Qorvo, Inc.
Qorvo, Inc. (2QO.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (2QO.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2QO.DE | €73.41 | -1.26% | 7B | -87.39 | -€0.84 | N/A |
| NVD.F | €154.18 | -0.75% | 3.8T | 57.90 | €2.67 | +0.02% |
| NVD.DE | €152.52 | -0.86% | 3.7T | 56.91 | €2.68 | +0.02% |
| 1YD.DE | €252.25 | -1.73% | 1.2T | 104.67 | €2.41 | +0.84% |
| TSFA.F | €200.00 | -3.38% | 1T | 27.57 | €7.29 | +0.79% |
| AMD.DE | €150.20 | -1.53% | 243.5B | 121.13 | €1.24 | N/A |
| ASME.DE | €597.30 | -0.86% | 234.9B | 24.84 | €24.05 | +1.09% |
| TII.DE | €159.52 | +1.10% | 145B | 33.23 | €4.80 | +3.11% |
| QCI.DE | €126.76 | -0.91% | 136.8B | 13.99 | €9.06 | +2.54% |
| AP2.DE | €153.88 | -1.81% | 123.5B | 21.11 | €7.29 | +0.97% |
Stock Comparison
2QO.DE vs NVD.F Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, NVD.F has a market cap of 3.8T. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while NVD.F trades at €154.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas NVD.F's P/E ratio is 57.90. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NVD.F's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is less volatile compared to NVD.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check NVD.F's competition here
2QO.DE vs NVD.DE Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, NVD.DE has a market cap of 3.7T. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while NVD.DE trades at €152.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas NVD.DE's P/E ratio is 56.91. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NVD.DE's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is less volatile compared to NVD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check NVD.DE's competition here
2QO.DE vs 1YD.DE Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, 1YD.DE has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while 1YD.DE trades at €252.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas 1YD.DE's P/E ratio is 104.67. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 1YD.DE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is less volatile compared to 1YD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check 1YD.DE's competition here
2QO.DE vs TSFA.F Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, TSFA.F has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while TSFA.F trades at €200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas TSFA.F's P/E ratio is 27.57. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TSFA.F's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is more volatile compared to TSFA.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check TSFA.F's competition here
2QO.DE vs AMD.DE Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, AMD.DE has a market cap of 243.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while AMD.DE trades at €150.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas AMD.DE's P/E ratio is 121.13. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMD.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is less volatile compared to AMD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check AMD.DE's competition here
2QO.DE vs ASME.DE Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, ASME.DE has a market cap of 234.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while ASME.DE trades at €597.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas ASME.DE's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASME.DE's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is less volatile compared to ASME.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check ASME.DE's competition here
2QO.DE vs TII.DE Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, TII.DE has a market cap of 145B. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while TII.DE trades at €159.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas TII.DE's P/E ratio is 33.23. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TII.DE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is less volatile compared to TII.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check TII.DE's competition here
2QO.DE vs QCI.DE Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, QCI.DE has a market cap of 136.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while QCI.DE trades at €126.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas QCI.DE's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to QCI.DE's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is less volatile compared to QCI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check QCI.DE's competition here
2QO.DE vs AP2.DE Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, AP2.DE has a market cap of 123.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while AP2.DE trades at €153.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas AP2.DE's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AP2.DE's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is less volatile compared to AP2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check AP2.DE's competition here
2QO.DE vs HY9H.F Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, HY9H.F has a market cap of 114.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while HY9H.F trades at €160.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas HY9H.F's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HY9H.F's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is less volatile compared to HY9H.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check HY9H.F's competition here
2QO.DE vs MTE.DE Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, MTE.DE has a market cap of 104.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while MTE.DE trades at €93.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas MTE.DE's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MTE.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is less volatile compared to MTE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check MTE.DE's competition here
2QO.DE vs KLA.DE Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, KLA.DE has a market cap of 100.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while KLA.DE trades at €760.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas KLA.DE's P/E ratio is 28.60. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KLA.DE's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is less volatile compared to KLA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check KLA.DE's competition here
2QO.DE vs ANL.DE Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, ANL.DE has a market cap of 98.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while ANL.DE trades at €198.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas ANL.DE's P/E ratio is 32.21. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ANL.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is less volatile compared to ANL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check ANL.DE's competition here
2QO.DE vs LAR.DE Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, LAR.DE has a market cap of 97.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while LAR.DE trades at €74.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas LAR.DE's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LAR.DE's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is less volatile compared to LAR.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check LAR.DE's competition here
2QO.DE vs INL.F Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, INL.F has a market cap of 77.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while INL.F trades at €17.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas INL.F's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INL.F's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is less volatile compared to INL.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check INL.F's competition here
2QO.DE vs INL.DE Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, INL.DE has a market cap of 76.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while INL.DE trades at €17.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas INL.DE's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INL.DE's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is less volatile compared to INL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check INL.DE's competition here
2QO.DE vs IFX.DE Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, IFX.DE has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while IFX.DE trades at €35.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas IFX.DE's P/E ratio is 37.16. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IFX.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is less volatile compared to IFX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check IFX.DE's competition here
2QO.DE vs VNX.DE Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, VNX.DE has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while VNX.DE trades at €156.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas VNX.DE's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VNX.DE's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is less volatile compared to VNX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check VNX.DE's competition here
