Cyber Com Co., Ltd.
Cyber Com Co., Ltd. (3852.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (3852.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3852.T | ¥1,904.00 | +0.11% | 15.3B | 18.30 | ¥104.04 | N/A |
| 4684.T | ¥5,465.00 | +0.74% | 2.4T | 37.23 | ¥147.02 | +0.69% |
| 4716.T | ¥16,705.00 | +1.15% | 2.1T | 34.95 | ¥474.25 | +1.15% |
| 3697.T | ¥1,641.00 | +1.80% | 432.2B | 53.28 | ¥30.81 | N/A |
| 3994.T | ¥6,228.00 | -0.89% | 345.2B | -57.72 | -¥108.08 | N/A |
| 9759.T | ¥3,537.00 | +1.90% | 269.6B | 22.96 | ¥153.55 | +2.47% |
| 4478.T | ¥3,925.00 | -7.76% | 251.8B | -24.38 | -¥174.51 | N/A |
| 4443.T | ¥1,893.00 | -1.76% | 246B | 593.60 | ¥3.28 | N/A |
| 215A.T | ¥2,015.00 | +0.90% | 204.5B | 52.29 | ¥39.11 | N/A |
| 4776.T | ¥4,025.00 | -0.74% | 187.4B | 43.86 | ¥92.45 | +0.74% |
Stock Comparison
3852.T vs 4684.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4684.T has a market cap of 2.4T. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4684.T trades at ¥5,465.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4684.T's P/E ratio is 37.23. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4684.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4684.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4684.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4716.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4716.T has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4716.T trades at ¥16,705.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4716.T's P/E ratio is 34.95. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4716.T's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4716.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4716.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3697.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3697.T has a market cap of 432.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3697.T trades at ¥1,641.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3697.T's P/E ratio is 53.28. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3697.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3697.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3697.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3994.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3994.T has a market cap of 345.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3994.T trades at ¥6,228.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3994.T's P/E ratio is -57.72. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3994.T's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3994.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3994.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9759.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9759.T has a market cap of 269.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9759.T trades at ¥3,537.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9759.T's P/E ratio is 22.96. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9759.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9759.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9759.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4478.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4478.T has a market cap of 251.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4478.T trades at ¥3,925.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4478.T's P/E ratio is -24.38. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4478.T's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4478.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4478.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4443.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4443.T has a market cap of 246B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4443.T trades at ¥1,893.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4443.T's P/E ratio is 593.60. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4443.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4443.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4443.T's competition here
3852.T vs 215A.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 215A.T has a market cap of 204.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 215A.T trades at ¥2,015.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 215A.T's P/E ratio is 52.29. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 215A.T's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 215A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 215A.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4776.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4776.T has a market cap of 187.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4776.T trades at ¥4,025.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4776.T's P/E ratio is 43.86. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4776.T's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4776.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4776.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4432.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4432.T has a market cap of 129B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4432.T trades at ¥3,700.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4432.T's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4432.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4432.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4432.T's competition here
3852.T vs 6947.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 6947.T has a market cap of 125.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 6947.T trades at ¥5,740.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 6947.T's P/E ratio is 24.49. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 6947.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 6947.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 6947.T's competition here
3852.T vs 2326.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 2326.T has a market cap of 99.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 2326.T trades at ¥7,410.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 2326.T's P/E ratio is 32.09. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2326.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 2326.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 2326.T's competition here
3852.T vs 2492.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 2492.T has a market cap of 99.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 2492.T trades at ¥430.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 2492.T's P/E ratio is 78.11. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2492.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 2492.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 2492.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4071.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4071.T has a market cap of 95.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4071.T trades at ¥2,320.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4071.T's P/E ratio is 28.64. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4071.T's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4071.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4071.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4746.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4746.T has a market cap of 74.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4746.T trades at ¥4,320.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4746.T's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4746.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4746.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4746.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9692.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9692.T has a market cap of 73.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9692.T trades at ¥2,355.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9692.T's P/E ratio is 18.95. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9692.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9692.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9692.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3673.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3673.T has a market cap of 70.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3673.T trades at ¥776.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3673.T's P/E ratio is 209.95. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3673.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3673.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3673.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3905.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3905.T has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3905.T trades at ¥2,930.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3905.T's P/E ratio is -85.21. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3905.T's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3905.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3905.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4481.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4481.T has a market cap of 68.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4481.T trades at ¥3,620.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4481.T's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4481.T's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4481.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4481.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3687.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3687.T has a market cap of 66.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3687.T trades at ¥2,026.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3687.T's P/E ratio is 34.38. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3687.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3687.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3687.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9790.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9790.T has a market cap of 64.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9790.T trades at ¥3,165.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9790.T's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9790.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9790.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9790.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4375.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4375.T has a market cap of 63.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4375.T trades at ¥1,137.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4375.T's P/E ratio is -40.64. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4375.T's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4375.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4375.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4828.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4828.T has a market cap of 60.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4828.T trades at ¥5,160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4828.T's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4828.T's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4828.