratio is -19.10. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8519.HK's ROE of -6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is more volatile compared to 8519.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 1443.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 1443.HK has a market cap of 96.20M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 1443.HK trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 1443.HK's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1443.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 1443.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 1843.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 1843.HK has a market cap of 95.20M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 1843.HK trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 1843.HK's P/E ratio is 91.12. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1843.HK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is more volatile compared to 1843.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 8527.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 8527.HK has a market cap of 85.50M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 8527.HK trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 8527.HK's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8527.HK's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is more volatile compared to 8527.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 0703.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 0703.HK has a market cap of 82.62M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 0703.HK trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 0703.HK's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0703.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is more volatile compared to 0703.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 8120.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 8120.HK has a market cap of 67.76M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 8120.HK trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 8120.HK's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8120.HK's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 8120.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 3666.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 3666.HK has a market cap of 57.54M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 3666.HK trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 3666.HK's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3666.HK's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 3666.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 8232.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 8232.HK has a market cap of 55.75M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 8232.HK trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 8232.HK's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8232.HK's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 8232.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 1703.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 1703.HK has a market cap of 55.20M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 1703.HK trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 1703.HK's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1703.HK's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is more volatile compared to 1703.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 8428.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 8428.HK has a market cap of 52.63M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 8428.HK trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 8428.HK's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8428.HK's ROE of -7.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 8428.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 8412.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 8412.HK has a market cap of 40.96M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 8412.HK trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 8412.HK's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8412.HK's ROE of -6.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is more volatile compared to 8412.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 8447.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 8447.HK has a market cap of 34.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 8447.HK trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 8447.HK's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8447.HK's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is more volatile compared to 8447.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 0657.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 0657.HK has a market cap of 33.09M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 0657.HK trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 0657.HK's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0657.HK's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 0657.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 8432.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 8432.HK has a market cap of 26.09M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 8432.HK trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 8432.HK's P/E ratio is 42.86. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8432.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is more volatile compared to 8432.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 8367.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 8367.HK has a market cap of 23.48M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 8367.HK trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 8367.HK's P/E ratio is 2.13. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8367.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is more volatile compared to 8367.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 8096.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 8096.HK has a market cap of 21.67M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 8096.HK trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 8096.HK's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8096.HK's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 8096.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 8056.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 8056.HK has a market cap of 18.15M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 8056.HK trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 8056.HK's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8056.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is more volatile compared to 8056.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 8475.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 8475.HK has a market cap of 15.13M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 8475.HK trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 8475.HK's P/E ratio is 0.31. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8475.HK's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is more volatile compared to 8475.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 8510.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 8510.HK has a market cap of 15.13M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 8510.HK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 8510.HK's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8510.HK's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 8510.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 1007.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 1007.HK has a market cap of 13.27M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 1007.HK trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 1007.HK's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1007.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is less volatile compared to 1007.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.
8495.HK vs 8493.HK Comparison
8495.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8495.HK stands at 69.12M. In comparison, 8493.HK has a market cap of 11.37M. Regarding current trading prices, 8495.HK is priced at $0.18, while 8493.HK trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8495.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.04, whereas 8493.HK's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, 8495.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8493.HK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 8495.HK is more volatile compared to 8493.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8495.HK.