Nippon Sheet Glass Company, Limited (5202.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (5202.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5202.T | ¥474.00 | -0.21% | 47.1B | 15.47 | ¥30.64 | N/A |
| 5802.T | ¥12,760.00 | -5.38% | 10.5T | 28.52 | ¥473.32 | +1.14% |
| 6902.T | ¥1,896.50 | -0.21% | 5.1T | 7.34 | ¥257.90 | +3.54% |
| 5108.T | ¥3,410.00 | -0.47% | 4.3T | 28.81 | ¥119.22 | +3.35% |
| 5334.T | ¥10,820.00 | +0.00% | 2.1T | 19.15 | ¥570.21 | +1.88% |
| 7259.T | ¥2,234.50 | -2.81% | 1.6T | 7.27 | ¥308.53 | +3.12% |
| 5101.T | ¥7,520.00 | -5.19% | 1.2T | 11.57 | ¥668.67 | +1.73% |
| 5991.T | ¥4,135.00 | +1.27% | 859.6B | 30.84 | ¥137.60 | +1.56% |
| 7276.T | ¥2,725.50 | -4.01% | 743.6B | 46.93 | ¥60.20 | +1.98% |
| 6473.T | ¥2,061.50 | +0.19% | 662.8B | 55.30 | ¥37.65 | +2.88% |
Stock Comparison
5202.T vs 5802.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 5802.T has a market cap of 10.5T. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 5802.T trades at ¥12,760.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 5802.T's P/E ratio is 28.52. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 5802.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 5802.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 5802.T's competition here
5202.T vs 6902.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 6902.T has a market cap of 5.1T. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 6902.T trades at ¥1,896.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 6902.T's P/E ratio is 7.34. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 6902.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 6902.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 6902.T's competition here
5202.T vs 5108.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 5108.T has a market cap of 4.3T. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 5108.T trades at ¥3,410.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 5108.T's P/E ratio is 28.81. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 5108.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 5108.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 5108.T's competition here
5202.T vs 5334.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 5334.T has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 5334.T trades at ¥10,820.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 5334.T's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 5334.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 5334.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 5334.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7259.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7259.T has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7259.T trades at ¥2,234.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7259.T's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7259.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7259.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7259.T's competition here
5202.T vs 5101.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 5101.T has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 5101.T trades at ¥7,520.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 5101.T's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 5101.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 5101.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 5101.T's competition here
5202.T vs 5991.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 5991.T has a market cap of 859.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 5991.T trades at ¥4,135.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 5991.T's P/E ratio is 30.84. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 5991.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 5991.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 5991.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7276.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7276.T has a market cap of 743.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7276.T trades at ¥2,725.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7276.T's P/E ratio is 46.93. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7276.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7276.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7276.T's competition here
5202.T vs 6473.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 6473.T has a market cap of 662.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 6473.T trades at ¥2,061.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 6473.T's P/E ratio is 55.30. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 6473.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 6473.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 6473.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7282.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7282.T has a market cap of 596.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7282.T trades at ¥5,027.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7282.T's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7282.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7282.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7282.T's competition here
5202.T vs 5105.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 5105.T has a market cap of 596.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 5105.T trades at ¥3,835.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 5105.T's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 5105.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 5105.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 5105.T's competition here
5202.T vs 6471.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 6471.T has a market cap of 596B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 6471.T trades at ¥1,208.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 6471.T's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 6471.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 6471.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 6471.T's competition here
5202.T vs 5110.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 5110.T has a market cap of 591.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 5110.T trades at ¥2,200.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 5110.T's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 5110.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 5110.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 5110.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7240.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7240.T has a market cap of 471.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7240.T trades at ¥2,945.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7240.T's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7240.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7240.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7240.T's competition here
5202.T vs 6923.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 6923.T has a market cap of 451.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 6923.T trades at ¥3,633.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 6923.T's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 6923.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 6923.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 6923.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7988.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7988.T has a market cap of 435.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7988.T trades at ¥4,710.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7988.T's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7988.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7988.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7988.T's competition here
5202.T vs 6592.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 6592.T has a market cap of 398.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 6592.T trades at ¥1,610.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 6592.T's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 6592.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 6592.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 6592.T's competition here
5202.T vs 3116.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 3116.T has a market cap of 387.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 3116.T trades at ¥2,148.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 3116.T's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 3116.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 3116.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 3116.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7220.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7220.T has a market cap of 318.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7220.T trades at ¥4,540.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7220.T's P/E ratio is 251.29. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7220.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7220.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7220.T's competition here
5202.T vs 5191.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 5191.T has a market cap of 269.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 5191.T trades at ¥2,594.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 5191.T's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 5191.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is more volatile compared to 5191.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 5191.T's competition here