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4828.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3836.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3836.T has a market cap of 56.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3836.T trades at ¥1,535.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3836.T's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3836.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3836.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3836.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9928.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9928.T has a market cap of 55.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9928.T trades at ¥1,875.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9928.T's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9928.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9928.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9928.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3983.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3983.T has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3983.T trades at ¥3,255.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3983.T's P/E ratio is 25.26. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3983.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3983.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3983.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4719.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4719.T has a market cap of 50.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4719.T trades at ¥3,755.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4719.T's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4719.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4719.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4719.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4165.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4165.T has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4165.T trades at ¥1,204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4165.T's P/E ratio is 55.28. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4165.T's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4165.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4165.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3663.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3663.T has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3663.T trades at ¥1,597.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3663.T's P/E ratio is 36.09. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3663.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3663.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3663.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3692.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3692.T has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3692.T trades at ¥6,020.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3692.T's P/E ratio is 70.51. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3692.T's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3692.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3692.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4477.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4477.T has a market cap of 46.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4477.T trades at ¥392.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4477.T's P/E ratio is 138.70. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4477.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4477.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4477.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4323.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4323.T has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4323.T trades at ¥1,898.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4323.T's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4323.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4323.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4323.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3763.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3763.T has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3763.T trades at ¥3,155.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3763.T's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3763.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3763.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3763.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9629.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9629.T has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9629.T trades at ¥1,920.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9629.T's P/E ratio is 21.90. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9629.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9629.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9629.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4259.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4259.T has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4259.T trades at ¥445.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4259.T's P/E ratio is -14.36. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4259.T's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4259.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4259.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4058.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4058.T has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4058.T trades at ¥3,380.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4058.T's P/E ratio is 43.61. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4058.T's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4058.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4058.T's competition here
3852.T vs 5038.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 5038.T has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 5038.T trades at ¥2,371.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 5038.T's P/E ratio is 45.14. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5038.T's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 5038.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 5038.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3771.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3771.T has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3771.T trades at ¥2,147.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3771.T's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3771.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3771.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3771.T's competition here
3852.T vs 5027.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 5027.T has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 5027.T trades at ¥581.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 5027.T's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5027.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 5027.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 5027.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3784.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3784.T has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3784.T trades at ¥2,017.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3784.T's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3784.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is more volatile compared to 3784.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3784.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4312.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4312.T has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4312.T trades at ¥1,095.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4312.T's P/E ratio is 36.37. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4312.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4312.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4312.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9717.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9717.T has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9717.T trades at ¥1,934.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9717.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9717.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is more volatile compared to 9717.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9717.T's competition here
3852.T vs 5254.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 5254.T has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 5254.T trades at ¥4,975.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 5254.T's P/E ratio is 40.95. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5254.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 5254.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 5254.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4826.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4826.T has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4826.T trades at ¥488.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4826.T's P/E ratio is 30.75. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4826.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4826.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4826.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4344.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4344.T has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4344.T trades at ¥192.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4344.T's P/E ratio is -6.81. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4344.T's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4344.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4344.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9687.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9687.T has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9687.T trades at ¥4,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9687.T's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9687.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9687.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9687.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3921.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3921.T has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3921.T trades at ¥1,806.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3921.T's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3921.T's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3921.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3921.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9399.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9399.T has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9399.T trades at ¥1,266.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9399.T's P/E ratio is -14.40. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9399.T's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9399.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9399.