Koei Chemical Company, Limited
Koei Chemical Company, Limited (4367.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (4367.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4367.T | ¥2,875.00 | +2.06% | 14.1B | -45.97 | -¥62.60 | +2.78% |
| 4612.T | ¥1,044.50 | -0.48% | 2.4T | 19.29 | ¥53.56 | +1.55% |
| 6988.T | ¥3,091.00 | +3.46% | 2.1T | 15.50 | ¥197.18 | +1.96% |
| 5201.T | ¥6,387.00 | +5.59% | 1.3T | 19.10 | ¥325.44 | +3.38% |
| 4182.T | ¥5,130.00 | +11.21% | 968.6B | -24.01 | -¥207.16 | +2.01% |
| 4183.T | ¥2,054.50 | +2.16% | 750.2B | 22.22 | ¥91.70 | +3.68% |
| 4403.T | ¥2,812.50 | +1.10% | 627.6B | 15.72 | ¥176.33 | +2.20% |
| 4088.T | ¥2,617.00 | +5.48% | 583.6B | 54.41 | ¥46.79 | +2.95% |
| 4203.T | ¥6,704.00 | +6.24% | 580.7B | 20.70 | ¥319.69 | +1.66% |
| 4626.T | ¥4,869.00 | +1.12% | 538.1B | 29.39 | ¥164.55 | +3.21% |
Stock Comparison
4367.T vs 4612.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4612.T has a market cap of 2.4T. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4612.T trades at ¥1,044.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4612.T's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4612.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4612.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4612.T's competition here
4367.T vs 6988.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 6988.T has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 6988.T trades at ¥3,091.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 6988.T's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 6988.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 6988.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 6988.T's competition here
4367.T vs 5201.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 5201.T has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 5201.T trades at ¥6,387.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 5201.T's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 5201.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is less volatile compared to 5201.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 5201.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4182.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4182.T has a market cap of 968.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4182.T trades at ¥5,130.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4182.T's P/E ratio is -24.01. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4182.T's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is less volatile compared to 4182.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4182.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4183.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4183.T has a market cap of 750.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4183.T trades at ¥2,054.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4183.T's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4183.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4183.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4183.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4403.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4403.T has a market cap of 627.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4403.T trades at ¥2,812.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4403.T's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4403.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4403.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4403.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4088.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4088.T has a market cap of 583.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4088.T trades at ¥2,617.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4088.T's P/E ratio is 54.41. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4088.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is less volatile compared to 4088.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4088.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4203.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4203.T has a market cap of 580.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4203.T trades at ¥6,704.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4203.T's P/E ratio is 20.70. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4203.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4203.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4203.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4626.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4626.T has a market cap of 538.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4626.T trades at ¥4,869.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4626.T's P/E ratio is 29.39. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4626.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4626.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4626.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4631.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4631.T has a market cap of 438.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4631.T trades at ¥4,608.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4631.T's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4631.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4631.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4631.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4613.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4613.T has a market cap of 412.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4613.T trades at ¥2,338.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4613.T's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4613.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4613.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4613.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4205.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4205.T has a market cap of 401.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4205.T trades at ¥2,110.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4205.T's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4205.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4205.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4205.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4401.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4401.T has a market cap of 399.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4401.T trades at ¥4,143.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4401.T's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4401.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4401.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4401.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4966.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4966.T has a market cap of 377.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4966.T trades at ¥24,240.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4966.T's P/E ratio is 27.11. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4966.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is less volatile compared to 4966.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4966.T's competition here
4367.T vs 5301.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 5301.T has a market cap of 349B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 5301.T trades at ¥1,637.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 5301.T's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 5301.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is less volatile compared to 5301.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 5301.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4118.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4118.T has a market cap of 327.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4118.T trades at ¥5,463.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4118.T's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4118.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4118.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4118.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4043.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4043.T has a market cap of 315.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4043.T trades at ¥4,451.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4043.T's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4043.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is less volatile compared to 4043.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4043.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4202.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4202.T has a market cap of 300.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4202.T trades at ¥1,192.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4202.T's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4202.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4202.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4202.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4208.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4208.T has a market cap of 295.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4208.T trades at ¥3,032.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4208.T's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4208.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4208.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4208.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4099.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4099.T has a market cap of 247B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4099.T trades at ¥5,930.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4099.T's P/E ratio is 29.60. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4099.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is less volatile compared to 4099.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4099.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4107.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4107.T has a market cap of 223.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4107.T trades at ¥4,575.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4107.T's P/E ratio is 34.41. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4107.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is less volatile compared to 4107.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4107.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4046.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4046.T has a market cap of 220.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4046.T trades at ¥1,838.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4046.T's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4046.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4046.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4046.T's competition here
