Tensho Electric Industries Co., Ltd.
Tensho Electric Industries Co., Ltd. 6776.T Peers
See (6776.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6776.T | ¥253.00 | +0.80% | 4.3B | 7.73 | ¥32.74 | +1.98% |
6902.T | ¥1,930.00 | +1.50% | 5.4T | 13.30 | ¥145.08 | +3.32% |
5108.T | ¥5,937.00 | +1.35% | 4T | 14.96 | ¥396.84 | +3.54% |
5802.T | ¥2,972.50 | +0.63% | 2.3T | 11.97 | ¥248.43 | +2.59% |
7259.T | ¥1,747.00 | +1.33% | 1.3T | 12.68 | ¥137.78 | +3.43% |
5334.T | ¥4,497.00 | +0.58% | 892.4B | 9.66 | ¥465.62 | +3.94% |
5101.T | ¥3,509.00 | +0.54% | 544.3B | 8.84 | ¥397.16 | +2.79% |
7276.T | ¥1,754.00 | -0.14% | 497.7B | 11.21 | ¥156.48 | +3.19% |
5105.T | ¥3,007.00 | +0.23% | 463B | 7.09 | ¥423.90 | +3.99% |
5110.T | ¥1,641.50 | -0.82% | 431.8B | -37.86 | -¥43.36 | +3.53% |
Stock Comparison
6776.T vs 6902.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 6902.T has a market cap of 5.4T. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 6902.T trades at ¥1,930.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 6902.T's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 6902.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 6902.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 5108.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 5108.T has a market cap of 4T. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 5108.T trades at ¥5,937.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 5108.T's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5108.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 5108.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 5802.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 5802.T has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 5802.T trades at ¥2,972.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 5802.T's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5802.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 5802.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7259.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7259.T has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7259.T trades at ¥1,747.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7259.T's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7259.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7259.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 5334.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 5334.T has a market cap of 892.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 5334.T trades at ¥4,497.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 5334.T's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5334.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 5334.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 5101.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 5101.T has a market cap of 544.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 5101.T trades at ¥3,509.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 5101.T's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5101.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 5101.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7276.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7276.T has a market cap of 497.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7276.T trades at ¥1,754.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7276.T's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7276.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7276.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 5105.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 5105.T has a market cap of 463B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 5105.T trades at ¥3,007.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 5105.T's P/E ratio is 7.09. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5105.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 5105.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 5110.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 5110.T has a market cap of 431.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 5110.T trades at ¥1,641.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 5110.T's P/E ratio is -37.86. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5110.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 5110.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 6923.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 6923.T has a market cap of 416.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 6923.T trades at ¥2,792.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 6923.T's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 6923.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 6923.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 6473.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 6473.T has a market cap of 350B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 6473.T trades at ¥1,099.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 6473.T's P/E ratio is 27.23. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 6473.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 6473.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 3116.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 3116.T has a market cap of 345.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 3116.T trades at ¥1,932.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 3116.T's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3116.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 3116.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7240.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7240.T has a market cap of 336B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7240.T trades at ¥2,059.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7240.T's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7240.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7240.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7282.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7282.T has a market cap of 333.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7282.T trades at ¥2,623.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7282.T's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7282.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7282.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 5991.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 5991.T has a market cap of 322.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 5991.T trades at ¥1,581.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 5991.T's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5991.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 5991.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7988.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7988.T has a market cap of 315.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7988.T trades at ¥3,315.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7988.T's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7988.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7988.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 6471.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 6471.T has a market cap of 313B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 6471.T trades at ¥640.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 6471.T's P/E ratio is 25.34. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 6471.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 6471.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 6592.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 6592.T has a market cap of 268.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 6592.T trades at ¥2,140.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 6592.T's P/E ratio is 28.60. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 6592.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 6592.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7313.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7313.T has a market cap of 195B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7313.T trades at ¥1,635.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7313.T's P/E ratio is 23.16. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7313.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7313.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 6995.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 6995.T has a market cap of 186.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 6995.T trades at ¥2,144.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 6995.T's P/E ratio is 6.53. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 6995.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 6995.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7220.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7220.T has a market cap of 178.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7220.T trades at ¥2,731.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7220.T's P/E ratio is 23.02. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7220.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7220.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 5191.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 5191.T has a market cap of 176.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 5191.T trades at ¥1,696.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 5191.T's P/E ratio is 6.42. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5191.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 5191.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7278.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7278.T has a market cap of 149.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7278.T trades at ¥4,080.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7278.T's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7278.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7278.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7242.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7242.T has a market cap of 149.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7242.T trades at ¥3,115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7242.T's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7242.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7242.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7296.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7296.T has a market cap of 134.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7296.T trades at ¥2,772.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7296.T's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7296.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7296.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7283.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7283.T has a market cap of 108.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7283.T trades at ¥1,740.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7283.T's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7283.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7283.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 8117.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 8117.T has a market cap of 99.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 8117.T trades at ¥1,794.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 8117.T's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 8117.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 8117.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 5161.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 5161.T has a market cap of 95.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 5161.T trades at ¥2,472.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 5161.T's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5161.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 5161.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 5975.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 5975.T has a market cap of 89.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 5975.T trades at ¥1,764.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 5975.T's P/E ratio is 6.35. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5975.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 5975.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7287.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7287.T has a market cap of 78.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7287.T trades at ¥1,371.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7287.T's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7287.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7287.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7250.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7250.T has a market cap of 74.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7250.T trades at ¥1,300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7250.T's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7250.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7250.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 5970.