Hengdeli Holdings Limited (3389.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (3389.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3389.HK | HK$0.21 | -3.67% | 955.7M | -21.70 | -HK$0.01 | N/A |
| 1929.HK | HK$12.22 | -2.71% | 122.2B | 13.77 | HK$0.90 | +4.36% |
| 1913.HK | HK$38.88 | -4.19% | 103.3B | 13.32 | HK$3.03 | +3.72% |
| 6181.HK | HK$434.80 | -3.81% | 78.7B | 13.98 | HK$32.78 | +6.77% |
| 0590.HK | HK$22.70 | -1.90% | 13.4B | 10.44 | HK$2.18 | +4.83% |
| 0116.HK | HK$10.22 | -4.58% | 6.9B | 4.16 | HK$2.47 | +9.73% |
| 6168.HK | HK$16.05 | -1.05% | 6.9B | 7.30 | HK$2.17 | +6.37% |
| 2585.HK | HK$12.15 | +0.83% | 3.3B | 28.98 | HK$0.42 | N/A |
| 2583.HK | HK$52.00 | -0.57% | 3.2B | 23.20 | HK$2.31 | N/A |
| 0113.HK | HK$6.20 | -1.90% | 2.4B | 11.14 | HK$0.56 | +4.81% |
Stock Comparison
3389.HK vs 1929.HK Comparison June 2026
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 955.7M. In comparison, 1929.HK has a market cap of 122.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at HK$0.21, while 1929.HK trades at HK$12.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.70, whereas 1929.HK's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 1929.HK's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is less volatile compared to 1929.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.Check 1929.HK's competition here
3389.HK vs 1913.HK Comparison June 2026
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 955.7M. In comparison, 1913.HK has a market cap of 103.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at HK$0.21, while 1913.HK trades at HK$38.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.70, whereas 1913.HK's P/E ratio is 13.32. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 1913.HK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is less volatile compared to 1913.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.Check 1913.HK's competition here
3389.HK vs 6181.HK Comparison June 2026
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 955.7M. In comparison, 6181.HK has a market cap of 78.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at HK$0.21, while 6181.HK trades at HK$434.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.70, whereas 6181.HK's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 6181.HK's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is less volatile compared to 6181.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.Check 6181.HK's competition here
3389.HK vs 0590.HK Comparison June 2026
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 955.7M. In comparison, 0590.HK has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at HK$0.21, while 0590.HK trades at HK$22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.70, whereas 0590.HK's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0590.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is less volatile compared to 0590.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.Check 0590.HK's competition here
3389.HK vs 0116.HK Comparison June 2026
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 955.7M. In comparison, 0116.HK has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at HK$0.21, while 0116.HK trades at HK$10.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.70, whereas 0116.HK's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0116.HK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is less volatile compared to 0116.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.Check 0116.HK's competition here
3389.HK vs 6168.HK Comparison June 2026
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 955.7M. In comparison, 6168.HK has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at HK$0.21, while 6168.HK trades at HK$16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.70, whereas 6168.HK's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 6168.HK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is less volatile compared to 6168.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.Check 6168.HK's competition here
3389.HK vs 2585.HK Comparison June 2026
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 955.7M. In comparison, 2585.HK has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at HK$0.21, while 2585.HK trades at HK$12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.70, whereas 2585.HK's P/E ratio is 28.98. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 2585.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is less volatile compared to 2585.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.Check 2585.HK's competition here
3389.HK vs 2583.HK Comparison June 2026
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 955.7M. In comparison, 2583.HK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at HK$0.21, while 2583.HK trades at HK$52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.70, whereas 2583.HK's P/E ratio is 23.20. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 2583.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is less volatile compared to 2583.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.Check 2583.HK's competition here
3389.HK vs 0113.HK Comparison June 2026
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 955.7M. In comparison, 0113.HK has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at HK$0.21, while 0113.HK trades at HK$6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.70, whereas 0113.HK's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0113.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 0113.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.Check 0113.HK's competition here
3389.HK vs 0887.HK Comparison June 2026
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 955.7M. In comparison, 0887.HK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at HK$0.21, while 0887.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.70, whereas 0887.HK's P/E ratio is 4.05. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0887.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is less volatile compared to 0887.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.Check 0887.HK's competition here
3389.HK vs 0398.HK Comparison June 2026
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 955.7M. In comparison, 0398.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at HK$0.21, while 0398.HK trades at HK$3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.70, whereas 0398.HK's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0398.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is less volatile compared to 0398.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.Check 0398.HK's competition here
3389.HK vs 1815.HK Comparison June 2026
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 955.7M. In comparison, 1815.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at HK$0.21, while 1815.HK trades at HK$0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.70, whereas 1815.HK's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 1815.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is less volatile compared to 1815.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.Check 1815.HK's competition here
3389.HK vs 0860.HK Comparison June 2026
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 955.7M. In comparison, 0860.HK has a market cap of 613.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at HK$0.21, while 0860.HK trades at HK$0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.70, whereas 0860.HK's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0860.HK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is less volatile compared to 0860.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.Check 0860.HK's competition here
3389.HK vs 1856.HK Comparison June 2026
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 955.7M. In comparison, 1856.HK has a market cap of 450.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at HK$0.21, while 1856.HK trades at HK$1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.70, whereas 1856.HK's P/E ratio is -8.33. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 1856.HK's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is less volatile compared to 1856.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.Check 1856.HK's competition here
3389.HK vs 8026.HK Comparison June 2026
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 955.7M. In comparison, 8026.HK has a market cap of 445M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at HK$0.21, while 8026.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.70, whereas 8026.HK's P/E ratio is 29.00. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 8026.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is less volatile compared to 8026.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.Check 8026.HK's competition here
3389.HK vs 0789.HK Comparison June 2026
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 955.7M. In comparison, 0789.HK has a market cap of 436.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at HK$0.21, while 0789.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.70, whereas 0789.HK's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0789.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is less volatile compared to 0789.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.Check 0789.HK's competition here
3389.HK vs 0280.HK Comparison June 2026
