TORIDOLL Holdings Corporation
TORIDOLL Holdings Corporation (3397.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (3397.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3397.T | ¥4,515.00 | +0.71% | 396.7B | 85.75 | ¥52.65 | +0.19% |
| 7550.T | ¥9,537.00 | +0.58% | 1.5T | 41.39 | ¥230.41 | +0.66% |
| 2702.T | ¥8,420.00 | +2.68% | 1.1T | 33.02 | ¥255.02 | +0.53% |
| 3563.T | ¥9,751.00 | +1.46% | 1.1T | 48.78 | ¥199.91 | +0.36% |
| 3197.T | ¥3,476.00 | +1.34% | 790.8B | 47.22 | ¥73.62 | +0.55% |
| 3387.T | ¥804.00 | +1.52% | 338.5B | 60.50 | ¥13.29 | +0.50% |
| 7581.T | ¥6,700.00 | +1.36% | 329.3B | 29.59 | ¥226.40 | +0.45% |
| 9861.T | ¥3,394.00 | +1.80% | 219.7B | 51.97 | ¥65.31 | +0.58% |
| 3350.T | ¥298.00 | -1.32% | 215.7B | -2.27 | -¥131.33 | N/A |
| 7616.T | ¥1,994.50 | +3.61% | 212B | 152.72 | ¥13.06 | +0.20% |
Stock Comparison
3397.T vs 7550.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 7550.T has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 7550.T trades at ¥9,537.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 7550.T's P/E ratio is 41.39. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7550.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is less volatile compared to 7550.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 7550.T's competition here
3397.T vs 2702.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 2702.T has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 2702.T trades at ¥8,420.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 2702.T's P/E ratio is 33.02. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2702.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is less volatile compared to 2702.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 2702.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3563.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3563.T has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3563.T trades at ¥9,751.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3563.T's P/E ratio is 48.78. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3563.T's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is less volatile compared to 3563.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3563.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3197.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3197.T has a market cap of 790.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3197.T trades at ¥3,476.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3197.T's P/E ratio is 47.22. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3197.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 3197.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3197.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3387.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3387.T has a market cap of 338.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3387.T trades at ¥804.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3387.T's P/E ratio is 60.50. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3387.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 3387.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3387.T's competition here
3397.T vs 7581.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 7581.T has a market cap of 329.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 7581.T trades at ¥6,700.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 7581.T's P/E ratio is 29.59. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7581.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is less volatile compared to 7581.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 7581.T's competition here
3397.T vs 9861.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 9861.T has a market cap of 219.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 9861.T trades at ¥3,394.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 9861.T's P/E ratio is 51.97. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9861.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is less volatile compared to 9861.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 9861.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3350.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3350.T has a market cap of 215.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3350.T trades at ¥298.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3350.T's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3350.T's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is less volatile compared to 3350.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3350.T's competition here
3397.T vs 7616.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 7616.T has a market cap of 212B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 7616.T trades at ¥1,994.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 7616.T's P/E ratio is 152.72. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7616.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is less volatile compared to 7616.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 7616.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3097.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3097.T has a market cap of 185.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3097.T trades at ¥4,810.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3097.T's P/E ratio is 29.55. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3097.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 3097.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3097.T's competition here
3397.T vs 9936.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 9936.T has a market cap of 161.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 9936.T trades at ¥3,090.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 9936.T's P/E ratio is 21.05. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9936.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 9936.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 9936.T's competition here
3397.T vs 8179.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 8179.T has a market cap of 148.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 8179.T trades at ¥1,506.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 8179.T's P/E ratio is 26.22. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8179.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 8179.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 8179.T's competition here
3397.T vs 7630.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 7630.T has a market cap of 147.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 7630.T trades at ¥925.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 7630.T's P/E ratio is 49.23. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7630.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 7630.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 7630.T's competition here
3397.T vs 2695.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 2695.T has a market cap of 146.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 2695.T trades at ¥3,690.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 2695.T's P/E ratio is 40.61. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2695.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 2695.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 2695.T's competition here
3397.T vs 9873.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 9873.T has a market cap of 145B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 9873.T trades at ¥6,490.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 9873.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9873.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 9873.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 9873.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3543.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3543.T has a market cap of 140.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3543.T trades at ¥3,080.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3543.T's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3543.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is less volatile compared to 3543.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3543.T's competition here
3397.T vs 8153.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 8153.T has a market cap of 133.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 8153.T trades at ¥4,315.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 8153.T's P/E ratio is 31.69. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8153.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 8153.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 8153.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3087.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3087.T has a market cap of 126.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3087.T trades at ¥3,010.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3087.T's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3087.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 3087.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3087.T's competition here
3397.T vs 7412.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 7412.T has a market cap of 123.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 7412.T trades at ¥640.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 7412.T's P/E ratio is 180.79. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7412.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is less volatile compared to 7412.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 7412.T's competition here
3397.T vs 9887.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 9887.T has a market cap of 112.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 9887.T trades at ¥5,890.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 9887.T's P/E ratio is 41.69. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9887.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 9887.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 9887.T's competition here
3397.T vs 7611.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 7611.T has a market cap of 107.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 7611.T trades at ¥2,991.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 7611.T's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7611.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 7611.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 7611.T's competition here
3397.T vs 9945.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 9945.T has a market cap of 101.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 9945.T trades at ¥2,634.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 9945.T's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9945.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 9945.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 9945.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3085.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3085.T has a market cap of 97.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3085.T trades at ¥3,065.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3085.T's P/E ratio is 33.15. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3085.T's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is less volatile compared to 3085.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3085.T's competition here
