Kurashiru, Inc.
Kurashiru, Inc. (299A.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (299A.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 299A.T | ¥998.00 | +1.32% | 42.1B | 23.08 | ¥43.24 | N/A |
| 4684.T | ¥4,004.00 | +0.65% | 1.7T | 25.23 | ¥158.72 | +1.87% |
| 4716.T | ¥9,325.00 | -0.53% | 1.2T | 19.48 | ¥478.74 | +2.04% |
| 9759.T | ¥2,819.00 | -0.81% | 214.6B | 17.60 | ¥160.16 | +3.09% |
| 3994.T | ¥3,216.00 | -2.37% | 177.9B | 112.21 | ¥28.66 | N/A |
| 3697.T | ¥649.70 | -1.23% | 171.1B | 19.18 | ¥33.88 | N/A |
| 4443.T | ¥1,148.00 | -2.71% | 145.2B | 71.00 | ¥16.17 | N/A |
| 215A.T | ¥1,295.00 | +10.68% | 130.4B | 68.34 | ¥18.95 | N/A |
| 4478.T | ¥1,999.00 | -2.73% | 118.4B | 134.43 | ¥14.87 | N/A |
| 4776.T | ¥2,150.00 | -0.78% | 99.4B | 14.05 | ¥153.06 | +1.86% |
Stock Comparison
299A.T vs 4684.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4684.T has a market cap of 1.7T. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4684.T trades at ¥4,004.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4684.T's P/E ratio is 25.23. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4684.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 4684.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4684.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4716.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4716.T has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4716.T trades at ¥9,325.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4716.T's P/E ratio is 19.48. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4716.T's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 4716.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4716.T's competition here
299A.T vs 9759.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 9759.T has a market cap of 214.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 9759.T trades at ¥2,819.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 9759.T's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 9759.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 9759.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 9759.T's competition here
299A.T vs 3994.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 3994.T has a market cap of 177.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 3994.T trades at ¥3,216.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 3994.T's P/E ratio is 112.21. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 3994.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is less volatile compared to 3994.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 3994.T's competition here
299A.T vs 3697.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 3697.T has a market cap of 171.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 3697.T trades at ¥649.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 3697.T's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 3697.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is less volatile compared to 3697.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 3697.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4443.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4443.T has a market cap of 145.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4443.T trades at ¥1,148.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4443.T's P/E ratio is 71.00. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4443.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is less volatile compared to 4443.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4443.T's competition here
299A.T vs 215A.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 215A.T has a market cap of 130.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 215A.T trades at ¥1,295.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 215A.T's P/E ratio is 68.34. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 215A.T's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is less volatile compared to 215A.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 215A.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4478.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4478.T has a market cap of 118.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4478.T trades at ¥1,999.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4478.T's P/E ratio is 134.43. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4478.T's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is less volatile compared to 4478.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4478.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4776.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4776.T has a market cap of 99.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4776.T trades at ¥2,150.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4776.T's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4776.T's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 4776.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4776.T's competition here
299A.T vs 6947.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 6947.T has a market cap of 93B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 6947.T trades at ¥4,415.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 6947.T's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 6947.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 6947.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 6947.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4071.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4071.T has a market cap of 92.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4071.T trades at ¥2,184.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4071.T's P/E ratio is 27.92. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4071.T's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 4071.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4071.T's competition here
299A.T vs 2492.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 2492.T has a market cap of 90.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 2492.T trades at ¥399.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 2492.T's P/E ratio is 47.00. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 2492.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 2492.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 2492.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4432.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4432.T has a market cap of 89.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4432.T trades at ¥2,586.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4432.T's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4432.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 4432.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4432.T's competition here
299A.T vs 3673.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 3673.T has a market cap of 80.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 3673.T trades at ¥895.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 3673.T's P/E ratio is 66.15. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 3673.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is less volatile compared to 3673.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 3673.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4828.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4828.T has a market cap of 78B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4828.T trades at ¥1,302.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4828.T's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4828.T's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 4828.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4828.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4746.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4746.T has a market cap of 76.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4746.T trades at ¥4,295.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4746.T's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4746.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 4746.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4746.T's competition here
299A.T vs 2326.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 2326.T has a market cap of 71.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 2326.T trades at ¥5,340.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 2326.T's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 2326.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 2326.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 2326.T's competition here
299A.T vs 9790.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 9790.T has a market cap of 69.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 9790.T trades at ¥3,350.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 9790.T's P/E ratio is 16.54. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 9790.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 9790.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 9790.T's competition here
299A.T vs 9692.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 9692.T has a market cap of 62.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 9692.T trades at ¥2,003.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 9692.T's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 9692.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is less volatile compared to 9692.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 9692.T's competition here
299A.T vs 3692.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 3692.T has a market cap of 59.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 3692.T trades at ¥7,550.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 3692.T's P/E ratio is 51.49. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 3692.T's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is less volatile compared to 3692.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 3692.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4481.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4481.T has a market cap of 59.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4481.T trades at ¥3,275.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4481.T's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4481.T's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 4481.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4481.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4259.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4259.T has a market cap of 57.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4259.T trades at ¥683.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4259.T's P/E ratio is -31.61. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4259.T's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is less volatile compared to 4259.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4259.T's competition here
