Krosaki Harima Corporation
Krosaki Harima Corporation 5352.T Peers
See (5352.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5352.T | ¥3,320.00 | +0.00% | 111.5B | 8.90 | ¥372.07 | +3.17% |
| 5233.T | ¥3,584.00 | +0.00% | 402.5B | 23.94 | ¥150.87 | +2.21% |
| 5232.T | ¥3,783.00 | +0.00% | 123.7B | 13.87 | ¥270.52 | +3.20% |
| 4044.T | ¥2,973.00 | +0.00% | 73.8B | 12.99 | ¥229.27 | +5.71% |
| 5011.T | ¥2,411.00 | +0.00% | 70.7B | 17.91 | ¥134.49 | +1.66% |
| 5290.T | ¥2,295.00 | +0.00% | 57.3B | 15.42 | ¥147.84 | +2.19% |
| 5288.T | ¥976.00 | +0.00% | 37B | 15.75 | ¥61.66 | +4.63% |
| 5357.T | ¥1,742.00 | +0.00% | 31.8B | 8.43 | ¥206.02 | +5.18% |
| 7463.T | ¥821.00 | +0.00% | 28.9B | 6.36 | ¥127.93 | +4.91% |
| 8007.T | ¥1,514.00 | +0.00% | 25.7B | 16.57 | ¥91.38 | +5.28% |
Stock Comparison
5352.T vs 5233.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 5233.T has a market cap of 402.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 5233.T trades at ¥3,584.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 5233.T's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 5233.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is less volatile compared to 5233.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 5232.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 5232.T has a market cap of 123.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 5232.T trades at ¥3,783.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 5232.T's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 5232.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is more volatile compared to 5232.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 4044.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 4044.T has a market cap of 73.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 4044.T trades at ¥2,973.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 4044.T's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 4044.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is more volatile compared to 4044.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 5011.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 5011.T has a market cap of 70.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 5011.T trades at ¥2,411.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 5011.T's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 5011.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is more volatile compared to 5011.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 5290.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 5290.T has a market cap of 57.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 5290.T trades at ¥2,295.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 5290.T's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 5290.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is less volatile compared to 5290.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 5288.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 5288.T has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 5288.T trades at ¥976.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 5288.T's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 5288.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is more volatile compared to 5288.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 5357.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 5357.T has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 5357.T trades at ¥1,742.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 5357.T's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 5357.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is more volatile compared to 5357.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 7463.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 7463.T has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 7463.T trades at ¥821.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 7463.T's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 7463.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is more volatile compared to 7463.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 8007.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 8007.T has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 8007.T trades at ¥1,514.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 8007.T's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 8007.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is less volatile compared to 8007.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 1429.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 1429.T has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 1429.T trades at ¥793.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 1429.T's P/E ratio is 13.26. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 1429.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is more volatile compared to 1429.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 5363.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 5363.T has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 5363.T trades at ¥540.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 5363.T's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 5363.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is less volatile compared to 5363.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 1904.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 1904.T has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 1904.T trades at ¥3,965.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 1904.T's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 1904.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T and 1904.T have similar daily volatility (1.65).