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3648.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3648.T has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3648.T trades at ¥1,343.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3648.T's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3648.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3648.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3648.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4448.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4448.T has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4448.T trades at ¥541.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4448.T's P/E ratio is -18.73. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4448.T's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4448.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4448.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3835.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3835.T has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3835.T trades at ¥496.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3835.T's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3835.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3835.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3835.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4333.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4333.T has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4333.T trades at ¥1,275.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4333.T's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4333.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4333.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4333.T's competition here
3852.T vs 5621.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 5621.T has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 5621.T trades at ¥2,306.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 5621.T's P/E ratio is 33.09. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5621.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 5621.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 5621.T's competition here
3852.T vs 2497.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 2497.T has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 2497.T trades at ¥571.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 2497.T's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2497.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 2497.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 2497.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3777.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3777.T has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3777.T trades at ¥69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3777.T's P/E ratio is -127.78. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3777.T's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3777.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3777.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4013.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4013.T has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4013.T trades at ¥1,005.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4013.T's P/E ratio is 42.40. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4013.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4013.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4013.T's competition here
3852.T vs 5586.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 5586.T has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 5586.T trades at ¥1,195.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 5586.T's P/E ratio is 82.72. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5586.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 5586.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 5586.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4192.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4192.T has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4192.T trades at ¥509.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4192.T's P/E ratio is -23.41. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4192.T's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4192.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4192.T's competition here
3852.T vs 5588.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 5588.T has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 5588.T trades at ¥1,610.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 5588.T's P/E ratio is 39.82. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5588.T's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 5588.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 5588.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9702.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9702.T has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9702.T trades at ¥1,505.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9702.T's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9702.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9702.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9702.T's competition here
3852.T vs 6047.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 6047.T has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 6047.T trades at ¥679.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 6047.T's P/E ratio is 208.23. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 6047.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 6047.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 6047.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3712.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3712.T has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3712.T trades at ¥5,440.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3712.T's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3712.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3712.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3712.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4382.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4382.T has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4382.T trades at ¥1,044.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4382.T's P/E ratio is -88.73. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4382.T's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4382.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4382.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3856.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3856.T has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3856.T trades at ¥878.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3856.T's P/E ratio is 2.25. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3856.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3856.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3856.T's competition here
3852.T vs 2307.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 2307.T has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 2307.T trades at ¥1,090.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 2307.T's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2307.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 2307.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 2307.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9553.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9553.T has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9553.T trades at ¥529.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9553.T's P/E ratio is -771.01. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9553.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9553.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9553.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3800.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3800.T has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3800.T trades at ¥1,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3800.T's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3800.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3800.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3800.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4011.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4011.T has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4011.T trades at ¥3,730.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4011.T's P/E ratio is 56.96. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4011.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4011.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4011.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3804.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3804.T has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3804.T trades at ¥2,208.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3804.T's P/E ratio is 21.82. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3804.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3804.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3804.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9651.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9651.T has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9651.T trades at ¥1,441.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9651.T's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9651.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9651.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9651.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4299.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4299.T has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4299.T trades at ¥1,200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4299.T's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4299.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4299.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4299.T's competition here