299A.T vs 9928.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 9928.T has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 9928.T trades at ¥1,719.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 9928.T's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 9928.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 9928.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 9928.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4719.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4719.T has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4719.T trades at ¥3,490.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4719.T's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4719.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 4719.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4719.T's competition here
299A.T vs 3836.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 3836.T has a market cap of 48.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 3836.T trades at ¥1,340.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 3836.T's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 3836.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 3836.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 3836.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4323.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4323.T has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4323.T trades at ¥1,973.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4323.T's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4323.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 4323.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4323.T's competition here
299A.T vs 3687.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 3687.T has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 3687.T trades at ¥1,484.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 3687.T's P/E ratio is 24.61. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 3687.T's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is less volatile compared to 3687.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 3687.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4375.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4375.T has a market cap of 44.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4375.T trades at ¥796.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4375.T's P/E ratio is -127.97. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4375.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 4375.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4375.T's competition here
299A.T vs 3905.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 3905.T has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 3905.T trades at ¥1,622.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 3905.T's P/E ratio is -17.06. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 3905.T's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is less volatile compared to 3905.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 3905.T's competition here
299A.T vs 3663.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 3663.T has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 3663.T trades at ¥1,325.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 3663.T's P/E ratio is 30.70. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 3663.T's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 3663.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 3663.T's competition here
299A.T vs 3763.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 3763.T has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 3763.T trades at ¥1,506.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 3763.T's P/E ratio is 15.02. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 3763.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is less volatile compared to 3763.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 3763.T's competition here
299A.T vs 9629.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 9629.T has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 9629.T trades at ¥1,790.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 9629.T's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 9629.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 9629.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 9629.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4477.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4477.T has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4477.T trades at ¥303.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4477.T's P/E ratio is 103.77. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4477.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 4477.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4477.T's competition here
299A.T vs 3784.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 3784.T has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 3784.T trades at ¥2,017.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 3784.T's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 3784.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 3784.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 3784.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4312.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4312.T has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4312.T trades at ¥1,095.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4312.T's P/E ratio is 36.37. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4312.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 4312.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4312.T's competition here
299A.T vs 9717.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 9717.T has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 9717.T trades at ¥1,934.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 9717.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 9717.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 9717.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 9717.T's competition here
299A.T vs 5038.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 5038.T has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 5038.T trades at ¥2,168.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 5038.T's P/E ratio is 33.38. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 5038.T's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 5038.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 5038.T's competition here
299A.T vs 5254.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 5254.T has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 5254.T trades at ¥4,415.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 5254.T's P/E ratio is 22.78. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 5254.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 5254.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 5254.T's competition here
299A.T vs 5027.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 5027.T has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 5027.T trades at ¥499.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 5027.T's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 5027.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 5027.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 5027.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4826.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4826.T has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4826.T trades at ¥512.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4826.T's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4826.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 4826.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4826.T's competition here
299A.T vs 3771.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 3771.T has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 3771.T trades at ¥1,745.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 3771.T's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 3771.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 3771.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 3771.T's competition here
299A.T vs 3983.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 3983.T has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 3983.T trades at ¥1,814.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 3983.T's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 3983.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 3983.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 3983.T's competition here
299A.T vs 9687.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 9687.T has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 9687.T trades at ¥4,400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 9687.T's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 9687.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 9687.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 9687.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4165.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4165.T has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4165.T trades at ¥612.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4165.T's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4165.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 4165.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4165.T's competition here
299A.T vs 3921.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 3921.T has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 3921.T trades at ¥1,669.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 3921.T's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 3921.T's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 3921.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 3921.T's competition here
299A.T vs 9553.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 9553.T has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 9553.T trades at ¥853.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 9553.T's P/E ratio is 119.80. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 9553.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is less volatile compared to 9553.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 9553.T's competition here
299A.T vs 9702.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 9702.T has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 9702.T trades at ¥2,018.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 9702.T's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 9702.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 9702.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 9702.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4425.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4425.T has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4425.T trades at ¥2,046.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4425.T's P/E ratio is -40.51. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4425.T's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is less volatile compared to 4425.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4425.T's competition here
