WonderFi Technologies Inc.
WonderFi Technologies Inc. (52D0.F) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (52D0.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52D0.F | €0.20 | -1.40% | 131.1M | -6.57 | -€0.03 | N/A |
| SAP.DE | €171.88 | -0.50% | 200.2B | 28.18 | €6.10 | +1.37% |
| FOO.DE | €170.94 | -1.35% | 162.2B | 25.44 | €6.72 | +0.83% |
| FOO.F | €169.06 | -1.99% | 158.6B | 25.12 | €6.73 | +0.84% |
| 307.F | €114.86 | -0.66% | 150.7B | 140.74 | €0.81 | N/A |
| ITU.DE | €407.30 | +1.12% | 112.8B | 30.74 | €13.25 | +0.95% |
| CDS.DE | €255.55 | -0.06% | 70.1B | 73.47 | €3.50 | N/A |
| AUD.DE | €224.00 | +0.07% | 47.7B | 49.70 | €4.51 | N/A |
| 5ZM.F | €65.63 | -1.32% | 19.4B | 12.31 | €5.33 | N/A |
| FFV.DE | €297.70 | +0.40% | 17.4B | 53.83 | €5.53 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
52D0.F vs SAP.DE Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, SAP.DE has a market cap of 200.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while SAP.DE trades at €171.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas SAP.DE's P/E ratio is 28.18. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SAP.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to SAP.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check SAP.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs FOO.DE Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, FOO.DE has a market cap of 162.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while FOO.DE trades at €170.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas FOO.DE's P/E ratio is 25.44. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FOO.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to FOO.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check FOO.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs FOO.F Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, FOO.F has a market cap of 158.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while FOO.F trades at €169.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas FOO.F's P/E ratio is 25.12. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FOO.F's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to FOO.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check FOO.F's competition here
52D0.F vs 307.F Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, 307.F has a market cap of 150.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while 307.F trades at €114.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas 307.F's P/E ratio is 140.74. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to 307.F's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to 307.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check 307.F's competition here
52D0.F vs ITU.DE Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, ITU.DE has a market cap of 112.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while ITU.DE trades at €407.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas ITU.DE's P/E ratio is 30.74. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ITU.DE's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to ITU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check ITU.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs CDS.DE Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, CDS.DE has a market cap of 70.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while CDS.DE trades at €255.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas CDS.DE's P/E ratio is 73.47. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CDS.DE's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to CDS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check CDS.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs AUD.DE Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, AUD.DE has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while AUD.DE trades at €224.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas AUD.DE's P/E ratio is 49.70. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AUD.DE's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to AUD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check AUD.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs 5ZM.F Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, 5ZM.F has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while 5ZM.F trades at €65.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas 5ZM.F's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to 5ZM.F's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to 5ZM.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check 5ZM.F's competition here
52D0.F vs FFV.DE Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, FFV.DE has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while FFV.DE trades at €297.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas FFV.DE's P/E ratio is 53.83. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FFV.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to FFV.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check FFV.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs CTX.DE Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, CTX.DE has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while CTX.DE trades at €106.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas CTX.DE's P/E ratio is 39.97. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CTX.DE's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to CTX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check CTX.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs E3G1.SG Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, E3G1.SG has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while E3G1.SG trades at €50.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas E3G1.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to E3G1.SG's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to E3G1.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check E3G1.SG's competition here
52D0.F vs NEM.DE Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, NEM.DE has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while NEM.DE trades at €69.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas NEM.DE's P/E ratio is 39.01. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NEM.DE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to NEM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check NEM.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs US44891N2080.SG Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, US44891N2080.SG has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while US44891N2080.SG trades at €29.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas US44891N2080.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to US44891N2080.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to US44891N2080.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check US44891N2080.SG's competition here
52D0.F vs RKET.HM Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, RKET.HM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while RKET.HM trades at €24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas RKET.HM's P/E ratio is 1.48. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to RKET.HM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to RKET.HM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check RKET.HM's competition here
52D0.F vs AOF.DE Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, AOF.DE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while AOF.DE trades at €89.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas AOF.DE's P/E ratio is 30.83. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AOF.DE's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to AOF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check AOF.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs TMV.DE Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, TMV.DE has a market cap of 739.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while TMV.DE trades at €4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas TMV.DE's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TMV.DE's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to TMV.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check TMV.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs VRF.DE Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, VRF.DE has a market cap of 710.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while VRF.DE trades at €3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas VRF.DE's P/E ratio is 27.13. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to VRF.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to VRF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check VRF.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs M8G.DE Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, M8G.DE has a market cap of 710.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while M8G.DE trades at €3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas M8G.DE's P/E ratio is 27.13. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to M8G.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to M8G.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check M8G.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs M8G.F Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, M8G.F has a market cap of 706.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while M8G.F trades at €3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas M8G.F's P/E ratio is 26.96. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to M8G.F's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to M8G.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check M8G.F's competition here
