Hengdeli Holdings Limited
Hengdeli Holdings Limited 3389.HK Peers
See (3389.HK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3389.HK | $0.12 | +11.32% | 519.67M | -5.90 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| 1913.HK | $52.45 | -2.60% | 134.21B | 18.34 | $2.86 | +2.74% |
| 6181.HK | $681.50 | +0.81% | 119.27B | 66.29 | $10.28 | N/A |
| 1929.HK | $10.72 | -2.01% | 107.07B | 23.82 | $0.45 | +4.66% |
| 0590.HK | $17.60 | +1.03% | 10.33B | 8.22 | $2.14 | +6.76% |
| 0116.HK | $7.46 | +0.13% | 5.02B | 6.54 | $1.14 | +7.37% |
| 0113.HK | $6.84 | +0.15% | 2.64B | 10.21 | $0.67 | +6.58% |
| 0256.HK | $0.49 | -2.02% | 2.11B | -8.08 | -$0.06 | N/A |
| 1815.HK | $1.65 | +5.10% | 2.04B | 82.50 | $0.02 | N/A |
| 0887.HK | $0.25 | +3.73% | 1.81B | 6.25 | $0.04 | +2.60% |
Stock Comparison
3389.HK vs 1913.HK Comparison
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 519.67M. In comparison, 1913.HK has a market cap of 134.21B. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at $0.12, while 1913.HK trades at $52.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.90, whereas 1913.HK's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 1913.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 1913.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.
3389.HK vs 6181.HK Comparison
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 519.67M. In comparison, 6181.HK has a market cap of 119.27B. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at $0.12, while 6181.HK trades at $681.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.90, whereas 6181.HK's P/E ratio is 66.29. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 6181.HK's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 6181.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.
3389.HK vs 1929.HK Comparison
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 519.67M. In comparison, 1929.HK has a market cap of 107.07B. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at $0.12, while 1929.HK trades at $10.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.90, whereas 1929.HK's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 1929.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 1929.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.
3389.HK vs 0590.HK Comparison
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 519.67M. In comparison, 0590.HK has a market cap of 10.33B. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at $0.12, while 0590.HK trades at $17.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.90, whereas 0590.HK's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0590.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 0590.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.
3389.HK vs 0116.HK Comparison
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 519.67M. In comparison, 0116.HK has a market cap of 5.02B. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at $0.12, while 0116.HK trades at $7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.90, whereas 0116.HK's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0116.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 0116.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.
3389.HK vs 0113.HK Comparison
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 519.67M. In comparison, 0113.HK has a market cap of 2.64B. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at $0.12, while 0113.HK trades at $6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.90, whereas 0113.HK's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0113.HK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 0113.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.
3389.HK vs 0256.HK Comparison
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 519.67M. In comparison, 0256.HK has a market cap of 2.11B. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at $0.12, while 0256.HK trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.90, whereas 0256.HK's P/E ratio is -8.08. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0256.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 0256.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.
3389.HK vs 1815.HK Comparison
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 519.67M. In comparison, 1815.HK has a market cap of 2.04B. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at $0.12, while 1815.HK trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.90, whereas 1815.HK's P/E ratio is 82.50. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 1815.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 1815.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.
3389.HK vs 0887.HK Comparison
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 519.67M. In comparison, 0887.HK has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at $0.12, while 0887.HK trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.90, whereas 0887.HK's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0887.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 0887.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.
3389.HK vs 0398.HK Comparison
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 519.67M. In comparison, 0398.HK has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at $0.12, while 0398.HK trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.90, whereas 0398.HK's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0398.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 0398.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.
3389.HK vs 0860.HK Comparison
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 519.67M. In comparison, 0860.HK has a market cap of 961.09M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at $0.12, while 0860.HK trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.90, whereas 0860.HK's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0860.HK's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 0860.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.
3389.HK vs 1466.HK Comparison
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 519.67M. In comparison, 1466.HK has a market cap of 532.95M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at $0.12, while 1466.HK trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.90, whereas 1466.HK's P/E ratio is -34.50. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 1466.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 1466.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.
3389.HK vs 0789.HK Comparison
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 519.67M. In comparison, 0789.HK has a market cap of 463.39M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at $0.12, while 0789.HK trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.90, whereas 0789.HK's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0789.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is less volatile compared to 0789.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.
3389.HK vs 1856.HK Comparison
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 519.67M. In comparison, 1856.HK has a market cap of 450.32M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at $0.12, while 1856.HK trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.90, whereas 1856.HK's P/E ratio is -9.62. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 1856.HK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 1856.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.
