Auto Server Co., Ltd.
Auto Server Co., Ltd. 5589.T Peers
See (5589.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5589.T | ¥2,561.00 | -0.47% | 18.3B | 12.39 | ¥206.77 | +2.58% |
| 4732.T | ¥1,565.00 | +0.55% | 740.7B | 19.87 | ¥78.76 | +2.69% |
| 9882.T | ¥1,514.00 | +0.53% | 134.2B | 12.30 | ¥123.04 | +3.47% |
| 3186.T | ¥1,660.00 | +0.42% | 133.8B | 16.61 | ¥99.92 | +1.99% |
| 7599.T | ¥1,027.00 | -0.58% | 103.1B | 7.67 | ¥133.98 | +3.96% |
| 7593.T | ¥479.00 | -0.21% | 58B | 8.69 | ¥55.15 | +5.01% |
| 9028.T | ¥3,220.00 | +1.10% | 54B | 8.79 | ¥366.28 | +2.78% |
| 9856.T | ¥1,090.00 | -0.91% | 35.8B | 5.88 | ¥185.42 | +5.87% |
| 8291.T | ¥478.00 | -2.05% | 28.4B | 4.30 | ¥111.12 | +5.02% |
| 9268.T | ¥339.00 | -0.88% | 23.1B | -46.12 | -¥7.35 | +5.31% |
Stock Comparison
5589.T vs 4732.T Comparison
5589.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5589.T stands at 18.3B. In comparison, 4732.T has a market cap of 740.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5589.T is priced at ¥2,561.00, while 4732.T trades at ¥1,565.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5589.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas 4732.T's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, 5589.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4732.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 5589.T is less volatile compared to 4732.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5589.T.
5589.T vs 9882.T Comparison
5589.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5589.T stands at 18.3B. In comparison, 9882.T has a market cap of 134.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 5589.T is priced at ¥2,561.00, while 9882.T trades at ¥1,514.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5589.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas 9882.T's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, 5589.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9882.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 5589.T is less volatile compared to 9882.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5589.T.
5589.T vs 3186.T Comparison
5589.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5589.T stands at 18.3B. In comparison, 3186.T has a market cap of 133.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5589.T is priced at ¥2,561.00, while 3186.T trades at ¥1,660.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5589.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas 3186.T's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, 5589.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3186.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 5589.T is less volatile compared to 3186.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5589.T.
5589.T vs 7599.T Comparison
5589.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5589.T stands at 18.3B. In comparison, 7599.T has a market cap of 103.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 5589.T is priced at ¥2,561.00, while 7599.T trades at ¥1,027.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5589.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas 7599.T's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, 5589.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7599.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 5589.T is less volatile compared to 7599.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5589.T.
5589.T vs 7593.T Comparison
5589.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5589.T stands at 18.3B. In comparison, 7593.T has a market cap of 58B. Regarding current trading prices, 5589.T is priced at ¥2,561.00, while 7593.T trades at ¥479.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5589.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas 7593.T's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, 5589.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7593.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 5589.T is more volatile compared to 7593.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5589.T.
5589.T vs 9028.T Comparison
5589.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5589.T stands at 18.3B. In comparison, 9028.T has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, 5589.T is priced at ¥2,561.00, while 9028.T trades at ¥3,220.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5589.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas 9028.T's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, 5589.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9028.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 5589.T is less volatile compared to 9028.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5589.T.
5589.T vs 9856.T Comparison
5589.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5589.T stands at 18.3B. In comparison, 9856.T has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5589.T is priced at ¥2,561.00, while 9856.T trades at ¥1,090.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5589.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas 9856.T's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, 5589.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9856.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 5589.T is more volatile compared to 9856.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5589.T.
5589.T vs 8291.T Comparison
5589.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5589.T stands at 18.3B. In comparison, 8291.T has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 5589.T is priced at ¥2,561.00, while 8291.T trades at ¥478.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5589.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas 8291.T's P/E ratio is 4.30. In terms of profitability, 5589.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 8291.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 5589.T is less volatile compared to 8291.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5589.T.
5589.T vs 9268.T Comparison
5589.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5589.T stands at 18.3B. In comparison, 9268.T has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 5589.T is priced at ¥2,561.00, while 9268.T trades at ¥339.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5589.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas 9268.T's P/E ratio is -46.12. In terms of profitability, 5589.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9268.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 5589.T is less volatile compared to 9268.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5589.T.
