Buffalo Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 3352.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See 3352.T's competitors and their performance on the JPX and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for 3352.T and its JPX peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3352.T | ¥1,779.00 | -1.00% | 4.2B | 8.98 | ¥199.55 | +3.63% |
| 4732.T | ¥1,974.00 | -0.10% | 907.1B | 21.96 | ¥90.92 | +2.74% |
| 3186.T | ¥3,375.00 | -0.44% | 265.4B | 15.14 | ¥223.56 | +1.33% |
| 9882.T | ¥1,785.00 | -0.34% | 152.9B | 13.06 | ¥137.86 | +3.44% |
| 7599.T | ¥1,289.00 | +0.78% | 129.2B | 10.44 | ¥123.33 | +2.77% |
| 7593.T | ¥530.00 | -0.19% | 61.8B | 11.10 | ¥47.94 | +4.51% |
| 9856.T | ¥1,266.00 | +2.01% | 39.2B | 6.73 | ¥185.66 | +4.64% |
| 8291.T | ¥554.00 | -0.18% | 33.1B | 14.70 | ¥37.82 | +4.86% |
| 9268.T | ¥424.00 | +0.71% | 28.8B | 8.26 | ¥50.99 | +4.28% |
| 5589.T | ¥2,918.00 | +2.64% | 21.1B | 13.58 | ¥214.70 | +2.26% |
Stock Comparison
USS Co., Ltd. (JPX: 4732.T)
3352.T vs 4732.T Comparison August 2026
Buffalo Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 3352.T) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3352.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 4732.T has a market cap of 907.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3352.T is priced at ¥1,779.00 on the JPX, while 4732.T trades at ¥1,974.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.98, whereas 4732.T's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, 3352.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 4732.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3352.T is less volatile compared to 4732.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3352.T.Check 4732.T's competition here
NEXTAGE Co., Ltd. (JPX: 3186.T)
3352.T vs 3186.T Comparison August 2026
Buffalo Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 3352.T) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3352.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3186.T has a market cap of 265.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3352.T is priced at ¥1,779.00 on the JPX, while 3186.T trades at ¥3,375.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.98, whereas 3186.T's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, 3352.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3186.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 3352.T is less volatile compared to 3186.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3352.T.Check 3186.T's competition here
Yellow Hat Ltd. (JPX: 9882.T)
3352.T vs 9882.T Comparison August 2026
Buffalo Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 3352.T) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3352.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 9882.T has a market cap of 152.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3352.T is priced at ¥1,779.00 on the JPX, while 9882.T trades at ¥1,785.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.98, whereas 9882.T's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, 3352.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9882.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3352.T is less volatile compared to 9882.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3352.T.Check 9882.T's competition here
IDOM Inc. (JPX: 7599.T)
3352.T vs 7599.T Comparison August 2026
Buffalo Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 3352.T) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3352.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 7599.T has a market cap of 129.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3352.T is priced at ¥1,779.00 on the JPX, while 7599.T trades at ¥1,289.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.98, whereas 7599.T's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, 3352.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7599.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3352.T is less volatile compared to 7599.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3352.T.Check 7599.T's competition here
Vt Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 7593.T)
3352.T vs 7593.T Comparison August 2026
Buffalo Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 3352.T) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3352.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 7593.T has a market cap of 61.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3352.T is priced at ¥1,779.00 on the JPX, while 7593.T trades at ¥530.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.98, whereas 7593.T's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, 3352.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7593.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3352.T is less volatile compared to 7593.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3352.T.Check 7593.T's competition here
KU Holdings Co., Ltd. (JPX: 9856.T)
3352.T vs 9856.T Comparison August 2026
Buffalo Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 3352.T) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3352.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 9856.T has a market cap of 39.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3352.T is priced at ¥1,779.00 on the JPX, while 9856.T trades at ¥1,266.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.98, whereas 9856.T's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, 3352.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9856.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3352.T is less volatile compared to 9856.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3352.T.Check 9856.T's competition here
Nissan Tokyo Sales Holdings Co., Ltd. (JPX: 8291.T)
3352.T vs 8291.T Comparison August 2026
Buffalo Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 3352.T) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3352.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 8291.T has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3352.T is priced at ¥1,779.00 on the JPX, while 8291.T trades at ¥554.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.98, whereas 8291.T's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, 3352.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8291.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3352.T is less volatile compared to 8291.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3352.T.Check 8291.T's competition here
Optimus Group Company Limited (JPX: 9268.T)
3352.T vs 9268.T Comparison August 2026
Buffalo Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 3352.T) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3352.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 9268.T has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3352.T is priced at ¥1,779.00 on the JPX, while 9268.T trades at ¥424.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.98, whereas 9268.T's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, 3352.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9268.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3352.T is less volatile compared to 9268.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3352.T.Check 9268.T's competition here
Auto Server Co., Ltd. (JPX: 5589.T)
3352.T vs 5589.T Comparison August 2026
Buffalo Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 3352.T) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3352.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 5589.T has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3352.T is priced at ¥1,779.00 on the JPX, while 5589.T trades at ¥2,918.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.98, whereas 5589.T's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, 3352.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 5589.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3352.T is less volatile compared to 5589.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3352.T.Check 5589.T's competition here
UP GARAGE Group Co., Ltd. (JPX: 7134.T)
3352.T vs 7134.T Comparison August 2026
Buffalo Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 3352.T) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3352.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 7134.T has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3352.T is priced at ¥1,779.00 on the JPX, while 7134.T trades at ¥1,392.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.98, whereas 7134.T's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, 3352.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7134.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3352.T is less volatile compared to 7134.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3352.T.Check 7134.T's competition here
