SHIFT Inc.
SHIFT Inc. 3697.T Peers
See (3697.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3697.T | ¥1,740.50 | -0.40% | 458.1B | 69.34 | ¥25.10 | N/A |
| 4684.T | ¥5,189.00 | +0.52% | 2.3T | 35.27 | ¥147.12 | +0.73% |
| 4716.T | ¥17,055.00 | +0.32% | 2.2T | 36.22 | ¥470.90 | +1.10% |
| 9759.T | ¥3,451.00 | -0.49% | 263.9B | 22.46 | ¥153.63 | +2.52% |
| 4443.T | ¥2,050.00 | -1.96% | 258.9B | 124.85 | ¥16.42 | N/A |
| 3994.T | ¥4,650.00 | -3.00% | 257.3B | -41.41 | -¥112.29 | N/A |
| 4478.T | ¥3,855.00 | -7.00% | 228.1B | -22.10 | -¥174.47 | N/A |
| 215A.T | ¥1,727.00 | -3.95% | 171.7B | 67.30 | ¥25.66 | N/A |
| 4776.T | ¥3,150.00 | -2.63% | 145.6B | 34.05 | ¥92.52 | +0.95% |
| 4432.T | ¥3,860.00 | -0.52% | 133.4B | 22.61 | ¥170.72 | +2.18% |
Stock Comparison
3697.T vs 4684.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4684.T has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4684.T trades at ¥5,189.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4684.T's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4684.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is more volatile compared to 4684.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4716.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4716.T has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4716.T trades at ¥17,055.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4716.T's P/E ratio is 36.22. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4716.T's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is more volatile compared to 4716.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 9759.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 9759.T has a market cap of 263.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 9759.T trades at ¥3,451.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 9759.T's P/E ratio is 22.46. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 9759.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is more volatile compared to 9759.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4443.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4443.T has a market cap of 258.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4443.T trades at ¥2,050.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4443.T's P/E ratio is 124.85. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4443.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 4443.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 3994.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 3994.T has a market cap of 257.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 3994.T trades at ¥4,650.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 3994.T's P/E ratio is -41.41. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 3994.T's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 3994.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4478.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4478.T has a market cap of 228.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4478.T trades at ¥3,855.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4478.T's P/E ratio is -22.10. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4478.T's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 4478.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 215A.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 215A.T has a market cap of 171.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 215A.T trades at ¥1,727.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 215A.T's P/E ratio is 67.30. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 215A.T's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 215A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4776.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4776.T has a market cap of 145.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4776.T trades at ¥3,150.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4776.T's P/E ratio is 34.05. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4776.T's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 4776.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4432.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4432.T has a market cap of 133.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4432.T trades at ¥3,860.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4432.T's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4432.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 4432.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 6947.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 6947.T has a market cap of 113.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 6947.T trades at ¥5,220.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 6947.T's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 6947.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 6947.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 2326.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 2326.T has a market cap of 98.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 2326.T trades at ¥7,250.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 2326.T's P/E ratio is 31.72. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 2326.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 2326.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 2492.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 2492.T has a market cap of 92.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 2492.T trades at ¥408.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 2492.T's P/E ratio is 121.79. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 2492.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 2492.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4071.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4071.T has a market cap of 86.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4071.T trades at ¥2,119.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4071.T's P/E ratio is 25.90. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4071.T's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 4071.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 9692.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 9692.T has a market cap of 73.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 9692.T trades at ¥2,302.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 9692.T's P/E ratio is 18.81. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 9692.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 9692.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4746.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4746.T has a market cap of 67.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4746.T trades at ¥3,780.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4746.T's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4746.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is more volatile compared to 4746.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 3687.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 3687.T has a market cap of 65.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 3687.T trades at ¥2,020.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 3687.T's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 3687.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 3687.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 3673.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 3673.T has a market cap of 64B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 3673.T trades at ¥713.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 3673.T's P/E ratio is 191.67. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 3673.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 3673.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4481.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4481.T has a market cap of 63.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4481.T trades at ¥3,420.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4481.T's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4481.T's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 4481.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 9790.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 9790.T has a market cap of 62.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 9790.T trades at ¥3,005.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 9790.T's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 9790.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 9790.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4828.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4828.T has a market cap of 56.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4828.T trades at ¥4,740.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4828.T's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4828.T's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 4828.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 3836.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 3836.T has a market cap of 55.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 3836.T trades at ¥1,510.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 3836.T's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 3836.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is more volatile compared to 3836.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 9928.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 9928.T has a market cap of 53.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 9928.T trades at ¥1,788.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 9928.T's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 9928.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is more volatile compared to 9928.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4375.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4375.T has a market cap of 50.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4375.T trades at ¥916.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4375.T's P/E ratio is -32.66. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4375.T's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 4375.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4719.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4719.T has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4719.T trades at ¥3,450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4719.T's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4719.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 4719.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4165.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4165.T has a market cap of 48B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4165.T trades at ¥1,177.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4165.T's P/E ratio is 54.95. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4165.T's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 4165.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4323.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4323.T has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4323.T trades at ¥1,878.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4323.T's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4323.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 4323.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 3663.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 3663.T has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 3663.T trades at ¥1,511.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 3663.T's P/E ratio is 34.02. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 3663.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 3663.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4477.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4477.T has a market cap of 43.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4477.T trades at ¥383.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4477.T's P/E ratio is 131.16. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4477.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 4477.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 3692.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 3692.T has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 3692.T trades at ¥5,390.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 3692.T's P/E ratio is 120.72. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 3692.T's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 3692.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 3983.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 3983.T has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 3983.T trades at ¥2,699.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 3983.T's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 3983.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 3983.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4259.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4259.T has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4259.T trades at ¥451.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4259.T's P/E ratio is -14.43. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4259.T's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 4259.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 5038.