Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See 3315.HK's competitors and their performance on the HKSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for 3315.HK and its HKSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3315.HK | HK$0.63 | +1.63% | 489M | 11.08 | HK$0.06 | +8.13% |
| 4335.HK | HK$300.00 | +0.00% | 1.5T | -91.69 | -HK$3.27 | N/A |
| 4336.HK | HK$1,620.00 | N/A | 1.3T | 20.55 | HK$78.82 | +0.96% |
| 0981.HK | HK$67.05 | -5.23% | 696.6B | 73.31 | HK$0.94 | N/A |
| 3986.HK | HK$470.00 | -3.33% | 433.6B | 139.99 | HK$3.40 | +0.18% |
| 6809.HK | HK$254.00 | -5.58% | 321.7B | 182.42 | HK$1.45 | +0.17% |
| 1347.HK | HK$117.40 | -4.55% | 210.1B | 368.59 | HK$0.33 | N/A |
| 9903.HK | HK$371.20 | -4.38% | 98.8B | -198.52 | -HK$1.91 | N/A |
| 0501.HK | HK$70.65 | -2.62% | 91.2B | 58.44 | HK$1.24 | +0.16% |
| 0522.HK | HK$154.50 | -5.79% | 67B | 74.42 | HK$2.15 | +1.31% |
Stock Comparison
Intel Corporation (HKSE: 4335.HK)
3315.HK vs 4335.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 4335.HK has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 4335.HK trades at HK$300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 4335.HK's P/E ratio is -91.69. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 4335.HK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is similarly volatile compared to 4335.HK. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 4335.HK's competition here
Applied Materials, Inc. (HKSE: 4336.HK)
3315.HK vs 4336.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 4336.HK has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 4336.HK trades at HK$1,620.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 4336.HK's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 4336.HK's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is similarly volatile compared to 4336.HK. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 4336.HK's competition here
Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (HKSE: 0981.HK)
3315.HK vs 0981.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 0981.HK has a market cap of 696.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 0981.HK trades at HK$67.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 0981.HK's P/E ratio is 73.31. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0981.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 0981.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 0981.HK's competition here
Gigadevice (HKSE: 3986.HK)
3315.HK vs 3986.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 3986.HK has a market cap of 433.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 3986.HK trades at HK$470.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 3986.HK's P/E ratio is 139.99. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3986.HK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 3986.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 3986.HK's competition here
Montage Tech (HKSE: 6809.HK)
3315.HK vs 6809.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 6809.HK has a market cap of 321.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 6809.HK trades at HK$254.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 6809.HK's P/E ratio is 182.42. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 6809.HK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 6809.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 6809.HK's competition here
Hua Hong Semiconductor Limited (HKSE: 1347.HK)
3315.HK vs 1347.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 1347.HK has a market cap of 210.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 1347.HK trades at HK$117.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 1347.HK's P/E ratio is 368.59. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1347.HK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 1347.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 1347.HK's competition here
Shanghai Iluvatar Corex (HKSE: 9903.HK)
3315.HK vs 9903.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 9903.HK has a market cap of 98.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 9903.HK trades at HK$371.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 9903.HK's P/E ratio is -198.52. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 9903.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 9903.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 9903.HK's competition here
OmniVision Integrated Circuits Group, Inc. (HKSE: 0501.HK)
3315.HK vs 0501.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 0501.HK has a market cap of 91.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 0501.HK trades at HK$70.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 0501.HK's P/E ratio is 58.44. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0501.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 0501.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 0501.HK's competition here
ASMPT Limited (HKSE: 0522.HK)
3315.HK vs 0522.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 0522.HK has a market cap of 67B. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 0522.HK trades at HK$154.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 0522.HK's P/E ratio is 74.42. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0522.HK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 0522.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 0522.HK's competition here
Shanghai Biren Technology Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 6082.HK)
3315.HK vs 6082.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 6082.HK has a market cap of 55.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 6082.HK trades at HK$43.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 6082.HK's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 6082.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 6082.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 6082.HK's competition here
Ingenic Semiconductor Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 3223.HK)
3315.HK vs 3223.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 3223.HK has a market cap of 48.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 3223.HK trades at HK$99.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 3223.HK's P/E ratio is 70.03. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3223.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 3223.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 3223.HK's competition here
Shanghai Fudan Microelectronics Group Company Limited (HKSE: 1385.HK)
3315.HK vs 1385.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 1385.HK has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 1385.HK trades at HK$26.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 1385.HK's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1385.HK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 1385.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 1385.HK's competition here
Gpixel Changchun Microelectronics Inc. (HKSE: 3277.HK)
3315.HK vs 3277.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 3277.HK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 3277.HK trades at HK$88.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 3277.HK's P/E ratio is 112.31. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3277.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 3277.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 3277.HK's competition here
InnoScience (Suzhou) Technology Holding Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2577.HK)
