Prime Strategy Co., Ltd.
Prime Strategy Co., Ltd. (5250.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (5250.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5250.T | ¥1,055.00 | -1.40% | 3.7B | 35.86 | ¥29.70 | +2.07% |
| 6702.T | ¥3,180.00 | -16.86% | 6.4T | 21.37 | ¥172.83 | +1.35% |
| 6701.T | ¥4,101.00 | -11.33% | 5.9T | 21.88 | ¥203.09 | +0.72% |
| 9613.T | ¥3,965.00 | +0.00% | 5.6T | 0.00 | ¥26,026,666,000.00 | N/A |
| 4307.T | ¥4,142.00 | -6.06% | 2.5T | 162.88 | ¥26.48 | +1.79% |
| 9719.T | ¥5,680.00 | +0.18% | 1.8T | 0.00 | ¥6,830,379,500.00 | +1.48% |
| 3626.T | ¥3,417.00 | -3.20% | 784.9B | 15.60 | ¥228.71 | +2.13% |
| 2327.T | ¥3,605.00 | +0.59% | 679B | 22.03 | ¥168.48 | +2.29% |
| 9749.T | ¥9,800.00 | -0.20% | 617.6B | 0.00 | ¥397,698,368.00 | +0.43% |
| 1973.T | ¥3,285.00 | +0.00% | 489.4B | 28.33 | ¥115.96 | +1.60% |
Stock Comparison
5250.T vs 6702.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 6702.T has a market cap of 6.4T. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 6702.T trades at ¥3,180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 6702.T's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 6702.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 6702.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 6702.T's competition here
5250.T vs 6701.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 6701.T has a market cap of 5.9T. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 6701.T trades at ¥4,101.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 6701.T's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 6701.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 6701.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 6701.T's competition here
5250.T vs 9613.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9613.T has a market cap of 5.6T. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 9613.T trades at ¥3,965.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 9613.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 9613.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is more volatile compared to 9613.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 9613.T's competition here
5250.T vs 4307.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 4307.T has a market cap of 2.5T. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 4307.T trades at ¥4,142.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 4307.T's P/E ratio is 162.88. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 4307.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 4307.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 4307.T's competition here
5250.T vs 9719.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9719.T has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 9719.T trades at ¥5,680.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 9719.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 9719.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is more volatile compared to 9719.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 9719.T's competition here
5250.T vs 3626.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3626.T has a market cap of 784.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 3626.T trades at ¥3,417.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 3626.T's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3626.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 3626.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 3626.T's competition here
5250.T vs 2327.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 2327.T has a market cap of 679B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 2327.T trades at ¥3,605.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 2327.T's P/E ratio is 22.03. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 2327.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 2327.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 2327.T's competition here
5250.T vs 9749.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9749.T has a market cap of 617.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 9749.T trades at ¥9,800.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 9749.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 9749.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is more volatile compared to 9749.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 9749.T's competition here
5250.T vs 1973.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 1973.T has a market cap of 489.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 1973.T trades at ¥3,285.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 1973.T's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 1973.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is more volatile compared to 1973.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 1973.T's competition here
5250.T vs 4733.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 4733.T has a market cap of 469.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 4733.T trades at ¥6,125.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 4733.T's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 4733.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 4733.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 4733.T's competition here
5250.T vs 8056.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 8056.T has a market cap of 449.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 8056.T trades at ¥4,474.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 8056.T's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 8056.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 8056.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 8056.T's competition here
5250.T vs 4812.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 4812.T has a market cap of 418.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 4812.T trades at ¥2,199.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 4812.T's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 4812.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 4812.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 4812.T's competition here
5250.T vs 7518.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 7518.T has a market cap of 355.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 7518.T trades at ¥4,480.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 7518.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 7518.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is more volatile compared to 7518.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 7518.T's competition here
5250.T vs 3923.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3923.T has a market cap of 308.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 3923.T trades at ¥856.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 3923.T's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3923.T's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 3923.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 3923.T's competition here
5250.T vs 9746.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9746.T has a market cap of 179.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 9746.T trades at ¥3,595.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 9746.T's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 9746.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 9746.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 9746.T's competition here
5250.T vs 8096.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 8096.T has a market cap of 177.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 8096.T trades at ¥6,190.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 8096.T's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 8096.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is more volatile compared to 8096.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 8096.T's competition here
5250.T vs 9682.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9682.T has a market cap of 167.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 9682.T trades at ¥1,020.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 9682.T's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 9682.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 9682.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 9682.T's competition here
5250.T vs 2317.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 2317.T has a market cap of 155.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 2317.T trades at ¥426.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 2317.T's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 2317.T's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 2317.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 2317.T's competition here
5250.T vs 9715.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9715.T has a market cap of 146.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 9715.T trades at ¥3,845.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 9715.T's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 9715.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 9715.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 9715.T's competition here
5250.T vs 4722.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 4722.T has a market cap of 145.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 4722.T trades at ¥1,529.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 4722.T's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 4722.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 4722.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 4722.T's competition here
5250.T vs 290A.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 290A.T has a market cap of 139.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 290A.T trades at ¥1,322.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 290A.T's P/E ratio is -411.43. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 290A.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 290A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 290A.T's competition here
5250.T vs 4819.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 4819.T has a market cap of 113.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 4819.T trades at ¥2,459.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 4819.T's P/E ratio is 36.62. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 4819.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 4819.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 4819.T's competition here
5250.T vs 4708.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 4708.T has a market cap of 94.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 4708.T trades at ¥1,464.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 4708.T's P/E ratio is 22.06. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 4708.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is more volatile compared to 4708.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 4708.T's competition here
