Skylark Holdings Co., Ltd.
Skylark Holdings Co., Ltd. (3197.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (3197.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3197.T | ¥2,971.00 | -0.90% | 675.9B | 43.47 | ¥68.35 | +0.63% |
| 7550.T | ¥9,585.00 | -1.42% | 1.5T | 39.91 | ¥240.16 | +0.72% |
| 3563.T | ¥8,463.00 | -0.42% | 958B | 50.38 | ¥168.00 | +0.35% |
| 2702.T | ¥6,610.00 | -0.15% | 878.9B | 25.93 | ¥254.87 | +0.74% |
| 3350.T | ¥842.00 | -6.86% | 607.9B | 28.48 | ¥29.56 | N/A |
| 3397.T | ¥5,085.00 | -0.80% | 446.3B | 300.53 | ¥16.92 | +0.20% |
| 3387.T | ¥1,609.00 | +0.37% | 338.6B | 58.02 | ¥27.73 | +0.50% |
| 7581.T | ¥5,580.00 | +0.36% | 273.8B | 25.60 | ¥217.95 | +0.45% |
| 9861.T | ¥3,425.00 | +1.06% | 221.6B | 57.42 | ¥59.65 | +0.59% |
| 7616.T | ¥1,966.00 | -0.35% | 209B | 262.13 | ¥7.50 | +0.25% |
Stock Comparison
3197.T vs 7550.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 7550.T has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 7550.T trades at ¥9,585.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 7550.T's P/E ratio is 39.91. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7550.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 7550.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 7550.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3563.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3563.T has a market cap of 958B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3563.T trades at ¥8,463.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3563.T's P/E ratio is 50.38. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3563.T's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 3563.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3563.T's competition here
3197.T vs 2702.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 2702.T has a market cap of 878.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 2702.T trades at ¥6,610.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 2702.T's P/E ratio is 25.93. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2702.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 2702.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 2702.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3350.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3350.T has a market cap of 607.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3350.T trades at ¥842.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3350.T's P/E ratio is 28.48. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3350.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 3350.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3350.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3397.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3397.T has a market cap of 446.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3397.T trades at ¥5,085.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3397.T's P/E ratio is 300.53. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3397.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 3397.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3397.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3387.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3387.T has a market cap of 338.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3387.T trades at ¥1,609.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3387.T's P/E ratio is 58.02. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3387.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 3387.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3387.T's competition here
3197.T vs 7581.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 7581.T has a market cap of 273.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 7581.T trades at ¥5,580.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 7581.T's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7581.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 7581.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 7581.T's competition here
3197.T vs 9861.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 9861.T has a market cap of 221.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 9861.T trades at ¥3,425.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 9861.T's P/E ratio is 57.42. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9861.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 9861.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 9861.T's competition here
3197.T vs 7616.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 7616.T has a market cap of 209B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 7616.T trades at ¥1,966.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 7616.T's P/E ratio is 262.13. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7616.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 7616.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 7616.T's competition here
3197.T vs 9936.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 9936.T has a market cap of 199.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 9936.T trades at ¥3,815.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 9936.T's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9936.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 9936.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 9936.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3097.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3097.T has a market cap of 164.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3097.T trades at ¥4,275.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3097.T's P/E ratio is 52.97. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3097.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 3097.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3097.T's competition here
3197.T vs 7630.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 7630.T has a market cap of 158.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 7630.T trades at ¥991.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 7630.T's P/E ratio is 48.77. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7630.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 7630.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 7630.T's competition here
3197.T vs 2695.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 2695.T has a market cap of 156B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 2695.T trades at ¥3,925.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 2695.T's P/E ratio is 126.12. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2695.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 2695.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 2695.T's competition here
3197.T vs 9873.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 9873.T has a market cap of 145B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 9873.T trades at ¥6,490.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 9873.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9873.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 9873.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 9873.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3543.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3543.T has a market cap of 141B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3543.T trades at ¥3,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3543.T's P/E ratio is 23.85. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3543.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 3543.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3543.T's competition here
3197.T vs 9887.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 9887.T has a market cap of 138.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 9887.T trades at ¥7,250.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 9887.T's P/E ratio is 62.67. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9887.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 9887.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 9887.T's competition here
3197.T vs 7611.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 7611.T has a market cap of 136.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 7611.T trades at ¥3,795.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 7611.T's P/E ratio is 32.60. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7611.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 7611.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 7611.T's competition here
3197.T vs 8179.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 8179.T has a market cap of 134.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 8179.T trades at ¥2,729.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 8179.T's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8179.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 8179.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 8179.T's competition here
3197.T vs 7412.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 7412.T has a market cap of 125.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 7412.T trades at ¥652.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 7412.T's P/E ratio is 255.69. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7412.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 7412.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 7412.T's competition here
3197.T vs 8153.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 8153.T has a market cap of 123B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 8153.T trades at ¥3,985.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 8153.T's P/E ratio is 39.01. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8153.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 8153.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 8153.T's competition here
3197.T vs 2157.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 2157.T has a market cap of 115.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 2157.T trades at ¥1,404.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 2157.T's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2157.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 2157.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 2157.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3087.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3087.T has a market cap of 110.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3087.T trades at ¥2,595.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3087.T's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3087.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 3087.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3087.T's competition here