299A.T vs 2321.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 2321.T has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 2321.T trades at ¥410.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 2321.T's P/E ratio is -174.47. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 2321.T's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is less volatile compared to 2321.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 2321.T's competition here
299A.T vs 3853.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 3853.T has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 3853.T trades at ¥1,238.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 3853.T's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 3853.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is less volatile compared to 3853.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 3853.T's competition here
299A.T vs 2497.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 2497.T has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 2497.T trades at ¥544.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 2497.T's P/E ratio is -26.82. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 2497.T's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 2497.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 2497.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4058.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4058.T has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4058.T trades at ¥1,843.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4058.T's P/E ratio is 19.73. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4058.T's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 4058.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4058.T's competition here
299A.T vs 3648.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 3648.T has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 3648.T trades at ¥1,193.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 3648.T's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 3648.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 3648.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 3648.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4333.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4333.T has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4333.T trades at ¥1,130.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4333.T's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4333.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 4333.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4333.T's competition here
299A.T vs 3835.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 3835.T has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 3835.T trades at ¥409.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 3835.T's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 3835.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 3835.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 3835.T's competition here
299A.T vs 3777.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 3777.T has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 3777.T trades at ¥60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 3777.T's P/E ratio is -171.43. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 3777.T's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 3777.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 3777.T's competition here
299A.T vs 7320.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 7320.T has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 7320.T trades at ¥1,583.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 7320.T's P/E ratio is -64.27. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 7320.T's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is less volatile compared to 7320.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 7320.T's competition here
299A.T vs 9651.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 9651.T has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 9651.T trades at ¥1,804.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 9651.T's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 9651.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 9651.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 9651.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4344.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4344.T has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4344.T trades at ¥123.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4344.T's P/E ratio is -5.65. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4344.T's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 4344.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4344.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4412.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4412.T has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4412.T trades at ¥2,096.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4412.T's P/E ratio is 147.61. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4412.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 4412.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4412.T's competition here
299A.T vs 3712.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 3712.T has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 3712.T trades at ¥5,430.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 3712.T's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 3712.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 3712.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 3712.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4446.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4446.T has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4446.T trades at ¥1,125.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4446.T's P/E ratio is -163.52. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4446.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is less volatile compared to 4446.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4446.T's competition here
299A.T vs 3852.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 3852.T has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 3852.T trades at ¥1,904.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 3852.T's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 3852.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 3852.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 3852.T's competition here
299A.T vs 3800.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 3800.T has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 3800.T trades at ¥1,962.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 3800.T's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 3800.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 3800.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 3800.T's competition here
299A.T vs 5621.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 5621.T has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 5621.T trades at ¥1,518.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 5621.T's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 5621.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 5621.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 5621.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4013.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4013.T has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4013.T trades at ¥711.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4013.T's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4013.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is less volatile compared to 4013.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4013.T's competition here
299A.T vs 9691.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 9691.T has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 9691.T trades at ¥3,950.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 9691.T's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 9691.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 9691.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 9691.T's competition here
299A.T vs 2307.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 2307.T has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 2307.T trades at ¥987.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 2307.T's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 2307.T's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 2307.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 2307.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4299.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4299.T has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4299.T trades at ¥1,323.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4299.T's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4299.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 4299.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4299.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4382.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4382.T has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4382.T trades at ¥888.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4382.T's P/E ratio is -181.97. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4382.T's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 4382.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4382.T's competition here
299A.T vs 2334.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 2334.T has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 2334.T trades at ¥391.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 2334.T's P/E ratio is -23.99. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 2334.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is less volatile compared to 2334.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 2334.T's competition here
299A.T vs 5586.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 5586.T has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 5586.T trades at ¥816.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 5586.T's P/E ratio is 89.87. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 5586.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 5586.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 5586.T's competition here
299A.T vs 6047.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 6047.T has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 6047.T trades at ¥536.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 6047.T's P/E ratio is 55.60. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 6047.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 6047.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 6047.T's competition here
299A.T vs 2169.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 2169.T has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 2169.T trades at ¥1,833.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 2169.T's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 2169.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 2169.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 2169.T's competition here
