Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See 3377.HK's competitors and their performance on the HKSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Development Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for 3377.HK and its HKSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3377.HK | HK$0.05 | +2.13% | 607.9M | -0.05 | -HK$0.93 | N/A |
| 0016.HK | HK$120.70 | -1.87% | 349.8B | 14.61 | HK$8.26 | +3.13% |
| 1109.HK | HK$32.68 | -3.88% | 233B | 9.39 | HK$3.48 | +4.07% |
| 1113.HK | HK$47.90 | -0.87% | 167.6B | 15.45 | HK$3.10 | +3.72% |
| 0688.HK | HK$13.28 | -2.06% | 145.3B | 10.27 | HK$1.29 | +3.77% |
| 0083.HK | HK$10.68 | -1.84% | 102.4B | 22.27 | HK$0.48 | +5.43% |
| 0004.HK | HK$19.12 | -1.49% | 58.4B | 37.94 | HK$0.50 | +2.09% |
| 0960.HK | HK$6.57 | -3.24% | 45.1B | 231.91 | HK$0.03 | +2.87% |
| 0247.HK | HK$19.35 | -0.77% | 43.2B | 19.15 | HK$1.01 | +3.00% |
| 2202.HK | HK$2.41 | -2.82% | 42.3B | -0.29 | -HK$8.41 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Sun Hung Kai Properties Limited (HKSE: 0016.HK)
3377.HK vs 0016.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0016.HK has a market cap of 349.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0016.HK trades at HK$120.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0016.HK's P/E ratio is 14.61. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0016.HK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0016.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0016.HK's competition here
China Resources Land Limited (HKSE: 1109.HK)
3377.HK vs 1109.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 1109.HK has a market cap of 233B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 1109.HK trades at HK$32.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1109.HK's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 1109.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 1109.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 1109.HK's competition here
CK Asset Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1113.HK)
3377.HK vs 1113.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 1113.HK has a market cap of 167.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 1113.HK trades at HK$47.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1113.HK's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 1113.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 1113.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 1113.HK's competition here
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. (HKSE: 0688.HK)
3377.HK vs 0688.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0688.HK has a market cap of 145.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0688.HK trades at HK$13.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0688.HK's P/E ratio is 10.27. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0688.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0688.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0688.HK's competition here
Sino Land Company Limited (HKSE: 0083.HK)
3377.HK vs 0083.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0083.HK has a market cap of 102.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0083.HK trades at HK$10.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0083.HK's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0083.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0083.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0083.HK's competition here
Wharf (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0004.HK)
3377.HK vs 0004.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0004.HK has a market cap of 58.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0004.HK trades at HK$19.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0004.HK's P/E ratio is 37.94. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0004.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0004.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0004.HK's competition here
Longfor Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0960.HK)
3377.HK vs 0960.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0960.HK has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0960.HK trades at HK$6.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0960.HK's P/E ratio is 231.91. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0960.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0960.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0960.HK's competition here
Tsim Sha Tsui Properties Limited (HKSE: 0247.HK)
3377.HK vs 0247.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0247.HK has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0247.HK trades at HK$19.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0247.HK's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0247.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0247.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0247.HK's competition here
China Vanke Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2202.HK)
3377.HK vs 2202.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 2202.HK has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 2202.HK trades at HK$2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 2202.HK's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 2202.HK's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 2202.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 2202.HK's competition here
Hang Lung Properties Limited (HKSE: 0101.HK)
3377.HK vs 0101.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0101.HK has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0101.HK trades at HK$7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0101.HK's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0101.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0101.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0101.HK's competition here
C&D International Investment Group Limited (HKSE: 1908.HK)
3377.HK vs 1908.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 1908.HK has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 1908.HK trades at HK$14.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1908.HK's P/E ratio is 5.59. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 1908.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 1908.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 1908.HK's competition here
Kerry Properties Limited (HKSE: 0683.HK)
3377.HK vs 0683.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0683.HK has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0683.HK trades at HK$19.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0683.HK's P/E ratio is 29.64. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0683.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0683.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0683.HK's competition here
Onewo Inc. (HKSE: 2602.HK)
3377.HK vs 2602.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 2602.HK has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 2602.HK trades at HK$17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 2602.HK's P/E ratio is 26.06. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 2602.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 2602.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 2602.HK's competition here
Country Garden Services Holdings Company Limited (HKSE: 6098.HK)
3377.HK vs 6098.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 6098.HK has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 6098.HK trades at HK$5.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 6098.HK's P/E ratio is 27.16. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 6098.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 6098.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 6098.HK's competition here
China Jinmao Holdings Group Limited (HKSE: 0817.HK)
3377.HK vs 0817.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0817.HK has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0817.HK trades at HK$1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0817.HK's P/E ratio is 39.98. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0817.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is less volatile compared to 0817.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0817.HK's competition here
Greentown China Holdings Limited (HKSE: 3900.HK)