4367.T vs 8098.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 8098.T has a market cap of 207.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 8098.T trades at ¥3,875.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 8098.T's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 8098.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 8098.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 8098.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4634.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4634.T has a market cap of 192B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4634.T trades at ¥4,105.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4634.T's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4634.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4634.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4634.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4971.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4971.T has a market cap of 183.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4971.T trades at ¥10,850.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4971.T's P/E ratio is 36.82. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4971.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is less volatile compared to 4971.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4971.T's competition here
4367.T vs 7970.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 7970.T has a market cap of 179.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 7970.T trades at ¥2,258.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 7970.T's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 7970.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 7970.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 7970.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4975.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4975.T has a market cap of 178.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4975.T trades at ¥7,310.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4975.T's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4975.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4975.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4975.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4047.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4047.T has a market cap of 164.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4047.T trades at ¥2,955.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4047.T's P/E ratio is 43.53. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4047.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is less volatile compared to 4047.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4047.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4095.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4095.T has a market cap of 162.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4095.T trades at ¥1,498.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4095.T's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4095.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4095.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4095.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4617.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4617.T has a market cap of 156.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4617.T trades at ¥3,160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4617.T's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4617.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4617.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4617.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4023.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4023.T has a market cap of 145.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4023.T trades at ¥3,835.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4023.T's P/E ratio is -14.26. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4023.T's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4023.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4023.T's competition here
4367.T vs 3101.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 3101.T has a market cap of 142.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 3101.T trades at ¥1,604.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 3101.T's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 3101.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 3101.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 3101.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4628.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4628.T has a market cap of 131.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4628.T trades at ¥9,730.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4628.T's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4628.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4628.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4628.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4958.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4958.T has a market cap of 127.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4958.T trades at ¥3,140.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4958.T's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4958.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4958.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4958.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4471.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4471.T has a market cap of 112.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4471.T trades at ¥5,110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4471.T's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4471.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4471.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4471.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4633.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4633.T has a market cap of 110.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4633.T trades at ¥2,280.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4633.T's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4633.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4633.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4633.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4914.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4914.T has a market cap of 110.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4914.T trades at ¥1,129.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4914.T's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4914.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4914.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4914.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4369.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4369.T has a market cap of 108.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4369.T trades at ¥3,450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4369.T's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4369.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is less volatile compared to 4369.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4369.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4187.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4187.T has a market cap of 102.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4187.T trades at ¥5,210.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4187.T's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4187.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is less volatile compared to 4187.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4187.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4028.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4028.T has a market cap of 99.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4028.T trades at ¥2,606.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4028.T's P/E ratio is 5.96. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4028.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4028.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4028.T's competition here
4367.T vs 5122.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 5122.T has a market cap of 95.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 5122.T trades at ¥5,580.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 5122.T's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 5122.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 5122.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 5122.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4461.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4461.T has a market cap of 91.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4461.T trades at ¥9,160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4461.T's P/E ratio is 23.83. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4461.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is less volatile compared to 4461.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4461.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4956.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4956.T has a market cap of 88.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4956.T trades at ¥1,420.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4956.T's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4956.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4956.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4956.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4109.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4109.T has a market cap of 84.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4109.T trades at ¥7,090.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4109.T's P/E ratio is 26.92. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4109.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is less volatile compared to 4109.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4109.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4215.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4215.T has a market cap of 84.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4215.T trades at ¥868.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4215.T's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4215.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4215.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4215.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4008.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4008.T has a market cap of 79.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4008.T trades at ¥1,244.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4008.T's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4008.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4008.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4008.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4464.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4464.T has a market cap of 77.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4464.T trades at ¥3,600.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4464.T's P/E ratio is 26.16. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4464.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is less volatile compared to 4464.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4464.T's competition here