5352.T vs 5285.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 5285.T has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 5285.T trades at ¥1,759.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 5285.T's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 5285.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is less volatile compared to 5285.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 5269.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 5269.T has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 5269.T trades at ¥293.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 5269.T's P/E ratio is -74.68. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 5269.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is less volatile compared to 5269.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 1981.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 1981.T has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 1981.T trades at ¥1,502.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 1981.T's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 1981.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is less volatile compared to 1981.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 3157.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 3157.T has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 3157.T trades at ¥1,142.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 3157.T's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3157.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is more volatile compared to 3157.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 5284.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 5284.T has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 5284.T trades at ¥2,050.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 5284.T's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 5284.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is less volatile compared to 5284.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 5388.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 5388.T has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 5388.T trades at ¥1,054.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 5388.T's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 5388.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is more volatile compared to 5388.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 7879.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 7879.T has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 7879.T trades at ¥651.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 7879.T's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 7879.T's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is more volatile compared to 7879.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 5356.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 5356.T has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 5356.T trades at ¥988.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 5356.T's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 5356.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is more volatile compared to 5356.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 6230.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 6230.T has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 6230.T trades at ¥2,028.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 6230.T's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 6230.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is more volatile compared to 6230.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 5282.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 5282.T has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 5282.T trades at ¥290.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 5282.T's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 5282.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is more volatile compared to 5282.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 5268.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 5268.T has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 5268.T trades at ¥616.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 5268.T's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 5268.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is less volatile compared to 5268.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 5935.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 5935.T has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 5935.T trades at ¥2,070.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 5935.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 5935.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is more volatile compared to 5935.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 8104.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 8104.T has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 8104.T trades at ¥518.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 8104.T's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 8104.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is more volatile compared to 8104.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 7461.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 7461.T has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 7461.T trades at ¥470.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 7461.T's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 7461.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is more volatile compared to 7461.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 7434.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 7434.T has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 7434.T trades at ¥1,737.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 7434.T's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 7434.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is less volatile compared to 7434.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 7635.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 7635.T has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 7635.T trades at ¥1,195.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 7635.T's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 7635.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is more volatile compared to 7635.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 3426.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 3426.T has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 3426.T trades at ¥1,466.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 3426.T's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 3426.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is less volatile compared to 3426.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 5283.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 5283.T has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 5283.T trades at ¥3,130.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 5283.T's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 5283.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is less volatile compared to 5283.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 7953.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 7953.T has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 7953.T trades at ¥382.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 7953.T's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 7953.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is more volatile compared to 7953.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 5900.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 5900.T has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 5900.T trades at ¥846.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 5900.T's P/E ratio is 18.93. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 5900.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is less volatile compared to 5900.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 1994.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 1994.T has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 1994.T trades at ¥480.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 1994.T's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 1994.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is less volatile compared to 1994.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 5277.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 5277.T has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 5277.T trades at ¥452.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 5277.T's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 5277.T's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is more volatile compared to 5277.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 5386.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 5386.T has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 5386.T trades at ¥394.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 5386.T's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 5386.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is less volatile compared to 5386.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 5928.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 5928.T has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 5928.T trades at ¥285.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 5928.T's P/E ratio is 106.42. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 5928.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is less volatile compared to 5928.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 5997.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 5997.T has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 5997.T trades at ¥587.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 5997.T's P/E ratio is 5.66. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 5997.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is less volatile compared to 5997.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 9767.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 9767.T has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 9767.T trades at ¥1,379.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 9767.T's P/E ratio is 9.72. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 9767.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is less volatile compared to 9767.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 7896.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 7896.T has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 7896.T trades at ¥515.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 7896.T's P/E ratio is 52.34. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 7896.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is less volatile compared to 7896.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 6173.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 6173.T has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 6173.T trades at ¥303.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 6173.T's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 6173.T's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is less volatile compared to 6173.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 9812.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 9812.T has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 9812.T trades at ¥320.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 9812.T's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 9812.T's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is less volatile compared to 9812.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 5287.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 5287.T has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 5287.T trades at ¥668.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 5287.T's P/E ratio is 6.61. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 5287.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is less volatile compared to 5287.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 5380.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 5380.T has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 5380.T trades at ¥1,557.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 5380.T's P/E ratio is -60.14. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 5380.T's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is less volatile compared to 5380.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.
5352.T vs 5610.T Comparison
5352.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5352.T stands at 111.5B. In comparison, 5610.T has a market cap of 14.5K. Regarding current trading prices, 5352.T is priced at ¥3,320.00, while 5610.T trades at ¥1,612.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5352.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.90, whereas 5610.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 5352.T's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 5610.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 5352.T is more volatile compared to 5610.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5352.T.