WonderFi Technologies Inc.
WonderFi Technologies Inc. (52D0.F) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (52D0.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52D0.F | €0.22 | -1.14% | 145.8M | -10.97 | -€0.02 | N/A |
| SAP.DE | €245.60 | -2.07% | 284.9B | 43.92 | €5.57 | +0.96% |
| FOO.F | €218.65 | -4.33% | 208.6B | 39.52 | €5.52 | +0.67% |
| FOO.DE | €218.10 | -4.49% | 208.3B | 39.33 | €5.54 | +0.67% |
| ITU.DE | €679.40 | -2.41% | 187.4B | 63.39 | €10.60 | +0.57% |
| 307.F | €102.72 | -3.93% | 136.7B | 96.90 | €1.07 | N/A |
| AUD.DE | €287.35 | +0.26% | 61.9B | 109.26 | €2.63 | N/A |
| CDS.DE | €165.64 | +0.00% | 45.4B | 61.12 | €2.71 | N/A |
| 5ZM.F | €64.47 | -1.44% | 19.2B | 22.15 | €2.91 | N/A |
| FFV.DE | €297.70 | +0.40% | 17.4B | 53.83 | €5.53 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
52D0.F vs SAP.DE Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, SAP.DE has a market cap of 284.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while SAP.DE trades at €245.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas SAP.DE's P/E ratio is 43.92. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SAP.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to SAP.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check SAP.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs FOO.F Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, FOO.F has a market cap of 208.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while FOO.F trades at €218.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas FOO.F's P/E ratio is 39.52. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FOO.F's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to FOO.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check FOO.F's competition here
52D0.F vs FOO.DE Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, FOO.DE has a market cap of 208.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while FOO.DE trades at €218.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas FOO.DE's P/E ratio is 39.33. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FOO.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to FOO.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check FOO.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs ITU.DE Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, ITU.DE has a market cap of 187.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while ITU.DE trades at €679.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas ITU.DE's P/E ratio is 63.39. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ITU.DE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to ITU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check ITU.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs 307.F Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, 307.F has a market cap of 136.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while 307.F trades at €102.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas 307.F's P/E ratio is 96.90. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 307.F's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to 307.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check 307.F's competition here
52D0.F vs AUD.DE Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, AUD.DE has a market cap of 61.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while AUD.DE trades at €287.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas AUD.DE's P/E ratio is 109.26. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AUD.DE's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to AUD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check AUD.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs CDS.DE Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, CDS.DE has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while CDS.DE trades at €165.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas CDS.DE's P/E ratio is 61.12. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CDS.DE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to CDS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check CDS.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs 5ZM.F Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, 5ZM.F has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while 5ZM.F trades at €64.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas 5ZM.F's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 5ZM.F's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to 5ZM.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check 5ZM.F's competition here
52D0.F vs FFV.DE Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, FFV.DE has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while FFV.DE trades at €297.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas FFV.DE's P/E ratio is 53.83. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FFV.DE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to FFV.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check FFV.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs E3G1.SG Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, E3G1.SG has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while E3G1.SG trades at €77.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas E3G1.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to E3G1.SG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to E3G1.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check E3G1.SG's competition here
52D0.F vs NEM.DE Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, NEM.DE has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while NEM.DE trades at €131.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas NEM.DE's P/E ratio is 79.88. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NEM.DE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to NEM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check NEM.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs CTX.DE Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, CTX.DE has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while CTX.DE trades at €106.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas CTX.DE's P/E ratio is 39.97. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CTX.DE's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to CTX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check CTX.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs US44891N2080.SG Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, US44891N2080.SG has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while US44891N2080.SG trades at €33.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas US44891N2080.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to US44891N2080.SG's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to US44891N2080.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check US44891N2080.SG's competition here
52D0.F vs AOF.DE Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, AOF.DE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while AOF.DE trades at €117.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas AOF.DE's P/E ratio is 40.70. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AOF.DE's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to AOF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check AOF.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs TMV.DE Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, TMV.DE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while TMV.DE trades at €9.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas TMV.DE's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TMV.DE's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to TMV.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check TMV.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs RKET.HM Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, RKET.HM has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while RKET.HM trades at €16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas RKET.HM's P/E ratio is 1.46. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RKET.HM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to RKET.HM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check RKET.HM's competition here