3397.T vs 9279.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 9279.T has a market cap of 91.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 9279.T trades at ¥4,580.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 9279.T's P/E ratio is 41.94. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9279.T's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is less volatile compared to 9279.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 9279.T's competition here
3397.T vs 2157.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 2157.T has a market cap of 91.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 2157.T trades at ¥1,108.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 2157.T's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2157.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is less volatile compared to 2157.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 2157.T's competition here
3397.T vs 7421.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 7421.T has a market cap of 79.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 7421.T trades at ¥1,608.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 7421.T's P/E ratio is 61.28. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7421.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 7421.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 7421.T's competition here
3397.T vs 8160.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 8160.T has a market cap of 72.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 8160.T trades at ¥2,560.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 8160.T's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8160.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 8160.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 8160.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3091.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3091.T has a market cap of 66.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3091.T trades at ¥4,490.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3091.T's P/E ratio is 33.97. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3091.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is less volatile compared to 3091.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3091.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3395.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3395.T has a market cap of 64.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3395.T trades at ¥2,997.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3395.T's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3395.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 3395.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3395.T's competition here
3397.T vs 8200.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 8200.T has a market cap of 59.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 8200.T trades at ¥2,308.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 8200.T's P/E ratio is 51.77. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8200.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 8200.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 8200.T's competition here
3397.T vs 2752.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 2752.T has a market cap of 56.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 2752.T trades at ¥1,099.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 2752.T's P/E ratio is 628.00. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2752.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 2752.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 2752.T's competition here
3397.T vs 9900.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 9900.T has a market cap of 56B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 9900.T trades at ¥1,848.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 9900.T's P/E ratio is 35.84. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9900.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 9900.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 9900.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3198.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3198.T has a market cap of 53.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3198.T trades at ¥2,355.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3198.T's P/E ratio is 40.88. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3198.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 3198.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3198.T's competition here
3397.T vs 8163.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 8163.T has a market cap of 52B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 8163.T trades at ¥1,258.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 8163.T's P/E ratio is 70.08. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8163.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 8163.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 8163.T's competition here
3397.T vs 9828.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 9828.T has a market cap of 51B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 9828.T trades at ¥2,888.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 9828.T's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9828.T's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 9828.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 9828.T's competition here
3397.T vs 2705.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 2705.T has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 2705.T trades at ¥6,790.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 2705.T's P/E ratio is 45.04. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2705.T's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 2705.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 2705.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3561.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3561.T has a market cap of 44.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3561.T trades at ¥1,469.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3561.T's P/E ratio is 22.17. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3561.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 3561.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3561.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3196.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3196.T has a market cap of 43.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3196.T trades at ¥2,043.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3196.T's P/E ratio is 107.19. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3196.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 3196.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3196.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3193.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3193.T has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3193.T trades at ¥3,470.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3193.T's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3193.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is less volatile compared to 3193.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3193.T's competition here
3397.T vs 7522.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 7522.T has a market cap of 39.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 7522.T trades at ¥996.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 7522.T's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7522.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is less volatile compared to 7522.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 7522.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3221.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3221.T has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3221.T trades at ¥3,490.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3221.T's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3221.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 3221.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3221.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3399.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3399.T has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3399.T trades at ¥3,550.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3399.T's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3399.T's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is less volatile compared to 3399.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3399.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3073.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3073.T has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3073.T trades at ¥1,690.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3073.T's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3073.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 3073.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3073.T's competition here
3397.T vs 2753.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 2753.T has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 2753.T trades at ¥1,436.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 2753.T's P/E ratio is 20.27. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2753.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is less volatile compared to 2753.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 2753.T's competition here
3397.T vs 7678.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 7678.T has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 7678.T trades at ¥5,380.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 7678.T's P/E ratio is 84.27. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7678.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is less volatile compared to 7678.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 7678.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3178.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3178.T has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3178.T trades at ¥1,225.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3178.T's P/E ratio is 23.61. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3178.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 3178.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3178.T's competition here
3397.T vs 9979.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 9979.T has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 9979.T trades at ¥1,090.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 9979.T's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9979.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 9979.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 9979.T's competition here