5202.T vs 6995.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 6995.T has a market cap of 253.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 6995.T trades at ¥2,975.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 6995.T's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 6995.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 6995.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 6995.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7278.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7278.T has a market cap of 215.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7278.T trades at ¥5,790.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7278.T's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7278.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7278.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7278.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7313.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7313.T has a market cap of 201.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7313.T trades at ¥1,723.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7313.T's P/E ratio is 28.66. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7313.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7313.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7313.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7250.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7250.T has a market cap of 173.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7250.T trades at ¥3,015.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7250.T's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7250.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7250.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7250.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7242.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7242.T has a market cap of 169.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7242.T trades at ¥3,850.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7242.T's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7242.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7242.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7242.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7296.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7296.T has a market cap of 165.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7296.T trades at ¥3,405.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7296.T's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7296.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7296.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7296.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7287.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7287.T has a market cap of 146.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7287.T trades at ¥2,562.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7287.T's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7287.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7287.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7287.T's competition here
5202.T vs 5975.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 5975.T has a market cap of 132.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 5975.T trades at ¥2,663.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 5975.T's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 5975.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 5975.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 5975.T's competition here
5202.T vs 8117.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 8117.T has a market cap of 111.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 8117.T trades at ¥2,021.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 8117.T's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 8117.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 8117.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 8117.T's competition here
5202.T vs 5161.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 5161.T has a market cap of 107.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 5161.T trades at ¥2,927.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 5161.T's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 5161.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 5161.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 5161.T's competition here
5202.T vs 6209.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 6209.T has a market cap of 104.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 6209.T trades at ¥3,850.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 6209.T's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 6209.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 6209.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 6209.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7283.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7283.T has a market cap of 102.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7283.T trades at ¥1,777.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7283.T's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7283.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7283.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7283.T's competition here
5202.T vs 5992.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 5992.T has a market cap of 97B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 5992.T trades at ¥3,855.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 5992.T's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 5992.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 5992.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 5992.T's competition here
5202.T vs 6463.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 6463.T has a market cap of 90.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 6463.T trades at ¥1,427.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 6463.T's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 6463.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 6463.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 6463.T's competition here
5202.T vs 5970.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 5970.T has a market cap of 88.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 5970.T trades at ¥2,060.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 5970.T's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 5970.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 5970.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 5970.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7241.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7241.T has a market cap of 85B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7241.T trades at ¥939.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7241.T's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7241.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7241.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7241.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7236.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7236.T has a market cap of 84B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7236.T trades at ¥14,840.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7236.T's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7236.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7236.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7236.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7292.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7292.T has a market cap of 81.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7292.T trades at ¥6,870.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7292.T's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7292.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7292.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7292.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7246.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7246.T has a market cap of 76.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7246.T trades at ¥781.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7246.T's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7246.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7246.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7246.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7239.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7239.T has a market cap of 74.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7239.T trades at ¥2,156.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7239.T's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7239.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7239.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7239.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7245.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7245.T has a market cap of 71.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7245.T trades at ¥1,567.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7245.T's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7245.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7245.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7245.T's competition here
5202.T vs 4246.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 4246.T has a market cap of 66.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 4246.T trades at ¥1,008.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 4246.T's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 4246.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 4246.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 4246.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7231.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7231.T has a market cap of 59.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7231.T trades at ¥2,725.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7231.T's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7231.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7231.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7231.T's competition here
5202.T vs 5985.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 5985.T has a market cap of 56.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 5985.T trades at ¥1,922.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 5985.T's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 5985.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 5985.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 5985.T's competition here
5202.T vs 5184.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 5184.T has a market cap of 54.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 5184.T trades at ¥4,190.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 5184.T's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 5184.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 5184.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 5184.T's competition here
5202.T vs 5949.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 5949.T has a market cap of 54.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 5949.T trades at ¥1,207.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 5949.T's P/E ratio is -6.47. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 5949.T's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 5949.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 5949.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7605.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7605.T has a market cap of 51B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7605.T trades at ¥2,817.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7605.T's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7605.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is more volatile compared to 7605.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7605.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7280.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7280.T has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7280.T trades at ¥1,120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7280.T's P/E ratio is 5.45. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7280.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7280.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7280.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7244.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7244.T has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7244.T trades at ¥515.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7244.T's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7244.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7244.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7244.T's competition here
