Grupo Financiero Inbursa, S.A.B. de C.V.
Grupo Financiero Inbursa, S.A.B. de C.V. (4FY.F) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (4FY.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4FY.F | €2.04 | -1.92% | 12.3B | 10.63 | €0.19 | +2.24% |
| BNP.DE | €81.30 | +0.20% | 89.1B | 7.86 | €10.29 | +9.13% |
| IES.DE | €5.12 | +0.47% | 88.8B | 8.96 | €0.57 | +6.99% |
| UB5.DE | €44.71 | +0.89% | 69.5B | 11.15 | €4.01 | +3.96% |
| LLD.DE | €1.08 | +2.86% | 62.4B | 13.31 | €0.08 | +3.66% |
| DBK.DE | €25.11 | +0.76% | 47.6B | 8.09 | €3.09 | +2.72% |
| SGE.DE | €61.54 | -1.22% | 44.9B | 9.04 | €6.80 | +2.76% |
| SGE.F | €61.66 | -1.66% | 44.6B | 8.99 | €6.80 | +2.76% |
| CBK.DE | €30.55 | -0.03% | 34B | 12.63 | €2.39 | +2.15% |
| FRYA.F | €29.44 | +6.36% | 31.7B | 10.55 | €2.67 | +9.75% |
Stock Comparison
4FY.F vs BNP.DE Comparison April 2026
4FY.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4FY.F stands at 12.3B. In comparison, BNP.DE has a market cap of 89.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 4FY.F is priced at €2.04, while BNP.DE trades at €81.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4FY.F currently has a P/E ratio of 10.63, whereas BNP.DE's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, 4FY.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNP.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 4FY.F is less volatile compared to BNP.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4FY.F.Check BNP.DE's competition here
4FY.F vs IES.DE Comparison April 2026
4FY.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4FY.F stands at 12.3B. In comparison, IES.DE has a market cap of 88.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 4FY.F is priced at €2.04, while IES.DE trades at €5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4FY.F currently has a P/E ratio of 10.63, whereas IES.DE's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, 4FY.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IES.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 4FY.F is less volatile compared to IES.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4FY.F.Check IES.DE's competition here
4FY.F vs UB5.DE Comparison April 2026
4FY.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4FY.F stands at 12.3B. In comparison, UB5.DE has a market cap of 69.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 4FY.F is priced at €2.04, while UB5.DE trades at €44.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4FY.F currently has a P/E ratio of 10.63, whereas UB5.DE's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, 4FY.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UB5.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 4FY.F and UB5.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UB5.DE's competition here
4FY.F vs LLD.DE Comparison April 2026
4FY.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4FY.F stands at 12.3B. In comparison, LLD.DE has a market cap of 62.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 4FY.F is priced at €2.04, while LLD.DE trades at €1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4FY.F currently has a P/E ratio of 10.63, whereas LLD.DE's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, 4FY.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LLD.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 4FY.F is less volatile compared to LLD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4FY.F.Check LLD.DE's competition here
4FY.F vs DBK.DE Comparison April 2026
4FY.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4FY.F stands at 12.3B. In comparison, DBK.DE has a market cap of 47.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 4FY.F is priced at €2.04, while DBK.DE trades at €25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4FY.F currently has a P/E ratio of 10.63, whereas DBK.DE's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, 4FY.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DBK.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 4FY.F is less volatile compared to DBK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4FY.F.Check DBK.DE's competition here
4FY.F vs SGE.DE Comparison April 2026
4FY.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4FY.F stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SGE.DE has a market cap of 44.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 4FY.F is priced at €2.04, while SGE.DE trades at €61.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4FY.F currently has a P/E ratio of 10.63, whereas SGE.DE's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, 4FY.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SGE.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 4FY.F is less volatile compared to SGE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4FY.F.Check SGE.DE's competition here
4FY.F vs SGE.F Comparison April 2026
4FY.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4FY.F stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SGE.F has a market cap of 44.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 4FY.F is priced at €2.04, while SGE.F trades at €61.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4FY.F currently has a P/E ratio of 10.63, whereas SGE.F's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, 4FY.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SGE.F's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 4FY.F is less volatile compared to SGE.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4FY.F.Check SGE.F's competition here
4FY.F vs CBK.DE Comparison April 2026
4FY.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4FY.F stands at 12.3B. In comparison, CBK.DE has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, 4FY.F is priced at €2.04, while CBK.DE trades at €30.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4FY.F currently has a P/E ratio of 10.63, whereas CBK.DE's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, 4FY.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBK.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 4FY.F is less volatile compared to CBK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4FY.F.Check CBK.DE's competition here
4FY.F vs FRYA.F Comparison April 2026