3397.T vs 2882.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 2882.T has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 2882.T trades at ¥2,007.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 2882.T's P/E ratio is 76.60. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2882.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 2882.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 2882.T's competition here
3397.T vs 9850.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 9850.T has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 9850.T trades at ¥975.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 9850.T's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9850.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 9850.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 9850.T's competition here
3397.T vs 7554.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 7554.T has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 7554.T trades at ¥1,143.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 7554.T's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7554.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 7554.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 7554.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3075.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3075.T has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3075.T trades at ¥1,594.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3075.T's P/E ratio is 28.82. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3075.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 3075.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3075.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3133.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3133.T has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3133.T trades at ¥338.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3133.T's P/E ratio is -4.14. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3133.T's ROE of -2.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is less volatile compared to 3133.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3133.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3068.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3068.T has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3068.T trades at ¥2,977.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3068.T's P/E ratio is -48.95. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3068.T's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 3068.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3068.T's competition here
3397.T vs 7621.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 7621.T has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 7621.T trades at ¥3,300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 7621.T's P/E ratio is -100.09. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7621.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 7621.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 7621.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3547.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3547.T has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3547.T trades at ¥1,935.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3547.T's P/E ratio is 23.90. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3547.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 3547.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3547.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3329.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3329.T has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3329.T trades at ¥2,145.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3329.T's P/E ratio is 23.93. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3329.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 3329.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3329.T's competition here
3397.T vs 7562.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 7562.T has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 7562.T trades at ¥3,735.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 7562.T's P/E ratio is 46.24. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7562.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 7562.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 7562.T's competition here
3397.T vs 2694.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 2694.T has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 2694.T trades at ¥70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 2694.T's P/E ratio is -22.65. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2694.T's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 2694.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 2694.T's competition here
3397.T vs 9701.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 9701.T has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 9701.T trades at ¥4,865.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 9701.T's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9701.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 9701.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 9701.T's competition here
3397.T vs 7561.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 7561.T has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 7561.T trades at ¥683.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 7561.T's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7561.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 7561.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 7561.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3418.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3418.T has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3418.T trades at ¥1,099.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3418.T's P/E ratio is 26.28. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3418.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 3418.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3418.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3030.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3030.T has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3030.T trades at ¥944.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3030.T's P/E ratio is 24.36. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3030.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is less volatile compared to 3030.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3030.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3175.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3175.T has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3175.T trades at ¥909.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3175.T's P/E ratio is 28.36. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3175.T's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 3175.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3175.T's competition here
3397.T vs 8207.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 8207.T has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 8207.T trades at ¥288.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 8207.T's P/E ratio is 993.10. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8207.T's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 8207.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 8207.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3053.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3053.T has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3053.T trades at ¥183.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3053.T's P/E ratio is -96.83. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3053.T's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 3053.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3053.T's competition here
3397.T vs 2764.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 2764.T has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 2764.T trades at ¥156.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 2764.T's P/E ratio is -63.41. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2764.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is less volatile compared to 2764.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 2764.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3082.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3082.T has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3082.T trades at ¥968.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3082.T's P/E ratio is 40.18. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3082.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 3082.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3082.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3063.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3063.T has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3063.T trades at ¥820.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3063.T's P/E ratio is -104.99. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3063.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is less volatile compared to 3063.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3063.T's competition here
3397.T vs 9950.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 9950.T has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 9950.T trades at ¥3,375.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 9950.T's P/E ratio is 99.15. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9950.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 9950.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 9950.T's competition here
3397.T vs 6082.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 6082.T has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 6082.T trades at ¥998.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 6082.T's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 6082.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 6082.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 6082.T's competition here
3397.T vs 2798.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 2798.T has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 2798.T trades at ¥2,948.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 2798.T's P/E ratio is 32.19. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2798.T's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 2798.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 2798.T's competition here
3397.T vs 7682.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 7682.T has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 7682.T trades at ¥4,085.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 7682.T's P/E ratio is 107.39. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7682.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 7682.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 7682.T's competition here
3397.T vs 5891.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 5891.T has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 5891.T trades at ¥1,514.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 5891.T's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5891.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 5891.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 5891.T's competition here
