Maire Tecnimont S.p.A.
Maire Tecnimont S.p.A. (3OY1.MU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (3OY1.MU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3OY1.MU | €12.23 | -0.41% | 4B | N/A | N/A | +2.91% |
| SQU.DE | €124.75 | -0.20% | 70.3B | 14.80 | €8.43 | +3.80% |
| HOT.DE | €191.80 | +0.79% | 14.4B | 17.60 | €10.90 | +2.73% |
| XD4.DE | €82.10 | +0.98% | 9.5B | 11.17 | €7.35 | +3.05% |
| 3OY1.BE | €12.05 | +0.58% | 4B | N/A | N/A | +2.95% |
| 3OY1.F | €11.95 | +0.42% | 3.9B | 18.11 | €0.66 | +2.98% |
| 3OY1.DU | €11.93 | -1.24% | 3.9B | N/A | N/A | +2.98% |
| 3OY1.SG | €11.74 | -0.84% | 3.8B | N/A | N/A | +3.03% |
| GBF.DE | €95.05 | +0.58% | 3.6B | 19.36 | €4.91 | +2.20% |
| ABS2.DE | €29.35 | -1.18% | 1.1B | 12.71 | €2.31 | +3.05% |
Stock Comparison
3OY1.MU vs SQU.DE Comparison July 2025
3OY1.MU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3OY1.MU stands at 4B. In comparison, SQU.DE has a market cap of 70.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3OY1.MU is priced at €12.23, while SQU.DE trades at €124.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3OY1.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQU.DE's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, 3OY1.MU's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SQU.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3OY1.MU is less volatile compared to SQU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3OY1.MU.Check SQU.DE's competition here
3OY1.MU vs HOT.DE Comparison July 2025
3OY1.MU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3OY1.MU stands at 4B. In comparison, HOT.DE has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3OY1.MU is priced at €12.23, while HOT.DE trades at €191.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3OY1.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HOT.DE's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, 3OY1.MU's ROE is +0.38%, compared to HOT.DE's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3OY1.MU is less volatile compared to HOT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3OY1.MU.Check HOT.DE's competition here
3OY1.MU vs XD4.DE Comparison July 2025
3OY1.MU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3OY1.MU stands at 4B. In comparison, XD4.DE has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3OY1.MU is priced at €12.23, while XD4.DE trades at €82.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3OY1.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD4.DE's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, 3OY1.MU's ROE is +0.38%, compared to XD4.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3OY1.MU is less volatile compared to XD4.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3OY1.MU.Check XD4.DE's competition here
3OY1.MU vs 3OY1.BE Comparison July 2025
3OY1.MU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3OY1.MU stands at 4B. In comparison, 3OY1.BE has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3OY1.MU is priced at €12.23, while 3OY1.BE trades at €12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3OY1.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3OY1.BE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 3OY1.MU's ROE is +0.38%, compared to 3OY1.BE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 3OY1.MU is more volatile compared to 3OY1.BE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3OY1.MU.Check 3OY1.BE's competition here
3OY1.MU vs 3OY1.F Comparison July 2025
3OY1.MU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3OY1.MU stands at 4B. In comparison, 3OY1.F has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3OY1.MU is priced at €12.23, while 3OY1.F trades at €11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3OY1.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3OY1.F's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, 3OY1.MU's ROE is +0.38%, compared to 3OY1.F's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 3OY1.MU is less volatile compared to 3OY1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3OY1.MU.Check 3OY1.F's competition here
3OY1.MU vs 3OY1.DU Comparison July 2025
3OY1.MU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3OY1.MU stands at 4B. In comparison, 3OY1.DU has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3OY1.MU is priced at €12.23, while 3OY1.DU trades at €11.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3OY1.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3OY1.DU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 3OY1.MU's ROE is +0.38%, compared to 3OY1.DU's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 3OY1.MU is less volatile compared to 3OY1.DU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3OY1.MU.Check 3OY1.DU's competition here
3OY1.MU vs 3OY1.SG Comparison July 2025
3OY1.MU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3OY1.MU stands at 4B. In comparison, 3OY1.SG has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3OY1.MU is priced at €12.23, while 3OY1.SG trades at €11.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3OY1.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3OY1.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 3OY1.MU's ROE is +0.38%, compared to 3OY1.SG's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 3OY1.MU is less volatile compared to 3OY1.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3OY1.MU.Check 3OY1.SG's competition here