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 955.7M. In comparison, 0280.HK has a market cap of 436.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at HK$0.21, while 0280.HK trades at HK$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.70, whereas 0280.HK's P/E ratio is 4.80. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0280.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 0280.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.Check 0280.HK's competition here
3389.HK vs 0213.HK Comparison June 2026
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 955.7M. In comparison, 0213.HK has a market cap of 342.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at HK$0.21, while 0213.HK trades at HK$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.70, whereas 0213.HK's P/E ratio is 3.41. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0213.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is less volatile compared to 0213.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.Check 0213.HK's competition here
3389.HK vs 3326.HK Comparison June 2026
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 955.7M. In comparison, 3326.HK has a market cap of 331.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at HK$0.21, while 3326.HK trades at HK$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.70, whereas 3326.HK's P/E ratio is -24.80. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 3326.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 3326.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.Check 3326.HK's competition here
3389.HK vs 0256.HK Comparison June 2026
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 955.7M. In comparison, 0256.HK has a market cap of 282.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at HK$0.21, while 0256.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.70, whereas 0256.HK's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0256.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is less volatile compared to 0256.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.Check 0256.HK's competition here
3389.HK vs 0417.HK Comparison June 2026
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 955.7M. In comparison, 0417.HK has a market cap of 164.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at HK$0.21, while 0417.HK trades at HK$0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.70, whereas 0417.HK's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0417.HK's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is less volatile compared to 0417.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.Check 0417.HK's competition here
3389.HK vs 6838.HK Comparison June 2026
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 955.7M. In comparison, 6838.HK has a market cap of 149.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at HK$0.21, while 6838.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.70, whereas 6838.HK's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 6838.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 6838.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.Check 6838.HK's competition here
3389.HK vs 1327.HK Comparison June 2026
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 955.7M. In comparison, 1327.HK has a market cap of 142.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at HK$0.21, while 1327.HK trades at HK$0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.70, whereas 1327.HK's P/E ratio is -4.71. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 1327.HK's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 1327.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.Check 1327.HK's competition here
3389.HK vs 0442.HK Comparison June 2026
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 955.7M. In comparison, 0442.HK has a market cap of 125.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at HK$0.21, while 0442.HK trades at HK$0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.70, whereas 0442.HK's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0442.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is less volatile compared to 0442.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.Check 0442.HK's competition here
3389.HK vs 1470.HK Comparison June 2026
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 955.7M. In comparison, 1470.HK has a market cap of 124M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at HK$0.21, while 1470.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.70, whereas 1470.HK's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 1470.HK's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is less volatile compared to 1470.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.Check 1470.HK's competition here
3389.HK vs 0513.HK Comparison June 2026
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 955.7M. In comparison, 0513.HK has a market cap of 108.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at HK$0.21, while 0513.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.70, whereas 0513.HK's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0513.HK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is less volatile compared to 0513.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.Check 0513.HK's competition here
3389.HK vs 2882.HK Comparison June 2026
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 955.7M. In comparison, 2882.HK has a market cap of 107.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at HK$0.21, while 2882.HK trades at HK$0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.70, whereas 2882.HK's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 2882.HK's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 2882.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.Check 2882.HK's competition here
3389.HK vs 1150.HK Comparison June 2026
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 955.7M. In comparison, 1150.HK has a market cap of 93M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at HK$0.21, while 1150.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.70, whereas 1150.HK's P/E ratio is -8.80. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 1150.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 1150.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.Check 1150.HK's competition here
3389.HK vs 0125.HK Comparison June 2026
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 955.7M. In comparison, 0125.HK has a market cap of 77.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at HK$0.21, while 0125.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.70, whereas 0125.HK's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0125.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is less volatile compared to 0125.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.Check 0125.HK's competition here
3389.HK vs 0084.HK Comparison June 2026
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 955.7M. In comparison, 0084.HK has a market cap of 65.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at HK$0.21, while 0084.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.70, whereas 0084.HK's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0084.HK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is less volatile compared to 0084.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.Check 0084.HK's competition here
3389.HK vs 8219.HK Comparison June 2026
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 955.7M. In comparison, 8219.HK has a market cap of 61.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at HK$0.21, while 8219.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.70, whereas 8219.HK's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 8219.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is less volatile compared to 8219.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.Check 8219.HK's competition here
3389.HK vs 0444.HK Comparison June 2026
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 955.7M. In comparison, 0444.HK has a market cap of 60.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at HK$0.21, while 0444.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.70, whereas 0444.HK's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0444.HK's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 0444.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.Check 0444.HK's competition here
3389.HK vs 8537.HK Comparison June 2026
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 955.7M. In comparison, 8537.HK has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at HK$0.21, while 8537.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.70, whereas 8537.HK's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 8537.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 8537.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.Check 8537.HK's competition here
3389.HK vs 0986.HK Comparison June 2026
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 955.7M. In comparison, 0986.HK has a market cap of 43.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at HK$0.21, while 0986.HK trades at HK$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.70, whereas 0986.HK's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0986.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is less volatile compared to 0986.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.Check 0986.HK's competition here