TISCO Financial Group Public Company Limited

47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BNP.DE has a market cap of 89.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.90, while BNP.DE trades at €81.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas BNP.DE's P/E ratio is 7.89. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BNP.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to BNP.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check BNP.DE's competition here

47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.3B. In comparison, IES.DE has a market cap of 88.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.90, while IES.DE trades at €5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas IES.DE's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IES.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to IES.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check IES.DE's competition here

47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.3B. In comparison, UB5.DE has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.90, while UB5.DE trades at €44.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas UB5.DE's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UB5.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to UB5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check UB5.DE's competition here

47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.3B. In comparison, LLD.DE has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.90, while LLD.DE trades at €1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas LLD.DE's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LLD.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to LLD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check LLD.DE's competition here

47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DBK.DE has a market cap of 47.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.90, while DBK.DE trades at €24.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas DBK.DE's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DBK.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to DBK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check DBK.DE's competition here

47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SGE.F has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.90, while SGE.F trades at €62.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas SGE.F's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SGE.F's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to SGE.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check SGE.F's competition here

47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SGE.DE has a market cap of 45.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.90, while SGE.DE trades at €62.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas SGE.DE's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SGE.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to SGE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check SGE.DE's competition here

47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CBK.DE has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.90, while CBK.DE trades at €30.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas CBK.DE's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CBK.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to CBK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check CBK.DE's competition here

47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.3B. In comparison, FRYA.F has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.90, while FRYA.F trades at €27.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas FRYA.F's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FRYA.F's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F and FRYA.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRYA.F's competition here

47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SEBC.F has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.90, while SEBC.F trades at €15.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas SEBC.F's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SEBC.F's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F and SEBC.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SEBC.F's competition here

47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BIRG.DE has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.90, while BIRG.DE trades at €15.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas BIRG.DE's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BIRG.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to BIRG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check BIRG.DE's competition here

47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.3B. In comparison, 4FY.F has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.90, while 4FY.F trades at €2.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas 4FY.F's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 4FY.F's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F and 4FY.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 4FY.F's competition here

47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.3B. In comparison, KTB1.F has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.90, while KTB1.F trades at €0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas KTB1.F's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KTB1.F's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to KTB1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check KTB1.F's competition here

47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.3B. In comparison, RN70.F has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.90, while RN70.F trades at €13.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas RN70.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RN70.F's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to RN70.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check RN70.F's competition here

47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.3B. In comparison, RAW.DE has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.90, while RAW.DE trades at €36.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas RAW.DE's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RAW.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to RAW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check RAW.DE's competition here

47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.3B. In comparison, TMLF.F has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.90, while TMLF.F trades at €0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas TMLF.F's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TMLF.F's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F and TMLF.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TMLF.F's competition here

47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ARLN.DE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.90, while ARLN.DE trades at €33.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas ARLN.DE's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARLN.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to ARLN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check ARLN.DE's competition here

47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ARL.DE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.90, while ARL.DE trades at €33.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas ARL.DE's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARL.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to ARL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check ARL.DE's competition here

47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ARLN.F has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.90, while ARLN.F trades at €33.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas ARLN.F's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARLN.F's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to ARLN.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check ARLN.F's competition here

47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ZYE1.F has a market cap of 505.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.90, while ZYE1.F trades at €26.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas ZYE1.F's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZYE1.F's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F and ZYE1.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZYE1.F's competition here

47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PCZ.DE has a market cap of 424.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.90, while PCZ.DE trades at €7.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas PCZ.DE's P/E ratio is 5.07. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PCZ.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to PCZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check PCZ.DE's competition here

47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.3B. In comparison, UBK.DE has a market cap of 160.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.90, while UBK.DE trades at €3.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas UBK.DE's P/E ratio is 193.50. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UBK.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to UBK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check UBK.DE's competition here

47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.3B. In comparison, QB7.DE has a market cap of 144.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.90, while QB7.DE trades at €3.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas QB7.DE's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QB7.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F and QB7.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QB7.DE's competition here

47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MBK.DE has a market cap of 137.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.90, while MBK.DE trades at €17.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas MBK.DE's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MBK.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to MBK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check MBK.DE's competition here

47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MULT.DE has a market cap of 127.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.90, while MULT.DE trades at €5.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas MULT.DE's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MULT.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to MULT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check MULT.DE's competition here

47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.3B. In comparison, VG80.DE has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.90, while VG80.DE trades at €2.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas VG80.DE's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VG80.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to VG80.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check VG80.DE's competition here

47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.3B. In comparison, VG8.DE has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.90, while VG8.DE trades at €2.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas VG8.DE's P/E ratio is 1.97. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VG8.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to VG8.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check VG8.DE's competition here

47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MBC.DE has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.90, while MBC.DE trades at €0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas MBC.DE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MBC.DE's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to MBC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check MBC.DE's competition here