52D0.F vs MUM.DE Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, MUM.DE has a market cap of 847.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while MUM.DE trades at €51.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas MUM.DE's P/E ratio is 29.02. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MUM.DE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to MUM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check MUM.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs M8G.DE Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, M8G.DE has a market cap of 710.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while M8G.DE trades at €3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas M8G.DE's P/E ratio is 27.13. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to M8G.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to M8G.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check M8G.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs M8G.F Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, M8G.F has a market cap of 706.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while M8G.F trades at €3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas M8G.F's P/E ratio is 26.96. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to M8G.F's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to M8G.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check M8G.F's competition here
52D0.F vs GKS.HM Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, GKS.HM has a market cap of 647.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while GKS.HM trades at €285.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas GKS.HM's P/E ratio is -123.38. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GKS.HM's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to GKS.HM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check GKS.HM's competition here
52D0.F vs 0S6.DE Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, 0S6.DE has a market cap of 586.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while 0S6.DE trades at €14.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas 0S6.DE's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 0S6.DE's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to 0S6.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check 0S6.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs GKS.DE Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, GKS.DE has a market cap of 494.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while GKS.DE trades at €219.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas GKS.DE's P/E ratio is -44.88. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GKS.DE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to GKS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check GKS.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs PSAN.DE Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, PSAN.DE has a market cap of 433.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while PSAN.DE trades at €28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas PSAN.DE's P/E ratio is -93.33. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PSAN.DE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to PSAN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check PSAN.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs IVU.DE Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, IVU.DE has a market cap of 359.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while IVU.DE trades at €21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas IVU.DE's P/E ratio is 29.71. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to IVU.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to IVU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check IVU.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs DBD.DE Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, DBD.DE has a market cap of 233.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while DBD.DE trades at €2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas DBD.DE's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DBD.DE's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to DBD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check DBD.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs SJJ.DE Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, SJJ.DE has a market cap of 179M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while SJJ.DE trades at €16.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas SJJ.DE's P/E ratio is 426.25. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SJJ.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to SJJ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check SJJ.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs FAA.DE Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, FAA.DE has a market cap of 176.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while FAA.DE trades at €16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas FAA.DE's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FAA.DE's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to FAA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check FAA.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs TPG.DE Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, TPG.DE has a market cap of 165.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while TPG.DE trades at €8.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas TPG.DE's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TPG.DE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to TPG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check TPG.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs MSGL.HM Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, MSGL.HM has a market cap of 149M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while MSGL.HM trades at €3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas MSGL.HM's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MSGL.HM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to MSGL.HM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check MSGL.HM's competition here
52D0.F vs BSS.F Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, BSS.F has a market cap of 102.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while BSS.F trades at €22.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas BSS.F's P/E ratio is 55.50. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BSS.F's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to BSS.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check BSS.F's competition here
52D0.F vs V3S.DE Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, V3S.DE has a market cap of 98.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while V3S.DE trades at €12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas V3S.DE's P/E ratio is -43.75. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to V3S.DE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to V3S.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check V3S.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs ESY.DE Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, ESY.DE has a market cap of 87.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while ESY.DE trades at €13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas ESY.DE's P/E ratio is -18.71. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ESY.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to ESY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check ESY.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs 27H.F Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, 27H.F has a market cap of 68.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while 27H.F trades at €0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas 27H.F's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 27H.F's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to 27H.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check 27H.F's competition here
52D0.F vs CSH.DE Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, CSH.DE has a market cap of 63.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while CSH.DE trades at €7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas CSH.DE's P/E ratio is -13.37. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CSH.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to CSH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check CSH.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs TR9.DE Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, TR9.DE has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while TR9.DE trades at €17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas TR9.DE's P/E ratio is -38.15. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TR9.DE's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to TR9.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check TR9.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs TR9.F Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, TR9.F has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while TR9.F trades at €18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas TR9.F's P/E ratio is -41.09. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TR9.F's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to TR9.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check TR9.F's competition here