3197.T vs 9945.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 9945.T has a market cap of 101.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 9945.T trades at ¥2,634.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 9945.T's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9945.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 9945.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 9945.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3085.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3085.T has a market cap of 97.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3085.T trades at ¥3,065.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3085.T's P/E ratio is 33.15. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3085.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 3085.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3085.T's competition here
3197.T vs 7421.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 7421.T has a market cap of 78.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 7421.T trades at ¥1,595.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 7421.T's P/E ratio is 76.72. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7421.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 7421.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 7421.T's competition here
3197.T vs 8160.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 8160.T has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 8160.T trades at ¥2,452.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 8160.T's P/E ratio is 21.80. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8160.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 8160.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 8160.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3399.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3399.T has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3399.T trades at ¥6,790.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3399.T's P/E ratio is 23.51. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3399.T's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 3399.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3399.T's competition here
3197.T vs 9279.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 9279.T has a market cap of 62.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 9279.T trades at ¥3,105.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 9279.T's P/E ratio is 33.55. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9279.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 9279.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 9279.T's competition here
3197.T vs 8200.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 8200.T has a market cap of 60.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 8200.T trades at ¥2,330.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 8200.T's P/E ratio is 62.47. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8200.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 8200.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 8200.T's competition here
3197.T vs 9828.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 9828.T has a market cap of 59.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 9828.T trades at ¥3,390.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 9828.T's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9828.T's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 9828.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 9828.T's competition here
3197.T vs 2752.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 2752.T has a market cap of 59B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 2752.T trades at ¥1,151.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 2752.T's P/E ratio is 719.38. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2752.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 2752.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 2752.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3091.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3091.T has a market cap of 57.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3091.T trades at ¥3,855.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3091.T's P/E ratio is 33.20. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3091.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 3091.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3091.T's competition here
3197.T vs 9900.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 9900.T has a market cap of 56.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 9900.T trades at ¥1,875.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 9900.T's P/E ratio is 41.78. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9900.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T and 9900.T have similar daily volatility (0.80).Check 9900.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3395.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3395.T has a market cap of 56B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3395.T trades at ¥2,559.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3395.T's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3395.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 3395.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3395.T's competition here
3197.T vs 8163.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 8163.T has a market cap of 53.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 8163.T trades at ¥1,293.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 8163.T's P/E ratio is 62.58. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8163.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 8163.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 8163.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3198.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3198.T has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3198.T trades at ¥2,308.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3198.T's P/E ratio is 35.39. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3198.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 3198.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3198.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3561.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3561.T has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3561.T trades at ¥1,518.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3561.T's P/E ratio is 26.02. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3561.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 3561.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3561.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3196.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3196.T has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3196.T trades at ¥2,034.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3196.T's P/E ratio is 74.40. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3196.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 3196.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3196.T's competition here
3197.T vs 7522.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 7522.T has a market cap of 40.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 7522.T trades at ¥1,005.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 7522.T's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7522.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 7522.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 7522.T's competition here
3197.T vs 2705.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 2705.T has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 2705.T trades at ¥5,390.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 2705.T's P/E ratio is 33.40. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2705.T's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 2705.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 2705.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3133.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3133.T has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3133.T trades at ¥690.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3133.T's P/E ratio is -48.29. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3133.T's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 3133.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3133.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3193.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3193.T has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3193.T trades at ¥3,115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3193.T's P/E ratio is 23.53. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3193.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 3193.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3193.T's competition here
3197.T vs 2753.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 2753.T has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 2753.T trades at ¥1,562.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 2753.T's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2753.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 2753.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 2753.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3073.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3073.T has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3073.T trades at ¥1,679.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3073.T's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3073.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 3073.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3073.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3221.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3221.T has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3221.T trades at ¥2,685.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3221.T's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3221.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 3221.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3221.T's competition here
3197.T vs 9979.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 9979.T has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 9979.T trades at ¥1,255.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 9979.T's P/E ratio is 19.76. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9979.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 9979.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 9979.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3178.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3178.T has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3178.T trades at ¥1,273.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3178.T's P/E ratio is 22.79. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3178.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 3178.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3178.T's competition here