5202.T vs 5121.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 5121.T has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 5121.T trades at ¥2,549.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 5121.T's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 5121.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 5121.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 5121.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7229.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7229.T has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7229.T trades at ¥3,005.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7229.T's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7229.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is more volatile compared to 7229.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7229.T's competition here
5202.T vs 5989.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 5989.T has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 5989.T trades at ¥1,484.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 5989.T's P/E ratio is 3.89. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 5989.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 5989.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 5989.T's competition here
5202.T vs 6584.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 6584.T has a market cap of 39.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 6584.T trades at ¥1,152.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 6584.T's P/E ratio is 26.14. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 6584.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 6584.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 6584.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7315.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7315.T has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7315.T trades at ¥845.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7315.T's P/E ratio is 20.14. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7315.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is more volatile compared to 7315.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7315.T's competition here
5202.T vs 5988.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 5988.T has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 5988.T trades at ¥1,569.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 5988.T's P/E ratio is -1982.28. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 5988.T's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 5988.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 5988.T's competition here
5202.T vs 6462.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 6462.T has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 6462.T trades at ¥3,720.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 6462.T's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 6462.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 6462.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 6462.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7298.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7298.T has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7298.T trades at ¥1,387.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7298.T's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7298.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is more volatile compared to 7298.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7298.T's competition here
5202.T vs 6470.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 6470.T has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 6470.T trades at ¥1,124.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 6470.T's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 6470.T's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 6470.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 6470.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7238.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7238.T has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7238.T trades at ¥112.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7238.T's P/E ratio is 33.24. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7238.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7238.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7238.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7466.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7466.T has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7466.T trades at ¥1,281.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7466.T's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7466.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7466.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7466.T's competition here
5202.T vs 5185.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 5185.T has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 5185.T trades at ¥1,785.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 5185.T's P/E ratio is 24.27. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 5185.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 5185.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 5185.T's competition here
5202.T vs 3526.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 3526.T has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 3526.T trades at ¥4,115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 3526.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 3526.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is more volatile compared to 3526.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 3526.T's competition here
5202.T vs 6356.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 6356.T has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 6356.T trades at ¥1,502.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 6356.T's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 6356.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 6356.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 6356.T's competition here
5202.T vs 6382.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 6382.T has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 6382.T trades at ¥1,217.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 6382.T's P/E ratio is 7.34. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 6382.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 6382.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 6382.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7266.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7266.T has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7266.T trades at ¥900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7266.T's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7266.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7266.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7266.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7256.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7256.T has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7256.T trades at ¥480.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7256.T's P/E ratio is 20.21. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7256.T's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7256.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7256.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7294.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7294.T has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7294.T trades at ¥845.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7294.T's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7294.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7294.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7294.T's competition here
5202.T vs 6444.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 6444.T has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 6444.T trades at ¥162.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 6444.T's P/E ratio is 64.23. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 6444.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 6444.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 6444.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7299.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7299.T has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7299.T trades at ¥1,641.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7299.T's P/E ratio is 7.82. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7299.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7299.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7299.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7254.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7254.T has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7254.T trades at ¥715.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7254.T's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7254.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7254.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7254.T's competition here
5202.T vs 6461.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 6461.T has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 6461.T trades at ¥1,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 6461.T's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 6461.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 6461.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 6461.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7235.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7235.T has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7235.T trades at ¥1,435.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7235.T's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7235.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7235.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7235.T's competition here
