Ming Fai International Holdings Limited
Ming Fai International Holdings Limited 3828.HK Peers
See (3828.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Household & Personal Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3828.HK | HK$0.80 | N/A | 579.1M | 4.00 | HK$0.20 | +12.20% |
| 2367.HK | HK$60.00 | -0.99% | 63.5B | 27.03 | HK$2.22 | +0.80% |
| 0973.HK | HK$33.80 | +0.30% | 49.9B | 61.45 | HK$0.55 | N/A |
| 3331.HK | HK$23.45 | N/A | 28.2B | 111.67 | HK$0.21 | N/A |
| 2145.HK | HK$64.95 | -1.07% | 25.9B | 30.49 | HK$2.13 | +2.31% |
| 1044.HK | HK$21.85 | -0.23% | 25.4B | 9.93 | HK$2.20 | +6.32% |
| 6993.HK | HK$4.23 | N/A | 24.5B | -30.21 | -HK$0.14 | +2.39% |
| 6601.HK | HK$3.03 | +0.33% | 4B | 17.82 | HK$0.17 | +4.37% |
| 0273.HK | HK$0.03 | +3.03% | 1.5B | -1.70 | -HK$0.02 | N/A |
| 0157.HK | HK$0.53 | N/A | 1.1B | -10.60 | -HK$0.05 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
3828.HK vs 2367.HK Comparison
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 579.1M. In comparison, 2367.HK has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.80, while 2367.HK trades at HK$60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 2367.HK's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2367.HK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 2367.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.
3828.HK vs 0973.HK Comparison
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 579.1M. In comparison, 0973.HK has a market cap of 49.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.80, while 0973.HK trades at HK$33.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 0973.HK's P/E ratio is 61.45. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0973.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK and 0973.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
3828.HK vs 3331.HK Comparison
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 579.1M. In comparison, 3331.HK has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.80, while 3331.HK trades at HK$23.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 3331.HK's P/E ratio is 111.67. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3331.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 3331.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.
3828.HK vs 2145.HK Comparison
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 579.1M. In comparison, 2145.HK has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.80, while 2145.HK trades at HK$64.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 2145.HK's P/E ratio is 30.49. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2145.HK's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 2145.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.
3828.HK vs 1044.HK Comparison
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 579.1M. In comparison, 1044.HK has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.80, while 1044.HK trades at HK$21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 1044.HK's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1044.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 1044.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.
3828.HK vs 6993.HK Comparison
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 579.1M. In comparison, 6993.HK has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.80, while 6993.HK trades at HK$4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 6993.HK's P/E ratio is -30.21. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6993.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 6993.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.
3828.HK vs 6601.HK Comparison
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 579.1M. In comparison, 6601.HK has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.80, while 6601.HK trades at HK$3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 6601.HK's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6601.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 6601.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.
3828.HK vs 0273.HK Comparison
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 579.1M. In comparison, 0273.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.80, while 0273.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 0273.HK's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0273.HK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 0273.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.
3828.HK vs 0157.HK Comparison
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 579.1M. In comparison, 0157.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.80, while 0157.HK trades at HK$0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 0157.HK's P/E ratio is -10.60. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0157.HK's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK and 0157.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
3828.HK vs 2138.HK Comparison
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 579.1M. In comparison, 2138.HK has a market cap of 746.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.80, while 2138.HK trades at HK$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 2138.HK's P/E ratio is -63.00. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2138.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 2138.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.
3828.HK vs 2177.HK Comparison
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 579.1M. In comparison, 2177.HK has a market cap of 582.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.80, while 2177.HK trades at HK$3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 2177.HK's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2177.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 2177.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.
3828.HK vs 1925.HK Comparison
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 579.1M. In comparison, 1925.HK has a market cap of 473.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.80, while 1925.HK trades at HK$1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 1925.HK's P/E ratio is 3.66. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1925.HK's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 1925.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.
3828.HK vs 2023.HK Comparison
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 579.1M. In comparison, 2023.HK has a market cap of 427.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.80, while 2023.HK trades at HK$0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 2023.HK's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2023.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 2023.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.
