Faith, Inc.
Faith, Inc. (4295.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (4295.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4295.T | ¥1,215.00 | -0.08% | 13.2B | -12.87 | -¥94.41 | +0.82% |
| 9602.T | ¥1,652.50 | +1.47% | 1.4T | 27.80 | ¥59.44 | +6.35% |
| 4816.T | ¥2,630.00 | -0.90% | 537.3B | 22.06 | ¥119.22 | +1.18% |
| 9605.T | ¥5,970.00 | +0.00% | 373B | 18.48 | ¥322.98 | +0.30% |
| 5032.T | ¥2,961.00 | +2.10% | 180.3B | 12.45 | ¥237.92 | +2.28% |
| 9601.T | ¥11,740.00 | +1.03% | 161.4B | 39.01 | ¥300.96 | +0.20% |
| 2329.T | ¥635.00 | +1.11% | 87.4B | 9.25 | ¥68.64 | +4.03% |
| 7860.T | ¥1,218.00 | +1.33% | 51.8B | 122.29 | ¥9.96 | +4.11% |
| 6879.T | ¥791.00 | +0.00% | 35B | -0.00 | -¥285,983,008.00 | +1.90% |
| 4301.T | ¥2,038.00 | +0.15% | 33B | 7.03 | ¥289.99 | +1.96% |
Stock Comparison
4295.T vs 9602.T Comparison April 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 9602.T has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 9602.T trades at ¥1,652.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 9602.T's P/E ratio is 27.80. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 9602.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 9602.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 9602.T's competition here
4295.T vs 4816.T Comparison April 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 4816.T has a market cap of 537.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 4816.T trades at ¥2,630.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 4816.T's P/E ratio is 22.06. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 4816.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 4816.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 4816.T's competition here
4295.T vs 9605.T Comparison April 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 9605.T has a market cap of 373B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 9605.T trades at ¥5,970.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 9605.T's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 9605.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 9605.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 9605.T's competition here
4295.T vs 5032.T Comparison April 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 5032.T has a market cap of 180.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 5032.T trades at ¥2,961.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 5032.T's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 5032.T's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 5032.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 5032.T's competition here
4295.T vs 9601.T Comparison April 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 9601.T has a market cap of 161.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 9601.T trades at ¥11,740.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 9601.T's P/E ratio is 39.01. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 9601.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 9601.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 9601.T's competition here
4295.T vs 2329.T Comparison April 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 2329.T has a market cap of 87.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 2329.T trades at ¥635.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 2329.T's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 2329.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 2329.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 2329.T's competition here
4295.T vs 7860.T Comparison April 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 7860.T has a market cap of 51.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 7860.T trades at ¥1,218.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 7860.T's P/E ratio is 122.29. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 7860.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 7860.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 7860.T's competition here
4295.T vs 6879.T Comparison April 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 6879.T has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 6879.T trades at ¥791.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 6879.T's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 6879.T's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is more volatile compared to 6879.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 6879.T's competition here
4295.T vs 4301.T Comparison April 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 4301.T has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 4301.T trades at ¥2,038.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 4301.T's P/E ratio is 7.03. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 4301.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 4301.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 4301.T's competition here
4295.T vs 3791.T Comparison April 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 3791.T has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 3791.T trades at ¥1,310.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 3791.T's P/E ratio is 41.72. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 3791.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 3791.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 3791.T's competition here
4295.T vs 9408.T Comparison April 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 9408.T has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 9408.T trades at ¥2,800.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 9408.T's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 9408.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is more volatile compared to 9408.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 9408.T's competition here
4295.T vs 4347.T Comparison April 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 4347.T has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 4347.T trades at ¥2,229.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 4347.T's P/E ratio is 28.08. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 4347.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 4347.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 4347.T's competition here
4295.T vs 4712.T Comparison April 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 4712.T has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 4712.T trades at ¥756.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 4712.T's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 4712.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 4712.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 4712.T's competition here
4295.T vs 9249.T Comparison April 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 9249.T has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 9249.T trades at ¥1,630.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 9249.T's P/E ratio is 47.55. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 9249.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 9249.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 9249.T's competition here
4295.T vs 9636.T Comparison April 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 9636.T has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 9636.T trades at ¥4,130.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 9636.T's P/E ratio is 69.39. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 9636.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 9636.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 9636.T's competition here
4295.T vs 4772.T Comparison April 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 4772.T has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 4772.T trades at ¥91.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 4772.T's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 4772.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 4772.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 4772.T's competition here
4295.T vs 4308.T Comparison April 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 4308.T has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 4308.T trades at ¥378.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 4308.T's P/E ratio is 18.63. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 4308.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 4308.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 4308.T's competition here
4295.T vs 4317.T Comparison April 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 4317.T has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 4317.T trades at ¥614.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 4317.T's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 4317.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 4317.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 4317.T's competition here
4295.T vs 3686.T Comparison April 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 3686.T has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 3686.T trades at ¥107.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 3686.T's P/E ratio is -10.26. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 3686.T's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 3686.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 3686.T's competition here
4295.T vs 3929.T Comparison April 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 3929.T has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 3929.T trades at ¥315.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 3929.T's P/E ratio is 19.81. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 3929.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 3929.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 3929.T's competition here
4295.T vs 5125.T Comparison April 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 5125.T has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 5125.T trades at ¥644.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 5125.T's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 5125.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 5125.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 5125.T's competition here
4295.T vs 4650.T Comparison April 2026
4295.T plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 4295.T stands at 13.2B. In comparison, 4650.T has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 4295.T is priced at ¥1,215.00, while 4650.T trades at ¥293.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
4295.T currently has a P/E ratio of -12.87, whereas 4650.T's P/E ratio is 52.32. In terms of profitability, 4295.T's ROE is -0.08%, compared to 4650.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 4295.T is less volatile compared to 4650.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 4295.T.Check 4650.T's competition here