3377.HK vs 3900.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 3900.HK has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 3900.HK trades at HK$7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 3900.HK's P/E ratio is 236.57. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 3900.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is less volatile compared to 3900.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 3900.HK's competition here
Poly Property Services Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 6049.HK)
3377.HK vs 6049.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 6049.HK has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 6049.HK trades at HK$27.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 6049.HK's P/E ratio is 8.94. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 6049.HK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 6049.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 6049.HK's competition here
Yuexiu Property Company Limited (HKSE: 0123.HK)
3377.HK vs 0123.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0123.HK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0123.HK trades at HK$3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0123.HK's P/E ratio is 687.26. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0123.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0123.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0123.HK's competition here
China Overseas Property Holdings Limited (HKSE: 2669.HK)
3377.HK vs 2669.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 2669.HK has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 2669.HK trades at HK$3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 2669.HK's P/E ratio is 7.53. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 2669.HK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is less volatile compared to 2669.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 2669.HK's competition here
Seazen Group Limited (HKSE: 1030.HK)
3377.HK vs 1030.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 1030.HK has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 1030.HK trades at HK$1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1030.HK's P/E ratio is 33.15. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 1030.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 1030.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 1030.HK's competition here
Hopson Development Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0754.HK)
3377.HK vs 0754.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0754.HK has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0754.HK trades at HK$2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0754.HK's P/E ratio is 108.33. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0754.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0754.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0754.HK's competition here
Greater Bay Area AI Computing Tech Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 1396.HK)
3377.HK vs 1396.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 1396.HK has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 1396.HK trades at HK$10.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1396.HK's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 1396.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 1396.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 1396.HK's competition here
China Overseas Grand Oceans Group Limited (HKSE: 0081.HK)
3377.HK vs 0081.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0081.HK has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0081.HK trades at HK$2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0081.HK's P/E ratio is 26.25. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0081.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0081.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0081.HK's competition here
Country Garden Holdings Company Limited (HKSE: 2007.HK)
3377.HK vs 2007.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 2007.HK has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 2007.HK trades at HK$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 2007.HK's P/E ratio is 1.19. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 2007.HK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is less volatile compared to 2007.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 2007.HK's competition here
Art Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0565.HK)
3377.HK vs 0565.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0565.HK has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0565.HK trades at HK$2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0565.HK's P/E ratio is -38.88. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0565.HK's ROE of -778.83%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0565.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0565.HK's competition here
Logan Group Company Limited (HKSE: 3380.HK)
3377.HK vs 3380.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 3380.HK has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 3380.HK trades at HK$1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 3380.HK's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 3380.HK's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 3380.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 3380.HK's competition here
Kowloon Development Company Limited (HKSE: 0034.HK)
3377.HK vs 0034.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0034.HK has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0034.HK trades at HK$4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0034.HK's P/E ratio is 742.68. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0034.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0034.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0034.HK's competition here
K. Wah International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0173.HK)
3377.HK vs 0173.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0173.HK has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0173.HK trades at HK$1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0173.HK's P/E ratio is 21.34. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0173.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0173.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0173.HK's competition here
Shenzhen Investment Limited (HKSE: 0604.HK)
3377.HK vs 0604.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0604.HK has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0604.HK trades at HK$0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0604.HK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0604.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0604.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0604.HK's competition here
Poly Property Group Co., Limited (HKSE: 0119.HK)
3377.HK vs 0119.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0119.HK has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0119.HK trades at HK$1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0119.HK's P/E ratio is 28.47. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0119.HK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0119.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0119.HK's competition here
Sunac China Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1918.HK)
3377.HK vs 1918.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 1918.HK has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 1918.HK trades at HK$0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1918.HK's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 1918.HK's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is less volatile compared to 1918.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 1918.HK's competition here
Tian An China Investments Company Limited (HKSE: 0028.HK)
3377.HK vs 0028.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0028.HK has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0028.HK trades at HK$3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0028.HK's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0028.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0028.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0028.HK's competition here
Beijing North Star Company Limited (HKSE: 0588.HK)