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 5970.T has a market cap of 73.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 5970.T trades at ¥1,727.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 5970.T's P/E ratio is 5.97. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5970.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 5970.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7292.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7292.T has a market cap of 70.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7292.T trades at ¥6,120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7292.T's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7292.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7292.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 6209.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 6209.T has a market cap of 64.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 6209.T trades at ¥2,401.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 6209.T's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 6209.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 6209.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7241.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7241.T has a market cap of 64.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7241.T trades at ¥720.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7241.T's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7241.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7241.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 6463.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 6463.T has a market cap of 63.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 6463.T trades at ¥1,910.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 6463.T's P/E ratio is 7.89. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 6463.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 6463.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 5988.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 5988.T has a market cap of 63.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 5988.T trades at ¥1,848.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 5988.T's P/E ratio is 35.11. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5988.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 5988.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7239.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7239.T has a market cap of 58.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7239.T trades at ¥1,699.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7239.T's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7239.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7239.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7246.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7246.T has a market cap of 53.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7246.T trades at ¥542.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7246.T's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7246.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7246.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7231.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7231.T has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7231.T trades at ¥2,309.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7231.T's P/E ratio is 25.81. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7231.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7231.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 5184.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 5184.T has a market cap of 47B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 5184.T trades at ¥3,570.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 5184.T's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5184.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 5184.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 5992.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 5992.T has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 5992.T trades at ¥1,800.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 5992.T's P/E ratio is 24.89. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5992.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 5992.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 4246.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 4246.T has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 4246.T trades at ¥637.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 4246.T's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4246.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 4246.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 5949.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 5949.T has a market cap of 41.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 5949.T trades at ¥942.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 5949.T's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5949.T's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 5949.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7229.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7229.T has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7229.T trades at ¥2,699.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7229.T's P/E ratio is 6.18. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7229.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7229.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7315.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7315.T has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7315.T trades at ¥845.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7315.T's P/E ratio is 20.14. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7315.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is more volatile compared to 7315.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7605.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7605.T has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7605.T trades at ¥2,141.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7605.T's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7605.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7605.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 5202.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 5202.T has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 5202.T trades at ¥409.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 5202.T's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5202.T's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 5202.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 6462.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 6462.T has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 6462.T trades at ¥3,720.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 6462.T's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 6462.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 6462.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7280.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7280.T has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7280.T trades at ¥805.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7280.T's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7280.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7280.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 5989.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 5989.T has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 5989.T trades at ¥1,270.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 5989.T's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5989.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 5989.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7244.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7244.T has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7244.T trades at ¥360.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7244.T's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7244.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7244.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7298.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7298.T has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7298.T trades at ¥1,387.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7298.T's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7298.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is more volatile compared to 7298.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7236.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7236.T has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7236.T trades at ¥4,740.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7236.T's P/E ratio is 38.11. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7236.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7236.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7245.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7245.T has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7245.T trades at ¥598.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7245.T's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7245.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7245.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7238.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7238.T has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7238.T trades at ¥103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7238.T's P/E ratio is 332.26. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7238.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7238.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 5121.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 5121.T has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 5121.T trades at ¥1,436.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 5121.T's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5121.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 5121.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 5185.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 5185.T has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 5185.T trades at ¥1,645.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 5185.T's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5185.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 5185.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7466.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7466.T has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7466.T trades at ¥2,190.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7466.T's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7466.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7466.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7294.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7294.T has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7294.T trades at ¥882.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7294.T's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7294.T's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7294.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 6584.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 6584.T has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 6584.T trades at ¥597.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 6584.T's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 6584.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 6584.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 6470.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 6470.T has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 6470.T trades at ¥636.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 6470.T's P/E ratio is -4.36. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 6470.T's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 6470.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 6382.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 6382.T has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 6382.T trades at ¥1,030.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 6382.T's P/E ratio is 7.66. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 6382.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 6382.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 3526.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 3526.T has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 3526.T trades at ¥2,600.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 3526.T's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3526.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 3526.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7266.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7266.T has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7266.T trades at ¥696.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7266.T's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7266.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7266.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 6461.