Ceres Inc. (3696.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (3696.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3696.T | ¥1,709.00 | -2.40% | 20.1B | 8.01 | ¥216.60 | +4.61% |
| 6501.T | ¥4,750.00 | -0.29% | 21.9T | 27.52 | ¥176.74 | +1.03% |
| 8058.T | ¥4,591.00 | +1.12% | 16.9T | 21.97 | ¥209.75 | +2.39% |
| 8031.T | ¥4,672.00 | -0.93% | 13.4T | 16.29 | ¥290.98 | +2.43% |
| 8001.T | ¥1,830.50 | -0.92% | 12.9T | 14.43 | ¥128.03 | +2.27% |
| 8002.T | ¥4,793.00 | -2.08% | 8T | 14.89 | ¥329.92 | +2.19% |
| 8053.T | ¥6,380.00 | -0.85% | 7.8T | 13.01 | ¥498.71 | +2.31% |
| 8015.T | ¥6,130.00 | -0.99% | 6.5T | 17.58 | ¥351.03 | +1.94% |
| 9435.T | ¥35,240.00 | -3.79% | 1.6T | 10.54 | ¥3,435.89 | +2.07% |
| 2768.T | ¥5,187.00 | -2.08% | 1.1T | 10.70 | ¥494.74 | +3.12% |
Stock Comparison
3696.T vs 6501.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 6501.T has a market cap of 21.9T. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 6501.T trades at ¥4,750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 6501.T's P/E ratio is 27.52. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 6501.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 6501.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 6501.T's competition here
3696.T vs 8058.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 8058.T has a market cap of 16.9T. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 8058.T trades at ¥4,591.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 8058.T's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 8058.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 8058.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 8058.T's competition here
3696.T vs 8031.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 8031.T has a market cap of 13.4T. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 8031.T trades at ¥4,672.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 8031.T's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 8031.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 8031.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 8031.T's competition here
3696.T vs 8001.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 8001.T has a market cap of 12.9T. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 8001.T trades at ¥1,830.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 8001.T's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 8001.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 8001.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 8001.T's competition here
3696.T vs 8002.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 8002.T has a market cap of 8T. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 8002.T trades at ¥4,793.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 8002.T's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 8002.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 8002.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 8002.T's competition here
3696.T vs 8053.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 8053.T has a market cap of 7.8T. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 8053.T trades at ¥6,380.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 8053.T's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 8053.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 8053.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 8053.T's competition here
3696.T vs 8015.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 8015.T has a market cap of 6.5T. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 8015.T trades at ¥6,130.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 8015.T's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 8015.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 8015.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 8015.T's competition here
3696.T vs 9435.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 9435.T has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 9435.T trades at ¥35,240.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 9435.T's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 9435.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 9435.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 9435.T's competition here
3696.T vs 2768.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 2768.T has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 2768.T trades at ¥5,187.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 2768.T's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 2768.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 2768.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 2768.T's competition here
3696.T vs 9042.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 9042.T has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 9042.T trades at ¥4,241.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 9042.T's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 9042.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 9042.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 9042.T's competition here
3696.T vs 4204.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 4204.T has a market cap of 996.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 4204.T trades at ¥2,462.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 4204.T's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 4204.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 4204.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 4204.T's competition here
3696.T vs 9024.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 9024.T has a market cap of 771.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 9024.T trades at ¥2,971.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 9024.T's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 9024.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 9024.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 9024.T's competition here
3696.T vs 5393.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 5393.T has a market cap of 759.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 5393.T trades at ¥4,031.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 5393.T's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 5393.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 5393.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 5393.T's competition here
3696.T vs 9041.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 9041.T has a market cap of 628.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 9041.T trades at ¥3,341.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 9041.T's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 9041.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 9041.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 9041.T's competition here
3696.T vs 7762.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 7762.T has a market cap of 598.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 7762.T trades at ¥2,361.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 7762.T's P/E ratio is 19.26. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 7762.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 7762.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 7762.T's competition here
3696.T vs 8088.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 8088.T has a market cap of 423.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 8088.T trades at ¥1,919.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 8088.T's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 8088.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 8088.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 8088.T's competition here
3696.T vs 9008.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 9008.T has a market cap of 418.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 9008.T trades at ¥726.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 9008.T's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 9008.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 9008.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 9008.T's competition here
3696.T vs 9006.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 9006.T has a market cap of 385B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 9006.T trades at ¥1,437.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 9006.T's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 9006.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 9006.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 9006.T's competition here
3696.T vs 3105.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 3105.T has a market cap of 360.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 3105.T trades at ¥2,365.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 3105.T's P/E ratio is 25.88. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 3105.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 3105.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 3105.T's competition here
3696.T vs 9048.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 9048.T has a market cap of 349.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 9048.T trades at ¥1,787.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 9048.T's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 9048.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 9048.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 9048.T's competition here