3315.HK vs 2577.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 2577.HK has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 2577.HK trades at HK$43.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 2577.HK's P/E ratio is -40.96. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2577.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 2577.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 2577.HK's competition here
Fortior (HKSE: 1304.HK)
3315.HK vs 1304.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 1304.HK has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 1304.HK trades at HK$115.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 1304.HK's P/E ratio is 44.02. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1304.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 1304.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 1304.HK's competition here
Epiworld International Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2726.HK)
3315.HK vs 2726.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 2726.HK has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 2726.HK trades at HK$110.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 2726.HK's P/E ratio is 2652.50. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2726.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 2726.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 2726.HK's competition here
Viewtrix Tech (HKSE: 3310.HK)
3315.HK vs 3310.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 3310.HK has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 3310.HK trades at HK$27.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 3310.HK's P/E ratio is -44.87. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3310.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 3310.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 3310.HK's competition here
SENASIC Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 6675.HK)
3315.HK vs 6675.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 6675.HK has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 6675.HK trades at HK$30.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 6675.HK's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 6675.HK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 6675.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 6675.HK's competition here
BASiC Semiconductor Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 9971.HK)
3315.HK vs 9971.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 9971.HK has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 9971.HK trades at HK$40.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 9971.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 9971.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 9971.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 9971.HK's competition here
Axera Semiconductor Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 0600.HK)
3315.HK vs 0600.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 0600.HK has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 0600.HK trades at HK$17.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 0600.HK's P/E ratio is -40.78. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0600.HK's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 0600.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 0600.HK's competition here
Shanghai FourSemi Semiconductor Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 3625.HK)
3315.HK vs 3625.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 3625.HK has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 3625.HK trades at HK$92.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 3625.HK's P/E ratio is -149.19. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3625.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 3625.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 3625.HK's competition here
Crealights Technology Co. Ltd. (HKSE: 1191.HK)
3315.HK vs 1191.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 1191.HK has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 1191.HK trades at HK$91.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 1191.HK's P/E ratio is -72.46. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1191.HK's ROE of +2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 1191.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 1191.HK's competition here
Black Sesame International Holding Limited (HKSE: 2533.HK)
3315.HK vs 2533.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 2533.HK has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 2533.HK trades at HK$10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 2533.HK's P/E ratio is -17.33. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2533.HK's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 2533.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 2533.HK's competition here
Nexchip Semiconductor Corp. (HKSE: 2249.HK)
3315.HK vs 2249.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 2249.HK has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 2249.HK trades at HK$28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 2249.HK's P/E ratio is 71.74. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2249.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 2249.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 2249.HK's competition here
SG Micro Corp (HKSE: 3661.HK)
3315.HK vs 3661.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 3661.HK has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 3661.HK trades at HK$87.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 3661.HK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3661.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 3661.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 3661.HK's competition here
SICC Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2631.HK)
3315.HK vs 2631.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 2631.HK has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 2631.HK trades at HK$64.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 2631.HK's P/E ratio is -479.06. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2631.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 2631.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 2631.HK's competition here
Suzhou Novosense Microelectronics Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2676.HK)
3315.HK vs 2676.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 2676.HK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 2676.HK trades at HK$149.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 2676.HK's P/E ratio is -614.17. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2676.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 2676.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 2676.HK's competition here
Guangdong Tianyu Semiconductor Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 2658.HK)
3315.HK vs 2658.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 2658.HK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 2658.HK trades at HK$39.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 2658.HK's P/E ratio is -229.65. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2658.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 2658.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 2658.HK's competition here
BaTelab Co Ltd (HKSE: 2149.HK)
3315.HK vs 2149.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 2149.HK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 2149.HK trades at HK$32.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 2149.HK's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2149.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 2149.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 2149.HK's competition here
China Electronics Huada Technology Company Limited (HKSE: 0085.HK)