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 5038.T has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 5038.T trades at ¥2,450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 5038.T's P/E ratio is 46.45. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 5038.T's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 5038.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 9629.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 9629.T has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 9629.T trades at ¥1,829.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 9629.T's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 9629.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is more volatile compared to 9629.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 3784.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 3784.T has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 3784.T trades at ¥2,017.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 3784.T's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 3784.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is more volatile compared to 3784.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4312.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4312.T has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4312.T trades at ¥1,095.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4312.T's P/E ratio is 36.37. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4312.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is more volatile compared to 4312.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 5027.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 5027.T has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 5027.T trades at ¥555.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 5027.T's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 5027.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 5027.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 9717.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 9717.T has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 9717.T trades at ¥1,934.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 9717.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 9717.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is more volatile compared to 9717.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4058.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4058.T has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4058.T trades at ¥3,025.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4058.T's P/E ratio is 39.15. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4058.T's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 4058.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 3763.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 3763.T has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 3763.T trades at ¥2,597.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 3763.T's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 3763.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 3763.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 5254.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 5254.T has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 5254.T trades at ¥4,845.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 5254.T's P/E ratio is 40.12. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 5254.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 5254.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 3771.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 3771.T has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 3771.T trades at ¥1,832.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 3771.T's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 3771.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 3771.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4826.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4826.T has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4826.T trades at ¥488.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4826.T's P/E ratio is 30.58. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4826.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is more volatile compared to 4826.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 3905.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 3905.T has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 3905.T trades at ¥1,811.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 3905.T's P/E ratio is -30.24. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 3905.T's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 3905.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 3835.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 3835.T has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 3835.T trades at ¥527.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 3835.T's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 3835.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 3835.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4344.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4344.T has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4344.T trades at ¥170.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4344.T's P/E ratio is -8.53. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4344.T's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 4344.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 2497.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 2497.T has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 2497.T trades at ¥577.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 2497.T's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 2497.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is more volatile compared to 2497.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 3921.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 3921.T has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 3921.T trades at ¥1,592.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 3921.T's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 3921.T's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 3921.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 9687.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 9687.T has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 9687.T trades at ¥3,520.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 9687.T's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 9687.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is more volatile compared to 9687.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4333.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4333.T has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4333.T trades at ¥1,212.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4333.T's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4333.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is more volatile compared to 4333.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 5586.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 5586.T has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 5586.T trades at ¥1,220.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 5586.T's P/E ratio is 85.98. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 5586.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 5586.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 5621.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 5621.T has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 5621.T trades at ¥2,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 5621.T's P/E ratio is 28.70. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 5621.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 5621.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4448.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4448.T has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4448.T trades at ¥456.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4448.T's P/E ratio is -15.94. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4448.T's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 4448.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4013.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4013.T has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4013.T trades at ¥914.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4013.T's P/E ratio is 38.71. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4013.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 4013.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4192.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4192.T has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4192.T trades at ¥494.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4192.T's P/E ratio is -22.55. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4192.T's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 4192.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 5588.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 5588.T has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 5588.T trades at ¥1,575.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 5588.T's P/E ratio is 39.33. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 5588.T's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 5588.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4382.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4382.T has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4382.T trades at ¥1,056.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4382.T's P/E ratio is -13.04. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4382.T's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 4382.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 9702.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 9702.T has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 9702.T trades at ¥1,371.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 9702.T's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 9702.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is more volatile compared to 9702.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 3712.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 3712.T has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 3712.T trades at ¥5,050.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 3712.T's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 3712.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 3712.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 3852.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 3852.T has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 3852.T trades at ¥1,904.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 3852.T's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 3852.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is more volatile compared to 3852.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 3648.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 3648.T has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 3648.T trades at ¥920.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 3648.T's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 3648.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is more volatile compared to 3648.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 6047.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 6047.T has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 6047.T trades at ¥611.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 6047.T's P/E ratio is -212.89. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 6047.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 6047.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 2307.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 2307.T has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 2307.T trades at ¥1,040.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 2307.T's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 2307.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is more volatile compared to 2307.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 3800.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 3800.T has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 3800.T trades at ¥1,917.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 3800.T's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 3800.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 3800.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4169.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4169.T has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4169.T trades at ¥336.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4169.T's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4169.T's ROE of -3.76%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 4169.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 9651.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 9651.T has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 9651.T trades at ¥1,413.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 9651.T's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 9651.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 9651.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4299.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4299.T has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4299.T trades at ¥1,176.