3696.T vs 8020.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 8020.T has a market cap of 345.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 8020.T trades at ¥2,028.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 8020.T's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 8020.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 8020.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 8020.T's competition here
3696.T vs 8078.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 8078.T has a market cap of 335.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 8078.T trades at ¥1,701.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 8078.T's P/E ratio is 8.94. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 8078.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 8078.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 8078.T's competition here
3696.T vs 3401.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 3401.T has a market cap of 310.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 3401.T trades at ¥1,591.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 3401.T's P/E ratio is -3.53. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 3401.T's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 3401.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 3401.T's competition here
3696.T vs 9045.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 9045.T has a market cap of 310.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 9045.T trades at ¥3,089.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 9045.T's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 9045.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 9045.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 9045.T's competition here
3696.T vs 9418.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 9418.T has a market cap of 287.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 9418.T trades at ¥1,580.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 9418.T's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 9418.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 9418.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 9418.T's competition here
3696.T vs 5331.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 5331.T has a market cap of 249.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 5331.T trades at ¥4,260.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 5331.T's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 5331.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 5331.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 5331.T's competition here
3696.T vs 9003.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 9003.T has a market cap of 231.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 9003.T trades at ¥2,400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 9003.T's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 9003.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 9003.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 9003.T's competition here
3696.T vs 4206.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 4206.T has a market cap of 226.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 4206.T trades at ¥3,569.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 4206.T's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 4206.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 4206.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 4206.T's competition here
3696.T vs 8066.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 8066.T has a market cap of 205.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 8066.T trades at ¥2,463.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 8066.T's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 8066.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 8066.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 8066.T's competition here
3696.T vs 3106.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 3106.T has a market cap of 165.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 3106.T trades at ¥10,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 3106.T's P/E ratio is 13.26. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 3106.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 3106.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 3106.T's competition here
3696.T vs 3076.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 3076.T has a market cap of 144.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 3076.T trades at ¥2,702.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 3076.T's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 3076.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 3076.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 3076.T's competition here
3696.T vs 3167.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 3167.T has a market cap of 142.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 3167.T trades at ¥1,139.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 3167.T's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 3167.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 3167.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 3167.T's competition here
3696.T vs 7224.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 7224.T has a market cap of 139.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 7224.T trades at ¥2,040.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 7224.T's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 7224.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 7224.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 7224.T's competition here
3696.T vs 3498.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 3498.T has a market cap of 134B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 3498.T trades at ¥6,360.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 3498.T's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 3498.T's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 3498.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 3498.T's competition here
3696.T vs 9010.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 9010.T has a market cap of 131.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 9010.T trades at ¥2,493.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 9010.T's P/E ratio is 3.67. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 9010.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 9010.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 9010.T's competition here
3696.T vs 7483.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 7483.T has a market cap of 101.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 7483.T trades at ¥2,824.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 7483.T's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 7483.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 7483.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 7483.T's competition here
3696.T vs 8057.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 8057.T has a market cap of 95.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 8057.T trades at ¥1,938.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 8057.T's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 8057.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 8057.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 8057.T's competition here
3696.T vs 8014.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 8014.T has a market cap of 94.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 8014.T trades at ¥3,800.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 8014.T's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 8014.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 8014.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 8014.T's competition here
3696.T vs 7130.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 7130.T has a market cap of 76.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 7130.T trades at ¥2,729.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 7130.T's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 7130.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 7130.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 7130.T's competition here
3696.T vs 3001.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 3001.T has a market cap of 74.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 3001.T trades at ¥2,335.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 3001.T's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 3001.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 3001.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 3001.T's competition here
3696.T vs 8157.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 8157.T has a market cap of 72.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 8157.T trades at ¥3,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 8157.T's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 8157.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 8157.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 8157.T's competition here
3696.T vs 2734.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 2734.T has a market cap of 66.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 2734.T trades at ¥1,047.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 2734.T's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 2734.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 2734.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 2734.T's competition here
