China Investment Financial Technology Group Limited (HKSE: 8029.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See 8029.HK's competitors and their performance on the HKSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for 8029.HK and its HKSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8029.HK | HK$0.53 | +10.42% | 148.4M | -3.69 | -HK$0.14 | N/A |
| 3396.HK | HK$15.79 | -7.82% | 41.5B | 14.02 | HK$1.26 | +0.65% |
| 6881.HK | HK$6.65 | -5.00% | 25.3B | 5.27 | HK$1.30 | +5.78% |
| 0290.HK | HK$1.45 | +0.35% | 14.6B | -5.29 | -HK$0.28 | N/A |
| 0585.HK | HK$4.39 | -6.70% | 3.8B | 1002.17 | HK$0.00 | N/A |
| 1709.HK | HK$0.79 | -1.86% | 1.6B | 3.79 | HK$0.21 | +1.26% |
| 3329.HK | HK$0.48 | +18.52% | 1.3B | -22.15 | -HK$0.02 | N/A |
| 0128.HK | HK$0.47 | -1.05% | 775.8M | -98.12 | -HK$0.00 | N/A |
| 1945.HK | HK$1.32 | -0.38% | 382.1M | 3.56 | HK$0.37 | N/A |
| 3623.HK | HK$0.55 | +0.00% | 343.7M | -5.22 | -HK$0.10 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Legend Holdings Corporation (HKSE: 3396.HK)
8029.HK vs 3396.HK Comparison October 2026
China Investment Financial Technology Group Limited (HKSE: 8029.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8029.HK stands at 148.4M. In comparison, 3396.HK has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 8029.HK is priced at HK$0.53 on the HKSE, while 3396.HK trades at HK$15.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8029.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas 3396.HK's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, 8029.HK's ROE is +0.64%, compared to 3396.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 8029.HK is less volatile compared to 3396.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8029.HK.Check 3396.HK's competition here
China Galaxy Securities Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 6881.HK)
8029.HK vs 6881.HK Comparison October 2026
China Investment Financial Technology Group Limited (HKSE: 8029.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8029.HK stands at 148.4M. In comparison, 6881.HK has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 8029.HK is priced at HK$0.53 on the HKSE, while 6881.HK trades at HK$6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8029.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas 6881.HK's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, 8029.HK's ROE is +0.64%, compared to 6881.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 8029.HK is more volatile compared to 6881.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8029.HK.Check 6881.HK's competition here
GoFintech Quantum Innovation Limited (HKSE: 0290.HK)
8029.HK vs 0290.HK Comparison October 2026
China Investment Financial Technology Group Limited (HKSE: 8029.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8029.HK stands at 148.4M. In comparison, 0290.HK has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 8029.HK is priced at HK$0.53 on the HKSE, while 0290.HK trades at HK$1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8029.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas 0290.HK's P/E ratio is -5.29. In terms of profitability, 8029.HK's ROE is +0.64%, compared to 0290.HK's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 8029.HK is more volatile compared to 0290.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8029.HK.Check 0290.HK's competition here
Imagi International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0585.HK)
8029.HK vs 0585.HK Comparison October 2026
China Investment Financial Technology Group Limited (HKSE: 8029.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8029.HK stands at 148.4M. In comparison, 0585.HK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 8029.HK is priced at HK$0.53 on the HKSE, while 0585.HK trades at HK$4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8029.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas 0585.HK's P/E ratio is 1002.17. In terms of profitability, 8029.HK's ROE is +0.64%, compared to 0585.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 8029.HK is less volatile compared to 0585.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8029.HK.Check 0585.HK's competition here
DL Holdings Group Limited (HKSE: 1709.HK)
8029.HK vs 1709.HK Comparison October 2026
China Investment Financial Technology Group Limited (HKSE: 8029.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8029.HK stands at 148.4M. In comparison, 1709.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 8029.HK is priced at HK$0.53 on the HKSE, while 1709.HK trades at HK$0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8029.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas 1709.HK's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, 8029.HK's ROE is +0.64%, compared to 1709.HK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 8029.HK is more volatile compared to 1709.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8029.HK.Check 1709.HK's competition here
BOCOM International Holdings Company Limited (HKSE: 3329.HK)
8029.HK vs 3329.HK Comparison October 2026
China Investment Financial Technology Group Limited (HKSE: 8029.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8029.HK stands at 148.4M. In comparison, 3329.HK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 8029.HK is priced at HK$0.53 on the HKSE, while 3329.HK trades at HK$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8029.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas 3329.HK's P/E ratio is -22.15. In terms of profitability, 8029.HK's ROE is +0.64%, compared to 3329.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 8029.HK is more volatile compared to 3329.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8029.HK.Check 3329.HK's competition here
ENM Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0128.HK)
8029.HK vs 0128.HK Comparison October 2026
