Cyber Com Co., Ltd.
Cyber Com Co., Ltd. (3852.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (3852.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3852.T | ¥1,904.00 | +0.11% | 15.3B | 18.30 | ¥104.04 | N/A |
| 4684.T | ¥5,259.00 | -0.94% | 2.3T | 35.81 | ¥146.86 | +0.72% |
| 4716.T | ¥15,635.00 | -0.51% | 2T | 32.94 | ¥474.59 | +1.22% |
| 3697.T | ¥1,563.00 | -0.38% | 411.5B | 50.83 | ¥30.75 | N/A |
| 3994.T | ¥6,477.00 | -0.90% | 358.4B | -59.70 | -¥108.50 | N/A |
| 9759.T | ¥3,300.00 | -0.36% | 252.3B | 21.47 | ¥153.68 | +2.64% |
| 4443.T | ¥1,930.00 | +0.42% | 243.9B | 590.21 | ¥3.27 | N/A |
| 215A.T | ¥2,385.00 | +0.55% | 238.8B | 60.94 | ¥39.14 | N/A |
| 4478.T | ¥3,260.00 | -1.66% | 193.9B | 140.46 | ¥23.21 | N/A |
| 4776.T | ¥3,985.00 | -2.45% | 184.3B | 34.84 | ¥114.38 | +0.75% |
Stock Comparison
3852.T vs 4684.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4684.T has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4684.T trades at ¥5,259.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4684.T's P/E ratio is 35.81. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4684.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4684.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4684.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4716.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4716.T has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4716.T trades at ¥15,635.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4716.T's P/E ratio is 32.94. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4716.T's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4716.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4716.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3697.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3697.T has a market cap of 411.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3697.T trades at ¥1,563.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3697.T's P/E ratio is 50.83. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3697.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3697.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3697.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3994.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3994.T has a market cap of 358.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3994.T trades at ¥6,477.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3994.T's P/E ratio is -59.70. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3994.T's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3994.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3994.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9759.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9759.T has a market cap of 252.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9759.T trades at ¥3,300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9759.T's P/E ratio is 21.47. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9759.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9759.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9759.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4443.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4443.T has a market cap of 243.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4443.T trades at ¥1,930.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4443.T's P/E ratio is 590.21. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4443.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4443.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4443.T's competition here
3852.T vs 215A.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 215A.T has a market cap of 238.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 215A.T trades at ¥2,385.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 215A.T's P/E ratio is 60.94. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 215A.T's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 215A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 215A.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4478.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4478.T has a market cap of 193.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4478.T trades at ¥3,260.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4478.T's P/E ratio is 140.46. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4478.T's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4478.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4478.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4776.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4776.T has a market cap of 184.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4776.T trades at ¥3,985.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4776.T's P/E ratio is 34.84. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4776.T's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4776.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4776.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4432.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4432.T has a market cap of 120.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4432.T trades at ¥3,485.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4432.T's P/E ratio is 21.46. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4432.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4432.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4432.T's competition here
3852.T vs 6947.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 6947.T has a market cap of 107.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 6947.T trades at ¥5,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 6947.T's P/E ratio is 21.08. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 6947.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 6947.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 6947.T's competition here
3852.T vs 2326.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 2326.T has a market cap of 106.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 2326.T trades at ¥7,820.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 2326.T's P/E ratio is 34.19. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2326.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 2326.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 2326.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4071.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4071.T has a market cap of 100.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4071.T trades at ¥2,471.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4071.T's P/E ratio is 30.23. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4071.T's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4071.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4071.T's competition here
3852.T vs 2492.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 2492.T has a market cap of 85.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 2492.T trades at ¥377.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 2492.T's P/E ratio is 67.08. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2492.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 2492.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 2492.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4828.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4828.T has a market cap of 74.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4828.T trades at ¥6,250.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4828.T's P/E ratio is 22.47. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4828.T's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4828.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4828.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9692.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9692.T has a market cap of 74B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9692.T trades at ¥2,341.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9692.T's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9692.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9692.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9692.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4746.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4746.T has a market cap of 73.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4746.T trades at ¥4,090.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4746.T's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4746.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4746.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4746.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9790.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9790.T has a market cap of 69.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9790.T trades at ¥3,360.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9790.T's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9790.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9790.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9790.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4481.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4481.T has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4481.T trades at ¥3,655.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4481.T's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4481.T's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4481.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4481.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3673.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3673.T has a market cap of 66.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3673.T trades at ¥742.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3673.T's P/E ratio is 87.71. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3673.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3673.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3673.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3687.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3687.T has a market cap of 61.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3687.T trades at ¥1,898.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3687.T's P/E ratio is 31.75. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3687.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3687.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3687.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3905.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3905.T has a market cap of 57.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3905.T trades at ¥2,613.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3905.T's P/E ratio is -69.83. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3905.T's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3905.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3905.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4375.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4375.T has a market cap of 56.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4375.T trades at ¥1,024.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4375.T's P/E ratio is -165.70. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4375.T's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4375.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4375.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3836.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3836.T has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3836.T trades at ¥1,523.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3836.T's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3836.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3836.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3836.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9928.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9928.T has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9928.T trades at ¥1,852.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9928.T's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9928.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9928.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9928.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3692.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3692.T has a market cap of 53.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3692.T trades at ¥6,760.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3692.T's P/E ratio is 77.82. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3692.T's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3692.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3692.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4719.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4719.T has a market cap of 52.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4719.T trades at ¥3,730.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4719.T's P/E ratio is 16.31. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4719.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4719.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4719.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4323.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4323.T has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4323.T trades at ¥2,103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4323.T's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4323.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4323.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4323.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3663.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3663.T has a market cap of 51.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3663.T trades at ¥1,680.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3663.T's P/E ratio is 38.86. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3663.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3663.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3663.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4165.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4165.T has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4165.T trades at ¥1,165.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4165.T's P/E ratio is 52.71. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4165.T's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4165.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4165.T's competition here
3852.T vs 5027.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 5027.T has a market cap of 47.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 5027.T trades at ¥788.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 5027.T's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5027.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 5027.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 5027.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3983.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3983.T has a market cap of 44B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3983.T trades at ¥2,796.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3983.T's P/E ratio is 24.49. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3983.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3983.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3983.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4477.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4477.T has a market cap of 43.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4477.T trades at ¥377.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4477.T's P/E ratio is 130.00. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4477.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4477.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4477.T's competition here
3852.T vs 5038.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 5038.T has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 5038.T trades at ¥2,813.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 5038.T's P/E ratio is 43.44. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5038.T's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 5038.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 5038.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4259.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4259.T has a market cap of 41.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4259.T trades at ¥493.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4259.T's P/E ratio is -15.78. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4259.T's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4259.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4259.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3763.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3763.T has a market cap of 39.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3763.T trades at ¥3,220.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3763.T's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3763.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3763.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3763.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9629.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9629.T has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9629.T trades at ¥1,967.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9629.T's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9629.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9629.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9629.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4058.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4058.T has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4058.T trades at ¥3,505.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4058.T's P/E ratio is 37.60. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4058.T's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4058.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4058.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3771.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3771.T has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3771.T trades at ¥2,079.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3771.T's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3771.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3771.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3771.T's competition here
3852.T vs 5254.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 5254.T has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 5254.T trades at ¥5,200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 5254.T's P/E ratio is 43.08. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5254.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 5254.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 5254.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3784.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3784.T has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3784.T trades at ¥2,017.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3784.T's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3784.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is more volatile compared to 3784.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3784.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4312.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4312.T has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4312.T trades at ¥1,095.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4312.T's P/E ratio is 36.37. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4312.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4312.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4312.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9717.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9717.T has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9717.T trades at ¥1,934.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9717.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9717.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is more volatile compared to 9717.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9717.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3853.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3853.T has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3853.T trades at ¥1,892.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3853.T's P/E ratio is 54.00. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3853.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3853.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3853.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4826.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4826.T has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4826.T trades at ¥496.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4826.T's P/E ratio is 31.14. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4826.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4826.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4826.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3921.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3921.T has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3921.T trades at ¥1,929.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3921.T's P/E ratio is 17.51. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3921.T's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3921.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3921.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9687.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9687.T has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9687.T trades at ¥4,285.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9687.T's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9687.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9687.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9687.T's competition here
3852.T vs 2334.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 2334.T has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 2334.T trades at ¥8,180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 2334.T's P/E ratio is -43.79. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2334.T's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 2334.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 2334.T's competition here