3197.T vs 2882.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 2882.T has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 2882.T trades at ¥2,113.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 2882.T's P/E ratio is 26.95. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2882.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 2882.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 2882.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3547.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3547.T has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3547.T trades at ¥2,538.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3547.T's P/E ratio is 69.99. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3547.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 3547.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3547.T's competition here
3197.T vs 9850.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 9850.T has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 9850.T trades at ¥997.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 9850.T's P/E ratio is 35.13. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9850.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T and 9850.T have similar daily volatility (0.80).Check 9850.T's competition here
3197.T vs 7678.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 7678.T has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 7678.T trades at ¥4,230.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 7678.T's P/E ratio is 39.54. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7678.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 7678.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 7678.T's competition here
3197.T vs 7621.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 7621.T has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 7621.T trades at ¥3,735.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 7621.T's P/E ratio is 153.64. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7621.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 7621.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 7621.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3075.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3075.T has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3075.T trades at ¥1,628.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3075.T's P/E ratio is 25.88. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3075.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 3075.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3075.T's competition here
3197.T vs 7554.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 7554.T has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 7554.T trades at ¥1,050.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 7554.T's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7554.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 7554.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 7554.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3068.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3068.T has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3068.T trades at ¥3,005.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3068.T's P/E ratio is 20.20. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3068.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 3068.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3068.T's competition here
3197.T vs 7562.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 7562.T has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 7562.T trades at ¥7,560.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 7562.T's P/E ratio is 29.62. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7562.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 7562.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 7562.T's competition here
3197.T vs 2694.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 2694.T has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 2694.T trades at ¥74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 2694.T's P/E ratio is -28.35. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2694.T's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 2694.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 2694.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3329.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3329.T has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3329.T trades at ¥2,122.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3329.T's P/E ratio is 23.78. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3329.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 3329.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3329.T's competition here
3197.T vs 9701.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 9701.T has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 9701.T trades at ¥3,920.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 9701.T's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9701.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 9701.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 9701.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3418.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3418.T has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3418.T trades at ¥1,144.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3418.T's P/E ratio is 31.56. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3418.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 3418.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3418.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3175.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3175.T has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3175.T trades at ¥947.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3175.T's P/E ratio is -124.93. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3175.T's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 3175.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3175.T's competition here
3197.T vs 7561.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 7561.T has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 7561.T trades at ¥637.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 7561.T's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7561.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 7561.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 7561.T's competition here
3197.T vs 8207.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 8207.T has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 8207.T trades at ¥287.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 8207.T's P/E ratio is 73.97. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8207.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 8207.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 8207.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3053.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3053.T has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3053.T trades at ¥181.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3053.T's P/E ratio is -78.02. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3053.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 3053.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3053.T's competition here
3197.T vs 5891.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 5891.T has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 5891.T trades at ¥1,914.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 5891.T's P/E ratio is 20.38. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 5891.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 5891.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 5891.T's competition here
3197.T vs 9950.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 9950.T has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 9950.T trades at ¥3,485.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 9950.T's P/E ratio is 43.35. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9950.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 9950.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 9950.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3082.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3082.T has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3082.T trades at ¥905.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3082.T's P/E ratio is 28.32. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3082.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 3082.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3082.T's competition here
3197.T vs 2798.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 2798.T has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 2798.T trades at ¥2,995.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 2798.T's P/E ratio is 37.95. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2798.T's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 2798.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 2798.T's competition here
3197.T vs 6082.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 6082.T has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 6082.T trades at ¥1,001.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 6082.T's P/E ratio is 29.33. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 6082.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 6082.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 6082.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3030.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3030.T has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3030.T trades at ¥775.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3030.T's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3030.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 3030.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3030.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3063.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3063.T has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3063.T trades at ¥789.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3063.T's P/E ratio is 23.84. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3063.T's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 3063.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3063.T's competition here
3197.T vs 2764.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 2764.T has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 2764.T trades at ¥132.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 2764.T's P/E ratio is 6.24. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2764.T's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 2764.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 2764.T's competition here
3197.T vs 7682.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 7682.T has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 7682.T trades at ¥3,880.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 7682.T's P/E ratio is 105.41. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7682.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 7682.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 7682.T's competition here