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4299.T's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4299.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is more volatile compared to 4299.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 5248.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 5248.T has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 5248.T trades at ¥781.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 5248.T's P/E ratio is 49.65. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 5248.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 5248.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 3823.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 3823.T has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 3823.T trades at ¥125.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 3823.T's P/E ratio is -8.45. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 3823.T's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 3823.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4425.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4425.T has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4425.T trades at ¥1,151.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4425.T's P/E ratio is -25.07. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4425.T's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 4425.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4015.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4015.T has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4015.T trades at ¥787.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4015.T's P/E ratio is 39.97. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4015.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 4015.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 2169.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 2169.T has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 2169.T trades at ¥1,810.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 2169.T's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 2169.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is more volatile compared to 2169.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4011.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4011.T has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4011.T trades at ¥3,210.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4011.T's P/E ratio is 48.98. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4011.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 4011.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 5572.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 5572.T has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 5572.T trades at ¥3,135.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 5572.T's P/E ratio is 66.32. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 5572.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 5572.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 3804.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 3804.T has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 3804.T trades at ¥1,897.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 3804.T's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 3804.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 3804.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 3937.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 3937.T has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 3937.T trades at ¥985.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 3937.T's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 3937.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 3937.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 3856.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 3856.T has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 3856.T trades at ¥600.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 3856.T's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 3856.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 3856.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 5591.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 5591.T has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 5591.T trades at ¥1,795.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 5591.T's P/E ratio is 96.20. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 5591.T's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 5591.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 9691.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 9691.T has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 9691.T trades at ¥3,095.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 9691.T's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 9691.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 9691.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 9343.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 9343.T has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 9343.T trades at ¥2,951.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 9343.T's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 9343.T's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is more volatile compared to 9343.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4054.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4054.T has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4054.T trades at ¥756.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4054.T's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4054.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 4054.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 3969.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 3969.T has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 3969.T trades at ¥1,401.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 3969.T's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 3969.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is more volatile compared to 3969.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4193.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4193.T has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4193.T trades at ¥1,940.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4193.T's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4193.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 4193.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4389.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4389.T has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4389.T trades at ¥1,767.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4389.T's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4389.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 4389.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 9553.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 9553.T has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 9553.T trades at ¥373.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 9553.T's P/E ratio is -490.79. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 9553.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 9553.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 153A.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 153A.T has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 153A.T trades at ¥1,574.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 153A.T's P/E ratio is 38.69. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 153A.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 153A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 3777.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 3777.T has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 3777.T trades at ¥33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 3777.T's P/E ratio is -61.11. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 3777.T's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 3777.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4168.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4168.T has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4168.T trades at ¥770.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4168.T's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4168.T's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 4168.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4284.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4284.T has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4284.T trades at ¥405.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4284.T's P/E ratio is 17.54. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4284.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 4284.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 5244.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 5244.T has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 5244.T trades at ¥227.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 5244.T's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 5244.T's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 5244.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4495.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4495.T has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4495.T trades at ¥1,827.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4495.T's P/E ratio is 18.12. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4495.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 4495.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4412.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4412.T has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4412.T trades at ¥1,121.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4412.T's P/E ratio is -2436.96. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4412.T's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 4412.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 3853.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 3853.T has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 3853.T trades at ¥526.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 3853.T's P/E ratio is 30.33. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 3853.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 3853.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4019.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4019.T has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4019.T trades at ¥996.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4019.T's P/E ratio is 63.81. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4019.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is more volatile compared to 4019.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 9698.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 9698.T has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 9698.T trades at ¥1,081.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 9698.T's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 9698.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 9698.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 9399.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 9399.T has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 9399.T trades at ¥445.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 9399.T's P/E ratio is -4.94. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 9399.T's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 9399.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 5259.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 5259.T has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 5259.T trades at ¥1,193.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 5259.T's P/E ratio is 35.30. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 5259.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is more volatile compared to 5259.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 2186.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 2186.T has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 2186.T trades at ¥925.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 2186.T's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 2186.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is more volatile compared to 2186.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 4397.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 4397.T has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 4397.T trades at ¥440.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 4397.T's P/E ratio is -1100.00. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 4397.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 4397.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.
3697.T vs 9561.T Comparison
3697.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3697.T stands at 458.1B. In comparison, 9561.T has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3697.T is priced at ¥1,740.50, while 9561.T trades at ¥843.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3697.T currently has a P/E ratio of 69.34, whereas 9561.T's P/E ratio is -11.04. In terms of profitability, 3697.T's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 9561.T's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, 3697.T is less volatile compared to 9561.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3697.T.