4FY.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4FY.F stands at 12.3B. In comparison, FRYA.F has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 4FY.F is priced at €2.04, while FRYA.F trades at €29.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4FY.F currently has a P/E ratio of 10.63, whereas FRYA.F's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, 4FY.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FRYA.F's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 4FY.F is less volatile compared to FRYA.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4FY.F.Check FRYA.F's competition here
4FY.F vs SEBC.F Comparison April 2026
4FY.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4FY.F stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SEBC.F has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 4FY.F is priced at €2.04, while SEBC.F trades at €16.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4FY.F currently has a P/E ratio of 10.63, whereas SEBC.F's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, 4FY.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SEBC.F's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 4FY.F and SEBC.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SEBC.F's competition here
4FY.F vs BIRG.DE Comparison April 2026
4FY.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4FY.F stands at 12.3B. In comparison, BIRG.DE has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 4FY.F is priced at €2.04, while BIRG.DE trades at €15.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4FY.F currently has a P/E ratio of 10.63, whereas BIRG.DE's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, 4FY.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BIRG.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 4FY.F and BIRG.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BIRG.DE's competition here
4FY.F vs KTB1.F Comparison April 2026
4FY.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4FY.F stands at 12.3B. In comparison, KTB1.F has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 4FY.F is priced at €2.04, while KTB1.F trades at €0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4FY.F currently has a P/E ratio of 10.63, whereas KTB1.F's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, 4FY.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KTB1.F's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 4FY.F is less volatile compared to KTB1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4FY.F.Check KTB1.F's competition here
4FY.F vs RAW.DE Comparison April 2026
4FY.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4FY.F stands at 12.3B. In comparison, RAW.DE has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 4FY.F is priced at €2.04, while RAW.DE trades at €35.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4FY.F currently has a P/E ratio of 10.63, whereas RAW.DE's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, 4FY.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RAW.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 4FY.F is less volatile compared to RAW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4FY.F.Check RAW.DE's competition here
4FY.F vs RN70.F Comparison April 2026
4FY.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4FY.F stands at 12.3B. In comparison, RN70.F has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 4FY.F is priced at €2.04, while RN70.F trades at €13.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4FY.F currently has a P/E ratio of 10.63, whereas RN70.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 4FY.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RN70.F's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 4FY.F and RN70.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RN70.F's competition here
4FY.F vs TMLF.F Comparison April 2026
4FY.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4FY.F stands at 12.3B. In comparison, TMLF.F has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4FY.F is priced at €2.04, while TMLF.F trades at €0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4FY.F currently has a P/E ratio of 10.63, whereas TMLF.F's P/E ratio is 4.70. In terms of profitability, 4FY.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TMLF.F's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 4FY.F is less volatile compared to TMLF.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4FY.F.Check TMLF.F's competition here
4FY.F vs 47T.F Comparison April 2026
4FY.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4FY.F stands at 12.3B. In comparison, 47T.F has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 4FY.F is priced at €2.04, while 47T.F trades at €2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4FY.F currently has a P/E ratio of 10.63, whereas 47T.F's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, 4FY.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 47T.F's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 4FY.F and 47T.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 47T.F's competition here
4FY.F vs ARLN.DE Comparison April 2026
4FY.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4FY.F stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ARLN.DE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4FY.F is priced at €2.04, while ARLN.DE trades at €33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4FY.F currently has a P/E ratio of 10.63, whereas ARLN.DE's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, 4FY.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARLN.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 4FY.F is less volatile compared to ARLN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4FY.F.Check ARLN.DE's competition here
4FY.F vs ARL.DE Comparison April 2026
4FY.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4FY.F stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ARL.DE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4FY.F is priced at €2.04, while ARL.DE trades at €33.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4FY.F currently has a P/E ratio of 10.63, whereas ARL.DE's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, 4FY.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARL.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 4FY.F is less volatile compared to ARL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4FY.F.Check ARL.DE's competition here
4FY.F vs ARLN.F Comparison April 2026
