Synspective Inc.
Synspective Inc. (290A.T) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (290A.T) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 290A.T | ¥1,475.00 | +0.82% | 167.2B | -488.40 | -¥3.19 | N/A |
| 6702.T | ¥3,260.00 | +0.90% | 5.8T | 19.29 | ¥172.75 | +1.50% |
| 6701.T | ¥4,094.00 | -1.63% | 5.7T | 21.16 | ¥203.11 | +0.88% |
| 9613.T | ¥3,965.00 | +0.00% | 5.6T | 0.00 | ¥26,026,666,000.00 | N/A |
| 4307.T | ¥4,710.00 | +3.27% | 2.8T | 181.61 | ¥26.43 | +1.60% |
| 9719.T | ¥5,680.00 | +0.18% | 1.8T | 0.00 | ¥6,830,379,500.00 | +1.48% |
| 3626.T | ¥3,479.00 | -0.66% | 792.5B | 17.58 | ¥204.87 | +2.22% |
| 2327.T | ¥3,499.00 | -0.65% | 656.9B | 21.32 | ¥168.35 | +2.37% |
| 9749.T | ¥9,800.00 | -0.20% | 617.6B | 0.00 | ¥397,698,368.00 | +0.43% |
| 1973.T | ¥3,285.00 | +0.00% | 489.4B | 28.33 | ¥115.96 | +1.60% |
Stock Comparison
290A.T vs 6702.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 6702.T has a market cap of 5.8T. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 6702.T trades at ¥3,260.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 6702.T's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 6702.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 6702.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 6702.T's competition here
290A.T vs 6701.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 6701.T has a market cap of 5.7T. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 6701.T trades at ¥4,094.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 6701.T's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 6701.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 6701.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 6701.T's competition here
290A.T vs 9613.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 9613.T has a market cap of 5.6T. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 9613.T trades at ¥3,965.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 9613.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 9613.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 9613.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 9613.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4307.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 4307.T has a market cap of 2.8T. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 4307.T trades at ¥4,710.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 4307.T's P/E ratio is 181.61. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 4307.T's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4307.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4307.T's competition here
290A.T vs 9719.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 9719.T has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 9719.T trades at ¥5,680.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 9719.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 9719.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 9719.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 9719.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3626.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 3626.T has a market cap of 792.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 3626.T trades at ¥3,479.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 3626.T's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 3626.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3626.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3626.T's competition here
290A.T vs 2327.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 2327.T has a market cap of 656.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 2327.T trades at ¥3,499.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 2327.T's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 2327.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 2327.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 2327.T's competition here
290A.T vs 9749.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 9749.T has a market cap of 617.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 9749.T trades at ¥9,800.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 9749.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 9749.T's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 9749.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 9749.T's competition here
290A.T vs 1973.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 1973.T has a market cap of 489.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 1973.T trades at ¥3,285.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 1973.T's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 1973.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 1973.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 1973.T's competition here
290A.T vs 8056.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 8056.T has a market cap of 470.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 8056.T trades at ¥4,733.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 8056.T's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 8056.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 8056.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 8056.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4733.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 4733.T has a market cap of 469.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 4733.T trades at ¥6,107.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 4733.T's P/E ratio is 25.90. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 4733.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4733.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4733.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4812.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 4812.T has a market cap of 423B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 4812.T trades at ¥2,127.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 4812.T's P/E ratio is 25.84. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 4812.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4812.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4812.T's competition here
290A.T vs 7518.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 7518.T has a market cap of 355.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 7518.T trades at ¥4,480.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 7518.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 7518.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 7518.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 7518.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3923.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 3923.T has a market cap of 311.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 3923.T trades at ¥889.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 3923.T's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 3923.T's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3923.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3923.T's competition here
290A.T vs 8096.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 8096.T has a market cap of 177.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 8096.T trades at ¥6,190.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 8096.T's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 8096.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 8096.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 8096.T's competition here
290A.T vs 9746.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 9746.T has a market cap of 176.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 9746.T trades at ¥3,485.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 9746.T's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 9746.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 9746.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 9746.T's competition here
290A.T vs 9682.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 9682.T has a market cap of 166.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 9682.T trades at ¥1,024.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 9682.T's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 9682.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 9682.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 9682.T's competition here
290A.T vs 2317.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 2317.T has a market cap of 151.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 2317.T trades at ¥420.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 2317.T's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 2317.T's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 2317.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 2317.T's competition here
290A.T vs 9715.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 9715.T has a market cap of 143.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 9715.T trades at ¥3,805.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 9715.T's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 9715.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 9715.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 9715.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4722.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 4722.T has a market cap of 142.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 4722.T trades at ¥1,556.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 4722.T's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 4722.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4722.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4722.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4819.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 4819.T has a market cap of 104.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 4819.T trades at ¥2,188.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 4819.T's P/E ratio is 82.65. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 4819.T's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4819.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4819.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4708.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 4708.T has a market cap of 94.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 4708.T trades at ¥1,464.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 4708.T's P/E ratio is 22.06. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 4708.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4708.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4708.T's competition here
290A.T vs 7595.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 7595.T has a market cap of 94.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 7595.T trades at ¥1,323.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 7595.T's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 7595.T's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 7595.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 7595.T's competition here