52D0.F vs PSAN.DE Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, PSAN.DE has a market cap of 700.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while PSAN.DE trades at €45.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas PSAN.DE's P/E ratio is -30.34. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PSAN.DE's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to PSAN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check PSAN.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs GKS.HM Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, GKS.HM has a market cap of 647.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while GKS.HM trades at €285.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas GKS.HM's P/E ratio is -123.38. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GKS.HM's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to GKS.HM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check GKS.HM's competition here
52D0.F vs MUM.DE Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, MUM.DE has a market cap of 621.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while MUM.DE trades at €37.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas MUM.DE's P/E ratio is 21.29. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MUM.DE's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to MUM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check MUM.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs 0S6.DE Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, 0S6.DE has a market cap of 576M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while 0S6.DE trades at €14.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas 0S6.DE's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to 0S6.DE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to 0S6.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check 0S6.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs GKS.DE Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, GKS.DE has a market cap of 494.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while GKS.DE trades at €219.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas GKS.DE's P/E ratio is -44.88. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GKS.DE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to GKS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check GKS.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs IVU.DE Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, IVU.DE has a market cap of 339.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while IVU.DE trades at €19.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas IVU.DE's P/E ratio is 25.52. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to IVU.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to IVU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check IVU.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs VRV.DE Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, VRV.DE has a market cap of 308.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while VRV.DE trades at €1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas VRV.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to VRV.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to VRV.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check VRV.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs DBD.DE Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, DBD.DE has a market cap of 233.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while DBD.DE trades at €2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas DBD.DE's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to DBD.DE's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to DBD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check DBD.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs MSGL.HM Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, MSGL.HM has a market cap of 171.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while MSGL.HM trades at €4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas MSGL.HM's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MSGL.HM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to MSGL.HM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check MSGL.HM's competition here
52D0.F vs SJJ.DE Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, SJJ.DE has a market cap of 137M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while SJJ.DE trades at €13.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas SJJ.DE's P/E ratio is 118.64. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SJJ.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to SJJ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check SJJ.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs FAA.DE Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, FAA.DE has a market cap of 125.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while FAA.DE trades at €11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas FAA.DE's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FAA.DE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to FAA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check FAA.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs TPG.DE Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, TPG.DE has a market cap of 105.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while TPG.DE trades at €5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas TPG.DE's P/E ratio is 2.28. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TPG.DE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to TPG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check TPG.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs BSS.F Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, BSS.F has a market cap of 102.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while BSS.F trades at €22.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas BSS.F's P/E ratio is 55.50. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BSS.F's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to BSS.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check BSS.F's competition here
52D0.F vs V3S.DE Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, V3S.DE has a market cap of 98.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while V3S.DE trades at €12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas V3S.DE's P/E ratio is -43.75. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to V3S.DE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to V3S.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check V3S.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs ESY.DE Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, ESY.DE has a market cap of 87.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while ESY.DE trades at €13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas ESY.DE's P/E ratio is -18.71. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ESY.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to ESY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check ESY.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs TPG0.DE Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, TPG0.DE has a market cap of 77.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while TPG0.DE trades at €3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas TPG0.DE's P/E ratio is 1.67. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TPG0.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to TPG0.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check TPG0.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs 27H.F Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, 27H.F has a market cap of 68.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while 27H.F trades at €0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas 27H.F's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to 27H.F's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to 27H.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check 27H.F's competition here
52D0.F vs CSH.DE Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, CSH.DE has a market cap of 52.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while CSH.DE trades at €6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas CSH.DE's P/E ratio is -11.42. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CSH.DE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to CSH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check CSH.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs TR9.F Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, TR9.F has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while TR9.F trades at €18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas TR9.F's P/E ratio is -41.09. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TR9.F's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to TR9.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check TR9.F's competition here
52D0.F vs TR9.DE Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, TR9.DE has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while TR9.DE trades at €17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas TR9.DE's P/E ratio is -38.15. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TR9.DE's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to TR9.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check TR9.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs VRL.DE Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, VRL.DE has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while VRL.DE trades at €14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas VRL.DE's P/E ratio is -31.49. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to VRL.DE's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to VRL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check VRL.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs 1OJ.F Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, 1OJ.F has a market cap of 30.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while 1OJ.F trades at €0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas 1OJ.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to 1OJ.F's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to 1OJ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check 1OJ.F's competition here