3828.HK vs 3332.HK Comparison
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 579.1M. In comparison, 3332.HK has a market cap of 421.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.80, while 3332.HK trades at HK$0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 3332.HK's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 3332.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 3332.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.
3828.HK vs 0399.HK Comparison
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 579.1M. In comparison, 0399.HK has a market cap of 390M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.80, while 0399.HK trades at HK$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 0399.HK's P/E ratio is -21.40. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0399.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 0399.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.
3828.HK vs 1962.HK Comparison
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 579.1M. In comparison, 1962.HK has a market cap of 355.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.80, while 1962.HK trades at HK$0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 1962.HK's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1962.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK and 1962.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
3828.HK vs 8512.HK Comparison
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 579.1M. In comparison, 8512.HK has a market cap of 266.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.80, while 8512.HK trades at HK$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 8512.HK's P/E ratio is 1.61. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8512.HK's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 8512.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.
3828.HK vs 0464.HK Comparison
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 579.1M. In comparison, 0464.HK has a market cap of 239.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.80, while 0464.HK trades at HK$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 0464.HK's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0464.HK's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 0464.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.
3828.HK vs 2593.HK Comparison
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 579.1M. In comparison, 2593.HK has a market cap of 237.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.80, while 2593.HK trades at HK$1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 2593.HK's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 2593.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 2593.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.
3828.HK vs 1455.HK Comparison
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 579.1M. In comparison, 1455.HK has a market cap of 226.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.80, while 1455.HK trades at HK$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 1455.HK's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1455.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 1455.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.
3828.HK vs 6893.HK Comparison
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 579.1M. In comparison, 6893.HK has a market cap of 195.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.80, while 6893.HK trades at HK$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 6893.HK's P/E ratio is -4.47. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 6893.HK's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK and 6893.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
3828.HK vs 1338.HK Comparison
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 579.1M. In comparison, 1338.HK has a market cap of 155M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.80, while 1338.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 1338.HK's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1338.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 1338.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.
3828.HK vs 0943.HK Comparison
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 579.1M. In comparison, 0943.HK has a market cap of 128.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.80, while 0943.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 0943.HK's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0943.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK and 0943.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
3828.HK vs 1667.HK Comparison
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 579.1M. In comparison, 1667.HK has a market cap of 126.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.80, while 1667.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 1667.HK's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1667.HK's ROE of -6.56%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK and 1667.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
3828.HK vs 1323.HK Comparison
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 579.1M. In comparison, 1323.HK has a market cap of 126.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.80, while 1323.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 1323.HK's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1323.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 1323.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.
3828.HK vs 8436.HK Comparison
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 579.1M. In comparison, 8436.HK has a market cap of 92M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.80, while 8436.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 8436.HK's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8436.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK and 8436.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
3828.HK vs 8281.HK Comparison
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 579.1M. In comparison, 8281.HK has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.80, while 8281.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 8281.HK's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8281.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK and 8281.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
3828.HK vs 8176.HK Comparison
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 579.1M. In comparison, 8176.HK has a market cap of 60.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.80, while 8176.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 8176.HK's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8176.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK and 8176.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
3828.HK vs 1173.HK Comparison
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 579.1M. In comparison, 1173.HK has a market cap of 55.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.80, while 1173.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 1173.HK's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1173.HK's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK and 1173.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
3828.HK vs 8451.HK Comparison
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 579.1M. In comparison, 8451.HK has a market cap of 52M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.80, while 8451.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 8451.HK's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8451.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK and 8451.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
3828.HK vs 1259.HK Comparison
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 579.1M. In comparison, 1259.HK has a market cap of 48.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.80, while 1259.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 1259.HK's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 1259.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK is less volatile compared to 1259.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3828.HK.
3828.HK vs 8200.HK Comparison
3828.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3828.HK stands at 579.1M. In comparison, 8200.HK has a market cap of 37.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 3828.HK is priced at HK$0.80, while 8200.HK trades at HK$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3828.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 8200.HK's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, 3828.HK's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 8200.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3828.HK and 8200.HK have similar daily volatility (0.00).