3696.T vs 5821.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 5821.T has a market cap of 61.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 5821.T trades at ¥3,825.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 5821.T's P/E ratio is 37.21. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 5821.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 5821.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 5821.T's competition here
3696.T vs 6328.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 6328.T has a market cap of 58.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 6328.T trades at ¥2,397.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 6328.T's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 6328.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 6328.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 6328.T's competition here
3696.T vs 8081.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 8081.T has a market cap of 57.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 8081.T trades at ¥2,501.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 8081.T's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 8081.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 8081.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 8081.T's competition here
3696.T vs 3232.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 3232.T has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 3232.T trades at ¥522.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 3232.T's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 3232.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 3232.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 3232.T's competition here
3696.T vs 8285.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 8285.T has a market cap of 43.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 8285.T trades at ¥687.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 8285.T's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 8285.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 8285.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 8285.T's competition here
3696.T vs 2676.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 2676.T has a market cap of 39.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 2676.T trades at ¥2,126.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 2676.T's P/E ratio is 26.92. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 2676.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 2676.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 2676.T's competition here
3696.T vs 9896.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 9896.T has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 9896.T trades at ¥1,476.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 9896.T's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 9896.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 9896.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 9896.T's competition here
3696.T vs 4685.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 4685.T has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 4685.T trades at ¥2,690.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 4685.T's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 4685.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 4685.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 4685.T's competition here
3696.T vs 2462.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 2462.T has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 2462.T trades at ¥1,433.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 2462.T's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 2462.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 2462.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 2462.T's competition here
3696.T vs 4439.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 4439.T has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 4439.T trades at ¥728.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 4439.T's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 4439.T's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 4439.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 4439.T's competition here
3696.T vs 8070.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 8070.T has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 8070.T trades at ¥819.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 8070.T's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 8070.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 8070.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 8070.T's competition here
3696.T vs 7119.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 7119.T has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 7119.T trades at ¥1,600.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 7119.T's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 7119.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 7119.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 7119.T's competition here
3696.T vs 7521.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 7521.T has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 7521.T trades at ¥2,680.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 7521.T's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 7521.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 7521.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 7521.T's competition here
3696.T vs 7490.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 7490.T has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 7490.T trades at ¥2,190.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 7490.T's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 7490.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 7490.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 7490.T's competition here
3696.T vs 6838.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 6838.T has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 6838.T trades at ¥1,980.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 6838.T's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 6838.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 6838.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 6838.T's competition here
3696.T vs 9248.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 9248.T has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 9248.T trades at ¥1,540.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 9248.T's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 9248.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 9248.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 9248.T's competition here
3696.T vs 3512.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 3512.T has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 3512.T trades at ¥790.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 3512.T's P/E ratio is 24.94. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 3512.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 3512.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 3512.T's competition here
3696.T vs 3420.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 3420.T has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 3420.T trades at ¥1,495.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 3420.T's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 3420.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 3420.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 3420.T's competition here
3696.T vs 9633.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 9633.T has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 9633.T trades at ¥1,605.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 9633.T's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 9633.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 9633.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 9633.T's competition here
3696.T vs 9564.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 9564.T has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 9564.T trades at ¥458.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 9564.T's P/E ratio is 14.59. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 9564.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 9564.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 9564.T's competition here
3696.T vs 7670.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 7670.T has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 7670.T trades at ¥999.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 7670.T's P/E ratio is 5.63. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 7670.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 7670.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 7670.T's competition here
3696.T vs 3353.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 3353.T has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 3353.T trades at ¥2,680.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 3353.T's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 3353.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 3353.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 3353.T's competition here