52D0.F vs VRL.DE Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, VRL.DE has a market cap of 28.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while VRL.DE trades at €13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas VRL.DE's P/E ratio is -14.30. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VRL.DE's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to VRL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check VRL.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs US37892C1062.SG Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, US37892C1062.SG has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while US37892C1062.SG trades at €1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas US37892C1062.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to US37892C1062.SG's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to US37892C1062.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check US37892C1062.SG's competition here
52D0.F vs NIIN.DE Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, NIIN.DE has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while NIIN.DE trades at €0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas NIIN.DE's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NIIN.DE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to NIIN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check NIIN.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs ISHA.DE Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, ISHA.DE has a market cap of 22.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while ISHA.DE trades at €1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas ISHA.DE's P/E ratio is -26.17. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ISHA.DE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to ISHA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check ISHA.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs 1OJ.F Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, 1OJ.F has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while 1OJ.F trades at €0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas 1OJ.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 1OJ.F's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to 1OJ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check 1OJ.F's competition here
52D0.F vs TBX.F Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, TBX.F has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while TBX.F trades at €8.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas TBX.F's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TBX.F's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to TBX.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check TBX.F's competition here
52D0.F vs TBX0.F Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, TBX0.F has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while TBX0.F trades at €7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas TBX0.F's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TBX0.F's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to TBX0.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check TBX0.F's competition here
52D0.F vs BWQ.DE Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, BWQ.DE has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while BWQ.DE trades at €3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas BWQ.DE's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BWQ.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to BWQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check BWQ.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs IVX.DE Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, IVX.DE has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while IVX.DE trades at €6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas IVX.DE's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to IVX.DE's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to IVX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check IVX.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs DTD2.DE Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, DTD2.DE has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while DTD2.DE trades at €1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas DTD2.DE's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DTD2.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to DTD2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check DTD2.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs ABX.DE Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, ABX.DE has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while ABX.DE trades at €2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas ABX.DE's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ABX.DE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to ABX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check ABX.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs 2LH.F Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, 2LH.F has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while 2LH.F trades at €3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas 2LH.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 2LH.F's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to 2LH.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check 2LH.F's competition here
52D0.F vs 8DQ.F Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, 8DQ.F has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while 8DQ.F trades at €0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas 8DQ.F's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 8DQ.F's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to 8DQ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check 8DQ.F's competition here
52D0.F vs CPU2.F Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, CPU2.F has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while CPU2.F trades at €1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas CPU2.F's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CPU2.F's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to CPU2.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check CPU2.F's competition here
52D0.F vs JE00B1Z48326.SG Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, JE00B1Z48326.SG has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while JE00B1Z48326.SG trades at €0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas JE00B1Z48326.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to JE00B1Z48326.SG's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to JE00B1Z48326.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check JE00B1Z48326.SG's competition here
52D0.F vs PLARTGS00019.SG Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, PLARTGS00019.SG has a market cap of 517.7K. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while PLARTGS00019.SG trades at €0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas PLARTGS00019.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PLARTGS00019.SG's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is less volatile compared to PLARTGS00019.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check PLARTGS00019.SG's competition here
52D0.F vs SC2.DE Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, SC2.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while SC2.DE trades at €50.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas SC2.DE's P/E ratio is -168.31. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SC2.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to SC2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check SC2.DE's competition here
52D0.F vs 9J4.F Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, 9J4.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while 9J4.F trades at €0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas 9J4.F's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 9J4.F's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to 9J4.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check 9J4.F's competition here
52D0.F vs 1HD.F Comparison August 2025
52D0.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 52D0.F stands at 145.8M. In comparison, 1HD.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 52D0.F is priced at €0.22, while 1HD.F trades at €0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
52D0.F currently has a P/E ratio of -10.97, whereas 1HD.F's P/E ratio is -21.59. In terms of profitability, 52D0.F's ROE is -0.12%, compared to 1HD.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 52D0.F is more volatile compared to 1HD.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 52D0.F.Check 1HD.F's competition here