Ming Fai International Holdings Limited (3828.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (3828.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Household & Personal Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3828.HK | HK$0.76 | -1.30% | 550.1M | 3.84 | HK$0.20 | +9.21% |
| 0973.HK | HK$33.80 | +0.30% | 49.9B | 61.45 | HK$0.55 | N/A |
| 6090.HK | HK$44.12 | +12.15% | 36.7B | 37.28 | HK$1.17 | N/A |
| 2367.HK | HK$28.56 | -1.86% | 30.7B | 14.56 | HK$1.99 | +4.80% |
| 3331.HK | HK$23.45 | +0.00% | 28.2B | 111.45 | HK$0.21 | N/A |
| 1044.HK | HK$23.58 | -1.91% | 27.7B | 9.81 | HK$2.45 | +6.48% |
| 1318.HK | HK$53.80 | -2.18% | 26.4B | 44.50 | HK$1.21 | N/A |
| 6993.HK | HK$3.14 | -0.63% | 18.3B | -23.24 | -HK$0.14 | +5.70% |
| 2698.HK | HK$29.08 | +0.97% | 18.2B | 18.78 | HK$1.56 | +2.38% |
| 2145.HK | HK$27.76 | -2.12% | 11.3B | 10.01 | HK$2.83 | +4.96% |
Stock Comparison
3828.HK vs 0973.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 0973.HK has a market cap of 49.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 0973.HK trades at HK$33.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 0973.HK's P/E ratio is 61.45. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0973.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is more volatile compared to 0973.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 0973.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 6090.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 6090.HK has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 6090.HK trades at HK$44.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 6090.HK's P/E ratio is 37.28. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 6090.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 6090.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 6090.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 2367.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 2367.HK has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 2367.HK trades at HK$28.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 2367.HK's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2367.HK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 2367.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 2367.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 3331.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 3331.HK has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 3331.HK trades at HK$23.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 3331.HK's P/E ratio is 111.45. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3331.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is more volatile compared to 3331.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 3331.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 1044.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 1044.HK has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 1044.HK trades at HK$23.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 1044.HK's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1044.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 1044.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 1044.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 1318.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 1318.HK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 1318.HK trades at HK$53.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 1318.HK's P/E ratio is 44.50. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1318.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 1318.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 1318.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 6993.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 6993.HK has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 6993.HK trades at HK$3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 6993.HK's P/E ratio is -23.24. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 6993.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is more volatile compared to 6993.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 6993.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 2698.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 2698.HK has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 2698.HK trades at HK$29.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 2698.HK's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2698.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 2698.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 2698.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 2145.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 2145.HK has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 2145.HK trades at HK$27.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 2145.HK's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2145.HK's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 2145.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 2145.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 2657.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 2657.HK has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 2657.HK trades at HK$53.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 2657.HK's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2657.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 2657.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 2657.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 6601.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 6601.HK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 6601.HK trades at HK$2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 6601.HK's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 6601.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is more volatile compared to 6601.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 6601.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 6883.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 6883.HK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 6883.HK trades at HK$2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 6883.HK's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 6883.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is more volatile compared to 6883.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 6883.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 0273.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 0273.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 0273.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 0273.HK's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0273.HK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 0273.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 0273.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 2569.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 2569.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 2569.HK trades at HK$1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 2569.HK's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2569.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 2569.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 2569.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 9886.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 9886.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 9886.HK trades at HK$0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 9886.HK's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 9886.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 9886.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 9886.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 0157.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 0157.HK has a market cap of 931M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 0157.HK trades at HK$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 0157.HK's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0157.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 0157.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 0157.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 0464.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 0464.HK has a market cap of 549.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 0464.HK trades at HK$0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 0464.HK's P/E ratio is -15.73. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0464.HK's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is more volatile compared to 0464.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 0464.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 2023.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 2023.HK has a market cap of 368.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 2023.HK trades at HK$0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 2023.HK's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2023.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 2023.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 2023.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 2177.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 2177.HK has a market cap of 361.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 2177.HK trades at HK$2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 2177.HK's P/E ratio is 85.93. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2177.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is more volatile compared to 2177.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 2177.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 1667.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 1667.HK has a market cap of 360M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 1667.HK trades at HK$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 1667.HK's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1667.HK's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is more volatile compared to 1667.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 1667.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 8512.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 8512.HK has a market cap of 344.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 8512.HK trades at HK$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 8512.HK's P/E ratio is 2.14. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8512.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 8512.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 8512.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 1455.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 1455.HK has a market cap of 306.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 1455.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 1455.HK's P/E ratio is 7.07. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1455.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 1455.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 1455.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 2031.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 2031.HK has a market cap of 293.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 2031.HK trades at HK$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 2031.HK's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2031.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 2031.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 2031.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 1962.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 1962.HK has a market cap of 285.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 1962.HK trades at HK$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 1962.HK's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1962.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 1962.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 1962.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 8281.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 8281.HK has a market cap of 265M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 8281.HK trades at HK$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 8281.HK's P/E ratio is 81.04. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8281.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is more volatile compared to 8281.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 8281.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 0943.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 0943.HK has a market cap of 249.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 0943.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 0943.HK's P/E ratio is 22.48. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0943.HK's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is more volatile compared to 0943.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 0943.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 6893.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 6893.HK has a market cap of 192.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 6893.HK trades at HK$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 6893.HK's P/E ratio is -4.26. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 6893.HK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 6893.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 6893.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 0399.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 0399.HK has a market cap of 164.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 0399.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 0399.HK's P/E ratio is -11.20. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0399.HK's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 0399.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 0399.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 1323.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 1323.HK has a market cap of 157M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 1323.HK trades at HK$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 1323.HK's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1323.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 1323.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 1323.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 2593.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 2593.HK has a market cap of 126.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 2593.HK trades at HK$0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 2593.HK's P/E ratio is -5.38. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 2593.HK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is more volatile compared to 2593.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 2593.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 8436.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 8436.HK has a market cap of 114M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 8436.HK trades at HK$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 8436.HK's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8436.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 8436.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 8436.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 1338.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 1338.HK has a market cap of 104.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 1338.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 1338.HK's P/E ratio is 39.29. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1338.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 1338.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 1338.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 3332.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 3332.HK has a market cap of 95.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 3332.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 3332.HK's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 3332.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 3332.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 3332.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 1259.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 1259.HK has a market cap of 66.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 1259.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 1259.HK's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1259.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 1259.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 1259.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 1173.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 1173.HK has a market cap of 65.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 1173.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 1173.HK's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 1173.HK's ROE of -3.55%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is more volatile compared to 1173.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 1173.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 8451.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 8451.HK has a market cap of 58.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 8451.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 8451.HK's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8451.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is more volatile compared to 8451.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 8451.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 8200.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 8200.HK has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 8200.HK trades at HK$0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 8200.HK's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8200.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 8200.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 8200.HK's competition here
3828.HK vs 8176.HK Comparison July 2026
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 550.1M. In comparison, 8176.HK has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.76, while 8176.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas 8176.HK's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 8176.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is more volatile compared to 8176.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.Check 8176.HK's competition here