China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See 8325.HK's competitors and their performance on the HKSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for 8325.HK and its HKSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8325.HK | HK$0.04 | +0.00% | 85.2M | 17.91 | HK$0.00 | N/A |
| 2076.HK | HK$62.15 | -0.72% | 48.8B | 28.77 | HK$2.16 | N/A |
| 1797.HK | HK$20.22 | +3.32% | 21.3B | 60.17 | HK$0.34 | N/A |
| 2306.HK | HK$1.95 | -1.02% | 1.6B | 21.67 | HK$0.09 | N/A |
| 1586.HK | HK$1.77 | -0.56% | 989.8M | 25.87 | HK$0.07 | N/A |
| 1463.HK | HK$0.34 | +0.00% | 977.2M | -8.57 | -HK$0.04 | N/A |
| 0818.HK | HK$0.35 | -4.17% | 935.8M | -7.70 | -HK$0.04 | N/A |
| 1127.HK | HK$1.21 | +0.83% | 925.5M | 4.26 | HK$0.28 | +9.96% |
| 2469.HK | HK$0.37 | +0.00% | 816.6M | 3.67 | HK$0.10 | N/A |
| 8450.HK | HK$0.75 | -0.66% | 750M | -56.39 | -HK$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Kanzhun Ltd. (HKSE: 2076.HK)
8325.HK vs 2076.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 2076.HK has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 2076.HK trades at HK$62.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 2076.HK's P/E ratio is 28.77. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 2076.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 2076.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 2076.HK's competition here
East Buy Holding Limited (HKSE: 1797.HK)
8325.HK vs 1797.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 1797.HK has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 1797.HK trades at HK$20.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 1797.HK's P/E ratio is 60.17. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 1797.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 1797.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 1797.HK's competition here
YH Entertainment Group (HKSE: 2306.HK)
8325.HK vs 2306.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 2306.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 2306.HK trades at HK$1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 2306.HK's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 2306.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 2306.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 2306.HK's competition here
China Leon Inspection Holding Limited (HKSE: 1586.HK)
8325.HK vs 1586.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 1586.HK has a market cap of 989.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 1586.HK trades at HK$1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 1586.HK's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 1586.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 1586.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 1586.HK's competition here
C-Link Squared Limited (HKSE: 1463.HK)
8325.HK vs 1463.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 1463.HK has a market cap of 977.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 1463.HK trades at HK$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 1463.HK's P/E ratio is -8.57. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 1463.HK's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 1463.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 1463.HK's competition here
Hi Sun Technology (China) Limited (HKSE: 0818.HK)
8325.HK vs 0818.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 0818.HK has a market cap of 935.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 0818.HK trades at HK$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 0818.HK's P/E ratio is -7.70. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 0818.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 0818.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 0818.HK's competition here
Lion Rock Group Limited (HKSE: 1127.HK)
8325.HK vs 1127.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 1127.HK has a market cap of 925.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 1127.HK trades at HK$1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 1127.HK's P/E ratio is 4.26. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 1127.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 1127.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 1127.HK's competition here
Fenbi Limited (HKSE: 2469.HK)
8325.HK vs 2469.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 2469.HK has a market cap of 816.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 2469.HK trades at HK$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 2469.HK's P/E ratio is 3.67. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 2469.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 2469.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 2469.HK's competition here
EDICO Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8450.HK)
8325.HK vs 8450.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 8450.HK has a market cap of 750M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 8450.HK trades at HK$0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 8450.HK's P/E ratio is -56.39. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 8450.HK's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 8450.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 8450.HK's competition here
Hung Hing Printing Group Limited (HKSE: 0450.HK)
8325.HK vs 0450.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 0450.HK has a market cap of 667.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 0450.HK trades at HK$0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 0450.HK's P/E ratio is -15.37. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 0450.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 0450.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 0450.HK's competition here
Sinopros Corporation Limited (HKSE: 0727.HK)
8325.HK vs 0727.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 0727.HK has a market cap of 597.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 0727.HK trades at HK$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 0727.HK's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 0727.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 0727.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 0727.HK's competition here
Scholar Education Group (HKSE: 1769.HK)
8325.HK vs 1769.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 1769.HK has a market cap of 577.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 1769.HK trades at HK$0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 1769.HK's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 1769.HK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 1769.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 1769.HK's competition here
BitStrat Holdings Limited (HKSE: 6113.HK)
8325.HK vs 6113.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 6113.HK has a market cap of 560M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 6113.HK trades at HK$1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 6113.HK's P/E ratio is -64.04. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 6113.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 6113.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 6113.HK's competition here
Defeng Solife Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8403.HK)
8325.HK vs 8403.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 8403.HK has a market cap of 460.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 8403.HK trades at HK$2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 8403.HK's P/E ratio is -56.78. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 8403.HK's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 8403.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 8403.HK's competition here
Wonderful Sky Financial Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1260.HK)
8325.HK vs 1260.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 1260.HK has a market cap of 449.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 1260.HK trades at HK$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 1260.HK's P/E ratio is -10.94. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 1260.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 1260.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 1260.HK's competition here
Hollwin Urban Operation Service Group Co., Ltd (HKSE: 2529.HK)
8325.HK vs 2529.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 2529.HK has a market cap of 448M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 2529.HK trades at HK$2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 2529.HK's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 2529.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 2529.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 2529.HK's competition here
REF Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1631.HK)
8325.HK vs 1631.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 1631.HK has a market cap of 423.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 1631.HK trades at HK$1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 1631.HK's P/E ratio is 233.90. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 1631.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 1631.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 1631.HK's competition here
ALSCO Pooling Service Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2649.HK)
8325.HK vs 2649.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 2649.HK has a market cap of 341.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 2649.HK trades at HK$3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 2649.HK's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 2649.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 2649.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 2649.HK's competition here
Cornerstone Technologies Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8391.HK)
8325.HK vs 8391.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 8391.HK has a market cap of 320.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 8391.HK trades at HK$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 8391.HK's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 8391.HK's ROE of +3.88%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 8391.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 8391.HK's competition here
Left Field Printing Group Limited (HKSE: 1540.HK)
8325.HK vs 1540.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 1540.HK has a market cap of 316.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 1540.HK trades at HK$0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 1540.HK's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 1540.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 1540.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 1540.HK's competition here