3315.HK vs 0085.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 0085.HK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 0085.HK trades at HK$0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 0085.HK's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0085.HK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 0085.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 0085.HK's competition here
Productive Technologies Company Limited (HKSE: 0650.HK)
3315.HK vs 0650.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 0650.HK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 0650.HK trades at HK$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 0650.HK's P/E ratio is -7.58. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0650.HK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 0650.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 0650.HK's competition here
Nsing Tech (HKSE: 2701.HK)
3315.HK vs 2701.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 2701.HK has a market cap of 865.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 2701.HK trades at HK$8.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 2701.HK's P/E ratio is -43.38. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2701.HK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 2701.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 2701.HK's competition here
Solomon Systech (International) Limited (HKSE: 2878.HK)
3315.HK vs 2878.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 2878.HK has a market cap of 636.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 2878.HK trades at HK$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 2878.HK's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2878.HK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 2878.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 2878.HK's competition here
MEGAIN Holding (Cayman) Co., Ltd. (HKSE: 6939.HK)
3315.HK vs 6939.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 6939.HK has a market cap of 593.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 6939.HK trades at HK$1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 6939.HK's P/E ratio is -52.76. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 6939.HK's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is similarly volatile compared to 6939.HK. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 6939.HK's competition here
HG Semiconductor Limited (HKSE: 6908.HK)
3315.HK vs 6908.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 6908.HK has a market cap of 410.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 6908.HK trades at HK$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 6908.HK's P/E ratio is -2.51. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 6908.HK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 6908.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 6908.HK's competition here
Contel Technology Company Limited (HKSE: 1912.HK)
3315.HK vs 1912.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 1912.HK has a market cap of 338.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 1912.HK trades at HK$2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 1912.HK's P/E ratio is -45.62. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1912.HK's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 1912.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 1912.HK's competition here
Genes Tech Group Holdings Company Limited (HKSE: 8257.HK)
3315.HK vs 8257.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 8257.HK has a market cap of 244M. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 8257.HK trades at HK$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 8257.HK's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 8257.HK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is similarly volatile compared to 8257.HK. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 8257.HK's competition here
QPL International Holdings Limited (HKSE: 0243.HK)
3315.HK vs 0243.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 0243.HK has a market cap of 173.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 0243.HK trades at HK$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 0243.HK's P/E ratio is -4.84. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0243.HK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is similarly volatile compared to 0243.HK. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 0243.HK's competition here
Phoenitron Holdings Limited (HKSE: 8066.HK)
3315.HK vs 8066.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 8066.HK has a market cap of 159.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 8066.HK trades at HK$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 8066.HK's P/E ratio is 279.07. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 8066.HK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is similarly volatile compared to 8066.HK. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 8066.HK's competition here
UBoT Holding Ltd. (HKSE: 8529.HK)
3315.HK vs 8529.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 8529.HK has a market cap of 159.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 8529.HK trades at HK$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 8529.HK's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 8529.HK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is similarly volatile compared to 8529.HK. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 8529.HK's competition here
Brainhole Technology Limited (HKSE: 2203.HK)
3315.HK vs 2203.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 2203.HK has a market cap of 100.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 2203.HK trades at HK$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 2203.HK's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2203.HK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 2203.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 2203.HK's competition here
Niche-Tech Group Limited (HKSE: 8490.HK)
3315.HK vs 8490.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 8490.HK has a market cap of 77.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 8490.HK trades at HK$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 8490.HK's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 8490.HK's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 8490.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 8490.HK's competition here
Risecomm Group Holdings Limited (HKSE: 1679.HK)
3315.HK vs 1679.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 1679.HK has a market cap of 72.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 1679.HK trades at HK$1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 1679.HK's P/E ratio is -4.61. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 1679.HK's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 1679.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 1679.HK's competition here
PFC Device Inc. (HKSE: 8231.HK)
3315.HK vs 8231.HK Comparison September 2026
Goldpac Group Limited (HKSE: 3315.HK) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the HKSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3315.HK stands at 489M. In comparison, 8231.HK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 3315.HK is priced at HK$0.63 on the HKSE, while 8231.HK trades at HK$1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3315.HK currently has a P/E ratio of 11.08, whereas 8231.HK's P/E ratio is -202.83. In terms of profitability, 3315.HK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 8231.HK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3315.HK is less volatile compared to 8231.HK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3315.HK.Check 8231.HK's competition here