Zoom Video Communications, Inc.
Zoom Video Communications, Inc. 5ZM.F Peers
See (5ZM.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5ZM.F | $70.78 | -2.99% | 22.06B | 24.07 | $2.94 | N/A |
| SAP.DE | $260.55 | -1.86% | 303.95B | 53.61 | $4.86 | +0.90% |
| FOO.DE | $246.55 | -2.41% | 236.56B | 43.71 | $5.64 | +0.60% |
| FOO.F | $241.00 | -4.16% | 231.23B | 42.73 | $5.64 | +0.60% |
| ITU.DE | $637.00 | +8.13% | 178.08B | 58.76 | $10.84 | +0.53% |
| 307.F | $90.19 | -1.69% | 109.86B | 82.74 | $1.09 | N/A |
| AUD.DE | $287.35 | +0.26% | 61.93B | 109.26 | $2.63 | N/A |
| CDS.DE | $165.64 | N/A | 45.36B | 61.12 | $2.71 | N/A |
| FFV.DE | $297.70 | +0.40% | 17.45B | 53.83 | $5.53 | N/A |
| NEM.DE | $117.60 | -0.84% | 13.58B | 76.36 | $1.54 | +0.88% |
Stock Comparison
5ZM.F vs SAP.DE Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, SAP.DE has a market cap of 303.95B. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while SAP.DE trades at $260.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas SAP.DE's P/E ratio is 53.61. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAP.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is less volatile compared to SAP.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs FOO.DE Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, FOO.DE has a market cap of 236.56B. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while FOO.DE trades at $246.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas FOO.DE's P/E ratio is 43.71. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FOO.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is less volatile compared to FOO.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs FOO.F Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, FOO.F has a market cap of 231.23B. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while FOO.F trades at $241.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas FOO.F's P/E ratio is 42.73. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FOO.F's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is less volatile compared to FOO.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs ITU.DE Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, ITU.DE has a market cap of 178.08B. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while ITU.DE trades at $637.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas ITU.DE's P/E ratio is 58.76. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ITU.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is more volatile compared to ITU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs 307.F Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, 307.F has a market cap of 109.86B. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while 307.F trades at $90.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas 307.F's P/E ratio is 82.74. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 307.F's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is less volatile compared to 307.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs AUD.DE Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, AUD.DE has a market cap of 61.93B. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while AUD.DE trades at $287.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas AUD.DE's P/E ratio is 109.26. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUD.DE's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is more volatile compared to AUD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs CDS.DE Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, CDS.DE has a market cap of 45.36B. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while CDS.DE trades at $165.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas CDS.DE's P/E ratio is 61.12. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDS.DE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is more volatile compared to CDS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs FFV.DE Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, FFV.DE has a market cap of 17.45B. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while FFV.DE trades at $297.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas FFV.DE's P/E ratio is 53.83. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FFV.DE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is more volatile compared to FFV.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs NEM.DE Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, NEM.DE has a market cap of 13.58B. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while NEM.DE trades at $117.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas NEM.DE's P/E ratio is 76.36. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEM.DE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is less volatile compared to NEM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs CTX.DE Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, CTX.DE has a market cap of 13.49B. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while CTX.DE trades at $106.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas CTX.DE's P/E ratio is 39.97. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTX.DE's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is more volatile compared to CTX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs E3G1.SG Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, E3G1.SG has a market cap of 12.84B. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while E3G1.SG trades at $59.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas E3G1.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to E3G1.SG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is more volatile compared to E3G1.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs US44891N2080.SG Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, US44891N2080.SG has a market cap of 2.56B. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while US44891N2080.SG trades at $31.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas US44891N2080.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to US44891N2080.SG's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is more volatile compared to US44891N2080.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs AOF.DE Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, AOF.DE has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while AOF.DE trades at $126.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas AOF.DE's P/E ratio is 44.34. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AOF.DE's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is less volatile compared to AOF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs TMV.DE Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, TMV.DE has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while TMV.DE trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas TMV.DE's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TMV.DE's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is less volatile compared to TMV.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs RKET.HM Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, RKET.HM has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while RKET.HM trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas RKET.HM's P/E ratio is 1.41. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RKET.HM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is more volatile compared to RKET.HM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs MUM.DE Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, MUM.DE has a market cap of 912.56M. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while MUM.DE trades at $54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas MUM.DE's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MUM.DE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is less volatile compared to MUM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs M8G.DE Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, M8G.DE has a market cap of 710.95M. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while M8G.DE trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas M8G.DE's P/E ratio is 27.13. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to M8G.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is less volatile compared to M8G.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs M8G.F Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, M8G.F has a market cap of 706.46M. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while M8G.F trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas M8G.F's P/E ratio is 26.96. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to M8G.F's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is less volatile compared to M8G.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs GKS.HM Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, GKS.HM has a market cap of 647.81M. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while GKS.HM trades at $285.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas GKS.HM's P/E ratio is -123.38. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GKS.HM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is more volatile compared to GKS.HM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs 0S6.DE Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, 0S6.DE has a market cap of 617.73M. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while 0S6.DE trades at $14.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas 0S6.DE's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0S6.DE's ROE of -2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is less volatile compared to 0S6.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs GKS.DE Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, GKS.DE has a market cap of 494.59M. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while GKS.DE trades at $219.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas GKS.DE's P/E ratio is -44.88. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GKS.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is less volatile compared to GKS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs PSAN.DE Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, PSAN.DE has a market cap of 455.35M. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while PSAN.DE trades at $29.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas PSAN.DE's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSAN.DE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is more volatile compared to PSAN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs IVU.DE Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, IVU.DE has a market cap of 311.24M. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while IVU.DE trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas IVU.DE's P/E ratio is 26.09. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IVU.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is more volatile compared to IVU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs TPG.DE Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, TPG.DE has a market cap of 237.86M. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while TPG.DE trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas TPG.DE's P/E ratio is 6.70. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TPG.DE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is less volatile compared to TPG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs DBD.DE Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, DBD.DE has a market cap of 233.75M. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while DBD.DE trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas DBD.DE's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DBD.DE's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is more volatile compared to DBD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs FAA.DE Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, FAA.DE has a market cap of 171.18M. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while FAA.DE trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas FAA.DE's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FAA.DE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is less volatile compared to FAA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs SJJ.DE Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, SJJ.DE has a market cap of 151.72M. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while SJJ.DE trades at $14.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas SJJ.DE's P/E ratio is -1445.00. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SJJ.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is more volatile compared to SJJ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs MSGL.HM Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, MSGL.HM has a market cap of 148.95M. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while MSGL.HM trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas MSGL.HM's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MSGL.HM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is more volatile compared to MSGL.HM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs 52D0.F Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, 52D0.F has a market cap of 140.30M. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while 52D0.F trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas 52D0.F's P/E ratio is -10.60. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 52D0.F's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is less volatile compared to 52D0.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs BSS.F Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, BSS.F has a market cap of 107.64M. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while BSS.F trades at $23.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas BSS.F's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSS.F's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is more volatile compared to BSS.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs V3S.DE Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, V3S.DE has a market cap of 98.69M. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while V3S.DE trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas V3S.DE's P/E ratio is -43.75. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to V3S.DE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is more volatile compared to V3S.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs ESY.DE Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, ESY.DE has a market cap of 87.61M. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while ESY.DE trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas ESY.DE's P/E ratio is -18.71. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ESY.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is more volatile compared to ESY.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs CSH.DE Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, CSH.DE has a market cap of 72.97M. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while CSH.DE trades at $8.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas CSH.DE's P/E ratio is -15.30. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSH.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is less volatile compared to CSH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs 27H.F Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, 27H.F has a market cap of 62.21M. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while 27H.F trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas 27H.F's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 27H.F's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is less volatile compared to 27H.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs TR9.F Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, TR9.F has a market cap of 36.22M. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while TR9.F trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas TR9.F's P/E ratio is -26.62. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TR9.F's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is more volatile compared to TR9.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs TR9.DE Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, TR9.DE has a market cap of 35.93M. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while TR9.DE trades at $18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas TR9.DE's P/E ratio is -26.41. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TR9.DE's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is more volatile compared to TR9.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs US37892C1062.SG Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, US37892C1062.SG has a market cap of 25.48M. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while US37892C1062.SG trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas US37892C1062.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to US37892C1062.SG's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is more volatile compared to US37892C1062.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs ISHA.DE Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, ISHA.DE has a market cap of 25.23M. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while ISHA.DE trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas ISHA.DE's P/E ratio is -86.50. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ISHA.DE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is more volatile compared to ISHA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs NIIN.DE Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, NIIN.DE has a market cap of 23.74M. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while NIIN.DE trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas NIIN.DE's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NIIN.DE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is less volatile compared to NIIN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs TBX.F Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, TBX.F has a market cap of 18.55M. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while TBX.F trades at $8.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas TBX.F's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TBX.F's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is more volatile compared to TBX.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs 1OJ.F Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, 1OJ.F has a market cap of 16.28M. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while 1OJ.F trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas 1OJ.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 1OJ.F's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is more volatile compared to 1OJ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs BWQ.DE Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, BWQ.DE has a market cap of 14.31M. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while BWQ.DE trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas BWQ.DE's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BWQ.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is less volatile compared to BWQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs TBX0.F Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, TBX0.F has a market cap of 14.09M. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while TBX0.F trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas TBX0.F's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TBX0.F's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is more volatile compared to TBX0.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs IVX.DE Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, IVX.DE has a market cap of 13.41M. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while IVX.DE trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas IVX.DE's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IVX.DE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is more volatile compared to IVX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs DTD2.DE Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, DTD2.DE has a market cap of 11.12M. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while DTD2.DE trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas DTD2.DE's P/E ratio is 6.39. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTD2.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is less volatile compared to DTD2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs ABX.DE Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, ABX.DE has a market cap of 10.37M. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while ABX.DE trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas ABX.DE's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABX.DE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is less volatile compared to ABX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs VRL.DE Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, VRL.DE has a market cap of 10.34M. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while VRL.DE trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas VRL.DE's P/E ratio is -6.99. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VRL.DE's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is less volatile compared to VRL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs 2LH.F Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, 2LH.F has a market cap of 9.29M. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while 2LH.F trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas 2LH.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 2LH.F's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is less volatile compared to 2LH.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs 8DQ.F Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, 8DQ.F has a market cap of 6.89M. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while 8DQ.F trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas 8DQ.F's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 8DQ.F's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is more volatile compared to 8DQ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs CPU2.F Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, CPU2.F has a market cap of 5.13M. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while CPU2.F trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas CPU2.F's P/E ratio is 114.00. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CPU2.F's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is less volatile compared to CPU2.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs JE00B1Z48326.SG Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, JE00B1Z48326.SG has a market cap of 2.67M. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while JE00B1Z48326.SG trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas JE00B1Z48326.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JE00B1Z48326.SG's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is less volatile compared to JE00B1Z48326.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs PLARTGS00019.SG Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, PLARTGS00019.SG has a market cap of 514807.00. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while PLARTGS00019.SG trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas PLARTGS00019.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PLARTGS00019.SG's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is more volatile compared to PLARTGS00019.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs 9J4.F Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, 9J4.F has a market cap of N/A. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while 9J4.F trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas 9J4.F's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 9J4.F's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is more volatile compared to 9J4.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs SC2.DE Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, SC2.DE has a market cap of N/A. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while SC2.DE trades at $50.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas SC2.DE's P/E ratio is -168.31. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SC2.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is more volatile compared to SC2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.
5ZM.F vs 1HD.F Comparison
5ZM.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5ZM.F stands at 22.06B. In comparison, 1HD.F has a market cap of N/A. Regarding current trading prices, 5ZM.F is priced at $70.78, while 1HD.F trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5ZM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 24.07, whereas 1HD.F's P/E ratio is -21.59. In terms of profitability, 5ZM.F's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 1HD.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 5ZM.F is more volatile compared to 1HD.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5ZM.F.