4FY.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4FY.F stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ARLN.F has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4FY.F is priced at €2.04, while ARLN.F trades at €33.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4FY.F currently has a P/E ratio of 10.63, whereas ARLN.F's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, 4FY.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARLN.F's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 4FY.F is less volatile compared to ARLN.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4FY.F.Check ARLN.F's competition here
4FY.F vs ZYE1.F Comparison April 2026
4FY.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4FY.F stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ZYE1.F has a market cap of 489.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 4FY.F is priced at €2.04, while ZYE1.F trades at €26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4FY.F currently has a P/E ratio of 10.63, whereas ZYE1.F's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, 4FY.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZYE1.F's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 4FY.F and ZYE1.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZYE1.F's competition here
4FY.F vs PCZ.DE Comparison April 2026
4FY.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4FY.F stands at 12.3B. In comparison, PCZ.DE has a market cap of 425.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 4FY.F is priced at €2.04, while PCZ.DE trades at €7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4FY.F currently has a P/E ratio of 10.63, whereas PCZ.DE's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, 4FY.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCZ.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 4FY.F is less volatile compared to PCZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4FY.F.Check PCZ.DE's competition here
4FY.F vs UBK.DE Comparison April 2026
4FY.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4FY.F stands at 12.3B. In comparison, UBK.DE has a market cap of 160.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 4FY.F is priced at €2.04, while UBK.DE trades at €3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4FY.F currently has a P/E ratio of 10.63, whereas UBK.DE's P/E ratio is 193.50. In terms of profitability, 4FY.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UBK.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 4FY.F is less volatile compared to UBK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4FY.F.Check UBK.DE's competition here
4FY.F vs QB7.DE Comparison April 2026
4FY.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4FY.F stands at 12.3B. In comparison, QB7.DE has a market cap of 148.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 4FY.F is priced at €2.04, while QB7.DE trades at €3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4FY.F currently has a P/E ratio of 10.63, whereas QB7.DE's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, 4FY.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QB7.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 4FY.F and QB7.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QB7.DE's competition here
4FY.F vs MBK.DE Comparison April 2026
4FY.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4FY.F stands at 12.3B. In comparison, MBK.DE has a market cap of 136.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 4FY.F is priced at €2.04, while MBK.DE trades at €17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4FY.F currently has a P/E ratio of 10.63, whereas MBK.DE's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, 4FY.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MBK.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 4FY.F and MBK.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MBK.DE's competition here
4FY.F vs MULT.DE Comparison April 2026
4FY.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4FY.F stands at 12.3B. In comparison, MULT.DE has a market cap of 129.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 4FY.F is priced at €2.04, while MULT.DE trades at €6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4FY.F currently has a P/E ratio of 10.63, whereas MULT.DE's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, 4FY.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MULT.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 4FY.F is less volatile compared to MULT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4FY.F.Check MULT.DE's competition here
4FY.F vs VG80.DE Comparison April 2026
4FY.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4FY.F stands at 12.3B. In comparison, VG80.DE has a market cap of 28.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 4FY.F is priced at €2.04, while VG80.DE trades at €2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4FY.F currently has a P/E ratio of 10.63, whereas VG80.DE's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, 4FY.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VG80.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 4FY.F is less volatile compared to VG80.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4FY.F.Check VG80.DE's competition here
4FY.F vs VG8.DE Comparison April 2026
4FY.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4FY.F stands at 12.3B. In comparison, VG8.DE has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 4FY.F is priced at €2.04, while VG8.DE trades at €2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4FY.F currently has a P/E ratio of 10.63, whereas VG8.DE's P/E ratio is 1.93. In terms of profitability, 4FY.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VG8.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 4FY.F is less volatile compared to VG8.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4FY.F.Check VG8.DE's competition here
4FY.F vs MBC.DE Comparison April 2026
4FY.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4FY.F stands at 12.3B. In comparison, MBC.DE has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 4FY.F is priced at €2.04, while MBC.DE trades at €0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4FY.F currently has a P/E ratio of 10.63, whereas MBC.DE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, 4FY.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MBC.DE's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 4FY.F is less volatile compared to MBC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4FY.F.Check MBC.DE's competition here