AGTech Holdings Limited
AGTech Holdings Limited 8279.HK Peers
See (8279.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8279.HK | $0.19 | +1.06% | 2.17B | 68.10 | $0.00 | N/A |
| 0027.HK | $31.85 | +0.95% | 139.29B | 15.93 | $2.00 | +1.57% |
| 1928.HK | $15.12 | -0.13% | 122.37B | 14.97 | $1.01 | N/A |
| 2282.HK | $11.00 | -0.54% | 41.77B | 9.09 | $1.21 | +5.42% |
| 1128.HK | $5.32 | -1.48% | 27.82B | 9.33 | $0.57 | +2.82% |
| 3918.HK | $3.62 | +1.69% | 16.01B | 19.05 | $0.19 | N/A |
| 0880.HK | $2.25 | -2.17% | 15.98B | 4500.00 | $0.00 | N/A |
| 0200.HK | $3.47 | -3.07% | 8.14B | -8.90 | -$0.39 | N/A |
| 2536.HK | $2.95 | -4.84% | 2.38B | 295.00 | $0.01 | N/A |
| 6889.HK | $3.31 | -4.06% | 2.31B | 11.41 | $0.29 | +7.59% |
Stock Comparison
8279.HK vs 0027.HK Comparison
8279.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8279.HK stands at 2.17B. In comparison, 0027.HK has a market cap of 139.29B. Regarding current trading prices, 8279.HK is priced at $0.19, while 0027.HK trades at $31.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8279.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 68.10, whereas 0027.HK's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, 8279.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0027.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 8279.HK is more volatile compared to 0027.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8279.HK.
8279.HK vs 1928.HK Comparison
8279.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8279.HK stands at 2.17B. In comparison, 1928.HK has a market cap of 122.37B. Regarding current trading prices, 8279.HK is priced at $0.19, while 1928.HK trades at $15.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8279.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 68.10, whereas 1928.HK's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, 8279.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1928.HK's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 8279.HK is more volatile compared to 1928.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8279.HK.
8279.HK vs 2282.HK Comparison
8279.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8279.HK stands at 2.17B. In comparison, 2282.HK has a market cap of 41.77B. Regarding current trading prices, 8279.HK is priced at $0.19, while 2282.HK trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8279.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 68.10, whereas 2282.HK's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, 8279.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2282.HK's ROE of +19.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 8279.HK is more volatile compared to 2282.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8279.HK.
8279.HK vs 1128.HK Comparison
8279.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8279.HK stands at 2.17B. In comparison, 1128.HK has a market cap of 27.82B. Regarding current trading prices, 8279.HK is priced at $0.19, while 1128.HK trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8279.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 68.10, whereas 1128.HK's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, 8279.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1128.HK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 8279.HK is more volatile compared to 1128.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8279.HK.
8279.HK vs 3918.HK Comparison
8279.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8279.HK stands at 2.17B. In comparison, 3918.HK has a market cap of 16.01B. Regarding current trading prices, 8279.HK is priced at $0.19, while 3918.HK trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8279.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 68.10, whereas 3918.HK's P/E ratio is 19.05. In terms of profitability, 8279.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3918.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 8279.HK is more volatile compared to 3918.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8279.HK.
8279.HK vs 0880.HK Comparison
8279.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8279.HK stands at 2.17B. In comparison, 0880.HK has a market cap of 15.98B. Regarding current trading prices, 8279.HK is priced at $0.19, while 0880.HK trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8279.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 68.10, whereas 0880.HK's P/E ratio is 4500.00. In terms of profitability, 8279.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0880.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 8279.HK is more volatile compared to 0880.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8279.HK.
8279.HK vs 0200.HK Comparison
8279.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8279.HK stands at 2.17B. In comparison, 0200.HK has a market cap of 8.14B. Regarding current trading prices, 8279.HK is priced at $0.19, while 0200.HK trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8279.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 68.10, whereas 0200.HK's P/E ratio is -8.90. In terms of profitability, 8279.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0200.HK's ROE of -4.52%. Regarding short-term risk, 8279.HK is more volatile compared to 0200.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8279.HK.
8279.HK vs 2536.HK Comparison
8279.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8279.HK stands at 2.17B. In comparison, 2536.HK has a market cap of 2.38B. Regarding current trading prices, 8279.HK is priced at $0.19, while 2536.HK trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8279.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 68.10, whereas 2536.HK's P/E ratio is 295.00. In terms of profitability, 8279.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2536.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 8279.HK is more volatile compared to 2536.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8279.HK.
8279.HK vs 6889.HK Comparison
8279.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8279.HK stands at 2.17B. In comparison, 6889.HK has a market cap of 2.31B. Regarding current trading prices, 8279.HK is priced at $0.19, while 6889.HK trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8279.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 68.10, whereas 6889.HK's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, 8279.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 6889.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 8279.HK is more volatile compared to 6889.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8279.HK.
8279.HK vs 1180.HK Comparison
8279.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8279.HK stands at 2.17B. In comparison, 1180.HK has a market cap of 2.05B. Regarding current trading prices, 8279.HK is priced at $0.19, while 1180.HK trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8279.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 68.10, whereas 1180.HK's P/E ratio is 5.74. In terms of profitability, 8279.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1180.HK's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, 8279.HK is more volatile compared to 1180.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8279.HK.
