Luk Hing Entertainment Group Holdings Limited
Luk Hing Entertainment Group Holdings Limited (8052.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (8052.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8052.HK | HK$0.06 | +6.78% | 34.5M | -3.15 | -HK$0.02 | N/A |
| 0027.HK | HK$40.00 | +5.54% | 169.6B | 19.39 | HK$2.00 | +2.58% |
| 1928.HK | HK$19.50 | +3.28% | 155.6B | 19.04 | HK$1.01 | +1.30% |
| 2282.HK | HK$16.81 | +2.63% | 61.7B | 13.43 | HK$1.21 | +3.72% |
| 1128.HK | HK$6.68 | +2.93% | 34.1B | 11.44 | HK$0.57 | +3.99% |
| 0880.HK | HK$3.25 | +3.50% | 22.1B | 6220.00 | HK$0.00 | N/A |
| 3918.HK | HK$4.07 | +1.50% | 17.9B | 21.26 | HK$0.19 | N/A |
| 0200.HK | HK$5.36 | +2.29% | 11.7B | -13.23 | -HK$0.39 | N/A |
| 8279.HK | HK$0.30 | +3.51% | 3.4B | -29.50 | -HK$0.01 | N/A |
| 6889.HK | HK$3.70 | +0.27% | 2.6B | 11.94 | HK$0.31 | +7.06% |
Stock Comparison
8052.HK vs 0027.HK Comparison August 2025
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 34.5M. In comparison, 0027.HK has a market cap of 169.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 0027.HK trades at HK$40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.15, whereas 0027.HK's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is +0.76%, compared to 0027.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is less volatile compared to 0027.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 0027.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 1928.HK Comparison August 2025
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 34.5M. In comparison, 1928.HK has a market cap of 155.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 1928.HK trades at HK$19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.15, whereas 1928.HK's P/E ratio is 19.04. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is +0.76%, compared to 1928.HK's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is less volatile compared to 1928.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 1928.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 2282.HK Comparison August 2025
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 34.5M. In comparison, 2282.HK has a market cap of 61.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 2282.HK trades at HK$16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.15, whereas 2282.HK's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is +0.76%, compared to 2282.HK's ROE of +19.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is less volatile compared to 2282.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 2282.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 1128.HK Comparison August 2025
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 34.5M. In comparison, 1128.HK has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 1128.HK trades at HK$6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.15, whereas 1128.HK's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is +0.76%, compared to 1128.HK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is less volatile compared to 1128.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 1128.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 0880.HK Comparison August 2025
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 34.5M. In comparison, 0880.HK has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 0880.HK trades at HK$3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.15, whereas 0880.HK's P/E ratio is 6220.00. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is +0.76%, compared to 0880.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is less volatile compared to 0880.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 0880.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 3918.HK Comparison August 2025
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 34.5M. In comparison, 3918.HK has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 3918.HK trades at HK$4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.15, whereas 3918.HK's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is +0.76%, compared to 3918.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is less volatile compared to 3918.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 3918.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 0200.HK Comparison August 2025
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 34.5M. In comparison, 0200.HK has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 0200.HK trades at HK$5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.15, whereas 0200.HK's P/E ratio is -13.23. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is +0.76%, compared to 0200.HK's ROE of -4.52%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is less volatile compared to 0200.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 0200.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 8279.HK Comparison August 2025
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 34.5M. In comparison, 8279.HK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 8279.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.15, whereas 8279.HK's P/E ratio is -29.50. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is +0.76%, compared to 8279.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is less volatile compared to 8279.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 8279.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 6889.HK Comparison August 2025
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 34.5M. In comparison, 6889.HK has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 6889.HK trades at HK$3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.15, whereas 6889.HK's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is +0.76%, compared to 6889.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is less volatile compared to 6889.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 6889.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 2536.HK Comparison August 2025
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 34.5M. In comparison, 2536.HK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 2536.HK trades at HK$2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.15, whereas 2536.HK's P/E ratio is 129.50. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is +0.76%, compared to 2536.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK and 2536.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 2536.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 1180.HK Comparison August 2025
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 34.5M. In comparison, 1180.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 1180.HK trades at HK$1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.15, whereas 1180.HK's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is +0.76%, compared to 1180.HK's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is less volatile compared to 1180.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 1180.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 1076.HK Comparison August 2025
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 34.5M. In comparison, 1076.HK has a market cap of 681.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 1076.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.15, whereas 1076.HK's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is +0.76%, compared to 1076.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is less volatile compared to 1076.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 1076.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 1680.HK Comparison August 2025
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 34.5M. In comparison, 1680.HK has a market cap of 477.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 1680.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.15, whereas 1680.HK's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is +0.76%, compared to 1680.HK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is less volatile compared to 1680.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 1680.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 0082.HK Comparison August 2025
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 34.5M. In comparison, 0082.HK has a market cap of 402.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 0082.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.15, whereas 0082.HK's P/E ratio is -8.90. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is +0.76%, compared to 0082.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is less volatile compared to 0082.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 0082.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 0296.HK Comparison August 2025
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 34.5M. In comparison, 0296.HK has a market cap of 326.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 0296.HK trades at HK$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.15, whereas 0296.HK's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is +0.76%, compared to 0296.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is less volatile compared to 0296.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 0296.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 0582.HK Comparison August 2025
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 34.5M. In comparison, 0582.HK has a market cap of 257.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 0582.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.15, whereas 0582.HK's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is +0.76%, compared to 0582.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is less volatile compared to 0582.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 0582.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 1245.HK Comparison August 2025
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 34.5M. In comparison, 1245.HK has a market cap of 244M. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 1245.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.15, whereas 1245.HK's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is +0.76%, compared to 1245.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is less volatile compared to 1245.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 1245.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 0102.HK Comparison August 2025
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 34.5M. In comparison, 0102.HK has a market cap of 211.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 0102.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.15, whereas 0102.HK's P/E ratio is 0.94. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is +0.76%, compared to 0102.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is less volatile compared to 0102.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 0102.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 0070.HK Comparison August 2025
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 34.5M. In comparison, 0070.HK has a market cap of 131.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 0070.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.15, whereas 0070.HK's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is +0.76%, compared to 0070.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK and 0070.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0070.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 0959.HK Comparison August 2025
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 34.5M. In comparison, 0959.HK has a market cap of 92.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 0959.HK trades at HK$0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.15, whereas 0959.HK's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is +0.76%, compared to 0959.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is less volatile compared to 0959.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 0959.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 1655.HK Comparison August 2025
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 34.5M. In comparison, 1655.HK has a market cap of 87.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 1655.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.15, whereas 1655.HK's P/E ratio is 1.12. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is +0.76%, compared to 1655.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK and 1655.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 1655.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 8308.HK Comparison August 2025
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 34.5M. In comparison, 8308.HK has a market cap of 81M. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 8308.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.15, whereas 8308.HK's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is +0.76%, compared to 8308.HK's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK and 8308.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 8308.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 1371.HK Comparison August 2025
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 34.5M. In comparison, 1371.HK has a market cap of 54M. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 1371.HK trades at HK$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.15, whereas 1371.HK's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is +0.76%, compared to 1371.HK's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK is less volatile compared to 1371.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8052.HK.Check 1371.HK's competition here
8052.HK vs 8400.HK Comparison August 2025
8052.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8052.HK stands at 34.5M. In comparison, 8400.HK has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, 8052.HK is priced at HK$0.06, while 8400.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8052.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.15, whereas 8400.HK's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, 8052.HK's ROE is +0.76%, compared to 8400.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 8052.HK and 8400.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 8400.HK's competition here