5202.T vs 6493.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 6493.T has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 6493.T trades at ¥460.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 6493.T's P/E ratio is 6.02. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 6493.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 6493.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 6493.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7247.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7247.T has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7247.T trades at ¥355.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7247.T's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7247.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7247.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7247.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7212.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7212.T has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7212.T trades at ¥651.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7212.T's P/E ratio is 2.55. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7212.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7212.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7212.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7273.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7273.T has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7273.T trades at ¥627.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7273.T's P/E ratio is 6.84. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7273.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7273.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7273.T's competition here
5202.T vs 3434.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 3434.T has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 3434.T trades at ¥1,210.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 3434.T's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 3434.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 3434.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 3434.T's competition here
5202.T vs 4222.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 4222.T has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 4222.T trades at ¥713.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 4222.T's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 4222.T's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 4222.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 4222.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7551.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7551.T has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7551.T trades at ¥684.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7551.T's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7551.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7551.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7551.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7271.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7271.T has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7271.T trades at ¥1,010.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7271.T's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7271.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7271.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7271.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7277.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7277.T has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7277.T trades at ¥313.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7277.T's P/E ratio is -70.65. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7277.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7277.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7277.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7218.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7218.T has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7218.T trades at ¥987.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7218.T's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7218.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7218.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7218.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7228.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7228.T has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7228.T trades at ¥3,710.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7228.T's P/E ratio is 8.03. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7228.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7228.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7228.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7291.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7291.T has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7291.T trades at ¥443.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7291.T's P/E ratio is 4.21. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7291.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7291.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7291.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7264.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7264.T has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7264.T trades at ¥1,282.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7264.T's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7264.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7264.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7264.T's competition here
5202.T vs 6042.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 6042.T has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 6042.T trades at ¥3,895.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 6042.T's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 6042.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is more volatile compared to 6042.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 6042.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7297.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7297.T has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7297.T trades at ¥855.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7297.T's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7297.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is more volatile compared to 7297.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7297.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7208.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7208.T has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7208.T trades at ¥1,160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7208.T's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7208.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7208.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7208.T's competition here
5202.T vs 5189.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 5189.T has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 5189.T trades at ¥2,949.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 5189.T's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 5189.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is more volatile compared to 5189.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 5189.T's competition here
5202.T vs 3422.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 3422.T has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 3422.T trades at ¥489.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 3422.T's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 3422.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 3422.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 3422.T's competition here
5202.T vs 6901.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 6901.T has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 6901.T trades at ¥1,296.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 6901.T's P/E ratio is 166.58. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 6901.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is more volatile compared to 6901.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 6901.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7214.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7214.T has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7214.T trades at ¥935.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7214.T's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7214.T's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7214.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7214.T's competition here
5202.T vs 6776.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 6776.T has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 6776.T trades at ¥267.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 6776.T's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 6776.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 6776.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 6776.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7284.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7284.T has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7284.T trades at ¥1,265.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7284.T's P/E ratio is 56.68. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7284.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7284.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7284.T's competition here
5202.T vs 6699.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 6699.T has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 6699.T trades at ¥484.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 6699.T's P/E ratio is 5.04. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 6699.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 6699.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 6699.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7217.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7217.T has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7217.T trades at ¥418.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7217.T's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7217.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is more volatile compared to 7217.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7217.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7215.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7215.T has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7215.T trades at ¥414.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7215.T's P/E ratio is -4.70. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7215.T's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 7215.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7215.T's competition here
5202.T vs 5162.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 5162.T has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 5162.T trades at ¥805.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 5162.T's P/E ratio is 23.23. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 5162.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is less volatile compared to 5162.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 5162.T's competition here
5202.T vs 7219.T Comparison June 2026
5202.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5202.T stands at 47.1B. In comparison, 7219.T has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 5202.T is priced at ¥474.00, while 7219.T trades at ¥2,291.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5202.T currently has a P/E ratio of 15.47, whereas 7219.T's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, 5202.T's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 7219.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 5202.T is more volatile compared to 7219.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5202.T.Check 7219.T's competition here