3197.T vs 9973.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 9973.T has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 9973.T trades at ¥27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 9973.T's P/E ratio is -8.33. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9973.T's ROE of -2.54%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 9973.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 9973.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3069.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3069.T has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3069.T trades at ¥160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3069.T's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3069.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 3069.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3069.T's competition here
3197.T vs 7674.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 7674.T has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 7674.T trades at ¥3,115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 7674.T's P/E ratio is -28.36. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7674.T's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 7674.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 7674.T's competition here
3197.T vs 7604.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 7604.T has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 7604.T trades at ¥822.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 7604.T's P/E ratio is -18.85. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7604.T's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 7604.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 7604.T's competition here
3197.T vs 9853.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 9853.T has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 9853.T trades at ¥926.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 9853.T's P/E ratio is -73.14. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9853.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 9853.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 9853.T's competition here
3197.T vs 7918.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 7918.T has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 7918.T trades at ¥117.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 7918.T's P/E ratio is -265.91. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7918.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 7918.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 7918.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3065.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3065.T has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3065.T trades at ¥1,680.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3065.T's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3065.T's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 3065.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3065.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3557.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3557.T has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3557.T trades at ¥1,002.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3557.T's P/E ratio is 112.33. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3557.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 3557.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3557.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3067.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3067.T has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3067.T trades at ¥462.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3067.T's P/E ratio is -106.45. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3067.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 3067.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3067.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3317.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3317.T has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3317.T trades at ¥2,845.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3317.T's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3317.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 3317.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3317.T's competition here
3197.T vs 9969.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 9969.T has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 9969.T trades at ¥247.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 9969.T's P/E ratio is -54.17. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 9969.T's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 9969.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 9969.T's competition here
3197.T vs 7625.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 7625.T has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 7625.T trades at ¥348.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 7625.T's P/E ratio is 80.00. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7625.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 7625.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 7625.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3358.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3358.T has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3358.T trades at ¥103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3358.T's P/E ratio is 177.59. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3358.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 3358.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3358.T's competition here
3197.T vs 2762.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 2762.T has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 2762.T trades at ¥96.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 2762.T's P/E ratio is -3.59. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2762.T's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 2762.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 2762.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3372.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3372.T has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3372.T trades at ¥250.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3372.T's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3372.T's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 3372.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3372.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3224.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3224.T has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3224.T trades at ¥696.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3224.T's P/E ratio is -140.32. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3224.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 3224.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3224.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3077.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3077.T has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3077.T trades at ¥485.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3077.T's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3077.T's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 3077.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3077.T's competition here
3197.T vs 2789.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 2789.T has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 2789.T trades at ¥463.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 2789.T's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 2789.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 2789.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 2789.T's competition here
3197.T vs 8181.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 8181.T has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 8181.T trades at ¥993.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 8181.T's P/E ratio is 5.93. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8181.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 8181.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 8181.T's competition here
3197.T vs 138A.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 138A.T has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 138A.T trades at ¥2,380.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 138A.T's P/E ratio is 22.19. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 138A.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 138A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 138A.T's competition here
3197.T vs 7524.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 7524.T has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 7524.T trades at ¥201.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 7524.T's P/E ratio is 136.73. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7524.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 7524.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 7524.T's competition here
3197.T vs 7585.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 7585.T has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 7585.T trades at ¥416.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 7585.T's P/E ratio is -9.84. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 7585.T's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 7585.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 7585.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3223.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3223.T has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3223.T trades at ¥992.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3223.T's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3223.T's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is more volatile compared to 3223.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3223.T's competition here
3197.T vs 3370.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 3370.T has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 3370.T trades at ¥382.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 3370.T's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3370.T's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 3370.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 3370.T's competition here
3197.T vs 8209.T Comparison August 2025
3197.T plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 3197.T stands at 675.9B. In comparison, 8209.T has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 3197.T is priced at ¥2,971.00, while 8209.T trades at ¥372.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
3197.T currently has a P/E ratio of 43.47, whereas 8209.T's P/E ratio is -8.46. In terms of profitability, 3197.T's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 8209.T's ROE of -19.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 3197.T is less volatile compared to 8209.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 3197.T.Check 8209.T's competition here