290A.T vs 9889.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 9889.T has a market cap of 77.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 9889.T trades at ¥1,228.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 9889.T's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 9889.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 9889.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 9889.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3762.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 3762.T has a market cap of 76.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 3762.T trades at ¥1,837.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 3762.T's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 3762.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3762.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3762.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3636.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 3636.T has a market cap of 73.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 3636.T trades at ¥4,505.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 3636.T's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 3636.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3636.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3636.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4413.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 4413.T has a market cap of 71B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 4413.T trades at ¥2,213.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 4413.T's P/E ratio is 28.93. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 4413.T's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4413.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4413.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3962.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 3962.T has a market cap of 65.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 3962.T trades at ¥929.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 3962.T's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 3962.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3962.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3962.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4674.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 4674.T has a market cap of 63.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 4674.T trades at ¥1,541.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 4674.T's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 4674.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4674.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4674.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3817.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 3817.T has a market cap of 60.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 3817.T trades at ¥4,665.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 3817.T's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 3817.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3817.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3817.T's competition here
290A.T vs 202A.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 202A.T has a market cap of 56.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 202A.T trades at ¥3,540.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 202A.T's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 202A.T's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 202A.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 202A.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4743.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 4743.T has a market cap of 43.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 4743.T trades at ¥1,612.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 4743.T's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 4743.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4743.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4743.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3844.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 3844.T has a market cap of 43.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 3844.T trades at ¥1,331.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 3844.T's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 3844.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3844.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3844.T's competition here
290A.T vs 9742.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 9742.T has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 9742.T trades at ¥2,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 9742.T's P/E ratio is -23.38. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 9742.T's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 9742.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 9742.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3371.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 3371.T has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 3371.T trades at ¥1,659.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 3371.T's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 3371.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3371.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3371.T's competition here
290A.T vs 9739.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 9739.T has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 9739.T trades at ¥2,548.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 9739.T's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 9739.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 9739.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 9739.T's competition here
290A.T vs 9600.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 9600.T has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 9600.T trades at ¥2,516.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 9600.T's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 9600.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 9600.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 9600.T's competition here
290A.T vs 9640.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 9640.T has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 9640.T trades at ¥2,160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 9640.T's P/E ratio is 32.96. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 9640.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 9640.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 9640.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4709.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 4709.T has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 4709.T trades at ¥1,034.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 4709.T's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 4709.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4709.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4709.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3857.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 3857.T has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 3857.T trades at ¥1,156.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 3857.T's P/E ratio is 23.20. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 3857.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3857.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3857.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4725.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 4725.T has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 4725.T trades at ¥1,793.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 4725.T's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 4725.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4725.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4725.T's competition here
290A.T vs 9658.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 9658.T has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 9658.T trades at ¥973.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 9658.T's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 9658.T's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 9658.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 9658.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4072.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 4072.T has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 4072.T trades at ¥2,785.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 4072.T's P/E ratio is 10.52. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 4072.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4072.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4072.T's competition here
290A.T vs 2359.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 2359.T has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 2359.T trades at ¥2,087.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 2359.T's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 2359.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 2359.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 2359.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3798.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 3798.T has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 3798.T trades at ¥494.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 3798.T's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 3798.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3798.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3798.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3393.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 3393.T has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 3393.T trades at ¥2,975.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 3393.T's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 3393.T's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3393.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3393.T's competition here
290A.T vs 8275.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 8275.T has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 8275.T trades at ¥1,062.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 8275.T's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 8275.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 8275.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 8275.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3984.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 3984.T has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 3984.T trades at ¥1,744.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 3984.T's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 3984.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3984.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3984.T's competition here