3377.HK vs 0588.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0588.HK has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0588.HK trades at HK$0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0588.HK's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0588.HK's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0588.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0588.HK's competition here
Tomson Group Limited (HKSE: 0258.HK)
3377.HK vs 0258.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0258.HK has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0258.HK trades at HK$2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0258.HK's P/E ratio is 25.95. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0258.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0258.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0258.HK's competition here
C C Land Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1224.HK)
3377.HK vs 1224.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 1224.HK has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 1224.HK trades at HK$1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1224.HK's P/E ratio is -4.09. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 1224.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 1224.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 1224.HK's competition here
Radiance Holdings (Group) Company Limited (HKSE: 9993.HK)
3377.HK vs 9993.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 9993.HK has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 9993.HK trades at HK$1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 9993.HK's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 9993.HK's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 9993.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 9993.HK's competition here
Midea Real Estate Holding Limited (HKSE: 3990.HK)
3377.HK vs 3990.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 3990.HK has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 3990.HK trades at HK$2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 3990.HK's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 3990.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 3990.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 3990.HK's competition here
Shui On Land Limited (HKSE: 0272.HK)
3377.HK vs 0272.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0272.HK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0272.HK trades at HK$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0272.HK's P/E ratio is 22.68. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0272.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0272.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0272.HK's competition here
Minmetals Land Limited (HKSE: 0230.HK)
3377.HK vs 0230.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0230.HK has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0230.HK trades at HK$1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0230.HK's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0230.HK's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0230.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0230.HK's competition here
Harbour Centre Development Limited (HKSE: 0051.HK)
3377.HK vs 0051.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0051.HK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0051.HK trades at HK$4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0051.HK's P/E ratio is -12.17. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0051.HK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0051.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0051.HK's competition here
Wing Tai Properties Limited (HKSE: 0369.HK)
3377.HK vs 0369.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0369.HK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0369.HK trades at HK$2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0369.HK's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0369.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0369.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0369.HK's competition here
Yuexiu Services Group Ltd. (HKSE: 6626.HK)
3377.HK vs 6626.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 6626.HK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 6626.HK trades at HK$1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 6626.HK's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 6626.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 6626.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 6626.HK's competition here
China Motor Bus Company, Limited (HKSE: 0026.HK)
3377.HK vs 0026.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0026.HK has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0026.HK trades at HK$58.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0026.HK's P/E ratio is -26.83. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0026.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0026.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0026.HK's competition here
Weiye Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1570.HK)
3377.HK vs 1570.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 1570.HK has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 1570.HK trades at HK$12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1570.HK's P/E ratio is -26.65. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 1570.HK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 1570.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 1570.HK's competition here
China Evergrande Group (HKSE: 3333.HK)
3377.HK vs 3333.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 3333.HK has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 3333.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 3333.HK's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 3333.HK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is less volatile compared to 3333.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 3333.HK's competition here
Tai Cheung Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0088.HK)
3377.HK vs 0088.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0088.HK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0088.HK trades at HK$3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0088.HK's P/E ratio is 41.11. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0088.HK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0088.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0088.HK's competition here
Far East Consortium International Limited (HKSE: 0035.HK)
3377.HK vs 0035.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0035.HK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0035.HK trades at HK$0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0035.HK's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0035.HK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0035.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0035.HK's competition here
Sansheng Holdings (Group) Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 2183.HK)
3377.HK vs 2183.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 2183.HK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 2183.HK trades at HK$4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 2183.HK's P/E ratio is 3.12. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 2183.HK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is less volatile compared to 2183.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 2183.HK's competition here
Tian Shan Development (Holding) Limited (HKSE: 2118.HK)
3377.HK vs 2118.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 2118.HK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 2118.HK trades at HK$1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 2118.HK's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 2118.HK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 2118.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 2118.HK's competition here
Sinic Holdings (Group) Company Limited (HKSE: 2103.HK)
3377.HK vs 2103.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 2103.HK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 2103.HK trades at HK$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 2103.HK's P/E ratio is 0.82. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 2103.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is less volatile compared to 2103.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 2103.HK's competition here
