Yachiyo Industry Co., Ltd.
Yachiyo Industry Co., Ltd. (7298.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (7298.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7298.T | ¥1,387.00 | -0.07% | 33.2B | 6.75 | ¥205.55 | +2.02% |
| 5802.T | ¥8,492.00 | -9.77% | 7T | 32.51 | ¥276.82 | +1.16% |
| 6902.T | ¥1,968.00 | +2.42% | 5.1T | 14.87 | ¥127.17 | +3.04% |
| 5108.T | ¥3,285.00 | -1.23% | 4.2T | 27.48 | ¥119.07 | +3.51% |
| 7259.T | ¥2,179.00 | -2.98% | 1.6T | 9.84 | ¥220.80 | +2.66% |
| 5334.T | ¥7,285.00 | -4.41% | 1.4T | 15.16 | ¥483.31 | +2.49% |
| 5101.T | ¥5,874.00 | -5.20% | 930.1B | 8.82 | ¥668.55 | +1.98% |
| 7276.T | ¥2,446.50 | -2.35% | 654.8B | 15.20 | ¥161.13 | +2.05% |
| 5105.T | ¥3,616.00 | -3.65% | 556.2B | 8.74 | ¥413.21 | +3.21% |
| 6471.T | ¥1,092.50 | -3.79% | 539.2B | 30.07 | ¥36.65 | +2.77% |
Stock Comparison
7298.T vs 5802.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 5802.T has a market cap of 7T. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 5802.T trades at ¥8,492.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 5802.T's P/E ratio is 32.51. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 5802.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 5802.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 5802.T's competition here
7298.T vs 6902.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 6902.T has a market cap of 5.1T. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 6902.T trades at ¥1,968.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 6902.T's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 6902.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 6902.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 6902.T's competition here
7298.T vs 5108.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 5108.T has a market cap of 4.2T. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 5108.T trades at ¥3,285.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 5108.T's P/E ratio is 27.48. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 5108.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 5108.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 5108.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7259.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7259.T has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7259.T trades at ¥2,179.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7259.T's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7259.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7259.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7259.T's competition here
7298.T vs 5334.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 5334.T has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 5334.T trades at ¥7,285.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 5334.T's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 5334.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 5334.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 5334.T's competition here
7298.T vs 5101.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 5101.T has a market cap of 930.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 5101.T trades at ¥5,874.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 5101.T's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 5101.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 5101.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 5101.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7276.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7276.T has a market cap of 654.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7276.T trades at ¥2,446.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7276.T's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7276.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7276.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7276.T's competition here
7298.T vs 5105.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 5105.T has a market cap of 556.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 5105.T trades at ¥3,616.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 5105.T's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 5105.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 5105.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 5105.T's competition here
7298.T vs 6471.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 6471.T has a market cap of 539.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 6471.T trades at ¥1,092.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 6471.T's P/E ratio is 30.07. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 6471.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 6471.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 6471.T's competition here
7298.T vs 5110.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 5110.T has a market cap of 530.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 5110.T trades at ¥2,033.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 5110.T's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 5110.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 5110.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 5110.T's competition here
7298.T vs 6473.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 6473.T has a market cap of 512.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 6473.T trades at ¥1,643.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 6473.T's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 6473.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 6473.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 6473.T's competition here
7298.T vs 5991.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 5991.T has a market cap of 501.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 5991.T trades at ¥2,446.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 5991.T's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 5991.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 5991.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 5991.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7282.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7282.T has a market cap of 470.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7282.T trades at ¥4,017.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7282.T's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7282.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7282.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7282.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7240.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7240.T has a market cap of 444.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7240.T trades at ¥2,805.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7240.T's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7240.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7240.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7240.T's competition here
7298.T vs 3116.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 3116.T has a market cap of 435.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 3116.T trades at ¥2,418.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 3116.T's P/E ratio is 21.08. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3116.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 3116.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 3116.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7988.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7988.T has a market cap of 404.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7988.T trades at ¥4,404.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7988.T's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7988.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7988.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7988.T's competition here
7298.T vs 6923.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 6923.T has a market cap of 404.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 6923.T trades at ¥2,866.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 6923.T's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 6923.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 6923.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 6923.T's competition here
7298.T vs 6592.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 6592.T has a market cap of 374.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 6592.T trades at ¥1,571.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 6592.T's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 6592.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 6592.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 6592.T's competition here
7298.T vs 5191.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 5191.T has a market cap of 269.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 5191.T trades at ¥2,594.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 5191.T's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 5191.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 5191.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 5191.T's competition here
7298.T vs 6995.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 6995.T has a market cap of 249.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 6995.T trades at ¥2,953.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 6995.T's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 6995.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 6995.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 6995.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7313.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7313.T has a market cap of 206.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7313.T trades at ¥1,776.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7313.T's P/E ratio is 39.01. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7313.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7313.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7313.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7278.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7278.T has a market cap of 203.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7278.T trades at ¥5,560.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7278.T's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7278.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7278.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7278.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7220.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7220.T has a market cap of 180.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7220.T trades at ¥2,662.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7220.T's P/E ratio is 19.73. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7220.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7220.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7220.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7242.