290A.T vs 5574.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 5574.T has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 5574.T trades at ¥2,546.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 5574.T's P/E ratio is 52.06. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 5574.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 5574.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 5574.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3916.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 3916.T has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 3916.T trades at ¥872.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 3916.T's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 3916.T's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3916.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3916.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3837.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 3837.T has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 3837.T trades at ¥1,468.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 3837.T's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 3837.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3837.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3837.T's competition here
290A.T vs 2349.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 2349.T has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 2349.T trades at ¥2,310.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 2349.T's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 2349.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 2349.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 2349.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4662.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 4662.T has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 4662.T trades at ¥1,595.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 4662.T's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 4662.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4662.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4662.T's competition here
290A.T vs 2158.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 2158.T has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 2158.T trades at ¥581.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 2158.T's P/E ratio is 86.75. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 2158.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 2158.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 2158.T's competition here
290A.T vs 2185.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 2185.T has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 2185.T trades at ¥1,845.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 2185.T's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 2185.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 2185.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 2185.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4258.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 4258.T has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 4258.T trades at ¥2,775.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 4258.T's P/E ratio is 32.48. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 4258.T's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4258.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4258.T's competition here
290A.T vs 7505.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 7505.T has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 7505.T trades at ¥2,015.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 7505.T's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 7505.T's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 7505.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 7505.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3666.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 3666.T has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 3666.T trades at ¥1,151.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 3666.T's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 3666.T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3666.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3666.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3788.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 3788.T has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 3788.T trades at ¥1,857.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 3788.T's P/E ratio is 21.77. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 3788.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3788.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3788.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4396.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 4396.T has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 4396.T trades at ¥1,040.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 4396.T's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 4396.T's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4396.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4396.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3565.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 3565.T has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 3565.T trades at ¥485.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 3565.T's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 3565.T's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3565.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3565.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4371.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 4371.T has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 4371.T trades at ¥1,239.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 4371.T's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 4371.T's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4371.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4371.T's competition here
290A.T vs 9709.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 9709.T has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 9709.T trades at ¥1,339.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 9709.T's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 9709.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 9709.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 9709.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3968.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 3968.T has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 3968.T trades at ¥557.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 3968.T's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 3968.T's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3968.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3968.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4783.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 4783.T has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 4783.T trades at ¥2,388.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 4783.T's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 4783.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4783.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4783.T's competition here
290A.T vs 6050.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 6050.T has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 6050.T trades at ¥1,677.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 6050.T's P/E ratio is 27.80. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 6050.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 6050.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 6050.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4813.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 4813.T has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 4813.T trades at ¥506.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 4813.T's P/E ratio is -5.74. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 4813.T's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4813.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4813.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4053.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 4053.T has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 4053.T trades at ¥455.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 4053.T's P/E ratio is 39.50. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 4053.T's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4053.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4053.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4498.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 4498.T has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 4498.T trades at ¥1,103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 4498.T's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 4498.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4498.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4498.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3676.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 3676.T has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 3676.T trades at ¥760.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 3676.T's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 3676.T's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3676.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3676.T's competition here
290A.T vs 5246.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 5246.T has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 5246.T trades at ¥610.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 5246.T's P/E ratio is -22.04. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 5246.T's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 5246.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 5246.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3925.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 3925.T has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 3925.T trades at ¥1,208.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 3925.T's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 3925.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3925.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3925.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3924.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 3924.T has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 3924.T trades at ¥915.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 3924.T's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 3924.T's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3924.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3924.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4055.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 4055.T has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 4055.T trades at ¥2,040.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 4055.T's P/E ratio is 32.59. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 4055.T's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is less volatile compared to 4055.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4055.T's competition here