3696.T vs 6554.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 6554.T has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 6554.T trades at ¥991.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 6554.T's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 6554.T's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 6554.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 6554.T's competition here
3696.T vs 3004.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 3004.T has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 3004.T trades at ¥2,197.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 3004.T's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 3004.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 3004.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 3004.T's competition here
3696.T vs 7795.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 7795.T has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 7795.T trades at ¥194.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 7795.T's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 7795.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 7795.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 7795.T's competition here
3696.T vs 5721.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 5721.T has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 5721.T trades at ¥50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 5721.T's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 5721.T's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 5721.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 5721.T's competition here
3696.T vs 7509.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 7509.T has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 7509.T trades at ¥4,600.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 7509.T's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 7509.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 7509.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 7509.T's competition here
3696.T vs 8835.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 8835.T has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 8835.T trades at ¥743.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 8835.T's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 8835.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 8835.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 8835.T's competition here
3696.T vs 4840.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 4840.T has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 4840.T trades at ¥694.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 4840.T's P/E ratio is -10.96. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 4840.T's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 4840.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 4840.T's competition here
3696.T vs 5355.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 5355.T has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 5355.T trades at ¥668.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 5355.T's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 5355.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 5355.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 5355.T's competition here
3696.T vs 3204.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 3204.T has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 3204.T trades at ¥505.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 3204.T's P/E ratio is 6.70. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 3204.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 3204.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 3204.T's competition here
3696.T vs 7066.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 7066.T has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 7066.T trades at ¥386.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 7066.T's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 7066.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 7066.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 7066.T's competition here
3696.T vs 9849.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 9849.T has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 9849.T trades at ¥4,435.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 9849.T's P/E ratio is 79.46. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 9849.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 9849.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 9849.T's competition here
3696.T vs 7571.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 7571.T has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 7571.T trades at ¥82.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 7571.T's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 7571.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 7571.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 7571.T's competition here
3696.T vs 7827.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 7827.T has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 7827.T trades at ¥1,631.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 7827.T's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 7827.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 7827.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 7827.T's competition here
3696.T vs 4241.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 4241.T has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 4241.T trades at ¥634.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 4241.T's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 4241.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 4241.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 4241.T's competition here
3696.T vs 3306.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 3306.T has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 3306.T trades at ¥599.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 3306.T's P/E ratio is 4.82. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 3306.T's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 3306.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 3306.T's competition here
3696.T vs 150A.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 150A.T has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 150A.T trades at ¥340.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 150A.T's P/E ratio is -15.95. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 150A.T's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 150A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 150A.T's competition here
3696.T vs 9760.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 9760.T has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 9760.T trades at ¥112.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 9760.T's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 9760.T's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 9760.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 9760.T's competition here
3696.T vs 2388.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 2388.T has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 2388.T trades at ¥35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 2388.T's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 2388.T's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 2388.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 2388.T's competition here
3696.T vs 9213.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 9213.T has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 9213.T trades at ¥1,040.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 9213.T's P/E ratio is -7.78. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 9213.T's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 9213.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 9213.T's competition here
3696.T vs 3814.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 3814.T has a market cap of 624.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 3814.T trades at ¥159.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 3814.T's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 3814.T's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 3814.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 3814.T's competition here
3696.T vs 5856.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 5856.T has a market cap of 326.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 5856.T trades at ¥3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 5856.T's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 5856.T's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is less volatile compared to 5856.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 5856.T's competition here
3696.T vs 1821.T Comparison June 2026
3696.T plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3696.T stands at 20.1B. In comparison, 1821.T has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, 3696.T is priced at ¥1,709.00, while 1821.T trades at ¥597.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3696.T currently has a P/E ratio of 8.01, whereas 1821.T's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, 3696.T's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 1821.T's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 3696.T is more volatile compared to 1821.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3696.T.Check 1821.T's competition here