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7242.T has a market cap of 180B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7242.T trades at ¥4,175.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7242.T's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7242.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7242.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7242.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7250.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7250.T has a market cap of 172.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7250.T trades at ¥3,015.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7250.T's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7250.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7250.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7250.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7296.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7296.T has a market cap of 156.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7296.T trades at ¥3,240.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7296.T's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7296.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7296.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7296.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7287.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7287.T has a market cap of 134.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7287.T trades at ¥2,319.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7287.T's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7287.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7287.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7287.T's competition here
7298.T vs 5161.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 5161.T has a market cap of 132.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 5161.T trades at ¥3,550.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 5161.T's P/E ratio is 22.76. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 5161.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 5161.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 5161.T's competition here
7298.T vs 5975.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 5975.T has a market cap of 116.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 5975.T trades at ¥2,376.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 5975.T's P/E ratio is 6.39. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 5975.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 5975.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 5975.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7283.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7283.T has a market cap of 104.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7283.T trades at ¥1,846.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7283.T's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7283.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7283.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7283.T's competition here
7298.T vs 8117.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 8117.T has a market cap of 103.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 8117.T trades at ¥1,887.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 8117.T's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 8117.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 8117.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 8117.T's competition here
7298.T vs 6209.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 6209.T has a market cap of 99.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 6209.T trades at ¥3,715.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 6209.T's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 6209.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 6209.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 6209.T's competition here
7298.T vs 5992.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 5992.T has a market cap of 93.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 5992.T trades at ¥3,675.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 5992.T's P/E ratio is 48.20. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 5992.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 5992.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 5992.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7241.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7241.T has a market cap of 85.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7241.T trades at ¥966.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7241.T's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7241.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7241.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7241.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7246.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7246.T has a market cap of 79.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7246.T trades at ¥812.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7246.T's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7246.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7246.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7246.T's competition here
7298.T vs 5970.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 5970.T has a market cap of 77.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 5970.T trades at ¥1,807.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 5970.T's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 5970.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 5970.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 5970.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7292.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7292.T has a market cap of 75.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7292.T trades at ¥6,540.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7292.T's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7292.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7292.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7292.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7239.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7239.T has a market cap of 69.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7239.T trades at ¥2,032.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7239.T's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7239.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7239.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7239.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7231.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7231.T has a market cap of 63.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7231.T trades at ¥2,915.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7231.T's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7231.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7231.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7231.T's competition here
7298.T vs 5949.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 5949.T has a market cap of 57.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 5949.T trades at ¥1,310.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 5949.T's P/E ratio is -3.03. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 5949.T's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 5949.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 5949.T's competition here
7298.T vs 4246.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 4246.T has a market cap of 56.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 4246.T trades at ¥828.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 4246.T's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 4246.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 4246.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 4246.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7280.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7280.T has a market cap of 54.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7280.T trades at ¥1,190.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7280.T's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7280.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7280.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7280.T's competition here
7298.T vs 5184.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 5184.T has a market cap of 53.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 5184.T trades at ¥4,070.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 5184.T's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 5184.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 5184.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 5184.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7605.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7605.T has a market cap of 51B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7605.T trades at ¥2,817.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7605.T's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7605.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T and 7605.T have similar daily volatility (0.14).Check 7605.T's competition here
7298.T vs 5202.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 5202.T has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 5202.T trades at ¥481.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 5202.T's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 5202.T's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 5202.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 5202.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7244.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7244.T has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7244.T trades at ¥488.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7244.T's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7244.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7244.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7244.T's competition here
7298.T vs 5121.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 5121.T has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 5121.T trades at ¥2,387.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 5121.T's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 5121.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 5121.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 5121.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7236.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7236.T has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7236.T trades at ¥7,840.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7236.T's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7236.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7236.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7236.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7229.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7229.T has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7229.T trades at ¥3,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7229.T's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7229.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is more volatile compared to 7229.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7229.T's competition here