3OY1.MU vs GBF.DE Comparison July 2025
3OY1.MU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3OY1.MU stands at 4B. In comparison, GBF.DE has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3OY1.MU is priced at €12.23, while GBF.DE trades at €95.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3OY1.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBF.DE's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, 3OY1.MU's ROE is +0.38%, compared to GBF.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3OY1.MU is less volatile compared to GBF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3OY1.MU.Check GBF.DE's competition here
3OY1.MU vs ABS2.DE Comparison July 2025
3OY1.MU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3OY1.MU stands at 4B. In comparison, ABS2.DE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3OY1.MU is priced at €12.23, while ABS2.DE trades at €29.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3OY1.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABS2.DE's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, 3OY1.MU's ROE is +0.38%, compared to ABS2.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3OY1.MU is less volatile compared to ABS2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3OY1.MU.Check ABS2.DE's competition here
3OY1.MU vs AB9.DE Comparison July 2025
3OY1.MU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3OY1.MU stands at 4B. In comparison, AB9.DE has a market cap of 368.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 3OY1.MU is priced at €12.23, while AB9.DE trades at €40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3OY1.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AB9.DE's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, 3OY1.MU's ROE is +0.38%, compared to AB9.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3OY1.MU is less volatile compared to AB9.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3OY1.MU.Check AB9.DE's competition here
3OY1.MU vs B5A.DE Comparison July 2025
3OY1.MU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3OY1.MU stands at 4B. In comparison, B5A.DE has a market cap of 160.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 3OY1.MU is priced at €12.23, while B5A.DE trades at €6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3OY1.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas B5A.DE's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, 3OY1.MU's ROE is +0.38%, compared to B5A.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3OY1.MU is less volatile compared to B5A.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3OY1.MU.Check B5A.DE's competition here
3OY1.MU vs B7J.DE Comparison July 2025
3OY1.MU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3OY1.MU stands at 4B. In comparison, B7J.DE has a market cap of 104.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 3OY1.MU is priced at €12.23, while B7J.DE trades at €6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3OY1.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas B7J.DE's P/E ratio is -10.34. In terms of profitability, 3OY1.MU's ROE is +0.38%, compared to B7J.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3OY1.MU is less volatile compared to B7J.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3OY1.MU.Check B7J.DE's competition here
3OY1.MU vs M4N.DE Comparison July 2025
3OY1.MU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3OY1.MU stands at 4B. In comparison, M4N.DE has a market cap of 22.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 3OY1.MU is priced at €12.23, while M4N.DE trades at €1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3OY1.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas M4N.DE's P/E ratio is 3.36. In terms of profitability, 3OY1.MU's ROE is +0.38%, compared to M4N.DE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3OY1.MU is less volatile compared to M4N.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3OY1.MU.Check M4N.DE's competition here
3OY1.MU vs TUF.DE Comparison July 2025
3OY1.MU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3OY1.MU stands at 4B. In comparison, TUF.DE has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, 3OY1.MU is priced at €12.23, while TUF.DE trades at €0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3OY1.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUF.DE's P/E ratio is -8.33. In terms of profitability, 3OY1.MU's ROE is +0.38%, compared to TUF.DE's ROE of +1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, 3OY1.MU is less volatile compared to TUF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3OY1.MU.Check TUF.DE's competition here
3OY1.MU vs 1T2.DE Comparison July 2025
3OY1.MU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3OY1.MU stands at 4B. In comparison, 1T2.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 3OY1.MU is priced at €12.23, while 1T2.DE trades at €1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3OY1.MU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 1T2.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 3OY1.MU's ROE is +0.38%, compared to 1T2.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3OY1.MU is more volatile compared to 1T2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3OY1.MU.Check 1T2.DE's competition here