Liu Chong Hing Investment Limited (HKSE: 0194.HK)
3377.HK vs 0194.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0194.HK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0194.HK trades at HK$4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0194.HK's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0194.HK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0194.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0194.HK's competition here
HKR International Limited (HKSE: 0480.HK)
3377.HK vs 0480.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0480.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0480.HK trades at HK$1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0480.HK's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0480.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0480.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0480.HK's competition here
Gemdale Properties and Investment Corporation Limited (HKSE: 0535.HK)
3377.HK vs 0535.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0535.HK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0535.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0535.HK's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0535.HK's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is similarly volatile compared to 0535.HK. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0535.HK's competition here
LVGEM (China) Real Estate Investment Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 0095.HK)
3377.HK vs 0095.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0095.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0095.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0095.HK's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0095.HK's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is less volatile compared to 0095.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0095.HK's competition here
China New City Commercial Development Limited (HKSE: 1321.HK)
3377.HK vs 1321.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 1321.HK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 1321.HK trades at HK$0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1321.HK's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 1321.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 1321.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 1321.HK's competition here
China South City Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1668.HK)
3377.HK vs 1668.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 1668.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 1668.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1668.HK's P/E ratio is 1.14. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 1668.HK's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 1668.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 1668.HK's competition here
China Merchants Land Limited (HKSE: 0978.HK)
3377.HK vs 0978.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0978.HK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0978.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0978.HK's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0978.HK's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0978.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0978.HK's competition here
China Cultural Tourism and Agriculture Group Limited (HKSE: 0542.HK)
3377.HK vs 0542.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0542.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0542.HK trades at HK$0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0542.HK's P/E ratio is -27.96. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0542.HK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is less volatile compared to 0542.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0542.HK's competition here
Shanghai Industrial Urban Development Group Limited (HKSE: 0563.HK)
3377.HK vs 0563.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0563.HK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0563.HK trades at HK$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0563.HK's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0563.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0563.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0563.HK's competition here
International Business Settlement Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0147.HK)
3377.HK vs 0147.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0147.HK has a market cap of 981.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0147.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0147.HK's P/E ratio is -23.92. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0147.HK's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is less volatile compared to 0147.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0147.HK's competition here
Cheuk Nang (Holdings) Limited (HKSE: 0131.HK)
3377.HK vs 0131.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0131.HK has a market cap of 855M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0131.HK trades at HK$1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0131.HK's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0131.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0131.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0131.HK's competition here
Vision Synergy Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0627.HK)
3377.HK vs 0627.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0627.HK has a market cap of 852.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0627.HK trades at HK$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0627.HK's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0627.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0627.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0627.HK's competition here
Guangzhou R&F Properties Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2777.HK)
3377.HK vs 2777.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 2777.HK has a market cap of 821.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 2777.HK trades at HK$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 2777.HK's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 2777.HK's ROE of -4.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is less volatile compared to 2777.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 2777.HK's competition here
Peking University Resources (Holdings) Company Limited (HKSE: 0618.HK)
3377.HK vs 0618.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0618.HK has a market cap of 821.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0618.HK trades at HK$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0618.HK's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0618.HK's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0618.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0618.HK's competition here
Powerlong Real Estate Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1238.HK)
3377.HK vs 1238.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 1238.HK has a market cap of 807.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 1238.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1238.HK's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 1238.HK's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is less volatile compared to 1238.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 1238.HK's competition here
Agile Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 3383.HK)
3377.HK vs 3383.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 3383.HK has a market cap of 756.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 3383.HK trades at HK$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 3383.HK's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 3383.HK's ROE of -8.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is less volatile compared to 3383.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 3383.HK's competition here
China Properties Group Limited (HKSE: 1838.HK)
3377.HK vs 1838.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 1838.HK has a market cap of 750.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 1838.HK trades at HK$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1838.HK's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 1838.HK's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is less volatile compared to 1838.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 1838.HK's competition here