7298.T vs 5985.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 5985.T has a market cap of 43.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 5985.T trades at ¥1,386.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 5985.T's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 5985.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 5985.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 5985.T's competition here
7298.T vs 6463.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 6463.T has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 6463.T trades at ¥1,244.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 6463.T's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 6463.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 6463.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 6463.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7245.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7245.T has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7245.T trades at ¥862.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7245.T's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7245.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7245.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7245.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7315.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7315.T has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7315.T trades at ¥845.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7315.T's P/E ratio is 20.14. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7315.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is more volatile compared to 7315.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7315.T's competition here
7298.T vs 5988.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 5988.T has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 5988.T trades at ¥1,588.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 5988.T's P/E ratio is 47.85. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 5988.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 5988.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 5988.T's competition here
7298.T vs 6462.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 6462.T has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 6462.T trades at ¥3,720.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 6462.T's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 6462.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 6462.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 6462.T's competition here
7298.T vs 5989.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 5989.T has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 5989.T trades at ¥1,171.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 5989.T's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 5989.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 5989.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 5989.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7238.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7238.T has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7238.T trades at ¥119.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7238.T's P/E ratio is -15.88. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7238.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7238.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7238.T's competition here
7298.T vs 6470.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 6470.T has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 6470.T trades at ¥1,029.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 6470.T's P/E ratio is 1079.17. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 6470.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 6470.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 6470.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7466.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7466.T has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7466.T trades at ¥1,262.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7466.T's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7466.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7466.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7466.T's competition here
7298.T vs 5185.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 5185.T has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 5185.T trades at ¥1,792.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 5185.T's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 5185.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 5185.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 5185.T's competition here
7298.T vs 3526.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 3526.T has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 3526.T trades at ¥4,115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 3526.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3526.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is more volatile compared to 3526.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 3526.T's competition here
7298.T vs 6584.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 6584.T has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 6584.T trades at ¥657.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 6584.T's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 6584.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 6584.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 6584.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7294.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7294.T has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7294.T trades at ¥906.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7294.T's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7294.T's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7294.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7294.T's competition here
7298.T vs 6356.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 6356.T has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 6356.T trades at ¥1,336.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 6356.T's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 6356.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 6356.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 6356.T's competition here
7298.T vs 6382.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 6382.T has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 6382.T trades at ¥1,222.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 6382.T's P/E ratio is 7.09. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 6382.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 6382.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 6382.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7299.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7299.T has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7299.T trades at ¥1,798.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7299.T's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7299.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7299.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7299.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7266.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7266.T has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7266.T trades at ¥830.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7266.T's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7266.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7266.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7266.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7254.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7254.T has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7254.T trades at ¥805.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7254.T's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7254.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7254.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7254.T's competition here
7298.T vs 6493.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 6493.T has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 6493.T trades at ¥576.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 6493.T's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 6493.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 6493.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 6493.T's competition here
7298.T vs 6444.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 6444.T has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 6444.T trades at ¥144.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 6444.T's P/E ratio is 58.13. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 6444.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 6444.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 6444.T's competition here
7298.T vs 4222.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 4222.T has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 4222.T trades at ¥1,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 4222.T's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 4222.T's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 4222.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 4222.T's competition here
7298.T vs 6461.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 6461.T has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 6461.T trades at ¥1,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 6461.T's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 6461.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 6461.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 6461.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7247.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7247.T has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7247.T trades at ¥381.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7247.T's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7247.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7247.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7247.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7212.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7212.T has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7212.T trades at ¥692.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7212.T's P/E ratio is -7.35. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7212.T's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7212.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7212.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7235.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7235.T has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7235.T trades at ¥1,302.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7235.T's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7235.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7235.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7235.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7273.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7273.T has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7273.T trades at ¥656.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7273.T's P/E ratio is 5.86. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7273.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7273.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7273.T's competition here