3852.T vs 5248.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 5248.T has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 5248.T trades at ¥781.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 5248.T's P/E ratio is 49.27. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5248.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 5248.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 5248.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4425.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4425.T has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4425.T trades at ¥1,111.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4425.T's P/E ratio is -15.53. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4425.T's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4425.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4425.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3937.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3937.T has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3937.T trades at ¥1,059.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3937.T's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3937.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3937.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3937.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4169.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4169.T has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4169.T trades at ¥297.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4169.T's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4169.T's ROE of -3.76%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4169.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4169.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9691.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9691.T has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9691.T trades at ¥3,540.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9691.T's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9691.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9691.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9691.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4389.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4389.T has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4389.T trades at ¥1,050.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4389.T's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4389.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4389.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4389.T's competition here
3852.T vs 2334.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 2334.T has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 2334.T trades at ¥3,945.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 2334.T's P/E ratio is -19.32. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2334.T's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 2334.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 2334.T's competition here
3852.T vs 2169.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 2169.T has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 2169.T trades at ¥1,780.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 2169.T's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 2169.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 2169.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 2169.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4015.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4015.T has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4015.T trades at ¥764.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4015.T's P/E ratio is 38.98. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4015.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4015.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4015.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4168.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4168.T has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4168.T trades at ¥947.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4168.T's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4168.T's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4168.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4168.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9343.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9343.T has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9343.T trades at ¥3,300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9343.T's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9343.T's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9343.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9343.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4193.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4193.T has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4193.T trades at ¥2,176.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4193.T's P/E ratio is 35.80. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4193.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4193.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4193.T's competition here
3852.T vs 153A.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 153A.T has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 153A.T trades at ¥1,841.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 153A.T's P/E ratio is 41.13. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 153A.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 153A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 153A.T's competition here
3852.T vs 5244.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 5244.T has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 5244.T trades at ¥277.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 5244.T's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5244.T's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 5244.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 5244.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3853.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3853.T has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3853.T trades at ¥652.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3853.T's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3853.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3853.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3853.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3969.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3969.T has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3969.T trades at ¥1,493.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3969.T's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3969.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3969.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3969.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4054.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4054.T has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4054.T trades at ¥782.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4054.T's P/E ratio is 16.93. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4054.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4054.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4054.T's competition here
3852.T vs 5591.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 5591.T has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 5591.T trades at ¥1,670.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 5591.T's P/E ratio is 90.27. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5591.T's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 5591.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 5591.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4019.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4019.T has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4019.T trades at ¥1,180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4019.T's P/E ratio is 74.78. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4019.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4019.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4019.T's competition here
3852.T vs 5572.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 5572.T has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 5572.T trades at ¥2,662.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 5572.T's P/E ratio is 55.54. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5572.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 5572.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 5572.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4284.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4284.T has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4284.T trades at ¥417.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4284.T's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4284.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4284.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4284.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4412.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4412.T has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4412.T trades at ¥1,207.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4412.T's P/E ratio is -3207.89. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4412.T's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4412.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4412.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4495.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4495.T has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4495.T trades at ¥1,921.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4495.T's P/E ratio is 18.84. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4495.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4495.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4495.T's competition here
3852.T vs 5259.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 5259.T has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 5259.T trades at ¥1,498.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 5259.T's P/E ratio is 43.61. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 5259.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 5259.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 5259.T's competition here
3852.T vs 9698.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 9698.T has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 9698.T trades at ¥1,137.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 9698.T's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 9698.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 9698.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 9698.T's competition here
3852.T vs 4397.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 4397.T has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 4397.T trades at ¥525.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 4397.T's P/E ratio is -1270.73. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 4397.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 4397.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 4397.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3823.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3823.T has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3823.T trades at ¥76.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3823.T's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3823.T's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3823.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3823.T's competition here
3852.T vs 3936.T Comparison August 2025
3852.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3852.T stands at 15.3B. In comparison, 3936.T has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3852.T is priced at ¥1,904.00, while 3936.T trades at ¥220.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3852.T currently has a P/E ratio of 18.30, whereas 3936.T's P/E ratio is -25.03. In terms of profitability, 3852.T's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 3936.T's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 3852.T is less volatile compared to 3936.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3852.T.Check 3936.T's competition here