Datang Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 2117.HK)
3377.HK vs 2117.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 2117.HK has a market cap of 681.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 2117.HK trades at HK$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 2117.HK's P/E ratio is 1.42. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 2117.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is less volatile compared to 2117.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 2117.HK's competition here
Shimao Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0813.HK)
3377.HK vs 0813.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0813.HK has a market cap of 674.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0813.HK trades at HK$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0813.HK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0813.HK's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is less volatile compared to 0813.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0813.HK's competition here
Kangqiao Service Group Limited (HKSE: 2205.HK)
3377.HK vs 2205.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 2205.HK has a market cap of 665M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 2205.HK trades at HK$0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 2205.HK's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 2205.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is less volatile compared to 2205.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 2205.HK's competition here
Redco Properties Group Limited (HKSE: 1622.HK)
3377.HK vs 1622.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 1622.HK has a market cap of 586M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 1622.HK trades at HK$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1622.HK's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 1622.HK's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 1622.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 1622.HK's competition here
Pokfulam Development Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 0225.HK)
3377.HK vs 0225.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0225.HK has a market cap of 584M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0225.HK trades at HK$5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0225.HK's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0225.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0225.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0225.HK's competition here
China New Town Development Company Limited (HKSE: 1278.HK)
3377.HK vs 1278.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 1278.HK has a market cap of 583.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 1278.HK trades at HK$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1278.HK's P/E ratio is 5.41. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 1278.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is less volatile compared to 1278.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 1278.HK's competition here
Shinsun Holdings (Group) Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2599.HK)
3377.HK vs 2599.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 2599.HK has a market cap of 532.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 2599.HK trades at HK$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 2599.HK's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 2599.HK's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is less volatile compared to 2599.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 2599.HK's competition here
Mingfa Group (International) Company Limited (HKSE: 0846.HK)
3377.HK vs 0846.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0846.HK has a market cap of 517.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0846.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0846.HK's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0846.HK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0846.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0846.HK's competition here
Hon Kwok Land Investment Company, Limited (HKSE: 0160.HK)
3377.HK vs 0160.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0160.HK has a market cap of 511.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0160.HK trades at HK$0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0160.HK's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0160.HK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0160.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0160.HK's competition here
Wang On Properties Limited (HKSE: 1243.HK)
3377.HK vs 1243.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 1243.HK has a market cap of 501.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 1243.HK trades at HK$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1243.HK's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 1243.HK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is less volatile compared to 1243.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 1243.HK's competition here
Novautek Technologies Group Limited (HKSE: 0519.HK)
3377.HK vs 0519.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0519.HK has a market cap of 479.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0519.HK trades at HK$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0519.HK's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0519.HK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0519.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0519.HK's competition here
Million Cities Holdings Limited (HKSE: 2892.HK)
3377.HK vs 2892.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 2892.HK has a market cap of 465M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 2892.HK trades at HK$0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 2892.HK's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 2892.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 2892.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 2892.HK's competition here
Zhong An Group Limited (HKSE: 0672.HK)
3377.HK vs 0672.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0672.HK has a market cap of 450.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0672.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0672.HK's P/E ratio is 2.70. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0672.HK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is less volatile compared to 0672.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0672.HK's competition here
CIFI Holdings (Group) Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 0884.HK)
3377.HK vs 0884.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0884.HK has a market cap of 403.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0884.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0884.HK's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0884.HK's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0884.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0884.HK's competition here
KWG Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1813.HK)
3377.HK vs 1813.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 1813.HK has a market cap of 382.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 1813.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1813.HK's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 1813.HK's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is less volatile compared to 1813.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 1813.HK's competition here
Greenland Hong Kong Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0337.HK)
3377.HK vs 0337.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0337.HK has a market cap of 368.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0337.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0337.HK's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0337.HK's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0337.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0337.HK's competition here
Central China Management Company Limited (HKSE: 9982.HK)