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 6461.T has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 6461.T trades at ¥1,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 6461.T's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 6461.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 6461.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7299.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7299.T has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7299.T trades at ¥1,370.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7299.T's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7299.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7299.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 6444.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 6444.T has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 6444.T trades at ¥119.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 6444.T's P/E ratio is -6.26. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 6444.T's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 6444.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7212.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7212.T has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7212.T trades at ¥669.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7212.T's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7212.T's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7212.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 4222.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 4222.T has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 4222.T trades at ¥639.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 4222.T's P/E ratio is -22.46. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4222.T's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 4222.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7273.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7273.T has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7273.T trades at ¥475.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7273.T's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7273.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7273.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7218.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7218.T has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7218.T trades at ¥1,035.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7218.T's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7218.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is more volatile compared to 7218.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 3434.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 3434.T has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 3434.T trades at ¥1,018.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 3434.T's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3434.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is more volatile compared to 3434.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7551.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7551.T has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7551.T trades at ¥600.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7551.T's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7551.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7551.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7247.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7247.T has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7247.T trades at ¥284.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7247.T's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7247.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7247.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 5985.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 5985.T has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 5985.T trades at ¥294.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 5985.T's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5985.T's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 5985.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7228.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7228.T has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7228.T trades at ¥3,705.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7228.T's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7228.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is more volatile compared to 7228.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 6493.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 6493.T has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 6493.T trades at ¥305.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 6493.T's P/E ratio is 51.87. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 6493.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 6493.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7235.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7235.T has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7235.T trades at ¥910.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7235.T's P/E ratio is 5.01. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7235.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7235.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7277.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7277.T has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7277.T trades at ¥287.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7277.T's P/E ratio is -9.75. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7277.T's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7277.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7254.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7254.T has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7254.T trades at ¥385.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7254.T's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7254.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7254.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 6356.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 6356.T has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 6356.T trades at ¥523.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 6356.T's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 6356.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 6356.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7264.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7264.T has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7264.T trades at ¥1,150.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7264.T's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7264.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is more volatile compared to 7264.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7291.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7291.T has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7291.T trades at ¥355.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7291.T's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7291.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7291.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7297.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7297.T has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7297.T trades at ¥847.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7297.T's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7297.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7297.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7271.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7271.T has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7271.T trades at ¥515.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7271.T's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7271.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7271.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 6699.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 6699.T has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 6699.T trades at ¥571.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 6699.T's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 6699.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 6699.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 6042.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 6042.T has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 6042.T trades at ¥2,525.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 6042.T's P/E ratio is 2.30. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 6042.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is more volatile compared to 6042.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7208.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7208.T has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7208.T trades at ¥847.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7208.T's P/E ratio is 6.47. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7208.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is more volatile compared to 7208.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7214.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7214.T has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7214.T trades at ¥801.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7214.T's P/E ratio is 340.85. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7214.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7214.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 6901.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 6901.T has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 6901.T trades at ¥905.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 6901.T's P/E ratio is 18.77. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 6901.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 6901.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7217.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7217.T has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7217.T trades at ¥782.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7217.T's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7217.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7217.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 3422.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 3422.T has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 3422.T trades at ¥315.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 3422.T's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3422.T's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 3422.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7284.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7284.T has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7284.T trades at ¥1,031.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7284.T's P/E ratio is -129.20. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7284.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7284.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7256.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7256.T has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7256.T trades at ¥93.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7256.T's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7256.T's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7256.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 5189.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 5189.T has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 5189.T trades at ¥1,848.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 5189.T's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5189.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is more volatile compared to 5189.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7215.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7215.T has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7215.T trades at ¥362.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7215.T's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7215.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 7215.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 3439.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 3439.T has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 3439.T trades at ¥617.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 3439.T's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3439.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is less volatile compared to 3439.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.
6776.T vs 7219.T Comparison
6776.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 6776.T stands at 4.3B. In comparison, 7219.T has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 6776.T is priced at ¥253.00, while 7219.T trades at ¥2,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
6776.T currently has a P/E ratio of 7.73, whereas 7219.T's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, 6776.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7219.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 6776.T is more volatile compared to 7219.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 6776.T.