290A.T vs 6199.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 6199.T has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 6199.T trades at ¥1,181.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 6199.T's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 6199.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 6199.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 6199.T's competition here
290A.T vs 2354.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 2354.T has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 2354.T trades at ¥858.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 2354.T's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 2354.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 2354.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 2354.T's competition here
290A.T vs 2335.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 2335.T has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 2335.T trades at ¥1,026.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 2335.T's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 2335.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 2335.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 2335.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4761.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 4761.T has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 4761.T trades at ¥1,345.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 4761.T's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 4761.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4761.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4761.T's competition here
290A.T vs 9799.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 9799.T has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 9799.T trades at ¥943.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 9799.T's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 9799.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 9799.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 9799.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3683.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 3683.T has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 3683.T trades at ¥1,095.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 3683.T's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 3683.T's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3683.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3683.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4418.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 4418.T has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 4418.T trades at ¥744.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 4418.T's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 4418.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4418.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4418.T's competition here
290A.T vs 9753.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 9753.T has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 9753.T trades at ¥1,264.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 9753.T's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 9753.T's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 9753.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 9753.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3997.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 3997.T has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 3997.T trades at ¥293.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 3997.T's P/E ratio is 202.70. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 3997.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3997.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3997.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3918.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 3918.T has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 3918.T trades at ¥1,173.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 3918.T's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 3918.T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3918.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3918.T's competition here
290A.T vs 6572.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 6572.T has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 6572.T trades at ¥202.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 6572.T's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 6572.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 6572.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 6572.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3657.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 3657.T has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 3657.T trades at ¥293.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 3657.T's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 3657.T's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3657.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3657.T's competition here
290A.T vs 2332.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 2332.T has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 2332.T trades at ¥1,804.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 2332.T's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 2332.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 2332.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 2332.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3847.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 3847.T has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 3847.T trades at ¥6,780.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 3847.T's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 3847.T's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3847.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3847.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3979.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 3979.T has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 3979.T trades at ¥363.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 3979.T's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 3979.T's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3979.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3979.T's competition here
290A.T vs 5578.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 5578.T has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 5578.T trades at ¥909.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 5578.T's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 5578.T's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 5578.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 5578.T's competition here
290A.T vs 155A.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 155A.T has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 155A.T trades at ¥845.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 155A.T's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 155A.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 155A.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 155A.T's competition here
290A.T vs 5597.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 5597.T has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 5597.T trades at ¥2,005.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 5597.T's P/E ratio is -13.69. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 5597.T's ROE of -2.73%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is less volatile compared to 5597.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 5597.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4356.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 4356.T has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 4356.T trades at ¥1,562.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 4356.T's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 4356.T's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4356.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4356.T's competition here
290A.T vs 3799.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 3799.T has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 3799.T trades at ¥1,031.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 3799.T's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 3799.T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 3799.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 3799.T's competition here
290A.T vs 5137.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 5137.T has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 5137.T trades at ¥219.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 5137.T's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 5137.T's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is less volatile compared to 5137.T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 5137.T's competition here
290A.T vs 9360.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 9360.T has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 9360.T trades at ¥2,840.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 9360.T's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 9360.T's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 9360.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 9360.T's competition here
290A.T vs 2391.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 2391.T has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 2391.T trades at ¥1,211.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 2391.T's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 2391.T's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 2391.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 2391.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4769.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 4769.T has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 4769.T trades at ¥1,051.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 4769.T's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 4769.T's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4769.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4769.T's competition here
290A.T vs 4442.T Comparison May 2026
290A.T plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 290A.T stands at 167.2B. In comparison, 4442.T has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, 290A.T is priced at ¥1,475.00, while 4442.T trades at ¥401.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
290A.T currently has a P/E ratio of -488.40, whereas 4442.T's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, 290A.T's ROE is -0.03%, compared to 4442.T's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 290A.T is more volatile compared to 4442.T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 290A.T.Check 4442.T's competition here