5250.T vs 7595.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 7595.T has a market cap of 94.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 7595.T trades at ¥1,346.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 7595.T's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 7595.T's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 7595.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 7595.T's competition here
5250.T vs 9889.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9889.T has a market cap of 75.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 9889.T trades at ¥1,202.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 9889.T's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 9889.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 9889.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 9889.T's competition here
5250.T vs 3762.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3762.T has a market cap of 73.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 3762.T trades at ¥1,811.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 3762.T's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3762.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 3762.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 3762.T's competition here
5250.T vs 3636.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3636.T has a market cap of 72.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 3636.T trades at ¥4,490.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 3636.T's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3636.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 3636.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 3636.T's competition here
5250.T vs 3962.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3962.T has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 3962.T trades at ¥902.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 3962.T's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3962.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 3962.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 3962.T's competition here
5250.T vs 4413.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 4413.T has a market cap of 63.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 4413.T trades at ¥1,980.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 4413.T's P/E ratio is 25.79. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 4413.T's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 4413.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 4413.T's competition here
5250.T vs 3817.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3817.T has a market cap of 57.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 3817.T trades at ¥4,495.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 3817.T's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3817.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 3817.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 3817.T's competition here
5250.T vs 202A.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 202A.T has a market cap of 56.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 202A.T trades at ¥3,540.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 202A.T's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 202A.T's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 202A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 202A.T's competition here
5250.T vs 4674.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 4674.T has a market cap of 55.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 4674.T trades at ¥1,363.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 4674.T's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 4674.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 4674.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 4674.T's competition here
5250.T vs 3371.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3371.T has a market cap of 46.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 3371.T trades at ¥1,780.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 3371.T's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3371.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 3371.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 3371.T's competition here
5250.T vs 4743.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 4743.T has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 4743.T trades at ¥1,722.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 4743.T's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 4743.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 4743.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 4743.T's competition here
5250.T vs 3844.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3844.T has a market cap of 43.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 3844.T trades at ¥1,361.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 3844.T's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3844.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 3844.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 3844.T's competition here
5250.T vs 9742.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9742.T has a market cap of 43.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 9742.T trades at ¥2,067.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 9742.T's P/E ratio is 33.56. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 9742.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 9742.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 9742.T's competition here
5250.T vs 9600.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9600.T has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 9600.T trades at ¥2,516.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 9600.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 9600.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is more volatile compared to 9600.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 9600.T's competition here
5250.T vs 9640.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9640.T has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 9640.T trades at ¥2,300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 9640.T's P/E ratio is 24.39. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 9640.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is more volatile compared to 9640.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 9640.T's competition here
5250.T vs 9739.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9739.T has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 9739.T trades at ¥2,456.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 9739.T's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 9739.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 9739.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 9739.T's competition here
5250.T vs 3857.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3857.T has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 3857.T trades at ¥1,156.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 3857.T's P/E ratio is 23.20. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3857.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is more volatile compared to 3857.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 3857.T's competition here
5250.T vs 2359.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 2359.T has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 2359.T trades at ¥2,048.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 2359.T's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 2359.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 2359.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 2359.T's competition here
5250.T vs 2158.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 2158.T has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 2158.T trades at ¥777.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 2158.T's P/E ratio is 114.37. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 2158.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 2158.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 2158.T's competition here
5250.T vs 4725.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 4725.T has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 4725.T trades at ¥1,791.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 4725.T's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 4725.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 4725.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 4725.T's competition here
5250.T vs 4072.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 4072.T has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 4072.T trades at ¥2,834.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 4072.T's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 4072.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 4072.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 4072.T's competition here
5250.T vs 4709.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 4709.T has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 4709.T trades at ¥1,005.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 4709.T's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 4709.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 4709.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 4709.T's competition here
5250.T vs 9658.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9658.T has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 9658.T trades at ¥922.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 9658.T's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 9658.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 9658.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 9658.T's competition here
5250.T vs 3798.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3798.T has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 3798.T trades at ¥495.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 3798.T's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3798.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 3798.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 3798.T's competition here
5250.T vs 8275.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 8275.T has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 8275.T trades at ¥1,064.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 8275.T's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 8275.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 8275.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 8275.T's competition here