2QO.DE vs MXI.DE Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, MXI.DE has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while MXI.DE trades at €86.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas MXI.DE's P/E ratio is 33.11. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MXI.DE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is less volatile compared to MXI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check MXI.DE's competition here
2QO.DE vs SGM.DE Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, SGM.DE has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while SGM.DE trades at €21.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas SGM.DE's P/E ratio is 35.30. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SGM.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is less volatile compared to SGM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check SGM.DE's competition here
2QO.DE vs AWM.DE Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, AWM.DE has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while AWM.DE trades at €63.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas AWM.DE's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AWM.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is more volatile compared to AWM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check AWM.DE's competition here
2QO.DE vs CR6.DE Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, CR6.DE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while CR6.DE trades at €69.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas CR6.DE's P/E ratio is -22.58. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CR6.DE's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is more volatile compared to CR6.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check CR6.DE's competition here
2QO.DE vs WAF1.DE Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, WAF1.DE has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while WAF1.DE trades at €119.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas WAF1.DE's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WAF1.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is less volatile compared to WAF1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check WAF1.DE's competition here
2QO.DE vs RMB.DE Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, RMB.DE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while RMB.DE trades at €25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas RMB.DE's P/E ratio is -65.26. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RMB.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is more volatile compared to RMB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check RMB.DE's competition here
2QO.DE vs AIX2.F Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, AIX2.F has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while AIX2.F trades at €27.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas AIX2.F's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AIX2.F's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is more volatile compared to AIX2.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check AIX2.F's competition here
2QO.DE vs ELG.DE Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, ELG.DE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while ELG.DE trades at €89.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas ELG.DE's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ELG.DE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is less volatile compared to ELG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check ELG.DE's competition here
2QO.DE vs AIXA.DE Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, AIXA.DE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while AIXA.DE trades at €13.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas AIXA.DE's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AIXA.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is less volatile compared to AIXA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check AIXA.DE's competition here
2QO.DE vs SOH1.F Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, SOH1.F has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while SOH1.F trades at €36.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas SOH1.F's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOH1.F's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is more volatile compared to SOH1.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check SOH1.F's competition here
2QO.DE vs WAF.DE Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, WAF.DE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while WAF.DE trades at €35.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas WAF.DE's P/E ratio is 36.99. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WAF.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is less volatile compared to WAF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check WAF.DE's competition here
2QO.DE vs SMHN.DE Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, SMHN.DE has a market cap of 618.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while SMHN.DE trades at €32.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas SMHN.DE's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SMHN.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is less volatile compared to SMHN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check SMHN.DE's competition here
2QO.DE vs SIS.DE Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, SIS.DE has a market cap of 585.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while SIS.DE trades at €56.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas SIS.DE's P/E ratio is -32.72. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SIS.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is less volatile compared to SIS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check SIS.DE's competition here
2QO.DE vs CPIA.F Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, CPIA.F has a market cap of 549.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while CPIA.F trades at €14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas CPIA.F's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CPIA.F's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is more volatile compared to CPIA.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check CPIA.F's competition here
2QO.DE vs CTNK.F Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, CTNK.F has a market cap of 112.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while CTNK.F trades at €5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas CTNK.F's P/E ratio is 4.31. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CTNK.F's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is less volatile compared to CTNK.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check CTNK.F's competition here
2QO.DE vs M5Z.DE Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, M5Z.DE has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while M5Z.DE trades at €1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas M5Z.DE's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to M5Z.DE's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is less volatile compared to M5Z.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check M5Z.DE's competition here
2QO.DE vs DQW1.DE Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, DQW1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while DQW1.DE trades at €8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas DQW1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DQW1.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is more volatile compared to DQW1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check DQW1.DE's competition here
2QO.DE vs MVIN.DE Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, MVIN.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while MVIN.DE trades at €1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas MVIN.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MVIN.DE's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is less volatile compared to MVIN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check MVIN.DE's competition here
2QO.DE vs DLG.DE Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, DLG.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while DLG.DE trades at €67.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas DLG.DE's P/E ratio is 60.04. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DLG.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is more volatile compared to DLG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check DLG.DE's competition here
2QO.DE vs MCP.DE Comparison August 2025
2QO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2QO.DE stands at 7B. In comparison, MCP.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 2QO.DE is priced at €73.41, while MCP.DE trades at €63.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2QO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -87.39, whereas MCP.DE's P/E ratio is 42.28. In terms of profitability, 2QO.DE's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MCP.DE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 2QO.DE is more volatile compared to MCP.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2QO.DE.Check MCP.DE's competition here