4367.T vs 3103.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 3103.T has a market cap of 73.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 3103.T trades at ¥1,277.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 3103.T's P/E ratio is 4.11. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 3103.T's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is less volatile compared to 3103.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 3103.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4116.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4116.T has a market cap of 72.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4116.T trades at ¥1,068.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4116.T's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4116.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4116.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4116.T's competition here
4367.T vs 7958.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 7958.T has a market cap of 72.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 7958.T trades at ¥3,570.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 7958.T's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 7958.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 7958.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 7958.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4022.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4022.T has a market cap of 71.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4022.T trades at ¥1,824.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4022.T's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4022.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is less volatile compared to 4022.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4022.T's competition here
4367.T vs 6036.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 6036.T has a market cap of 69.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 6036.T trades at ¥2,551.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 6036.T's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 6036.T's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 6036.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 6036.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4365.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4365.T has a market cap of 60.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4365.T trades at ¥20,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4365.T's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4365.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4365.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4365.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4972.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4972.T has a market cap of 56.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4972.T trades at ¥3,405.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4972.T's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4972.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is less volatile compared to 4972.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4972.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4221.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4221.T has a market cap of 54.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4221.T trades at ¥4,835.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4221.T's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4221.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4221.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4221.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4362.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4362.T has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4362.T trades at ¥2,499.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4362.T's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4362.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4362.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4362.T's competition here
4367.T vs 5304.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 5304.T has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 5304.T trades at ¥2,654.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 5304.T's P/E ratio is -730.00. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 5304.T's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 5304.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 5304.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4619.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4619.T has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4619.T trades at ¥2,428.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4619.T's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4619.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4619.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4619.T's competition here
4367.T vs 5302.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 5302.T has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 5302.T trades at ¥4,770.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 5302.T's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 5302.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 5302.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 5302.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4078.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4078.T has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4078.T trades at ¥3,405.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4078.T's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4078.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4078.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4078.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4082.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4082.T has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4082.T trades at ¥2,010.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4082.T's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4082.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4082.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4082.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4275.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4275.T has a market cap of 46.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4275.T trades at ¥2,161.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4275.T's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4275.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is less volatile compared to 4275.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4275.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4027.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4027.T has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4027.T trades at ¥2,033.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4027.T's P/E ratio is 22.90. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4027.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4027.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4027.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4094.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4094.T has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4094.T trades at ¥2,016.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4094.T's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4094.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4094.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4094.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4611.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4611.T has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4611.T trades at ¥1,262.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4611.T's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4611.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4611.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4611.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4112.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4112.T has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4112.T trades at ¥2,131.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4112.T's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4112.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4112.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4112.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4462.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4462.T has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4462.T trades at ¥2,450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4462.T's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4462.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4462.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4462.T's competition here
4367.T vs 3355.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 3355.T has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 3355.T trades at ¥1,655.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 3355.T's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 3355.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 3355.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 3355.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4963.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4963.T has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4963.T trades at ¥1,069.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4963.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4963.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4963.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4963.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4092.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4092.T has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4092.T trades at ¥3,835.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4092.T's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4092.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is less volatile compared to 4092.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4092.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4636.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4636.T has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4636.T trades at ¥1,405.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4636.T's P/E ratio is 20.20. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4636.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4636.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4636.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4973.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4973.T has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4973.T trades at ¥5,300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4973.T's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4973.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4973.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4973.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4620.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4620.T has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4620.T trades at ¥1,016.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4620.T's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4620.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4620.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4620.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4064.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4064.T has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4064.T trades at ¥3,130.