China Investment Financial Technology Group Limited (HKSE: 8029.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8029.HK stands at 148.4M. In comparison, 0128.HK has a market cap of 775.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 8029.HK is priced at HK$0.53 on the HKSE, while 0128.HK trades at HK$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8029.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas 0128.HK's P/E ratio is -98.12. In terms of profitability, 8029.HK's ROE is +0.64%, compared to 0128.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 8029.HK is more volatile compared to 0128.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8029.HK.Check 0128.HK's competition here
Zero2IPO Holdings Inc. (HKSE: 1945.HK)
8029.HK vs 1945.HK Comparison October 2026
China Investment Financial Technology Group Limited (HKSE: 8029.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8029.HK stands at 148.4M. In comparison, 1945.HK has a market cap of 382.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 8029.HK is priced at HK$0.53 on the HKSE, while 1945.HK trades at HK$1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8029.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas 1945.HK's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, 8029.HK's ROE is +0.64%, compared to 1945.HK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 8029.HK is less volatile compared to 1945.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8029.HK.Check 1945.HK's competition here
China Success Finance Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 3623.HK)
8029.HK vs 3623.HK Comparison October 2026
China Investment Financial Technology Group Limited (HKSE: 8029.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8029.HK stands at 148.4M. In comparison, 3623.HK has a market cap of 343.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 8029.HK is priced at HK$0.53 on the HKSE, while 3623.HK trades at HK$0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8029.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas 3623.HK's P/E ratio is -5.22. In terms of profitability, 8029.HK's ROE is +0.64%, compared to 3623.HK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 8029.HK is more volatile compared to 3623.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8029.HK.Check 3623.HK's competition here
China Development Bank International Investment Ltd. (HKSE: 1062.HK)
8029.HK vs 1062.HK Comparison October 2026
China Investment Financial Technology Group Limited (HKSE: 8029.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8029.HK stands at 148.4M. In comparison, 1062.HK has a market cap of 261.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 8029.HK is priced at HK$0.53 on the HKSE, while 1062.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8029.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas 1062.HK's P/E ratio is -1.76. In terms of profitability, 8029.HK's ROE is +0.64%, compared to 1062.HK's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 8029.HK is more volatile compared to 1062.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8029.HK.Check 1062.HK's competition here
China Innovation Investment Limited (HKSE: 1217.HK)
8029.HK vs 1217.HK Comparison October 2026
China Investment Financial Technology Group Limited (HKSE: 8029.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8029.HK stands at 148.4M. In comparison, 1217.HK has a market cap of 128M. Regarding current trading prices, 8029.HK is priced at HK$0.53 on the HKSE, while 1217.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8029.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas 1217.HK's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, 8029.HK's ROE is +0.64%, compared to 1217.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 8029.HK is more volatile compared to 1217.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8029.HK.Check 1217.HK's competition here
Minerva Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 0397.HK)
8029.HK vs 0397.HK Comparison October 2026
China Investment Financial Technology Group Limited (HKSE: 8029.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8029.HK stands at 148.4M. In comparison, 0397.HK has a market cap of 119.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 8029.HK is priced at HK$0.53 on the HKSE, while 0397.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8029.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas 0397.HK's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, 8029.HK's ROE is +0.64%, compared to 0397.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 8029.HK is more volatile compared to 0397.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8029.HK.Check 0397.HK's competition here
BlockFin Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0888.HK)
8029.HK vs 0888.HK Comparison October 2026
China Investment Financial Technology Group Limited (HKSE: 8029.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8029.HK stands at 148.4M. In comparison, 0888.HK has a market cap of 52.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 8029.HK is priced at HK$0.53 on the HKSE, while 0888.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8029.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas 0888.HK's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, 8029.HK's ROE is +0.64%, compared to 0888.HK's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 8029.HK is less volatile compared to 0888.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8029.HK.Check 0888.HK's competition here
NOIZ Group Limited (HKSE: 8163.HK)
8029.HK vs 8163.HK Comparison October 2026
China Investment Financial Technology Group Limited (HKSE: 8029.HK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 8029.HK stands at 148.4M. In comparison, 8163.HK has a market cap of 33.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 8029.HK is priced at HK$0.53 on the HKSE, while 8163.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
8029.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas 8163.HK's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, 8029.HK's ROE is +0.64%, compared to 8163.HK's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 8029.HK is more volatile compared to 8163.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 8029.HK.Check 8163.HK's competition here