East Nova Holdings Limited (HKSE: 3626.HK)
8325.HK vs 3626.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 3626.HK has a market cap of 312.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 3626.HK trades at HK$1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 3626.HK's P/E ratio is 120.91. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 3626.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 3626.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 3626.HK's competition here
Hong Kong Johnson Holdings Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1955.HK)
8325.HK vs 1955.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 1955.HK has a market cap of 287.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 1955.HK trades at HK$0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 1955.HK's P/E ratio is 20.74. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 1955.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 1955.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 1955.HK's competition here
Hygieia Group Limited (HKSE: 1650.HK)
8325.HK vs 1650.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 1650.HK has a market cap of 280M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 1650.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 1650.HK's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 1650.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 1650.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 1650.HK's competition here
Sun Hing Printing Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1975.HK)
8325.HK vs 1975.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 1975.HK has a market cap of 192M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 1975.HK trades at HK$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 1975.HK's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 1975.HK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 1975.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 1975.HK's competition here
A.Plus Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1841.HK)
8325.HK vs 1841.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 1841.HK has a market cap of 148M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 1841.HK trades at HK$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 1841.HK's P/E ratio is -22.88. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 1841.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 1841.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 1841.HK's competition here
Max Sight Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8483.HK)
8325.HK vs 8483.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 8483.HK has a market cap of 134.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 8483.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 8483.HK's P/E ratio is -275.41. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 8483.HK's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 8483.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 8483.HK's competition here
MOG Digitech Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1942.HK)
8325.HK vs 1942.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 1942.HK has a market cap of 113.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 1942.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 1942.HK's P/E ratio is 0.39. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 1942.HK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 1942.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 1942.HK's competition here
ISP Holdings Limited (HKSE: 2340.HK)
8325.HK vs 2340.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 2340.HK has a market cap of 106.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 2340.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 2340.HK's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 2340.HK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 2340.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 2340.HK's competition here
Universe Printshop Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8448.HK)
8325.HK vs 8448.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 8448.HK has a market cap of 104.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 8448.HK trades at HK$1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 8448.HK's P/E ratio is 42.61. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 8448.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 8448.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 8448.HK's competition here
Magnus Concordia Group Limited (HKSE: 1172.HK)
8325.HK vs 1172.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 1172.HK has a market cap of 92.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 1172.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 1172.HK's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 1172.HK's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 1172.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 1172.HK's competition here
Finet Group Limited (HKSE: 8317.HK)
8325.HK vs 8317.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 8317.HK has a market cap of 84M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 8317.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 8317.HK's P/E ratio is -9.68. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 8317.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 8317.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 8317.HK's competition here
China Come Ride New Energy Group Limited (HKSE: 8039.HK)
8325.HK vs 8039.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 8039.HK has a market cap of 74.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 8039.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 8039.HK's P/E ratio is -15.31. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 8039.HK's ROE of -3.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is less volatile compared to 8039.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 8039.HK's competition here
Daohe Global Group Limited (HKSE: 0915.HK)
8325.HK vs 0915.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 0915.HK has a market cap of 63.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 0915.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 0915.HK's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 0915.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 0915.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 0915.HK's competition here
eprint Group Limited (HKSE: 1884.HK)
8325.HK vs 1884.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 1884.HK has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 1884.HK trades at HK$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 1884.HK's P/E ratio is -10.34. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 1884.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 1884.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 1884.HK's competition here
HM International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8416.HK)
8325.HK vs 8416.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 8416.HK has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 8416.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 8416.HK's P/E ratio is 7.26. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 8416.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 8416.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 8416.HK's competition here
Xinhua News Media Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0309.HK)
8325.HK vs 0309.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 0309.HK has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 0309.HK trades at HK$0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 0309.HK's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 0309.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 0309.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 0309.HK's competition here
Neway Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0055.HK)
8325.HK vs 0055.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 0055.HK has a market cap of 36.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 0055.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 0055.HK's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 0055.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 0055.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 0055.HK's competition here
Century Plaza Hotel Group (HKSE: 8315.HK)
8325.HK vs 8315.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 8315.HK has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 8315.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 8315.HK's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 8315.HK's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 8315.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 8315.HK's competition here
AV Promotions Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8419.HK)
8325.HK vs 8419.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 8419.HK has a market cap of 30.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 8419.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 8419.HK's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 8419.HK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 8419.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 8419.HK's competition here
Beautiful Life Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1850.HK)
8325.HK vs 1850.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 1850.HK has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 1850.HK trades at HK$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 1850.HK's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 1850.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is more volatile compared to 1850.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 1850.HK's competition here
NOVA Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1360.HK)
8325.HK vs 1360.HK Comparison August 2026
China Smartpay Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8325.HK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8325.HK stands at 85.2M. In comparison, 1360.HK has a market cap of 24.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 8325.HK is priced at HK$0.04 on the HKSE, while 1360.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8325.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas 1360.HK's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, 8325.HK's ROE is -0.49%, compared to 1360.HK's ROE of -8.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 8325.HK is less volatile compared to 1360.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8325.HK.Check 1360.HK's competition here