7298.T vs 3434.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 3434.T has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 3434.T trades at ¥1,251.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 3434.T's P/E ratio is -63.57. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3434.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 3434.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 3434.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7551.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7551.T has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7551.T trades at ¥690.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7551.T's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7551.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7551.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7551.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7277.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7277.T has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7277.T trades at ¥357.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7277.T's P/E ratio is 32.84. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7277.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7277.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7277.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7218.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7218.T has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7218.T trades at ¥1,087.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7218.T's P/E ratio is 5.86. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7218.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7218.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7218.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7256.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7256.T has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7256.T trades at ¥253.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7256.T's P/E ratio is -1.69. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7256.T's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7256.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7256.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7271.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7271.T has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7271.T trades at ¥926.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7271.T's P/E ratio is 13.26. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7271.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7271.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7271.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7228.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7228.T has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7228.T trades at ¥3,825.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7228.T's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7228.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7228.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7228.T's competition here
7298.T vs 6042.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 6042.T has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 6042.T trades at ¥4,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 6042.T's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 6042.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 6042.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 6042.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7264.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7264.T has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7264.T trades at ¥1,297.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7264.T's P/E ratio is 38.87. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7264.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7264.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7264.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7291.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7291.T has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7291.T trades at ¥416.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7291.T's P/E ratio is 20.93. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7291.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7291.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7291.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7297.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7297.T has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7297.T trades at ¥899.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7297.T's P/E ratio is -10.67. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7297.T's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7297.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7297.T's competition here
7298.T vs 5189.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 5189.T has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 5189.T trades at ¥3,055.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 5189.T's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 5189.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 5189.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 5189.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7208.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7208.T has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7208.T trades at ¥1,090.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7208.T's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7208.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7208.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7208.T's competition here
7298.T vs 6901.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 6901.T has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 6901.T trades at ¥1,291.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 6901.T's P/E ratio is -22.42. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 6901.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is more volatile compared to 6901.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 6901.T's competition here
7298.T vs 6699.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 6699.T has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 6699.T trades at ¥571.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 6699.T's P/E ratio is 2.68. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 6699.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 6699.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 6699.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7214.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7214.T has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7214.T trades at ¥925.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7214.T's P/E ratio is -108.81. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7214.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7214.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7214.T's competition here
7298.T vs 3422.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 3422.T has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 3422.T trades at ¥401.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 3422.T's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3422.T's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 3422.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 3422.T's competition here
7298.T vs 6776.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 6776.T has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 6776.T trades at ¥267.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 6776.T's P/E ratio is 4.46. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 6776.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 6776.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 6776.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7284.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7284.T has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7284.T trades at ¥1,200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7284.T's P/E ratio is 6.85. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7284.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7284.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7284.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7217.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7217.T has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7217.T trades at ¥400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7217.T's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7217.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7217.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7217.T's competition here
7298.T vs 5162.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 5162.T has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 5162.T trades at ¥835.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 5162.T's P/E ratio is -62.71. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 5162.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 5162.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 5162.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7215.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7215.T has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7215.T trades at ¥362.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7215.T's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7215.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is less volatile compared to 7215.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7215.T's competition here
7298.T vs 7219.T Comparison April 2026
7298.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 7298.T stands at 33.2B. In comparison, 7219.T has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 7298.T is priced at ¥1,387.00, while 7219.T trades at ¥2,281.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
7298.T currently has a P/E ratio of 6.75, whereas 7219.T's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, 7298.T's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7219.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 7298.T is more volatile compared to 7219.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 7298.T.Check 7219.T's competition here