3377.HK vs 9982.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 9982.HK has a market cap of 367.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 9982.HK trades at HK$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 9982.HK's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 9982.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 9982.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 9982.HK's competition here
Glory Health Industry Limited (HKSE: 2329.HK)
3377.HK vs 2329.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 2329.HK has a market cap of 364.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 2329.HK trades at HK$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 2329.HK's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 2329.HK's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is less volatile compared to 2329.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 2329.HK's competition here
Top Spring International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 3688.HK)
3377.HK vs 3688.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 3688.HK has a market cap of 360.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 3688.HK trades at HK$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 3688.HK's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 3688.HK's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is less volatile compared to 3688.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 3688.HK's competition here
Road King Infrastructure Limited (HKSE: 1098.HK)
3377.HK vs 1098.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 1098.HK has a market cap of 355.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 1098.HK trades at HK$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1098.HK's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 1098.HK's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 1098.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 1098.HK's competition here
Wang On Group Limited (HKSE: 1222.HK)
3377.HK vs 1222.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 1222.HK has a market cap of 340M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 1222.HK trades at HK$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1222.HK's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 1222.HK's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is less volatile compared to 1222.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 1222.HK's competition here
Guangdong Land Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0124.HK)
3377.HK vs 0124.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0124.HK has a market cap of 338.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0124.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0124.HK's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0124.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0124.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0124.HK's competition here
KRP Development Holdings Limited (HKSE: 2421.HK)
3377.HK vs 2421.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 2421.HK has a market cap of 308.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 2421.HK trades at HK$0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 2421.HK's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 2421.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is less volatile compared to 2421.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 2421.HK's competition here
Jiande International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0865.HK)
3377.HK vs 0865.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0865.HK has a market cap of 303.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0865.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0865.HK's P/E ratio is -7.03. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0865.HK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is less volatile compared to 0865.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0865.HK's competition here
Ever Reach Group (Holdings) Company Limited (HKSE: 3616.HK)
3377.HK vs 3616.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 3616.HK has a market cap of 284.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 3616.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 3616.HK's P/E ratio is 1.48. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 3616.HK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is less volatile compared to 3616.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 3616.HK's competition here
Fantasia Holdings Group Co., Limited (HKSE: 1777.HK)
3377.HK vs 1777.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 1777.HK has a market cap of 282.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 1777.HK trades at HK$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1777.HK's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 1777.HK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is less volatile compared to 1777.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 1777.HK's competition here
KWG Living Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 3913.HK)
3377.HK vs 3913.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 3913.HK has a market cap of 277.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 3913.HK trades at HK$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 3913.HK's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 3913.HK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is less volatile compared to 3913.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 3913.HK's competition here
China Asia Valley Group Limited (HKSE: 0063.HK)
3377.HK vs 0063.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0063.HK has a market cap of 273.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0063.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0063.HK's P/E ratio is 53.75. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0063.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is less volatile compared to 0063.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0063.HK's competition here
Kaisa Group Holdings Ltd. (HKSE: 1638.HK)
3377.HK vs 1638.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 1638.HK has a market cap of 270.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 1638.HK trades at HK$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1638.HK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 1638.HK's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is less volatile compared to 1638.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 1638.HK's competition here
SRE Group Limited (HKSE: 1207.HK)
3377.HK vs 1207.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 1207.HK has a market cap of 267.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 1207.HK trades at HK$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 1207.HK's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 1207.HK's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is less volatile compared to 1207.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 1207.HK's competition here
Chinney Investments, Limited (HKSE: 0216.HK)
3377.HK vs 0216.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 0216.HK has a market cap of 261.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 0216.HK trades at HK$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 0216.HK's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 0216.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 0216.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 0216.HK's competition here
Dexin China Holdings Company Limited (HKSE: 2019.HK)
3377.HK vs 2019.HK Comparison July 2026
Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited (HKSE: 3377.HK) plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3377.HK stands at 607.9M. In comparison, 2019.HK has a market cap of 252.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 3377.HK is priced at HK$0.05 on the HKSE, while 2019.HK trades at HK$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3377.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas 2019.HK's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, 3377.HK's ROE is +3.92%, compared to 2019.HK's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 3377.HK is more volatile compared to 2019.HK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3377.HK.Check 2019.HK's competition here