3397.T vs 7604.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 7604.T has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 7604.T trades at ¥914.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 7604.T's P/E ratio is -19.25. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7604.T's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 7604.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 7604.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3069.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3069.T has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3069.T trades at ¥166.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3069.T's P/E ratio is 34.30. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3069.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is less volatile compared to 3069.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3069.T's competition here
3397.T vs 9973.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 9973.T has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 9973.T trades at ¥27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 9973.T's P/E ratio is -10.63. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9973.T's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is less volatile compared to 9973.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 9973.T's competition here
3397.T vs 7674.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 7674.T has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 7674.T trades at ¥2,524.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 7674.T's P/E ratio is -8.63. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7674.T's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 7674.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 7674.T's competition here
3397.T vs 9853.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 9853.T has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 9853.T trades at ¥907.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 9853.T's P/E ratio is 230.79. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9853.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 9853.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 9853.T's competition here
3397.T vs 7918.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 7918.T has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 7918.T trades at ¥111.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 7918.T's P/E ratio is -25.34. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7918.T's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is less volatile compared to 7918.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 7918.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3065.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3065.T has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3065.T trades at ¥1,612.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3065.T's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3065.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 3065.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3065.T's competition here
3397.T vs 7625.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 7625.T has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 7625.T trades at ¥465.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 7625.T's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7625.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 7625.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 7625.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3557.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3557.T has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3557.T trades at ¥967.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3557.T's P/E ratio is 172.37. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3557.T's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 3557.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3557.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3077.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3077.T has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3077.T trades at ¥768.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3077.T's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3077.T's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is less volatile compared to 3077.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3077.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3317.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3317.T has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3317.T trades at ¥1,540.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3317.T's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3317.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 3317.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3317.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3067.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3067.T has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3067.T trades at ¥451.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3067.T's P/E ratio is 53.06. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3067.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 3067.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3067.T's competition here
3397.T vs 2762.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 2762.T has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 2762.T trades at ¥99.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 2762.T's P/E ratio is -4.23. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2762.T's ROE of -1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 2762.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 2762.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3224.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3224.T has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3224.T trades at ¥762.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3224.T's P/E ratio is -55.62. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3224.T's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 3224.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3224.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3358.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3358.T has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3358.T trades at ¥107.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3358.T's P/E ratio is 445.83. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3358.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is less volatile compared to 3358.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3358.T's competition here
3397.T vs 9969.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 9969.T has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 9969.T trades at ¥238.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 9969.T's P/E ratio is 48.37. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 9969.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is less volatile compared to 9969.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 9969.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3372.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3372.T has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3372.T trades at ¥220.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3372.T's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3372.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 3372.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3372.T's competition here
3397.T vs 138A.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 138A.T has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 138A.T trades at ¥2,901.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 138A.T's P/E ratio is 28.06. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 138A.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 138A.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 138A.T's competition here
3397.T vs 2789.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 2789.T has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 2789.T trades at ¥463.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 2789.T's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 2789.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 2789.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 2789.T's competition here
3397.T vs 8181.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 8181.T has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 8181.T trades at ¥1,003.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 8181.T's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8181.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 8181.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 8181.T's competition here
3397.T vs 7524.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 7524.T has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 7524.T trades at ¥166.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 7524.T's P/E ratio is 58.25. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7524.T's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 7524.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 7524.T's competition here
3397.T vs 7585.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 7585.T has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 7585.T trades at ¥412.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 7585.T's P/E ratio is -7.44. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 7585.T's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 7585.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 7585.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3223.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3223.T has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3223.T trades at ¥934.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3223.T's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3223.T's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 3223.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3223.T's competition here
3397.T vs 3370.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 3370.T has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 3370.T trades at ¥412.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 3370.T's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3370.T's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is less volatile compared to 3370.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 3370.T's competition here
3397.T vs 8209.T Comparison April 2026
3397.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3397.T stands at 396.7B. In comparison, 8209.T has a market cap of 881.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 3397.T is priced at ¥4,515.00, while 8209.T trades at ¥309.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3397.T currently has a P/E ratio of 85.75, whereas 8209.T's P/E ratio is -8.26. In terms of profitability, 3397.T's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 8209.T's ROE of +1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, 3397.T is more volatile compared to 8209.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3397.T.Check 8209.T's competition here