3389.HK vs 0213.HK Comparison
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 519.67M. In comparison, 0213.HK has a market cap of 343.25M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at $0.12, while 0213.HK trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.90, whereas 0213.HK's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0213.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 0213.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.
3389.HK vs 0280.HK Comparison
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 519.67M. In comparison, 0280.HK has a market cap of 327.35M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at $0.12, while 0280.HK trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.90, whereas 0280.HK's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0280.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 0280.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.
3389.HK vs 8026.HK Comparison
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 519.67M. In comparison, 8026.HK has a market cap of 320.39M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at $0.12, while 8026.HK trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.90, whereas 8026.HK's P/E ratio is -7.03. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 8026.HK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 8026.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.
3389.HK vs 3326.HK Comparison
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 519.67M. In comparison, 3326.HK has a market cap of 204.45M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at $0.12, while 3326.HK trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.90, whereas 3326.HK's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 3326.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 3326.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.
3389.HK vs 6838.HK Comparison
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 519.67M. In comparison, 6838.HK has a market cap of 159.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at $0.12, while 6838.HK trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.90, whereas 6838.HK's P/E ratio is -8.83. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 6838.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 6838.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.
3389.HK vs 0986.HK Comparison
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 519.67M. In comparison, 0986.HK has a market cap of 156.66M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at $0.12, while 0986.HK trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.90, whereas 0986.HK's P/E ratio is -12.10. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0986.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is less volatile compared to 0986.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.
3389.HK vs 0417.HK Comparison
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 519.67M. In comparison, 0417.HK has a market cap of 149.51M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at $0.12, while 0417.HK trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.90, whereas 0417.HK's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0417.HK's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 0417.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.
3389.HK vs 0442.HK Comparison
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 519.67M. In comparison, 0442.HK has a market cap of 134.71M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at $0.12, while 0442.HK trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.90, whereas 0442.HK's P/E ratio is -11.14. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0442.HK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 0442.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.
3389.HK vs 2882.HK Comparison
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 519.67M. In comparison, 2882.HK has a market cap of 130.79M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at $0.12, while 2882.HK trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.90, whereas 2882.HK's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 2882.HK's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 2882.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.
3389.HK vs 1150.HK Comparison
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 519.67M. In comparison, 1150.HK has a market cap of 100.41M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at $0.12, while 1150.HK trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.90, whereas 1150.HK's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 1150.HK's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 1150.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.
3389.HK vs 0513.HK Comparison
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 519.67M. In comparison, 0513.HK has a market cap of 99.74M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at $0.12, while 0513.HK trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.90, whereas 0513.HK's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0513.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 0513.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.
3389.HK vs 0125.HK Comparison
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 519.67M. In comparison, 0125.HK has a market cap of 88.03M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at $0.12, while 0125.HK trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.90, whereas 0125.HK's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0125.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 0125.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.
3389.HK vs 0084.HK Comparison
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 519.67M. In comparison, 0084.HK has a market cap of 87.10M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at $0.12, while 0084.HK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.90, whereas 0084.HK's P/E ratio is 0.20. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0084.HK's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is less volatile compared to 0084.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.
3389.HK vs 0444.HK Comparison
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 519.67M. In comparison, 0444.HK has a market cap of 60.44M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at $0.12, while 0444.HK trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.90, whereas 0444.HK's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 0444.HK's ROE of +52.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 0444.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.
3389.HK vs 1327.HK Comparison
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 519.67M. In comparison, 1327.HK has a market cap of 45.93M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at $0.12, while 1327.HK trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.90, whereas 1327.HK's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 1327.HK's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 1327.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.
3389.HK vs 8537.HK Comparison
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 519.67M. In comparison, 8537.HK has a market cap of 42.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at $0.12, while 8537.HK trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.90, whereas 8537.HK's P/E ratio is 0.93. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 8537.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 8537.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.
3389.HK vs 8219.HK Comparison
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 519.67M. In comparison, 8219.HK has a market cap of 39.85M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at $0.12, while 8219.HK trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.90, whereas 8219.HK's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 8219.HK's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 8219.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.
3389.HK vs 1470.HK Comparison
3389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3389.HK stands at 519.67M. In comparison, 1470.HK has a market cap of 32.80M. Regarding current trading prices, 3389.HK is priced at $0.12, while 1470.HK trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.90, whereas 1470.HK's P/E ratio is 4.10. In terms of profitability, 3389.HK's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 1470.HK's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 3389.HK is more volatile compared to 1470.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3389.HK.