52D0.F vs 1OJ.SG Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, 1OJ.SG has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while 1OJ.SG trades at €0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas 1OJ.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to 1OJ.SG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to 1OJ.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check 1OJ.SG's competition here
52D0.F vs US37892C1062.SG Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, US37892C1062.SG has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while US37892C1062.SG trades at €1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas US37892C1062.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to US37892C1062.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to US37892C1062.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check US37892C1062.SG's competition here
52D0.F vs NIIN.DE Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, NIIN.DE has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while NIIN.DE trades at €0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas NIIN.DE's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NIIN.DE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to NIIN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check NIIN.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs TBX.F Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, TBX.F has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while TBX.F trades at €8.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas TBX.F's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TBX.F's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to TBX.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check TBX.F's competition here
52D0.F vs ISHA.DE Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, ISHA.DE has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while ISHA.DE trades at €1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas ISHA.DE's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ISHA.DE's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to ISHA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check ISHA.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs TBX0.F Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, TBX0.F has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while TBX0.F trades at €8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas TBX0.F's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TBX0.F's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to TBX0.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check TBX0.F's competition here
52D0.F vs BWQ.DE Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, BWQ.DE has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while BWQ.DE trades at €3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas BWQ.DE's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BWQ.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to BWQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check BWQ.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs C1V0.DE Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, C1V0.DE has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while C1V0.DE trades at €6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas C1V0.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to C1V0.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to C1V0.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check C1V0.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs IVX.DE Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, IVX.DE has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while IVX.DE trades at €6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas IVX.DE's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to IVX.DE's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to IVX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check IVX.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs DTD2.DE Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, DTD2.DE has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while DTD2.DE trades at €1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas DTD2.DE's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to DTD2.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to DTD2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check DTD2.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs 9DR.SG Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, 9DR.SG has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while 9DR.SG trades at €0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas 9DR.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to 9DR.SG's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to 9DR.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check 9DR.SG's competition here
52D0.F vs 31M.SG Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, 31M.SG has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while 31M.SG trades at €0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas 31M.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to 31M.SG's ROE of +4.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to 31M.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check 31M.SG's competition here
52D0.F vs 8DQ.F Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, 8DQ.F has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while 8DQ.F trades at €0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas 8DQ.F's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to 8DQ.F's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to 8DQ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check 8DQ.F's competition here
52D0.F vs ABX.DE Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, ABX.DE has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while ABX.DE trades at €1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas ABX.DE's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ABX.DE's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to ABX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check ABX.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs 2LH.F Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, 2LH.F has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while 2LH.F trades at €1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas 2LH.F's P/E ratio is -47.60. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to 2LH.F's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to 2LH.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check 2LH.F's competition here
52D0.F vs CPU2.F Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, CPU2.F has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while CPU2.F trades at €0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas CPU2.F's P/E ratio is -78.00. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CPU2.F's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to CPU2.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check CPU2.F's competition here
52D0.F vs 223.SG Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, 223.SG has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while 223.SG trades at €0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas 223.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to 223.SG's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to 223.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check 223.SG's competition here
52D0.F vs JE00B1Z48326.SG Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, JE00B1Z48326.SG has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while JE00B1Z48326.SG trades at €0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas JE00B1Z48326.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to JE00B1Z48326.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to JE00B1Z48326.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check JE00B1Z48326.SG's competition here
52D0.F vs PLARTGS00019.SG Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, PLARTGS00019.SG has a market cap of 511.9K. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while PLARTGS00019.SG trades at €0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas PLARTGS00019.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PLARTGS00019.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to PLARTGS00019.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check PLARTGS00019.SG's competition here
52D0.F vs SC2.DE Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, SC2.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while SC2.DE trades at €50.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas SC2.DE's P/E ratio is -168.31. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SC2.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to SC2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check SC2.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs 9J4.F Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, 9J4.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while 9J4.F trades at €0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas 9J4.F's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to 9J4.F's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to 9J4.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check 9J4.F's competition here
52D0.F vs 1HD.F Comparison March 2026
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 131.1M. In comparison, 1HD.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.20, while 1HD.F trades at €0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -6.57, whereas 1HD.F's P/E ratio is -21.59. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.33%, compared to 1HD.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to 1HD.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check 1HD.F's competition here