Trust Co., Ltd. (JPX: 3347.T)
3352.T vs 3347.T Comparison August 2026
Buffalo Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 3352.T) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3352.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3347.T has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3352.T is priced at ¥1,779.00 on the JPX, while 3347.T trades at ¥408.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.98, whereas 3347.T's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, 3352.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3347.T's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3352.T is less volatile compared to 3347.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3352.T.Check 3347.T's competition here
WILLPLUS Holdings Corporation (JPX: 3538.T)
3352.T vs 3538.T Comparison August 2026
Buffalo Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 3352.T) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3352.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3538.T has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3352.T is priced at ¥1,779.00 on the JPX, while 3538.T trades at ¥1,034.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.98, whereas 3538.T's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, 3352.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3538.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3352.T is less volatile compared to 3538.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3352.T.Check 3538.T's competition here
International Conglomerate of Distribution for Automobile Holdings Co., Ltd. (JPX: 3184.T)
3352.T vs 3184.T Comparison August 2026
Buffalo Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 3352.T) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3352.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3184.T has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3352.T is priced at ¥1,779.00 on the JPX, while 3184.T trades at ¥4,205.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.98, whereas 3184.T's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, 3352.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3184.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3352.T is less volatile compared to 3184.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3352.T.Check 3184.T's competition here
BIKE O & Co. Ltd. (JPX: 3377.T)
3352.T vs 3377.T Comparison August 2026
Buffalo Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 3352.T) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3352.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 3377.T has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3352.T is priced at ¥1,779.00 on the JPX, while 3377.T trades at ¥396.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.98, whereas 3377.T's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, 3352.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3377.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3352.T is less volatile compared to 3377.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3352.T.Check 3377.T's competition here
Apple International Co., Ltd. (JPX: 2788.T)
3352.T vs 2788.T Comparison August 2026
Buffalo Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 3352.T) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3352.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 2788.T has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3352.T is priced at ¥1,779.00 on the JPX, while 2788.T trades at ¥427.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.98, whereas 2788.T's P/E ratio is 4.48. In terms of profitability, 3352.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2788.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3352.T is less volatile compared to 2788.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3352.T.Check 2788.T's competition here
Double Tree Inc. (JPX: 305A.T)
3352.T vs 305A.T Comparison August 2026
Buffalo Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 3352.T) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3352.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 305A.T has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3352.T is priced at ¥1,779.00 on the JPX, while 305A.T trades at ¥1,146.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.98, whereas 305A.T's P/E ratio is 6.18. In terms of profitability, 3352.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 305A.T's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3352.T is more volatile compared to 305A.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3352.T.Check 305A.T's competition here
Ledax Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 7602.T)
3352.T vs 7602.T Comparison August 2026
Buffalo Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 3352.T) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3352.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 7602.T has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3352.T is priced at ¥1,779.00 on the JPX, while 7602.T trades at ¥165.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.98, whereas 7602.T's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, 3352.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7602.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3352.T is less volatile compared to 7602.T. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3352.T.Check 7602.T's competition here
Goodspeed Co., Ltd. (JPX: 7676.T)
3352.T vs 7676.T Comparison August 2026
Buffalo Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 3352.T) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3352.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 7676.T has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3352.T is priced at ¥1,779.00 on the JPX, while 7676.T trades at ¥847.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.98, whereas 7676.T's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, 3352.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7676.T's ROE of -4.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 3352.T is more volatile compared to 7676.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3352.T.Check 7676.T's competition here
Sunautas Co., Ltd. (JPX: 7623.T)
3352.T vs 7623.T Comparison August 2026
Buffalo Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 3352.T) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3352.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 7623.T has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3352.T is priced at ¥1,779.00 on the JPX, while 7623.T trades at ¥832.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.98, whereas 7623.T's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, 3352.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7623.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3352.T is more volatile compared to 7623.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3352.T.Check 7623.T's competition here
KEIJIDOUSHAKAN. Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 7680.T)
3352.T vs 7680.T Comparison August 2026
Buffalo Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 3352.T) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3352.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 7680.T has a market cap of 164.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 3352.T is priced at ¥1,779.00 on the JPX, while 7680.T trades at ¥3,190.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.98, whereas 7680.T's P/E ratio is 1.64. In terms of profitability, 3352.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 7680.T's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3352.T is more volatile compared to 7680.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3352.T.Check 7680.T's competition here
Tokatsu Holdings Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 2754.T)
3352.T vs 2754.T Comparison August 2026
Buffalo Co.,Ltd. (JPX: 3352.T) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the JPX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3352.T stands at 4.2B. In comparison, 2754.T has a market cap of 6.5K. Regarding current trading prices, 3352.T is priced at ¥1,779.00 on the JPX, while 2754.T trades at ¥807.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.98, whereas 2754.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 3352.T's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2754.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3352.T is more volatile compared to 2754.T. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3352.T.Check 2754.T's competition here