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4064.T's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4064.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4064.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4064.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4229.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4229.T has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4229.T trades at ¥4,235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4229.T's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4229.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4229.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4229.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4968.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4968.T has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4968.T trades at ¥1,380.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4968.T's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4968.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4968.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4968.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4410.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4410.T has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4410.T trades at ¥966.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4410.T's P/E ratio is 23.05. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4410.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4410.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4410.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4228.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4228.T has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4228.T trades at ¥507.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4228.T's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4228.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4228.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4228.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4977.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4977.T has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4977.T trades at ¥1,226.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4977.T's P/E ratio is 6.76. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4977.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4977.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4977.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4231.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4231.T has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4231.T trades at ¥950.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4231.T's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4231.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4231.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4231.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4635.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4635.T has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4635.T trades at ¥1,235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4635.T's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4635.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4635.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4635.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4409.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4409.T has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4409.T trades at ¥723.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4409.T's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4409.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4409.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4409.T's competition here
4367.T vs 7699.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 7699.T has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 7699.T trades at ¥719.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 7699.T's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 7699.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 7699.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 7699.T's competition here
4367.T vs 5018.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 5018.T has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 5018.T trades at ¥1,643.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 5018.T's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 5018.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 5018.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 5018.T's competition here
4367.T vs 8152.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 8152.T has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 8152.T trades at ¥7,560.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 8152.T's P/E ratio is 6.53. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 8152.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 8152.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 8152.T's competition here
4367.T vs 5381.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 5381.T has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 5381.T trades at ¥977.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 5381.T's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 5381.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is less volatile compared to 5381.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 5381.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4627.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4627.T has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4627.T trades at ¥1,678.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4627.T's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4627.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4627.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4627.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4957.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4957.T has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4957.T trades at ¥1,374.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4957.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4957.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4957.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4957.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4113.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4113.T has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4113.T trades at ¥747.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4113.T's P/E ratio is 6.85. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4113.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is less volatile compared to 4113.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4113.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4119.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4119.T has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4119.T trades at ¥6,110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4119.T's P/E ratio is -7.41. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4119.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is less volatile compared to 4119.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4119.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4629.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4629.T has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4629.T trades at ¥1,968.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4629.T's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4629.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4629.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4629.T's competition here
4367.T vs 7940.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 7940.T has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 7940.T trades at ¥1,044.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 7940.T's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 7940.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 7940.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 7940.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4100.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4100.T has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4100.T trades at ¥1,436.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4100.T's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4100.T's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4100.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4100.T's competition here
4367.T vs 5695.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 5695.T has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 5695.T trades at ¥2,524.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 5695.T's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 5695.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 5695.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 5695.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4406.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4406.T has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4406.T trades at ¥193.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4406.T's P/E ratio is 15.34. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4406.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4406.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4406.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4624.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4624.T has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4624.T trades at ¥3,745.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4624.T's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4624.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4624.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4624.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4234.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4234.T has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4234.T trades at ¥683.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4234.T's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4234.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4234.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4234.T's competition here
4367.T vs 4623.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 4623.T has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 4623.T trades at ¥1,706.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 4623.T's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 4623.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 4623.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 4623.T's competition here
4367.T vs 3537.T Comparison May 2026
4367.T plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4367.T stands at 14.1B. In comparison, 3537.T has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 4367.T is priced at ¥2,875.00, while 3537.T trades at ¥1,632.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4367.T currently has a P/E ratio of -45.97, whereas 3537.T's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, 4367.T's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 3537.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 4367.T is more volatile compared to 3537.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4367.T.Check 3537.T's competition here