Shopify Inc.
Shopify Inc. 307.F Peers
See (307.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 307.F | €97.32 | +1.48% | 127.7B | 91.95 | €1.06 | N/A |
| SAP.DE | €253.10 | -0.98% | 295.3B | 51.97 | €4.87 | +0.80% |
| FOO.DE | €226.90 | -2.18% | 216.9B | 40.81 | €5.56 | +0.65% |
| FOO.F | €226.60 | -2.07% | 216.6B | 40.90 | €5.54 | +0.65% |
| ITU.DE | €654.90 | -0.27% | 182.7B | 62.02 | €10.56 | +0.58% |
| AUD.DE | €287.35 | +0.26% | 61.9B | 109.26 | €2.63 | N/A |
| CDS.DE | €165.64 | +0.00% | 45.4B | 61.12 | €2.71 | N/A |
| 5ZM.F | €65.60 | -0.35% | 20.3B | 23.02 | €2.85 | N/A |
| FFV.DE | €297.70 | +0.40% | 17.4B | 53.83 | €5.53 | N/A |
| NEM.DE | €120.30 | -0.74% | 13.9B | 78.12 | €1.54 | +0.40% |
Stock Comparison
307.F vs SAP.DE Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, SAP.DE has a market cap of 295.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while SAP.DE trades at €253.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas SAP.DE's P/E ratio is 51.97. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SAP.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to SAP.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs FOO.DE Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, FOO.DE has a market cap of 216.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while FOO.DE trades at €226.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas FOO.DE's P/E ratio is 40.81. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FOO.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to FOO.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs FOO.F Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, FOO.F has a market cap of 216.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while FOO.F trades at €226.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas FOO.F's P/E ratio is 40.90. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FOO.F's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to FOO.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs ITU.DE Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, ITU.DE has a market cap of 182.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while ITU.DE trades at €654.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas ITU.DE's P/E ratio is 62.02. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ITU.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to ITU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs AUD.DE Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, AUD.DE has a market cap of 61.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while AUD.DE trades at €287.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas AUD.DE's P/E ratio is 109.26. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AUD.DE's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to AUD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs CDS.DE Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, CDS.DE has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while CDS.DE trades at €165.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas CDS.DE's P/E ratio is 61.12. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CDS.DE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to CDS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs 5ZM.F Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, 5ZM.F has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while 5ZM.F trades at €65.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas 5ZM.F's P/E ratio is 23.02. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 5ZM.F's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to 5ZM.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs FFV.DE Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, FFV.DE has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while FFV.DE trades at €297.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas FFV.DE's P/E ratio is 53.83. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FFV.DE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to FFV.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs NEM.DE Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, NEM.DE has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while NEM.DE trades at €120.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas NEM.DE's P/E ratio is 78.12. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NEM.DE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to NEM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs E3G1.SG Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, E3G1.SG has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while E3G1.SG trades at €68.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas E3G1.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to E3G1.SG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to E3G1.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs CTX.DE Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, CTX.DE has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while CTX.DE trades at €106.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas CTX.DE's P/E ratio is 39.97. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CTX.DE's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to CTX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs US44891N2080.SG Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, US44891N2080.SG has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while US44891N2080.SG trades at €32.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas US44891N2080.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to US44891N2080.SG's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to US44891N2080.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs AOF.DE Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, AOF.DE has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while AOF.DE trades at €137.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas AOF.DE's P/E ratio is 47.97. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AOF.DE's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to AOF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs TMV.DE Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, TMV.DE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while TMV.DE trades at €9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas TMV.DE's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TMV.DE's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to TMV.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs RKET.HM Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, RKET.HM has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while RKET.HM trades at €17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas RKET.HM's P/E ratio is 1.43. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RKET.HM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to RKET.HM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs MUM.DE Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, MUM.DE has a market cap of 904.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while MUM.DE trades at €53.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas MUM.DE's P/E ratio is 29.72. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MUM.DE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to MUM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs M8G.DE Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, M8G.DE has a market cap of 710.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while M8G.DE trades at €3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas M8G.DE's P/E ratio is 27.13. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to M8G.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to M8G.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs M8G.F Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, M8G.F has a market cap of 706.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while M8G.F trades at €3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas M8G.F's P/E ratio is 26.96. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to M8G.F's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to M8G.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs GKS.HM Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, GKS.HM has a market cap of 647.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while GKS.HM trades at €285.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas GKS.HM's P/E ratio is -123.38. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GKS.HM's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to GKS.HM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs 0S6.DE Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, 0S6.DE has a market cap of 617.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while 0S6.DE trades at €14.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas 0S6.DE's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 0S6.DE's ROE of -2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is less volatile compared to 0S6.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs GKS.DE Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, GKS.DE has a market cap of 494.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while GKS.DE trades at €219.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas GKS.DE's P/E ratio is -44.88. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GKS.DE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to GKS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs PSAN.DE Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, PSAN.DE has a market cap of 461.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while PSAN.DE trades at €29.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas PSAN.DE's P/E ratio is -99.33. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PSAN.DE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to PSAN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs IVU.DE Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, IVU.DE has a market cap of 335.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while IVU.DE trades at €19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas IVU.DE's P/E ratio is 27.71. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IVU.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to IVU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs DBD.DE Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, DBD.DE has a market cap of 233.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while DBD.DE trades at €2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas DBD.DE's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DBD.DE's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to DBD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs TPG.DE Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, TPG.DE has a market cap of 197.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while TPG.DE trades at €9.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas TPG.DE's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TPG.DE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to TPG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs SJJ.DE Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, SJJ.DE has a market cap of 177.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while SJJ.DE trades at €16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas SJJ.DE's P/E ratio is -1690.00. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SJJ.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to SJJ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs FAA.DE Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, FAA.DE has a market cap of 170.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while FAA.DE trades at €15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas FAA.DE's P/E ratio is 19.81. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FAA.DE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to FAA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs MSGL.HM Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, MSGL.HM has a market cap of 147.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while MSGL.HM trades at €3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas MSGL.HM's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MSGL.HM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to MSGL.HM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs 52D0.F Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, 52D0.F has a market cap of 144.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while 52D0.F trades at €0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas 52D0.F's P/E ratio is -10.87. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 52D0.F's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to 52D0.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs BSS.F Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, BSS.F has a market cap of 102.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while BSS.F trades at €22.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas BSS.F's P/E ratio is 55.50. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BSS.F's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to BSS.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs V3S.DE Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, V3S.DE has a market cap of 98.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while V3S.DE trades at €12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas V3S.DE's P/E ratio is -43.75. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to V3S.DE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to V3S.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs ESY.DE Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, ESY.DE has a market cap of 87.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while ESY.DE trades at €13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas ESY.DE's P/E ratio is -18.71. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ESY.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to ESY.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs CSH.DE Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, CSH.DE has a market cap of 71.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while CSH.DE trades at €8.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas CSH.DE's P/E ratio is -15.05. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CSH.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to CSH.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs 27H.F Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, 27H.F has a market cap of 68.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while 27H.F trades at €0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas 27H.F's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 27H.F's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to 27H.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs TR9.F Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, TR9.F has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while TR9.F trades at €18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas TR9.F's P/E ratio is -26.62. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TR9.F's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to TR9.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs TR9.DE Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, TR9.DE has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while TR9.DE trades at €17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas TR9.DE's P/E ratio is -24.72. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TR9.DE's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to TR9.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs ISHA.DE Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, ISHA.DE has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while ISHA.DE trades at €1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas ISHA.DE's P/E ratio is -174.00. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ISHA.DE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to ISHA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs US37892C1062.SG Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, US37892C1062.SG has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while US37892C1062.SG trades at €1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas US37892C1062.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to US37892C1062.SG's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to US37892C1062.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs NIIN.DE Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, NIIN.DE has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while NIIN.DE trades at €0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas NIIN.DE's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NIIN.DE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to NIIN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs 1OJ.F Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, 1OJ.F has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while 1OJ.F trades at €0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas 1OJ.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1OJ.F's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to 1OJ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs VRL.DE Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, VRL.DE has a market cap of 18.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while VRL.DE trades at €8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas VRL.DE's P/E ratio is -12.61. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VRL.DE's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is less volatile compared to VRL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs TBX.F Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, TBX.F has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while TBX.F trades at €8.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas TBX.F's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TBX.F's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to TBX.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs TBX0.F Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, TBX0.F has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while TBX0.F trades at €7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas TBX0.F's P/E ratio is 7.66. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TBX0.F's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to TBX0.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs BWQ.DE Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, BWQ.DE has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while BWQ.DE trades at €3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas BWQ.DE's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BWQ.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is less volatile compared to BWQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs IVX.DE Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, IVX.DE has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while IVX.DE trades at €6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas IVX.DE's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IVX.DE's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to IVX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs DTD2.DE Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, DTD2.DE has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while DTD2.DE trades at €1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas DTD2.DE's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DTD2.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to DTD2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs 2LH.F Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, 2LH.F has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while 2LH.F trades at €3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas 2LH.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 2LH.F's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to 2LH.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs ABX.DE Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, ABX.DE has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while ABX.DE trades at €2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas ABX.DE's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ABX.DE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is less volatile compared to ABX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs 8DQ.F Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, 8DQ.F has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while 8DQ.F trades at €0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas 8DQ.F's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 8DQ.F's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to 8DQ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs CPU2.F Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, CPU2.F has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while CPU2.F trades at €1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas CPU2.F's P/E ratio is 104.00. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CPU2.F's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to CPU2.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs JE00B1Z48326.SG Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, JE00B1Z48326.SG has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while JE00B1Z48326.SG trades at €0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas JE00B1Z48326.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JE00B1Z48326.SG's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to JE00B1Z48326.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs PLARTGS00019.SG Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, PLARTGS00019.SG has a market cap of 534.8K. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while PLARTGS00019.SG trades at €0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas PLARTGS00019.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PLARTGS00019.SG's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to PLARTGS00019.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs SC2.DE Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, SC2.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while SC2.DE trades at €50.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas SC2.DE's P/E ratio is -168.31. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SC2.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to SC2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs 9J4.F Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, 9J4.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while 9J4.F trades at €0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas 9J4.F's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 9J4.F's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to 9J4.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.
307.F vs 1HD.F Comparison
307.F plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 307.F stands at 127.7B. In comparison, 1HD.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 307.F is priced at €97.32, while 1HD.F trades at €0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
307.F currently has a P/E ratio of 91.95, whereas 1HD.F's P/E ratio is -21.59. In terms of profitability, 307.F's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 1HD.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 307.F is more volatile compared to 1HD.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 307.F.