3852.T vs 5621.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 5621.T has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 5621.T trades at ¥2,610.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 5621.T's P/E ratio is 38.27. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5621.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 5621.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 5621.T's competition here
3852.T vs 2497.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 2497.T has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 2497.T trades at ¥650.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 2497.T's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2497.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 2497.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 2497.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4013.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4013.T has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4013.T trades at ¥1,198.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4013.T's P/E ratio is 31.28. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4013.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4013.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4013.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4344.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4344.T has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4344.T trades at ¥170.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4344.T's P/E ratio is -5.93. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4344.T's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4344.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4344.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3856.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3856.T has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3856.T trades at ¥1,213.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3856.T's P/E ratio is 3.41. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3856.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3856.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3856.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3835.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3835.T has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3835.T trades at ¥499.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3835.T's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3835.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3835.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3835.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3648.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3648.T has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3648.T trades at ¥1,299.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3648.T's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3648.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3648.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3648.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4333.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4333.T has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4333.T trades at ¥1,245.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4333.T's P/E ratio is 19.05. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4333.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4333.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4333.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9399.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9399.T has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9399.T trades at ¥1,149.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9399.T's P/E ratio is -109.53. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9399.T's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9399.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9399.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3777.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3777.T has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3777.T trades at ¥68.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3777.T's P/E ratio is -194.29. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3777.T's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3777.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3777.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4448.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4448.T has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4448.T trades at ¥463.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4448.T's P/E ratio is -15.67. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4448.T's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4448.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4448.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9702.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9702.T has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9702.T trades at ¥1,593.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9702.T's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9702.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9702.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9702.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4169.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4169.T has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4169.T trades at ¥421.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4169.T's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4169.T's ROE of -3.76%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4169.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4169.T's competition here
3852.T vs 6047.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 6047.T has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 6047.T trades at ¥739.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 6047.T's P/E ratio is 222.59. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 6047.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 6047.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 6047.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3712.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3712.T has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3712.T trades at ¥5,700.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3712.T's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3712.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3712.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3712.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4382.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4382.T has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4382.T trades at ¥1,120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4382.T's P/E ratio is -95.16. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4382.T's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4382.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4382.T's competition here
3852.T vs 2307.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 2307.T has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 2307.T trades at ¥1,204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 2307.T's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2307.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 2307.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 2307.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4192.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4192.T has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4192.T trades at ¥473.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4192.T's P/E ratio is -36.44. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4192.T's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4192.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4192.T's competition here
3852.T vs 5588.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 5588.T has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 5588.T trades at ¥1,505.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 5588.T's P/E ratio is 38.30. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5588.T's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 5588.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 5588.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9553.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9553.T has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9553.T trades at ¥604.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9553.T's P/E ratio is -827.40. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9553.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9553.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9553.T's competition here
3852.T vs 5586.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 5586.T has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 5586.T trades at ¥1,035.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 5586.T's P/E ratio is 72.94. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5586.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 5586.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 5586.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4011.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4011.T has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4011.T trades at ¥3,920.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4011.T's P/E ratio is 143.38. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4011.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4011.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4011.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3800.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3800.T has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3800.T trades at ¥1,925.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3800.T's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3800.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3800.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3800.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4168.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4168.T has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4168.T trades at ¥1,140.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4168.T's P/E ratio is 19.62. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4168.T's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4168.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4168.T's competition here