299A.T vs 3856.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 3856.T has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 3856.T trades at ¥640.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 3856.T's P/E ratio is 1.80. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 3856.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is less volatile compared to 3856.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 3856.T's competition here
299A.T vs 9343.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 9343.T has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 9343.T trades at ¥660.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 9343.T's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 9343.T's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 9343.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 9343.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4448.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4448.T has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4448.T trades at ¥285.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4448.T's P/E ratio is -9.64. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4448.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 4448.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4448.T's competition here
299A.T vs 332A.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 332A.T has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 332A.T trades at ¥1,037.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 332A.T's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 332A.T's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 332A.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 332A.T's competition here
299A.T vs 3937.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 3937.T has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 3937.T trades at ¥956.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 3937.T's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 3937.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 3937.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 3937.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4193.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4193.T has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4193.T trades at ¥2,140.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4193.T's P/E ratio is 37.40. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4193.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 4193.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4193.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4495.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4495.T has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4495.T trades at ¥2,265.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4495.T's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4495.T's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 4495.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4495.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4169.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4169.T has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4169.T trades at ¥250.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4169.T's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4169.T's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 4169.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4169.T's competition here
299A.T vs 3969.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 3969.T has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 3969.T trades at ¥1,401.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 3969.T's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 3969.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 3969.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 3969.T's competition here
299A.T vs 3804.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 3804.T has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 3804.T trades at ¥1,572.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 3804.T's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 3804.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is less volatile compared to 3804.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 3804.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4389.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4389.T has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4389.T trades at ¥847.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4389.T's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4389.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is less volatile compared to 4389.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4389.T's competition here
299A.T vs 5244.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 5244.T has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 5244.T trades at ¥235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 5244.T's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 5244.T's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 5244.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 5244.T's competition here
299A.T vs 5572.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 5572.T has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 5572.T trades at ¥2,273.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 5572.T's P/E ratio is 65.32. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 5572.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 5572.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 5572.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4011.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4011.T has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4011.T trades at ¥2,564.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4011.T's P/E ratio is 93.58. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4011.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 4011.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4011.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4075.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4075.T has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4075.T trades at ¥1,613.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4075.T's P/E ratio is 71.34. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4075.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is less volatile compared to 4075.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4075.T's competition here
299A.T vs 9698.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 9698.T has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 9698.T trades at ¥1,216.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 9698.T's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 9698.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 9698.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 9698.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4168.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4168.T has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4168.T trades at ¥699.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4168.T's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4168.T's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 4168.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4168.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4284.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4284.T has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4284.T trades at ¥441.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4284.T's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4284.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 4284.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4284.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4192.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4192.T has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4192.T trades at ¥247.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4192.T's P/E ratio is -19.07. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4192.T's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 4192.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4192.T's competition here
299A.T vs 5588.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 5588.T has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 5588.T trades at ¥784.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 5588.T's P/E ratio is 19.96. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 5588.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is less volatile compared to 5588.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 5588.T's competition here
299A.T vs 5248.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 5248.T has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 5248.T trades at ¥493.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 5248.T's P/E ratio is 18.81. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 5248.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 5248.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 5248.T's competition here
299A.T vs 2303.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 2303.T has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 2303.T trades at ¥2,661.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 2303.T's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 2303.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 2303.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 2303.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4256.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4256.T has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4256.T trades at ¥1,333.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4256.T's P/E ratio is 57.93. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4256.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 4256.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4256.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4054.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4054.T has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4054.T trades at ¥578.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4054.T's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4054.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is more volatile compared to 4054.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4054.T's competition here
299A.T vs 4379.T Comparison March 2026
299A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 299A.T stands at 42.1B. In comparison, 4379.T has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 299A.T is priced at ¥998.00, while 4379.T trades at ¥500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
299A.T currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas 4379.T's P/E ratio is 43.07. In terms of profitability, 299A.T's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4379.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 299A.T is less volatile compared to 4379.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 299A.T.Check 4379.T's competition here