5250.T vs 3916.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3916.T has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 3916.T trades at ¥903.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 3916.T's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3916.T's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 3916.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 3916.T's competition here
5250.T vs 2349.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 2349.T has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 2349.T trades at ¥2,450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 2349.T's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 2349.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is more volatile compared to 2349.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 2349.T's competition here
5250.T vs 3393.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3393.T has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 3393.T trades at ¥2,788.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 3393.T's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3393.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 3393.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 3393.T's competition here
5250.T vs 3837.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3837.T has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 3837.T trades at ¥1,483.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 3837.T's P/E ratio is 19.96. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3837.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 3837.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 3837.T's competition here
5250.T vs 3984.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3984.T has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 3984.T trades at ¥1,544.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 3984.T's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3984.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 3984.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 3984.T's competition here
5250.T vs 5574.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 5574.T has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 5574.T trades at ¥2,498.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 5574.T's P/E ratio is 48.16. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 5574.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 5574.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 5574.T's competition here
5250.T vs 2185.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 2185.T has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 2185.T trades at ¥1,872.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 2185.T's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 2185.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 2185.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 2185.T's competition here
5250.T vs 9709.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9709.T has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 9709.T trades at ¥1,553.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 9709.T's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 9709.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 9709.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 9709.T's competition here
5250.T vs 4258.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 4258.T has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 4258.T trades at ¥2,915.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 4258.T's P/E ratio is 32.97. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 4258.T's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 4258.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 4258.T's competition here
5250.T vs 3788.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3788.T has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 3788.T trades at ¥1,907.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 3788.T's P/E ratio is 22.64. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3788.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 3788.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 3788.T's competition here
5250.T vs 4396.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 4396.T has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 4396.T trades at ¥1,070.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 4396.T's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 4396.T's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 4396.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 4396.T's competition here
5250.T vs 4662.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 4662.T has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 4662.T trades at ¥1,512.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 4662.T's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 4662.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 4662.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 4662.T's competition here
5250.T vs 4371.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 4371.T has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 4371.T trades at ¥1,377.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 4371.T's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 4371.T's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 4371.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 4371.T's competition here
5250.T vs 3666.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3666.T has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 3666.T trades at ¥1,151.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 3666.T's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3666.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is more volatile compared to 3666.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 3666.T's competition here
5250.T vs 7505.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 7505.T has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 7505.T trades at ¥1,808.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 7505.T's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 7505.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 7505.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 7505.T's competition here
5250.T vs 4783.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 4783.T has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 4783.T trades at ¥2,459.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 4783.T's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 4783.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 4783.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 4783.T's competition here
5250.T vs 4813.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 4813.T has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 4813.T trades at ¥527.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 4813.T's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 4813.T's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 4813.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 4813.T's competition here
5250.T vs 4498.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 4498.T has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 4498.T trades at ¥1,173.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 4498.T's P/E ratio is 20.97. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 4498.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 4498.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 4498.T's competition here
5250.T vs 3565.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3565.T has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 3565.T trades at ¥437.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 3565.T's P/E ratio is 3.11. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3565.T's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 3565.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 3565.T's competition here
5250.T vs 6050.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 6050.T has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 6050.T trades at ¥1,631.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 6050.T's P/E ratio is 20.37. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 6050.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 6050.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 6050.T's competition here
5250.T vs 3968.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3968.T has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 3968.T trades at ¥524.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 3968.T's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3968.T's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 3968.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 3968.T's competition here
5250.T vs 3676.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3676.T has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 3676.T trades at ¥832.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 3676.T's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3676.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 3676.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 3676.T's competition here
5250.T vs 3925.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3925.T has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 3925.T trades at ¥1,350.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 3925.T's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3925.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 3925.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 3925.T's competition here
5250.T vs 5246.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 5246.T has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 5246.T trades at ¥657.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 5246.T's P/E ratio is -23.56. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 5246.T's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 5246.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 5246.T's competition here
5250.T vs 6199.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 6199.T has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 6199.T trades at ¥1,329.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 6199.T's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 6199.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 6199.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 6199.T's competition here
5250.T vs 2354.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 2354.T has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 2354.T trades at ¥920.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 2354.T's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 2354.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 2354.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 2354.T's competition here