8279.HK vs 1076.HK Comparison
8279.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8279.HK stands at 2.17B. In comparison, 1076.HK has a market cap of 681.55M. Regarding current trading prices, 8279.HK is priced at $0.19, while 1076.HK trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8279.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 68.10, whereas 1076.HK's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, 8279.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1076.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 8279.HK is less volatile compared to 1076.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8279.HK.
8279.HK vs 1680.HK Comparison
8279.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8279.HK stands at 2.17B. In comparison, 1680.HK has a market cap of 626.32M. Regarding current trading prices, 8279.HK is priced at $0.19, while 1680.HK trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8279.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 68.10, whereas 1680.HK's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, 8279.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1680.HK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 8279.HK is more volatile compared to 1680.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8279.HK.
8279.HK vs 0082.HK Comparison
8279.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8279.HK stands at 2.17B. In comparison, 0082.HK has a market cap of 398.30M. Regarding current trading prices, 8279.HK is priced at $0.19, while 0082.HK trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8279.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 68.10, whereas 0082.HK's P/E ratio is -8.80. In terms of profitability, 8279.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0082.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 8279.HK is more volatile compared to 0082.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8279.HK.
8279.HK vs 0296.HK Comparison
8279.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8279.HK stands at 2.17B. In comparison, 0296.HK has a market cap of 362.49M. Regarding current trading prices, 8279.HK is priced at $0.19, while 0296.HK trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8279.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 68.10, whereas 0296.HK's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, 8279.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0296.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 8279.HK is more volatile compared to 0296.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8279.HK.
8279.HK vs 0582.HK Comparison
8279.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8279.HK stands at 2.17B. In comparison, 0582.HK has a market cap of 255.60M. Regarding current trading prices, 8279.HK is priced at $0.19, while 0582.HK trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8279.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 68.10, whereas 0582.HK's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, 8279.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0582.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 8279.HK is more volatile compared to 0582.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8279.HK.
8279.HK vs 1245.HK Comparison
8279.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8279.HK stands at 2.17B. In comparison, 1245.HK has a market cap of 227.21M. Regarding current trading prices, 8279.HK is priced at $0.19, while 1245.HK trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8279.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 68.10, whereas 1245.HK's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, 8279.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1245.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 8279.HK is less volatile compared to 1245.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8279.HK.
8279.HK vs 0102.HK Comparison
8279.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8279.HK stands at 2.17B. In comparison, 0102.HK has a market cap of 211.94M. Regarding current trading prices, 8279.HK is priced at $0.19, while 0102.HK trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8279.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 68.10, whereas 0102.HK's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, 8279.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0102.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 8279.HK is more volatile compared to 0102.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8279.HK.
8279.HK vs 0070.HK Comparison
8279.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8279.HK stands at 2.17B. In comparison, 0070.HK has a market cap of 91.12M. Regarding current trading prices, 8279.HK is priced at $0.19, while 0070.HK trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8279.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 68.10, whereas 0070.HK's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, 8279.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0070.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 8279.HK is more volatile compared to 0070.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8279.HK.
8279.HK vs 8308.HK Comparison
8279.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8279.HK stands at 2.17B. In comparison, 8308.HK has a market cap of 90.94M. Regarding current trading prices, 8279.HK is priced at $0.19, while 8308.HK trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8279.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 68.10, whereas 8308.HK's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, 8279.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 8308.HK's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 8279.HK is more volatile compared to 8308.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8279.HK.
8279.HK vs 1655.HK Comparison
8279.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8279.HK stands at 2.17B. In comparison, 1655.HK has a market cap of 72.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 8279.HK is priced at $0.19, while 1655.HK trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8279.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 68.10, whereas 1655.HK's P/E ratio is 0.92. In terms of profitability, 8279.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1655.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 8279.HK is more volatile compared to 1655.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8279.HK.
8279.HK vs 0959.HK Comparison
8279.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8279.HK stands at 2.17B. In comparison, 0959.HK has a market cap of 62.20M. Regarding current trading prices, 8279.HK is priced at $0.19, while 0959.HK trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8279.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 68.10, whereas 0959.HK's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, 8279.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0959.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 8279.HK is more volatile compared to 0959.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8279.HK.
8279.HK vs 8400.HK Comparison
8279.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8279.HK stands at 2.17B. In comparison, 8400.HK has a market cap of 43.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 8279.HK is priced at $0.19, while 8400.HK trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8279.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 68.10, whereas 8400.HK's P/E ratio is 4.30. In terms of profitability, 8279.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 8400.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 8279.HK is more volatile compared to 8400.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8279.HK.
8279.HK vs 1371.HK Comparison
8279.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8279.HK stands at 2.17B. In comparison, 1371.HK has a market cap of 28.88M. Regarding current trading prices, 8279.HK is priced at $0.19, while 1371.HK trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8279.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 68.10, whereas 1371.HK's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, 8279.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1371.HK's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 8279.HK is more volatile compared to 1371.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8279.HK.
8279.HK vs 8052.HK Comparison
8279.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8279.HK stands at 2.17B. In comparison, 8052.HK has a market cap of 21.38M. Regarding current trading prices, 8279.HK is priced at $0.19, while 8052.HK trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8279.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 68.10, whereas 8052.HK's P/E ratio is 0.56. In terms of profitability, 8279.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 8052.HK's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, 8279.HK is less volatile compared to 8052.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8279.HK.