3852.T vs 153A.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 153A.T has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 153A.T trades at ¥2,265.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 153A.T's P/E ratio is 45.49. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 153A.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 153A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 153A.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9651.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9651.T has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9651.T trades at ¥1,480.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9651.T's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9651.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9651.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9651.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4299.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4299.T has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4299.T trades at ¥1,220.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4299.T's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4299.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4299.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4299.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9343.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9343.T has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9343.T trades at ¥3,825.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9343.T's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9343.T's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9343.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9343.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9691.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9691.T has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9691.T trades at ¥3,995.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9691.T's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9691.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9691.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9691.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3804.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3804.T has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3804.T trades at ¥2,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3804.T's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3804.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3804.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3804.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3937.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3937.T has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3937.T trades at ¥1,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3937.T's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3937.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3937.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3937.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4019.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4019.T has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4019.T trades at ¥1,433.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4019.T's P/E ratio is 54.97. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4019.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4019.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4019.T's competition here
3852.T vs 5244.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 5244.T has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 5244.T trades at ¥301.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 5244.T's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5244.T's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 5244.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 5244.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4015.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4015.T has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4015.T trades at ¥783.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4015.T's P/E ratio is 39.75. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4015.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4015.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4015.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4193.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4193.T has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4193.T trades at ¥2,305.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4193.T's P/E ratio is 37.49. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4193.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4193.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4193.T's competition here
3852.T vs 5248.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 5248.T has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 5248.T trades at ¥719.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 5248.T's P/E ratio is 45.74. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5248.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 5248.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 5248.T's competition here
3852.T vs 2169.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 2169.T has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 2169.T trades at ¥1,770.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 2169.T's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2169.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 2169.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 2169.T's competition here
3852.T vs 5572.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 5572.T has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 5572.T trades at ¥3,050.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 5572.T's P/E ratio is 64.50. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5572.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 5572.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 5572.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4054.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4054.T has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4054.T trades at ¥850.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4054.T's P/E ratio is 18.83. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4054.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4054.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4054.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4425.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4425.T has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4425.T trades at ¥1,047.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4425.T's P/E ratio is -14.37. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4425.T's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4425.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4425.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4389.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4389.T has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4389.T trades at ¥1,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4389.T's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4389.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4389.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4389.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4495.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4495.T has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4495.T trades at ¥2,373.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4495.T's P/E ratio is 23.53. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4495.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4495.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4495.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3969.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3969.T has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3969.T trades at ¥1,495.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3969.T's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3969.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3969.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3969.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4412.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4412.T has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4412.T trades at ¥1,353.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4412.T's P/E ratio is -3560.53. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4412.T's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4412.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4412.T's competition here
3852.T vs 5259.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 5259.T has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 5259.T trades at ¥1,735.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 5259.T's P/E ratio is 51.26. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5259.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 5259.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 5259.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9337.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9337.T has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9337.T trades at ¥3,070.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9337.T's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9337.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9337.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9337.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4284.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4284.T has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4284.T trades at ¥493.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4284.T's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4284.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4284.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4284.T's competition here
3852.T vs 2321.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 2321.T has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 2321.T trades at ¥185.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 2321.T's P/E ratio is -70.88. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2321.T's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 2321.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 2321.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4397.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4397.T has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4397.T trades at ¥566.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4397.T's P/E ratio is -1415.00. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4397.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4397.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4397.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9698.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9698.T has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9698.T trades at ¥1,179.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9698.T's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9698.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9698.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9698.T's competition here
3852.T vs 5591.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 5591.T has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 5591.T trades at ¥1,450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 5591.T's P/E ratio is 50.51. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5591.T's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 5591.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 5591.T's competition here