5589.T vs 3347.T Comparison
5589.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5589.T stands at 18.3B. In comparison, 3347.T has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 5589.T is priced at ¥2,561.00, while 3347.T trades at ¥408.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5589.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas 3347.T's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, 5589.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3347.T's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 5589.T is more volatile compared to 3347.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5589.T.
5589.T vs 7134.T Comparison
5589.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5589.T stands at 18.3B. In comparison, 7134.T has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 5589.T is priced at ¥2,561.00, while 7134.T trades at ¥1,165.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5589.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas 7134.T's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, 5589.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7134.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 5589.T is less volatile compared to 7134.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5589.T.
5589.T vs 3538.T Comparison
5589.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5589.T stands at 18.3B. In comparison, 3538.T has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 5589.T is priced at ¥2,561.00, while 3538.T trades at ¥1,001.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5589.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas 3538.T's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, 5589.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3538.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 5589.T is more volatile compared to 3538.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5589.T.
5589.T vs 3184.T Comparison
5589.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5589.T stands at 18.3B. In comparison, 3184.T has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 5589.T is priced at ¥2,561.00, while 3184.T trades at ¥3,400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5589.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas 3184.T's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, 5589.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3184.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 5589.T is more volatile compared to 3184.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5589.T.
5589.T vs 3377.T Comparison
5589.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5589.T stands at 18.3B. In comparison, 3377.T has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5589.T is priced at ¥2,561.00, while 3377.T trades at ¥412.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5589.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas 3377.T's P/E ratio is 30.72. In terms of profitability, 5589.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3377.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 5589.T is less volatile compared to 3377.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5589.T.
5589.T vs 2788.T Comparison
5589.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5589.T stands at 18.3B. In comparison, 2788.T has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5589.T is priced at ¥2,561.00, while 2788.T trades at ¥368.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5589.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas 2788.T's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, 5589.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2788.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 5589.T is more volatile compared to 2788.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5589.T.
5589.T vs 9082.T Comparison
5589.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5589.T stands at 18.3B. In comparison, 9082.T has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5589.T is priced at ¥2,561.00, while 9082.T trades at ¥839.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5589.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas 9082.T's P/E ratio is -7.04. In terms of profitability, 5589.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9082.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 5589.T is more volatile compared to 9082.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5589.T.
5589.T vs 7676.T Comparison
5589.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5589.T stands at 18.3B. In comparison, 7676.T has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 5589.T is priced at ¥2,561.00, while 7676.T trades at ¥847.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5589.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas 7676.T's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, 5589.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7676.T's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, 5589.T is more volatile compared to 7676.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5589.T.
5589.T vs 3352.T Comparison
5589.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5589.T stands at 18.3B. In comparison, 3352.T has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 5589.T is priced at ¥2,561.00, while 3352.T trades at ¥1,330.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5589.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas 3352.T's P/E ratio is 25.51. In terms of profitability, 5589.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3352.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 5589.T is more volatile compared to 3352.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5589.T.
5589.T vs 7602.T Comparison
5589.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5589.T stands at 18.3B. In comparison, 7602.T has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5589.T is priced at ¥2,561.00, while 7602.T trades at ¥130.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5589.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas 7602.T's P/E ratio is -220.34. In terms of profitability, 5589.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7602.T's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 5589.T is less volatile compared to 7602.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5589.T.
5589.T vs 7623.T Comparison
5589.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5589.T stands at 18.3B. In comparison, 7623.T has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5589.T is priced at ¥2,561.00, while 7623.T trades at ¥832.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5589.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas 7623.T's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, 5589.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 7623.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 5589.T is more volatile compared to 7623.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5589.T.
5589.T vs 3011.T Comparison
5589.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5589.T stands at 18.3B. In comparison, 3011.T has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 5589.T is priced at ¥2,561.00, while 3011.T trades at ¥139.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5589.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas 3011.T's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, 5589.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3011.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 5589.T is less volatile compared to 3011.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5589.T.
5589.T vs 2754.T Comparison
5589.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5589.T stands at 18.3B. In comparison, 2754.T has a market cap of 6.5K. Regarding current trading prices, 5589.T is priced at ¥2,561.00, while 2754.T trades at ¥807.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5589.T currently has a P/E ratio of 12.39, whereas 2754.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 5589.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2754.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 5589.T is more volatile compared to 2754.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5589.T.