5250.T vs 3924.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3924.T has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 3924.T trades at ¥915.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 3924.T's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3924.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 3924.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 3924.T's competition here
5250.T vs 4053.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 4053.T has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 4053.T trades at ¥419.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 4053.T's P/E ratio is 35.09. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 4053.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 4053.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 4053.T's competition here
5250.T vs 3997.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3997.T has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 3997.T trades at ¥382.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 3997.T's P/E ratio is 261.07. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3997.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 3997.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 3997.T's competition here
5250.T vs 2335.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 2335.T has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 2335.T trades at ¥1,004.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 2335.T's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 2335.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 2335.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 2335.T's competition here
5250.T vs 9799.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9799.T has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 9799.T trades at ¥990.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 9799.T's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 9799.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 9799.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 9799.T's competition here
5250.T vs 4761.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 4761.T has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 4761.T trades at ¥1,299.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 4761.T's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 4761.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 4761.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 4761.T's competition here
5250.T vs 4418.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 4418.T has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 4418.T trades at ¥845.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 4418.T's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 4418.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 4418.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 4418.T's competition here
5250.T vs 4055.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 4055.T has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 4055.T trades at ¥1,695.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 4055.T's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 4055.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 4055.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 4055.T's competition here
5250.T vs 9753.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9753.T has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 9753.T trades at ¥1,269.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 9753.T's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 9753.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 9753.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 9753.T's competition here
5250.T vs 6572.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 6572.T has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 6572.T trades at ¥218.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 6572.T's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 6572.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 6572.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 6572.T's competition here
5250.T vs 5137.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 5137.T has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 5137.T trades at ¥285.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 5137.T's P/E ratio is 25.77. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 5137.T's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 5137.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 5137.T's competition here
5250.T vs 3683.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3683.T has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 3683.T trades at ¥975.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 3683.T's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3683.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 3683.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 3683.T's competition here
5250.T vs 3657.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3657.T has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 3657.T trades at ¥300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 3657.T's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3657.T's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 3657.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 3657.T's competition here
5250.T vs 3918.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3918.T has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 3918.T trades at ¥1,039.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 3918.T's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3918.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 3918.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 3918.T's competition here
5250.T vs 4356.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 4356.T has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 4356.T trades at ¥1,771.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 4356.T's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 4356.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 4356.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 4356.T's competition here
5250.T vs 2332.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 2332.T has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 2332.T trades at ¥1,786.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 2332.T's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 2332.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 2332.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 2332.T's competition here
5250.T vs 3847.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3847.T has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 3847.T trades at ¥6,780.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 3847.T's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3847.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is more volatile compared to 3847.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 3847.T's competition here
5250.T vs 5578.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 5578.T has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 5578.T trades at ¥1,023.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 5578.T's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 5578.T's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 5578.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 5578.T's competition here
5250.T vs 3979.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3979.T has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 3979.T trades at ¥339.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 3979.T's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3979.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 3979.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 3979.T's competition here
5250.T vs 3799.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 3799.T has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 3799.T trades at ¥1,088.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 3799.T's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3799.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is more volatile compared to 3799.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 3799.T's competition here
5250.T vs 9360.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 9360.T has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 9360.T trades at ¥2,997.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 9360.T's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 9360.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 9360.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 9360.T's competition here
5250.T vs 155A.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 155A.T has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 155A.T trades at ¥801.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 155A.T's P/E ratio is 28.82. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 155A.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 155A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 155A.T's competition here
5250.T vs 4442.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 4442.T has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 4442.T trades at ¥410.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 4442.T's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 4442.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 4442.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 4442.T's competition here
5250.T vs 2391.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 2391.T has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 2391.T trades at ¥1,237.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 2391.T's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 2391.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is more volatile compared to 2391.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 2391.T's competition here
5250.T vs 339A.T Comparison May 2026
5250.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 5250.T stands at 3.7B. In comparison, 339A.T has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, 5250.T is priced at ¥1,055.00, while 339A.T trades at ¥1,039.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
5250.T currently has a P/E ratio of 35.86, whereas 339A.T's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, 5250.T's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 339A.T's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 5250.T is less volatile compared to 339A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 5250.T.Check 339A.T's competition here